Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
I suppose then, plantation charters awarded to those English and Dutch "colonists" has no meaning to you. Ergo, share holders and monarchs seeking specified returns on their investment (GBP STERLING) from those plantation-holders --founding fathers-- is irrelevant in your origin story, 1606 to present.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Mon Oct 9th, 2017 at 07:31:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by Cat on Mon Oct 9th, 2017 at 07:40:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by Cat on Mon Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:22:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The charters granted a legitimacy which was valuable. The grantees benefited from that. The grantors - less so. From a business point of view almost all of these companies on the N. American continent were a disaster, though some, like the Hudson Bay Company, did survive into modern times, being dissolved in 2012. It was a profitable company but I do not know if it ever met the expectations of returns on which the grants were made.

Monarchs wanted to project power and influence within the constrained means of late feudal society. Colonists had their own reasons and supplied the people required. Limited Liability Companies were the most appropriate tool they had available so it was what got used. But they rarely made business sense by present day standards. Not to say the failed companies never benefited the Monarchs and/or at least some of the businessmen. An early version of "Government should be run like a business." The British East India Company was a whole different matter.
 

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Oct 10th, 2017 at 01:34:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series