Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
And you can easily imagine what effect such an increase in core-oringinated FDI to the periphery would have on the current account balance problem and the aggregate demand problem of the periphery.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid on Tue Aug 28th, 2012 at 03:20:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Foreign direct investment contributes to the current account deficit of the recipient and the surplus of the originator.

This is why the only solution to the current account imbalance is transfers.

If you are not convinced, try it on someone who has not been entirely debauched by economics. — Piero Sraffa

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Aug 28th, 2012 at 04:54:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is why the only solution to the current account imbalance is transfers.

if that's the quid, what's going to be the pro quo?

what's a possible incentive get those ingots  evacuated?

if hard money BB plutocrats can block a euro-wide solution so long and effectively, what's a win-win end game that could be sufficiently persuasive to convert the recalcitrant?

what's the hook for public pressure to hang on? occupying banks ain't cutting it, yet the people are seeing their quality of life diminishing without fully understanding the mechanics of how it happened.

the good ship europe is listing, water's rushing into the hold, how to plug the leaks to re-accomplish reflotation? to repair what's broken may consist of reverse engineering the causation, with as little disappointment or damage as possible, or to try a whole new model of economic governance, but to get stuck sitting on a fence arguing sides is like waiting for the aliens to come down with a global budget plan. if a debt-rock burst your hull, using a bigger rock to try to fix the problem seems stupid. if growth of certain elements of industrial policy shudders to a halt without tax breaks and subsidies yet dear leaders cannot reconcile themselves to reconfigure policies to reflect new realities, what do we need?

some geithner/bernanke figure to find a burning bush to listen to and come down the hill with some new economic ten commandments.

even here there's so much still discussed... i know these knaves have covered their tracks well, have had scads of luxurious leisure time to hatch their plans, compliant media aid in the layers of obfuscation, and keeping us always feeling like it's some deus ex machina that's responsible, whereas everyone here seems to be clear that it isn't, this is clusterfuck salad of greed, injudicious bets, pathetic regulation, incompetence, malice, resource shrinkage/population expansion, not enough euro-babies/too many immigrants, any or all the above...

there seems to be a significant consensus we're pretty doomed, that this story cannot but end messily, some even speculating armed infra-european conflict.

if we're in a maze, what i would like to know is is there a thread, however improbable that could lead us out?

or are we really condemned to waiting for so much blood in the street that governments have to relent and a debt jubilee is the only way to stop the rage of those feeling utterly unrepresented by their political systems?

maybe we need olympics every year!

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Aug 28th, 2012 at 07:41:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The quo is the survival of the Euro-system. It is almost as bad as the situation in 2008 when the biggest banks were balking at the only solution on the table in the USA - taking the TARP money. If nothing was done the system implodes and them along with it. But they had a hard time getting beyond their entitled mentality so as to grasp the opportunity for survival. The current situation in Europe makes those involved in that fiasco look like geniuses.

I say 'on the table' because there were other, better solutions available, but they were not under consideration due to the dereliction of duty by 99% of the US population when it came to insuring that the US government was not subordinated to Wall Street.


"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Aug 29th, 2012 at 12:23:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the long run and if the investment are succesful yes,but in the short run, shouldn't the inflow of foreign equity cover the deficit?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid on Wed Sep 5th, 2012 at 09:43:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series