Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.

What does Europe think of itself?

by Colman Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 04:39:34 PM EST

This is a stolen diary of Migeru's, which I deleted and substituted with a story so that it can move into the debate box later.

This diary is a reaction to Jerome's story Is this really what the UK thinks of Europe?

The issue, really, is that we need an accurate picture of what each country's position vis-a vis the EU is. Never mind what we think should be, if our opinions were mainstream we would be involved with political parties, not blogs.

A related issue is that European governments actively stifle public debate of the EU, because they are all afraid that the people will disagree with the direction they want Europe to take.

Update [2005-12-12 16:39:34 by Colman]: If you're interested in actual data the Europa site has an archive of Eurobarometer polls and so on. We should probably make a stab at answering this seriously after drowning the thread in snark last night.


We need an accurate picture of what the current state of opinion is, and how far it can be stretched, if we are to articulate a vision for Europe. And, seriously, a vision for Europe needs to be articulated (and communicated) between now and 2009, and national political parties won't do it. The current 5-year cycle can be when the EU touches bottom, or the beginning of its disintegration. And the EU will only bounce if a realistic European vision is articulated. But this diary is not about articulating a vision, but about assessing where we are and where we can realistically be.

So, based on your personal experience and any solid data (such as opinion surveys), where do you think each of the 25 member states stands on the EU? For each country, I would like to start by framing the question in the following terms:

  • what does each country ideally expect from the EU?
  • what does each country get out of the EU?
  • what does each country contribute to the EU?
  • what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Feel free to discuss the differences among political parties, and between public opinion and the political class, as well as regional, socioeconomic, or other factors.

    And finally, to paraphrase Wittgestein, if you don't have anything to say about a particular country, it's best to say nothing about it.

  • Display:
    For deleting the original diary without asking, but I wanted to get in before there were comments on it. I guess I'll have to dig up the responses to surveys on Ireland, mixed with personal opinions. That's work for tomorrow though.
    by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:11:08 PM EST
    Ok, people: here are the ground rules...

    If you want to discuss a country that has not been discussed before, put the country's name in the "Subject" of your comments. Let's keep all the comments pertaining to each country under one thread.

    Also, any country in the EU, EFTA, CoE, UEFA, Eurovision, or EuroMed qualifies for discussion.

    Have fun!

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:15:30 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Sorry about that ...

    (he'd already filled in 25 comments with each of the countries ... give him lots of 4's!)

    by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:16:25 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    But the comments were empty... Just the country name in the title... I'm not even sure I know what Spain thinks any more.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:18:42 PM EST
    [ Parent ]

     
  • what does each country ideally expect from the EU?
     

  • Lots of cash. Especially for farmers.

  • what does each country get out of the EU?


  • Not enough cash.


     
  • what does each country contribute to the EU?

  • Bugger all.


     
  • what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

  • Relieving them of their cash.


    by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:23:00 PM EST
    24 more of these, and the EU really is a zero-sum game and we might as well shut it down.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:30:31 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Do you see what you've done to this thread?  Now no one can get out a serious answer.

    (It's a pretty funny thread, though.)

    by DH from MD on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 07:53:10 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Yeah, Colman, maybe I'll retroactively withdraw my consent.

    What's that about getting the first comment it, anyway? You're already going to write the best one, so why monopolize the awards?

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 07:55:19 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    That's the danger of posting something like this on a Sunday evening. Anyway, there was a serious point under the snark: that isn't an inaccurate view of part of the Irish attitude to the EU. Certainly it bears more than a passing resemblance to the way the EU has been sold sometimes.
    by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 10:06:47 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    To expand that point: there was consternation in some of the media and some political circles when it became clear that a rich Ireland would become a contributor rather than a beneficiary of the EU budget, which will happen sometime in the next few years.
    by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 10:09:48 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Well, we all have to take advantage of Jérôme being on a management training session for 2 days to try and reap the best comment awards :)
    He said he hoped to get an internet connection at the hotel this evening, so expect a one shot flow of comments tonight...

    When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
    by Agnes a Paris on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:01:01 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    You do realize this debate is 6 weeks old?

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:03:25 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    That's the reason why I am jet-lagged.
    My comment re Poland still holds though.

    When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
    by Agnes a Paris on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:04:57 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    My feeling is that "Ireland, the snarky version" sounds pretty much like "Poland, the snarky version". At least it is the feed back when I speak about the EU with friends back home.
    To them, EU is not a zero sum game at all so it may well depend on which side of the cash flows you are : net contributor or net beneficiary ...

    When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
    by Agnes a Paris on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 09:57:46 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    To act as a loudspeaker for France. To keep the German peaceful. To adopt - and enjoy - our administrative system. To keep the Brits away.


    what does each country get out of the EU?

    To speak with a voice equal to that of the USA. To pay for our farmers. To pay part of our French-made Airbuses.


    what does each country contribute to the EU?

    Panache. An alternative to the Anglo-Saxon model. Culture. The political will to say no to the Americans. Brilliant civil servants.


    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Same as above, why?

    In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

    by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:30:48 PM EST
    This promises to be an amusing debate - good think that Colman hijacked it.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:36:46 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    You know, I've always been uncomfortable by the phrase 'Anglo-Saxon model.'

    As though the United Kingdom is a little usurping agent of the United States hanging on the fringe of Europe to  come swinginging in, dividing and conquering.

    It's not as though Britain has no experience of socialism or state planning.

    Nor is it it the case that the UK is a mini-America with low taxes, no public services and a fundamentally right-wing, religious populace. It isn't.

    In reality, there is no 'Anglo-Saxon model.' The majority of modern stateplanned economic theory comes from an Englishman - Keynes.

    Just another way the French try and make themselves feel superior and more purely European.

    The tradition of an efficient, detached civil service is just as strong - if not moreso - in Britain as France. Did France have anything like the kind of rationalistic, bureaucratic system before Britain introduced the Northcote-Trevelyan reforms?

    Britain is a European country, and has every right to count itself an equal and alike member of European nations. Setting aside the eurosceptic press and frankly depressingly underinformed (on the European issue) public, what's so supposdely different from the 'Anglo-Saxon model' than that which is employed in France?

    I'm a fan of yours Jerome, on here and DailyKos, and always appreciate your pieces. However, I really think you've completely allowed yourself to fall into the false dichotomy of US/UK vs. Europe when in reality - culturally, governmentally, socially - Britain is far more European than American. It really doesn't hold up when you look at the kind of history of socialism, secularism and rationalism that is so deeply rooted in British and European cultures and entirely absent from America.

    by Mephistopheles (J.F.Bargh@student.salford.ac.uk) on Fri Dec 23rd, 2005 at 04:44:29 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Well, whilst we're on the topic of dubious generalisations:


    It really doesn't hold up when you look at the kind of history of socialism, secularism and rationalism that is so deeply rooted in British and European cultures and entirely absent from America.

    I'll entirely agree that these things have been consistently airbrushed from the histories of the USA, but that doesn't really square with "entirely absent" in my book.

    by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Sat Dec 24th, 2005 at 08:43:22 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    I concur. Mephistopheles, you should read Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Dec 24th, 2005 at 11:31:36 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
     A great deal of British European policy during the time of the Empire was divide and conquer, and Tory policies were pretty similar in the Thatcher era, internal government practices notwithstanding. That continual anti-EU drumbeat has been a force in Britain since the earliest days of the planning for the Union.

    ....because I would rather see us reduce the consumption of imported oil than have to send American boys to fight in the Persian Gulf. - John B. Anderson
    by Anderson Republican on Mon Dec 26th, 2005 at 12:18:24 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    false dichotomy of US/UK vs. Europe when in reality - culturally, governmentally, socially - Britain is far more European than American

    I have not been following up the debate closely enough, as Migeru rightly points out, to say who may and may not have fallen into this dichotomy, but from I am seeing out of having lived both in the UK and France, and travelling to the US on a regular basis, I think Mephistopheles has a good point here.
    It would be a huge mistake to isolate the UK by keeping singling out their difference in approaching certain issues. Other EU countries are far from being along the same lines so why should the culprit always be the UK ?

    And this is only a general comment, not an underlying accusation of someone having mischievously written something specific. On some sensitive issues, I sometimes feel it would be wiser to put a disclaimer along with the post.

    When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill

    by Agnes a Paris on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:13:46 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Agnes, if you really want to revisit Mephistopheles' comment, I suggest that you read this diary and all 133 comments to it. As this is now in the archive you won't be able to comment on it, but you can write your own diary on the issue.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:20:29 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Well, you are right, I seem to be dyslexic today when using my computer. The EU debate somehow appeared on my home page and I did not even bother to check the dates.
    Guess my 15 hour day travelling yesterday has something to do with it. Sorry about that.

    When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
    by Agnes a Paris on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:27:38 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    That was one ugly debate, let me tell you...

    Then again, maybe you can put a fresh spin on the whole "US/UK/EU" thing.

    Use the heightened awareness provided by jet lag to a good end!

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper

    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:30:29 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Well, I am afraid I am still biased by personal issues in that matter, which is why I restrained from commenting on that thread.
    Just about coping with a French partner, living in the UK, who believes the US is the Holly land and that you are doomed without a G.C. Which is not my opinion at all. Wish life could be simpler sometimes...

    When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
    by Agnes a Paris on Tue Jan 31st, 2006 at 10:40:43 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Free market economics is very much a British invention, from Adam Smith on. In their reception of Adam Smith, German economists saw his thought as completely alien, made an effort to assimilate it, and nevertheless ultimately rejected it: until staffing decisions at German universities were made by American occupiers after World War II.

    British social thought starts with the individual; German social thought in contrast always emphasizes the social nature of man. The idea that "the majority of modern stateplanned economic theory comes from an Englishman - Keynes" is a typical instance of anglophone chauvinism. As it happens, any theories of state planning that were employed by the British or Americans had already been anticipated by German economists, who did fine without Keynes. Anglophone social scientists think that other societies have nothing worthwhile to say about social theory because they can't—or simply don't—read foreign languages anymore.

    If you think that "Britain is far more European than American", you need to explain why Britain would join America by allying itself with a regime that rejects everything (modern) European: abiding by international law; war is to be initiated only as a last resort; the executive accepts that it is bound by laws made by an independent branch of government; torture is beyond the pale; educated people accept science without qualms, and try to keep their religion to themselves.

    On issue after issue, I see Britain reflexively and slavishly following the pathological example of the US. Everyone knows the Anglo-American invasion and occupation of Iraq was illegal, including English jurists, but the English political system is so corrupt that this simple truth is consistently ignored. Blair wants to push throug an American version of the Patriot Act (the House of Commons here did show some spine, reducing the amount of time that the state can hold suspects without charging them, although ending up with a period far in excess of what is considered acceptable in European countries). In its breathless advocacy of neoliberal policies, Britain acts exactly as is expected of it by its master: as America's Trojan horse in Europe. Blair even apes American politicians' atavism by presenting himself as the most "religious" prime minister of the century.

    In all its emulation of US social policy, I have found only one instance where such practice has led to a positive result: the recent banning of smoking in pubs. Unfortunately, its policy on smoking seems to be the only case in which the US has a better model to offer to the Europeans.

    A bomb, H bomb, Minuteman / The names get more attractive / The decisions are made by NATO / The press call it British opinion -- The Three Johns

    by Alexander on Sat Feb 18th, 2006 at 12:44:19 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    What does Spain ideally expect from the EU?
    To regain its rightful place among world powers. To achieve European integration before Spain breaks up into its constituent atoms/to undermine Spain by gaining equal representation rights for said constituent atoms (depending on who you ask). Money for infrastructure, farmers, miners, shipbuilders, fishermen and the "historical debt with Andalusia". A crackdown on ETA/a ruling by the European Human Rights Tribunal upholding the Basque right to self-determination. Gibraltar.
    what does Spain get out of the EU?
    Money for farmers, infrastructures and the poorer regions, but not any more for fishermen, miners or shipbuilders. A boost to our battered self-esteem: "we are European now, finally!". A convenient place to retire national political figures fallen into disgrace. French farmers no longer burn lorries carrying Spanish produce. High-speed trains.
    what does Spain contribute to the EU?
    Flamenco, bull-fighting, tapas, paella,  beaches, golf clubs. Megalomaniac former prime ministers. A pro-EU public. A port of entry for illegal Africans and Latin Americans.
    what does Spain believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?
    Political connections with Arabic nations and Latin America. Able pro-EU politicians. The Spanish way of life. Spain is different. Everything under the sun.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 05:55:50 PM EST
    Sorry, am too sleepy for a serious reply.

    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    Paying our budget deficits and infrastructure building. Allowing some international grandstanding for our little PMs. Punish Romania and Slovakia once a while.

    what does each country get out of the EU?

    Bliars, bloody liars.

    what does each country contribute to the EU?

    A set of corruption and embezzlement practices they aren't yet prepared for, political insanity even more alien than our non-Indo-European language.

    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Invention of the perpeetum mobile.

    *Lunatic*, n.
    One whose delusions are out of fashion.

    by DoDo on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 06:04:35 PM EST
    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    Higher legal and consumer standards, CAP money, structural funds to rebuild our infrastructure, easy border passage to relatives or ancestral places in neighbouring countries, easier travel and access (holiday/work) to Western Europe, a voice in all-European matters. (In Hungary, joining was supported by over 80% - the above reasons overrode also widespread fears of increased competition, foreign takeovers and reduction of sovereignity.)

    what does each country get out of the EU?

    Same as above, only less than desired.

    what does each country contribute to the EU?

    Problems. Such as: a marginalised Gypsy minority, nationalism, a corrupt and insane political elite, budget deficits.

    On the European stage, alternation between blind me-too-ism, clumsy compromise proposals and silly selfish grandstandings. (Yeah, all like Spain, but much sillier.)

    On the positive side - development (see below). Also a market (Hungary is a developing country with a foreign trade deficit; tough reduced lately).

    As for the stereotypes part: salami, paprika, horses, all kinds of curd cheese products, inventors, scientists, depressing art movies.

    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Same as the positives above, but let's emphasize development. If Hungary et al will use EU money to grow fast enough, they might turn net contributors by the time f.e. Turkey joins. Also, ideally, Hungary could work as compromise-builder in the Council.

    *Lunatic*, n.
    One whose delusions are out of fashion.

    by DoDo on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 07:57:07 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    at least if I tried to do it seriously.

    I don't even think I could pull off snark, although I could do it from a stereotypical American tourist's poitn of view, as in, "duuuude, my parents gave me $5,000, let's go to Europe, duuuude!"

    by Plutonium Page (page dot vlinders at gmail dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 06:06:46 PM EST
    Hey, don't be shy! Talk about why Belgians have a windshield wiper on the inside or something...

    *Lunatic*, n.
    One whose delusions are out of fashion.
    by DoDo on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 06:59:46 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    That's the joke Argentinians tell about Gallegos (Spaniards).

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 07:00:23 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Really?

    My Dutch relatives told me this is a standard Dutch anti-Belgian joke...

    *Lunatic*, n.
    One whose delusions are out of fashion.

    by DoDo on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 07:03:30 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    Disintegration, so as to allow us to fulfill our Manifest Destiny, or at least a stopping of integration in Britain, so that we have a powerful ally to be our prison bitch on foreign policy.

    what does each country get out of the EU?

    A headache (see Jerome's comment).

    what does each country contribute to the EU?

    Constant bitching about America's role in the two world wars from American citizens who weren't even born at the time the two were fought.

    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    A reason for the British public to demand that Labour throw out Tony Blair.

    Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.

    by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 06:11:55 PM EST
    Sorry, how is this a joke?

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 06:15:06 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    From the perspective of a Republican, it's not.  Democrats and Greens, in my experience, tend to be thankful for the EU, as a bloc capable of balancing the international system.

    Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
    by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 06:32:57 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    What does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    The complete and utter destruction of France.  Give the Germans Alsace, the Italians get Corsica, the Greeks get Marseilles, and then just bring back the Gaulish language and give the rest to them.

    What does each country get out of the EU?

    Military bases for our future empire in Europe.  Rome will look like the good ol' days.

    What does each country contribute to the EU?

    The wisdom that comes from being descendant of penal colonies and religious extremists.

    What does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    A reason to see why "Moskau" is a better song than anything Britney Spears has produced.

    by DH from MD on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 06:49:41 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    My opinion of Italians is not always absolutely stellar (although I like them very much) but I know for a sure thing they won't be stupid to the point of accepting Corsica :-)
    by Francois in Paris on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 07:53:48 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    ...to do is make fun of all those right-wing nuts who believe that Napoleon was successful because he was from Corsica and thus not French.  They always sound so idiotic.

    (Is there something wrong with Corsica that my ignorant American self can't see?)

    by DH from MD on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 07:58:47 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Let's be honest, DH:  Most right-wingers don't know enough history to even comment on it.  These are people who believe that masters and slaves lived in harmony prior to the 1860s, when the demonic Abe Lincoln attacked the "morally superior" Southerners, and who think judges are actually trying to push "The Homosexual Agenda" instead of actually handing down rulings based on the Constitution.

    Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
    by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 08:12:29 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    ...not the ones I know.  They know history, but they conform the facts to fit their narrow viewpoint of how the U.S. is all-good and that the French suck at everything.
    by DH from MD on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 08:23:17 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    How dare you say the French suck at everything!!! They only suck at politics and warmaking.

    They do lots of things really well. Vivre Band Desunee!!!!

    by messy on Tue Feb 7th, 2006 at 08:39:38 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    They are, err, no, they are not nice. It's a beautiful place. The locals are great if they like you, but they, err, can be major pains in the arse when they're in the mood, especially in the "independentist" ones.

    And their upkeep is pretty expensive. To the point that a former Prime Minister suggested quite meanly a few years ago, that it should not be for Corsica to ask for its independence from France but for France to get its independence from Corsica...
    by Francois in Paris on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 08:12:30 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Make's ya wonder why the Romans ever wanted it. :)
    by DH from MD on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 08:32:10 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    The Ancient Romans were even bloodier minded than the Corscicans.
    by Rolfyboy6 (rolfyboyNOSPAM@sonic.net) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 12:17:10 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    I'll have to do the EU week in (p)review tomorrow... er... later today.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Dec 11th, 2005 at 07:13:24 PM EST
    Q:What does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    A:Finland sees EU originally and primary as a matter of national security. It sees itself moving further away from Russian sphere of influence. This question (in 1995) was framed as: "EU or CIS? These are choices to be made." The economical aspects or market access to Europe are added bonus.

    Q:What does each country get out of the EU?

    A:Essentially Finland has fared quite well in EU. Finland sees itself politically stronger and having more freedom of action than ever before in its history. Thus the political and security aspects have been more than satisfactory fullfilled. For example, aggressive Russian political pressure against Finland of early 1970's is nowhere in sight.

    The economic advantages of EU have been mixed. The market access is reality and Finnish industries fare well but EU is generally seen as too slow and incapable of shedding its skin to reform itself to match challenges of tomorrow. Lisbon Treaty has been disappointed in sense of missing its goals.

    Q:What does each country contribute to the EU?

    A:Finland effectively offers more bulk to EU but nothing truly vital in larger scheme of things. EU has had two major regional changes for Nordic countries, both related to Nordic Council's abadonment by EU members (Finland, Sweden, Denmark).

    http://www.norden.org/start/start.asp?lang=6

    First, it has led to near collapse of NC that was widely used in 1980's and 1990's as vehicle of regional cooperation and integration as these issues are now discussed through EU.

    Second, this has also led to near complete collapse of Norway's strategy of influencing EU through NC. This has forced Norway to reexamine its relations with EU and importance it has through various institutions. Iceland has always been breed apart politically.

    A: What does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    A:Finland sees itself as major gateway to Russia. Finns as whole are highly suspicious of Russians but they also see themselves are true experts in this issue would like to see EU's added weight in dealing trade issues with Russia. Finland sees that there is huge amount of money to be made in Russia and thus sees expanding trade relations with Russia (by EU) as nationally vital issue now that fear of immediate Russian invasion has passed (or at least postponed for several decades to come).

    by Nikita on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 01:48:20 AM EST
    Thanks for the first non-snarky answer to the questions.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 06:13:51 AM EST
    [ Parent ]

    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?
    what does each country get out of the EU?
    what does each country contribute to the EU?
    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    italy :

    1. to be taken seriously + help in stamping out mafia
    2. it's taken MARGINALLY more seriously, various mafias doing fine
    3. pizza, spaghetti, ice cream, eros, mandolin orchestras
    4. total destruction, via vaudeville, cruel laws, neo-machiavelli-ism and historical, hysterical, sheer shamelessness


    It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
    by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 03:12:37 AM EST
    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?
    Peace, stability, open borders
    Independence from the U.S.
    + a way to be express patriotism without appearing nationalistic (strong role for the E.U. in the world with Germany being strong in the E.U. vs. strong role for Germany in the world), some police integration

    what does each country get out of the EU?
    free travel, some independence from the U.S., some regulations, some police integration

    what does each country contribute to the EU?
    1) Money 2) Money 3) Money. Support for the French. Depending on the current government, a role as mediator between France and the U.K.

    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?
    Ideas, people.

    (those opinions are not necessarily my own)

    _______________________________________________

    "Those who fight might lose, those who don't fight have already lost." - Berthold Brecht

    by RavenTS on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 06:15:53 AM EST
    With greatest respect to Nikita,

    And the following is what is expected IF we join.

    what does this country ideally expect from the EU?
    That the EU will usurp local control of oil and eliminate the right to hunt whales*.

    what does this country get out of the EU?
    ZIP, most norwegians feel (true or not) that Norway already follows EU regulations and guidelines more closely than existing EU members.

    what this country contribute to the EU?
    Already sell the EU oil and gas, but on our own terms.  Join up, and then it's on the EU's terms.

    what does this country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?  Idealistically, some small amount of influence.... realistically???? nah!

    * On a side note, many many norwegians do still enjoy whale meat, though most won't readily admit to it.  One cafe I used to frequent, after several months of regular dining, and getting to know the owner.  One day he leans in close and whispers "We also have whale available, though it's not printed on the menu".

    "In war, the moral is to the physical as three is to one" - Napoleon

    by John in Norway (nordicapollo@yahoo.com) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 06:17:12 AM EST
    All these snarks... That doesn't give me clear focus. I need this off my chest first.

    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    To be left alone.

    what does each country get out of the EU?

    Money.

    what does each country contribute to the EU?

    Tourists and hence, money.

    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Are you kidding us? Legal distribution of marijuana, of course.

    I'll ponder on the serious answers when I've eaten my cheese-sandwich with milk and have gone on my bike to my office. I shall not wear clogs.

    by Nomad on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 07:23:27 AM EST
    Snarky Cloggie
    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    Space. Anywhere. As much as possible. So we don't have to bang our knobby knees on the toilet doors and share bath towels that hang nicely in a cramped attic but Americans would consider a small washcloth. Fridges that you don't have to bend over for and newfangled devices that dry clothes - a spinning device that can end the constant hanging of clothes indoors all winter.

    what does each country get out of the EU?

    Money - compliments of Holland.

    what does each country contribute to the EU?

    Less money than Holland.

    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Cloggieland? Long hair in the military. Wee teaspoons that Dutchies leave in their cups that get stuck up your nose when you try and drink a cuppa'. Adult baby food (called stampot here)... bike thieves, a booming drug trade, unionised prostitution and incredibly bad music.



    Atlantic Free Press
    by ghandi (expatforums@gmail.com) on Thu Jan 5th, 2006 at 03:07:24 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    What does Sweden ideally expect from the EU?
    Cheap booze. Cosy jobs for politicians. Pretexts for passing unpopular laws.

    What does Sweden get out of the EU?
    Cheap booze. Booze related problems. Cosy jobs for politicians. Pretexts for passing unpopular laws. Arguments over Swedish laws impopular with the EU.

    What does Sweden contribute to the EU?
    Cash.

    what does Sweden believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?
    As little as possible.

    by Johannes on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 08:27:10 AM EST
    *  what does Britain ideally expect from the EU?

    Fairness, the best deal for the most people, improved quality and standard of living

    *  what does Britain get out of the EU?

    common human rights, common regulations, open markets, free movement of people, cultural and social exchange, very nice holiday destinations

    *  what does Britain contribute to the EU?

    A different perspective, (although I don't believe in an 'Anglo Saxon' anything)

    *  what does Britain believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Cakes, gravy and a proclivity for changing our minds, pragmatism?

    All opinions being my own and of course not representative of Britain or the British...

    by ------- on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 09:21:50 AM EST
    Cool! Now we need to merge in some of the stuff from Jerome's "Is this what the UK thinks of Europe" threat.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 09:23:27 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Sorry forgot one thing, enlargement, it's not enough to be worried just about the people of Europe, if we're having a club of law and rules, anyone who signs up to those agreed rules and sticks to them should be allowed to join...
    by ------- on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 09:31:13 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    *  what does Britain ideally expect from the EU?

    Somewhere for prime ministers to send people they have got fed up with (Roy Jenkins, Peter Mandelson, Chris Patten, Neil Kinnock et al).

    * what does Britain get out of the EU?

    Somewhere for prime ministers to send people they have got fed up with (Roy Jenkins, Peter Mandelson, Chris Patten, Neil Kinnock et al).

    * what does Britain contribute to the EU?

    Roy Jenkins, Chris Patten, Peter Mandelson, Neil Kinnock et al

    *  what does Britain believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    Old Boys who are past their sell by dates

    Eats cheroots and leaves.

    by NeutralObserver on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 08:30:26 PM EST
    [ Parent ]
    Because even though I'm not European, I want to save this thread from total snark-related ruin.

    What does the U.S. ideally expect from the EU?

    A reliable trading partner.  Constructive criticism when warranted (as it always is), and restraint of unfair criticism (i.e. George Bush plotted 9/11).

    What does the U.S. get out of the EU?

    A reliable trading partner.  An ally in potential wars.  A better model of government which we hope to emulate.  Someplace other than Canada with decent liberal governments.

    What does the U.S. contribute to the EU?

    Hundreds of jobs from our archaic military installations in Germany.  Proof that there are people in this country that call it the "United States", not "America" as if we owned the whole continent.

    What does the U.S. believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    The hope that you guys understand that not all of us are insane.

    by DH from MD on Mon Dec 12th, 2005 at 10:11:46 PM EST
    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?
    To please take our political class and flog it. To efficiently rule us, something we are unable to do. To bail us out of mexican-style democracy. To make the rich pay taxes (they currently don't). To pay out our surreal budget deficit. To give us time to do all those wonderful things that don't make money.
    what does each country get out of the EU?
    protection for typical agricultural products. Strong consumer protection and "health & safety" laws. An inspiration to get better at administration. Money that should be spent on education and infrastructure and routinely ends up in politicians' pockets or goes back to Bruxelles as unspent. A stage where we can be ridiculised thanks to inept politicians. A couple of good football tournaments.
    what does each country contribute to the EU?
    Some underpaid, unrecognised and highly-skilled workforce. Lots of lovely food, nice clothes, the classiest holiday destinations, a mediocre football team, never-ending supplies of snarkiness and opportunities for nordic people to feel superior, women you would die for. A well-oiled and organised criminal infrastructure, less flashy and tacky than Eastern-European counterparts and less hostile than Chinese cartels. The source of all European history and the very thought of Europe as a single entity. Rome. Opera. Opera in Rome.
    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?
    history, culture, entertainment, research, fashion, you name it. Just don't make us think about money.
    by toyg (g.lacava@gmail.com) on Tue Dec 13th, 2005 at 08:02:37 AM EST
    what does each country ideally expect from the EU?

    that each EU membership state checks and balances the outbreak of totalitarian regimes of the other membership states and that the EU prevents it from happening, including the totalitarianism of itself toward the citizens of all EU member states and to stand united against the influence of a totalitarian outbreak in the US, Russia or Asia.
    what does each country get out of the EU?

    a suspicious and jealous neighbour state that checks up on him and tells him to behave legally, humane, civil, fair and for the common good of all EU membership state's citizens.
    what does each country contribute to the EU?

    an opposing view point about how to achieve what each country expects of the other with the willingness to find a compromise for the common good of all.
    what does each country believe its contribution to the EU can be, ideally?

    I am a lousy believer in ideas. I pass.
    by mimi on Tue Dec 13th, 2005 at 10:28:36 PM EST
    One thing that seems to be overlooked in all the nationalistic discussion is that the EU offers a chance that Europe might get through a half century without neighboring countries attacking each other.

    Since most Europeans now alive were born after the end of WWII they have little personal experience with the cycle of perpetual warfare that existed previously. That seems like something worth defending, to me.


    Policies not Politics
    ---- Daily Landscape

    by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Sun Jan 15th, 2006 at 09:39:43 AM EST
    According to Google the sentences

    Germans are known for *
    Italians are known for *
    Norvegians are known for *
    etc., pp.

    render the following internationam map of opinions:



    "The USA appears destined by fate to plague America with misery in the name of liberty." Simon Bolivar, Caracas, 1819

    by Ritter on Sun Jan 22nd, 2006 at 06:26:52 AM EST
    This image is a perfect candidate for a 'width=100%' attribute in the IMG tag.

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 22nd, 2006 at 06:42:06 AM EST
    [ Parent ]
    • While Central Europeans are known for their boundless hospitality...
    • Europeans are known for visiting "football matches" to get "pissed" and beating each other to bloody pulps.
    • For example, Nordic and Alpine/Germanic Europeans are known for their low context communication style while Mediterranean Europe has a high context oral one
    • We, Central Europeans are known for our keen interest in historical contexts, for a fascination with history.
    • Americans, unlike Europeans, are known for getting together for a range of purposes.
    • the ever-so-humanistic Europeans are known for is their opposition to the death penalty.
    • Europeans are known for their high practice to game ratio and their focus on skill development as opposed to wins and losses.
    • Europeans are known for a more cautious attitude towards technology procurement and implementation, at least compared to organizations in North America
    • the Europeans are known for sticking to their plan

    What a load of bull!

    guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
    by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 22nd, 2006 at 06:47:33 AM EST
    [ Parent ]


    Display:
    Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]

    Top Diaries

    Pentecost steam

    by DoDo - May 23
    39 comments

    A Nomad's Life (A Farewell)

    by Nomad - May 10
    14 comments

    Simple Solar Principles

    by gmoke - May 17
    2 comments

    Rail News Blogging #24

    by DoDo - May 12
    11 comments

    Ferguson hates on Keynes

    by Migeru - May 6
    100 comments