The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The story of Jodrell Bank could serve as a metaphor for post-war British scientific and industrial development. Built in an atmosphere of argument and recrimination over its cost, and plagued by constant union disputes and sniping press comment, it nevertheless triumphed against all the odds, contributing greatly to Britain's scientific reputation and to our understanding of deep space. When Lovell first proposed building the telescope in 1948, he estimated that it would cost around £60,000 to build. After work began in 1950, it was soon clear that these figures were wildly optimistic; and, in 1952, a more "realistic" sum of £333,000 was agreed on, to be shared equally between the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the Nuffield Foundation. But this, too, soon turned out to be an underestimate (the telescope ultimately cost £670,000), as the building work was plagued by strikes, bureaucratic delays, delivery failures and escalating raw material costs. The project became the subject of heated debates in Parliament, and at one point, burdened by a debt of around a third of a million pounds and in trouble with the Public Accounts Committee, Lovell faced possible imprisonment for the alleged overspending of public money.
The story of Jodrell Bank could serve as a metaphor for post-war British scientific and industrial development. Built in an atmosphere of argument and recrimination over its cost, and plagued by constant union disputes and sniping press comment, it nevertheless triumphed against all the odds, contributing greatly to Britain's scientific reputation and to our understanding of deep space.
When Lovell first proposed building the telescope in 1948, he estimated that it would cost around £60,000 to build. After work began in 1950, it was soon clear that these figures were wildly optimistic; and, in 1952, a more "realistic" sum of £333,000 was agreed on, to be shared equally between the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the Nuffield Foundation.
But this, too, soon turned out to be an underestimate (the telescope ultimately cost £670,000), as the building work was plagued by strikes, bureaucratic delays, delivery failures and escalating raw material costs. The project became the subject of heated debates in Parliament, and at one point, burdened by a debt of around a third of a million pounds and in trouble with the Public Accounts Committee, Lovell faced possible imprisonment for the alleged overspending of public money.
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 84 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1484 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments