The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The only prediction that I'm prepared to make is that this is too big of a mess for the traditional approach of papering it over with fudge to suffice. The EU/EMU is going to look substantially different as a result of this.
it will certainly make all europeans rethink what the EU means and stands for, beyond a common currency and less border protocols.
it think it's a time where the original concepts will be re-examined and all countries will have to weigh up seriously the advantages of Brussels' interplay with their own nation states.
Iceland sees the advantages of joining, after years of dithering.
fence sitting will be much less of an option.
certain countries would benefit enormously from more 'rational' guidance in their politics, not just their debt restructure.
what fudge is there? cutting back on social services for the poor, shutting hospitals, slashing pensions, IMF style?
or taxing the well-heeled, when they can easily move their gains offshore and out of reach? disincentivising them from keeping their factories in the EU, with cheaper labour markets on their knees for investment too?
how we can keep this crisis intra-european, when so much of our wealth creation is already geared to foreign markets and labour?
the EU' problem on how to regulate itself will be meaningless if others use guile to game their own systems, like china with her currency now, so even if we did enact legislation to over-ride individual nations and keep our aquis more pure, the fact that others can take advantage of this suggests that until we can get a global currency and regulation system, we are stuck with cowboy capitalism from the atlantic, commu-capitalism from china, energy realpolitik from russia, and slash and burn growth from brazil, india, and the other 'second world' economies.
it's very confusing, and some-one has to lose the way it's set up and going.
i think if all nations concentrated on making their own clean energy, and balancing their energy budgets by reducing the costs through correct investment, europe could prove something important, while serving her own needs and setting a global example.
exports are great, but we need to think more longterm, and foreign markets are too dependent on fuel prices and free trade agreements being honoured.
free trade has not benefitted many people, and consumerism has allowed so much waste, feeding profits for the few, and leaving pollution.
thanks for your comment. The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
Greece got into the jam it's in because joining Europe made it sucker bait. Krugman at least, faintly, acknowledges that. But Krugman fails to consider the implications of what he's saying. Unless and until Europe and the U.S. can police international capital markets at least two things will happen, and not just in Greece. International banks will conspire to set up smaller Eurozone countries to fail. And then the banks will use those smaller countries as speculative piñatas. Krugman dismisses out of hand the notion that Greece can (or should) exit the Eurozone. "A breakup of the Euro is very nearly unthinkable," he writes. But note that there's a huge difference between breaking up the Euro and having Greece and/or other small countries exit the Eurozone. From the Greek perspective, if Greeks don't want to be penurious debt-slaves to international banks for the next several decades it makes perfect sense to exit the Eurozone, tell the banks to fuck off, print money, kick-start their economy, and invite the tourists back at cheap rates. If Greek priorities are to put Greeks back to work in Greece, they should drop the Euro. The Eurozone would survive. But the idea of national borders, national identity, protectionism, and possibly profoundly anti-capitalist development models are such anathema to "liberals" like Paul Krugman that they won't be part of the policy conversation. Not, that is, unless the Greeks make them so. The other thing generally to keep in mind as we watch the Greek crisis play out is that a corrupted government in cahoots with insanely corrupt international banks will everywhere and always contrive to wreck its economy in terms of the interests of the vast majority of its citizens, while the rich get richer. True in Greece. Also true in the US of A.
Greece got into the jam it's in because joining Europe made it sucker bait. Krugman at least, faintly, acknowledges that. But Krugman fails to consider the implications of what he's saying. Unless and until Europe and the U.S. can police international capital markets at least two things will happen, and not just in Greece. International banks will conspire to set up smaller Eurozone countries to fail. And then the banks will use those smaller countries as speculative piñatas.
Krugman dismisses out of hand the notion that Greece can (or should) exit the Eurozone. "A breakup of the Euro is very nearly unthinkable," he writes. But note that there's a huge difference between breaking up the Euro and having Greece and/or other small countries exit the Eurozone. From the Greek perspective, if Greeks don't want to be penurious debt-slaves to international banks for the next several decades it makes perfect sense to exit the Eurozone, tell the banks to fuck off, print money, kick-start their economy, and invite the tourists back at cheap rates. If Greek priorities are to put Greeks back to work in Greece, they should drop the Euro. The Eurozone would survive.
But the idea of national borders, national identity, protectionism, and possibly profoundly anti-capitalist development models are such anathema to "liberals" like Paul Krugman that they won't be part of the policy conversation. Not, that is, unless the Greeks make them so.
The other thing generally to keep in mind as we watch the Greek crisis play out is that a corrupted government in cahoots with insanely corrupt international banks will everywhere and always contrive to wreck its economy in terms of the interests of the vast majority of its citizens, while the rich get richer. True in Greece. Also true in the US of A.
true dat. The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/729
It could probably be done if it were executed with the care and long term planning that was done when the euro was established. However, such an approach in the midst of a financial crisis is highly unlikely. I find the argument that such action would likely result in a far bigger mess than anything that might be done to stabilize the present situation convincing.
There may well be some virtue for a certain amount of protectionism for some countries in some situations. However, trying to erect protectionist barriers against countries with whom you share a common currency sounds like a thoroughly impossible undertaking. So far, extreme autarchy has never worked anywhere.
the logistics and expense of changing back to an old national currency are very daunting.
can the euro only survive in a period of economic growth, though? The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
The euro probably needs some different management arrangements than what it has at present to cope with such.
ok, what kind of approach do you see as being most hopeful to achieve this?
if we can't shuck off slacker countries because they're adding drag, why did we take them on board in the first place?
here's where i'd like to imagine it was for noble reasons, i guess events will tell.
when the tide goes out, you can tell who was swimming naked. (warren buffet) The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
The short answer to your question is that the regulatory institutions of the EMU need greater powers of control. However, if you look at the US where such institutions have powers and fairly clearly established traditions of using them, you see a situation where they lacked the political will and judgment to use them and the shock has swamped the world.
The curious thing about the EU is that it is fairly new and in some fundamental ways different from governmental arrangements that have come before it. That makes it interesting to watch. I think that because of this the people dealing with this situation are genuinely unsure of what options are available to them. That is something that can be clarified a good bit. That still leaves the question of how much responsibility the rich and powerful have for the people who aren't. There's never a conclusive answer to that whether those people are separated by national borders or are nominally part of the same nation.
The curious thing about the EU is that it is fairly new and in some fundamental ways different from governmental arrangements that have come before it
because it operates through consensus rather than party politics? The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
in the EU there is a curious lack of any kind of trans-national popular political sentiment
it is curious, i agree.
maybe there should be a european football club. The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
When political leaders have been forced to provide popular referenda on EU issues things often don't go their way so instead of listening to them they look for a way to get around them.
And that's different from any other institution ... how?
;-)
Getting an elite decision maker to rescind a decision is fairly close to impossible. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
by DoDo - May 23 40 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2340 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 341 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments