The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
In more than three dozen interviews with Republican strategists and campaign operatives -- old hands and rising next-generation conservatives alike -- the most common reactions to Ryan ranged from gnawing apprehension to hair-on-fire anger that Romney has practically ceded the election. It is not that the public professions of excitement about the Ryan selection are totally insincere. It is that many of the most optimistic Republican operatives will privately acknowledge that their views are being shaped more by fingers-crossed hope than by a hard-headed appraisal of what's most likely to happen. And the more pessimistic strategists don't even feign good cheer: They think the Ryan pick is a disaster for the GOP.
It is not that the public professions of excitement about the Ryan selection are totally insincere. It is that many of the most optimistic Republican operatives will privately acknowledge that their views are being shaped more by fingers-crossed hope than by a hard-headed appraisal of what's most likely to happen.
And the more pessimistic strategists don't even feign good cheer: They think the Ryan pick is a disaster for the GOP.
GOP has managed to impose their policies without having to talk about them. When people know what their policies are they first don't believe any pol would do that and then they get angry. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
The smart thing for a Republican with Romney's profile to do would be pick a VP candidate who has (for example) some attraction for the Latino vote. Gives him a chance to chip away at Obama's support.
But this choice seems rooted in the theory that it's all about the base... I guess we'll find out if the base is truly big enough... I suspect not because there are too many swing states where Ryan is a net nothing (not positive, not negative)...
It was just that there was an ethically challenged contender who was even more appealing to the radical reactionary wing of the Republican party, who need to be on board both for base turnout and for voter suppression. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
I won't even attempt to paraphrase the excuse that he made, since word salad like that needs to be quoted verbatim. Its just hard to remember something that makes so little sense. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
Really:
"After having these letters called to my attention I checked into them, and they were treated as constituent service requests in the same way matters involving Social Security or Veterans Affairs are handled. This is why I didn't recall the letters earlier," he continued. "But they should have been handled differently, and I take responsibility for that. Regardless, it's clear that the Obama stimulus did nothing to stimulate the economy, and now the President is asking to do it all over again."
It's always the little people's fault... Index of Frank's Diaries
Surely nobody would say they are taking responsibility in a statement in which they are disclaiming responsibility?
Like I say somewhere else in this thread (inflated into a diary at some other sites), looking at the numbers of the current state of play, the Ryan pick is not about persuading swing voters, its about amping up the base vote for the Republicans and maintaining enthusiasm for Democratic voter suppression, so a Romney or Ryan defense has to be read in terms of giving a rationalization for supporters to hang onto, not about persuading the skeptical. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
So no - a token candidate would not have helped.
Ryan has helped with the baser parts of the base. But I still don't think there are enough of those to swing the swingier states.
Then again, considering the Rs are fielding two people with obvious psychological issues and they're only polling a few points down on Obama, anything could happen.
citation needed. All those anonymous officials that get to praise Obama for Keeping Us Safe are hardly a sign of a hostile press. Von überall könnte das Volk, Urbrut alles Undemokratischen, Zelle des Terrors, über die gewählten Hüter von Wachstum und Wohlstand® kommen. - flatter
... are up against an uppity nigger high-melanin challenged individual ...
please, please, before afew goes on an editing rampage. I have a t-shirt with that on it. And whatever you do, DON'T BLINK!
So the Republicans made a close race of it in two steps: first, when they prevented employment generating follow-ups to the second round of stimulus from April of 2009, in both the Energy bill and the Jobs bill, setting up a winning position. Second, in picking a weak nominee from amongst an extremely weak field, allowing the incumbent that ought to be behind to hold onto a narrow lead. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
Swing Voters and Elastic States
Measured by his "voter elasticity" index, North Carolina, Virginia and Pennsylvania are "base turnout" swing states, Colorado, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Wisconsin are "swing voter swing states", and Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada and Ohio are a roughly even balance of each.
Because of Romney's Latino problem, NM is not considered in play at the Presidential level, so taking it off the list, that set of swing states puts Obama at 191 and Romney at 191, each needing 79.
Lining those up in terms of the 538's model of the likelihood of a win of that state in November, Obama:
201/270 MN: 91.2% +10 ~ balanced 217/270 MI: 89.0% +16 ~ balanced 237/270 PA: 86.2% +20 ~ base turnout 247/270 WI: 80.1% +10 ~ swing voter 253/270 NV: 78.2% +6 ~ balanced 257/270 NH: 73.5% +4 ~ swing voter 275/270 OH: 67.9% +18 ~ balanced 288/270 VA: 66.2% +13 ~ base turnout 294/270 IA: 63.6% +6 ~ swing voter 303/270 CO: 59.2% +9 ~ swing voter 332/270 FL: 53.9% +29 ~ balanced
Romney: 206/270 NC: 67.8% +15 ~ base turnout
Now, assume that Mitt Romney has given up on persuading persuadable voters and is doubling down on turning out the base, and put the swing voter swing state leaning toward Obama in the Obama column, and the major Latino Problem states in the same column, and run the count again. WI: 80.1% +10 ~ swing voter NH: 73.5% +4 ~ swing voter NV: 78.2% +6 ~ balanced / Latino Problem IA: 63.6% +6 ~ swing voter CO: 59.2% +9 ~ swing voter / Latino Problem ... 226/270 all swing voter / Latino Problem: +35
236/270 MN: 91.2% +10 ~ balanced 252/270 MI: 89.0% +16 ~ balanced 272/270 PA: 86.2% +20 ~ base turnout 275/270 OH: 67.9% +18 ~ balanced 288/270 VA: 66.2% +13 ~ base turnout 332/270 FL: 53.9% +29 ~ balanced
Still doesn't look like a winning strategy, but OTOH Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and Florida are all states where state governments dominated by Republicans are doing the best they can to suppress Democratic base voting.
So that looks like the strategy: base turnout by the Republicans, base voter suppression against the Democrats.
To make it work, you need the operatives of the voter suppression fight to be fully behind the campaign, and that is the second half of the point of the Ryan pick. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by Migeru - Jun 15 67 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1567 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 418 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments
by Metatone - May 1490 comments