The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Etc.
http://www.lequipe.fr/Rugby/Actualites/Toulon-roi-de-l-europe/372022
At least meant to.
Britain must succumb to EU's new olive oil diktat, say officials - Telegraph
Britain has no choice but to implement an EU ban on glass jugs or dipping bowls containing olive oil at the table, despite anger from restaurants and consumers, officials said today. A European ruling that olive oil must be presented in sealed, tamper-proof packaging was today lambasted by family-owed producers and continental restaurants as petty interference that would strangle businesses. But a spokesman for the Department of Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (Defra) said that although the Government had not supported the measure it would ensure it was enforced when it became law on January 1. "While we welcome some of the new rules on improved labelling, we did not support this ban as it will likely lead to unnecessary waste and place added burdens on businesses," the spokesman said. "We will continue to work with the catering industry to help them adapt to these changes."
A European ruling that olive oil must be presented in sealed, tamper-proof packaging was today lambasted by family-owed producers and continental restaurants as petty interference that would strangle businesses.
But a spokesman for the Department of Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (Defra) said that although the Government had not supported the measure it would ensure it was enforced when it became law on January 1.
"While we welcome some of the new rules on improved labelling, we did not support this ban as it will likely lead to unnecessary waste and place added burdens on businesses," the spokesman said. "We will continue to work with the catering industry to help them adapt to these changes."
C'est la vie.
Salon - Joe Scarborough's IRS hypocrisy
This week, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough joined the chorus of those decrying the IRS for targeting Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny in applying for nonprofit status. "You can't allow the government to tread on political speech," Scarborough said. "The Internal Revenue Service -- the taxman -- to go after their political beliefs. ... I can't imagine much worse than this," he added. Targeting nonprofit groups because of their political beliefs is wrong -- pretty much everyone agrees on that. So today's Scarborough must be outraged by his 2003 self, which gave this monologue on his show "Scarborough Country" on July 13, 2003: The leader of the NAACP bashes President Bush and the Republican Party. Why is this clearly partisan group still being funded by your tax dollars? [...] [T]he NAACP continues to get a free ride off of taxpayers because of the tax-exempt status that's conferred to them by our federal government, now, this despite the fact the NAACP produced and ran the most vicious campaign attack ad in the history of televised presidential campaign. [...]
Targeting nonprofit groups because of their political beliefs is wrong -- pretty much everyone agrees on that. So today's Scarborough must be outraged by his 2003 self, which gave this monologue on his show "Scarborough Country" on July 13, 2003:
The leader of the NAACP bashes President Bush and the Republican Party. Why is this clearly partisan group still being funded by your tax dollars? [...] [T]he NAACP continues to get a free ride off of taxpayers because of the tax-exempt status that's conferred to them by our federal government, now, this despite the fact the NAACP produced and ran the most vicious campaign attack ad in the history of televised presidential campaign. [...]
[T]he NAACP continues to get a free ride off of taxpayers because of the tax-exempt status that's conferred to them by our federal government, now, this despite the fact the NAACP produced and ran the most vicious campaign attack ad in the history of televised presidential campaign. [...]
the end is wonderful
Britain's Jewish community is enjoying a demographic revival for the first time in 50 years because of massive growth in its haredi population. Almost three out of every four Jewish babies in the UK are born to ultra-Orthodox families, who account for 46,500 out of the estimated 280,000 Jews in the UK, according to Dr. Yaakov Wise of Manchester University's Center for Jewish Studies. By the second half of this century, haredim will outnumber secular ones, he said. [...] "The birth rate has exceeded the mortality rate for the first time since [World War II] in each year since 2005," Wise said. "Secular Jewish women have on average 1.65 children whereas the ultra-Orthodox have on average 6.9.
Almost three out of every four Jewish babies in the UK are born to ultra-Orthodox families, who account for 46,500 out of the estimated 280,000 Jews in the UK, according to Dr. Yaakov Wise of Manchester University's Center for Jewish Studies. By the second half of this century, haredim will outnumber secular ones, he said.
[...]
"The birth rate has exceeded the mortality rate for the first time since [World War II] in each year since 2005," Wise said. "Secular Jewish women have on average 1.65 children whereas the ultra-Orthodox have on average 6.9.
Of course RT's headline is also flat out wrong. And not even backed up in the article.
Islam could be dominant UK religion in 10 years - census analysis -- RT News
Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said to UK daily the Telegraph that the decline of Christianity is"inevitable." "In another 20 years there are going to be more active Muslims than there are churchgoers," he said.
Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said to UK daily the Telegraph that the decline of Christianity is
"inevitable." "In another 20 years there are going to be more active Muslims than there are churchgoers," he said.
Which is two decads and active, not total.
Ryanair pilots have been warned not to sign a letter to airline regulators expressing concern that the airline's employment practices could jeopardise passenger safety. In a memo staff were told they would be guilty of "gross misconduct" and "liable for dismissal" if they signed the letter to the Irish Aviation Authority that regulates Ryanair. The letter was drawn up by the Ryanair Pilot Group (RPG), which represents captains and co-pilots working for the airline but is not recognised by the company. It warned that the "confusing, uncertain and unpredictable employment situation" at Ryanair was becoming "an increasing distraction in daily flight operations". It added that it was causing "stress and worry" for pilots and had implications for safety.
In a memo staff were told they would be guilty of "gross misconduct" and "liable for dismissal" if they signed the letter to the Irish Aviation Authority that regulates Ryanair. The letter was drawn up by the Ryanair Pilot Group (RPG), which represents captains and co-pilots working for the airline but is not recognised by the company.
It warned that the "confusing, uncertain and unpredictable employment situation" at Ryanair was becoming "an increasing distraction in daily flight operations". It added that it was causing "stress and worry" for pilots and had implications for safety.
I can think of worse things, and I see them among the so-called "secular" (i.e., fellow atheists) among my cadre class here. "Tout pour sa gueule!"
But "no religion" is not a group.
but no indication of the increase in Islam between 2001 and 2011
Form another article:
the British Muslim population has surged dramatically over the past 15 years, increasing by 75 per cent in England and Wales. The 2011 census puts the Muslim population of the UK at around 5 per cent, a total that has been boosted by around 600,000 Muslim immigrants who have arrived in the UK over the past decade.
Of course, that 600,000 is still just half of the Christian immigrants.
Hm, even though this is a popular mechanism within the EU (Council uses it all the time, not to mention it is a main argument for passing treaty changes), EU makes the strategy less effective in other settings as the parliament creates common place for a big enough no.
Although 'He may have been killed by Russian agents, but we can't make that fact public' possibly isn't the last word in circumspection.
So coalitions of the willing it is.
by DoDo - May 17, 55 comments
by In Wales - May 16, 90 comments
by afew - May 18, 18 comments
by Fran - May 17, 8 comments
by Helen - Apr 18, 20 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 84 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1484 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments