European Tribune - Enron's disciples in Germany?

From what I found, the Federal Grid Agency still didn't announce an explanation for this behaviour. IWR, however, pointed to two relevant facts:

• Following last year's re-organisation of the market, the bulk of the costs of electricity from cold reserve plants counts as grid operating cost, and that cost is billed to private consumers (who aren't exempted like large companies) as transmission tariff.
  
• At the time, Germany was actually exporting electricity to Italy via Austria.

These circumstances make a gaming of the system possible. The theory goes like this: if the replacement of the power lost by the Gundremmingen shutdown would count as part of the Italy exports, then the costs of electricity from cold reserve plants activated in Germany could not be transferred to (domestic) consumers, and German power companies would be left to pay. So starting up a plant in Austria allows for shifting costs to consumers in Germany.

Is the grid-operator always responsible for costs for starting up plants in cold reserve? If so, why would German power companies pay if it was started in Germany, would they not be paid by the grid-operator?

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!