European Tribune

Meanwhile, "back on the ranch", or how the west was lost

by DrKate
Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 12:01:04 AM EST

...and not the US Preznit's ranch, either.

When I first posted here I talked about Native American issues as my focus, and the desire to share with our European friends some of the untold stuff going on in America that has to do with the "first people".....

This entry--which will be brief--has to to with one facet of the "settlement" of the western U.S. starting in the mid-late 1800's and through about 1940.  The western US is dry, with low and high deserts, and mountainous.  Water development was the key to the colonization of western North America by the United States.

Short Background

The land west of the Mississippi River was (and still is in many respects), "Indian Country"....millions of natives of course at the time of Columbus, reduced to several hundred thousand, occupied vast areas entire western part of North America.

There is much literature on the killing, forcible removal, conscious spread of disease (through blankets, by concentrated living quarters, etc) that killed millions of natives which deserve mention, but cannot in this post.  Instead I direct you to the standard books, Darcy McNickle, "They Came Here First"; Dee Brown, "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee", Helen Hunt , "A Century of Dishonor", and more recent texts such as David Stannard, "American Holocaust".  They are excellent, but difficult reads. And I am sure there are many other selections that could be listed.

The Beginning of the Story

After the civil war, the US treasury was broke, and land in the west was offered as compensation to soldiers, both from the north and south.  The land and it's resources were owned by the Indians, so after the Indian wars when native people had been forced onto reservations, the land, timber, forage, water, minerals, oil, & gas was supposed to be purchased from the Indians by the US government and given to the Tribes for their development--an assumed "trust responsibility" the US was obligated to at the time of the Treaties, and to which it is still obligated.

But the US treasury was broke, right?  And the newly-arrived settlers needed water to make a go of it in an arid land. (Yes, they refused to even acknowledge the sophisticated resource use, economic and governing structures already established by natives there, but that is another diary).

Well, to make an incredibly long story shorter, the US "borrowed" the money from the Tribes to develop the water resources and other facilities (huge projects across the west) for the non-Indian settlers, opened Indian land for settlement and sale, and used those proceeds not for the development of the Tribe, but instead to "pay back" the US Treasury for the original money they "borrowed" from the Indians.

Individual Indians, some 300,000 filed a class action lawsuit in 1996 against the US Departments of Interior (and agencies therein) and the Treasury, claiming some $137 billion has not been paid to the Tribes since 1890.  The US blamed the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), but the Tribal lawyers found at least 60 (sixty) different treasury accounts into which money derived from the sale of Indian natural resources was deposited.  This was a huge scandal and the Tribal plaintiffs have won nearly every round.  But the US administration--democratic and republican--are loathe to deal honestly with the Tribes, so the case goes on.  Please read more at http//www.indiantrust.com a.k.a., Cobell v. Norton

This litigation, the Cobell case, is really about the timber, oil, minerals, gas, and forage resource revenues owed to individual Indians.  It goes to the heart of US mismanagement of Indian affairs, and is the reason why so many tribes are in abject poverty, with unemployment hovering near 70% and sometimes higher.

The Water Story

The piece I will present in two, maybe three diaries, is about water--the most fundamental resource in the west and clearly more valuable than oil--or at least eventually.  Guess who sits on the headwaters of most major rivers in the west, have fishing treaty rights on and federal reserved water rights to much of the water in the west?  Of course, the native people of America.  (By the way, 60% of the coal; nearly 50%oil and gas, and nearly 70% of uranium is derived from Indian lands in the US.)

The west was developed by harnessing Indian money to build non-Indian facilities that captured the water for economic gain.  Then, the Indian money that was used to build the project was repaid to the US from the proceeds of the sales from Indian land and water, and where I work, probably from oil, gas and grazing.  Those proceeds were supposed to go the the Tribal government (as opposed to individual indians) for their development.

There are at least a dozen places in the western U.S....all involving Indian Tribes, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, rivers, hydropower, and agriculture, where this happened.

We have the smoking gun, which is the next chapter in this series.  Thanks for reading!

ps wish I was better at using html tags!


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
The ongoing (through all kinds of administrations) BIA situation is perhaps the worst scandal in recent American government. The native American community has been screwed at every turn for a couple of hundred years. A head-on culture collision...
by asdf on Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 10:01:22 AM EST
Although I will enter also my "what does this have to do with Europe" comment... Perhaps a comparison to the situation of the Roma, or Turkish guestworkers, would provide a useful transAtlantic contrast...
by asdf on Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 10:03:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Are there others out there that can help?  

Its just a reminder that indigenous struggles are still going on now for basic things--like water, economic development, health care, all over the world.  Europe, as America, has resources to solve these problems, if they would pay attention and go back to first principles and some decency.

The US "Amb ASS ador" to the UN is an absolute pig on these issues affecting all people.  What do you think will happen to indigenous people in this?

Finally, note that the UN has adopted a strategy with respect to all indigenous people, who happen to live in areas of the greatest biodiversity andcultural diversity on the planet.  Protecting these people, their knowledge, and these biodiverse areas are critical to the ability to achieve sustainability.

The failure of the US to fully exterminate the Indians presents an opportunity for all of us to learn about how to manage our living on earth in a way that doesn't destroy it.

A long way of saying, I think these issues are relevant to the matters discussed here.

We cannot solve the problems of today using the same thinking that produced them. (Einstein) http://www.noquarterusa.net

by DrKate on Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 11:33:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Agreed. Don't worry about insufficient 'Euro relevance.' We try (however unsuccessfully) to cover the whole world here. I've long been meaning to write about the Bushmen of Botswana and their struggle to keep their land, for example, which also has little to do with Europe as such.

I learned a lot from your piece - thanks very much!

The world's northernmost desert wind.

by Sirocco (sirocco2005ATgmail.com) on Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 02:06:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's from a bumpersticker often sighted here in Colorado. How this may relate to Europe is that the Native Americans were displaced by people of European ancestory in a wave of Colonialism. The impact of European (I'm including the US under this heading) Colonialism is still seen daily in world politics, especially now in the Mid East. The patterns of Colonial behavior are repetative, so if we are to learn from history, we can use the example of American history as one useful starting point.

One interesting note re: Native population decline in the Western Hemisphere. There are some estimates that upwards of 90% of the pre-Columbian native population died as a result of a smallpox pandemic. The smallpox was brought over by the Spanish conquistadors, but was likely an accidental infestation. This all occured by the time the so-called Pilgrims landed in Massachussetts in 1620.

The Western US, from the eastern edge of the Rocky Mountains (known locally as the Front Range) to the Mississippi River, and from the Dakotas to Texas, sits on an underground aquifer known as the Ogallala (ironically this is a Lakota Sioux name). The Ogallala is being depleted at an alarming rate by agriculture and ranching, which in turn has created a situation in which agricultural lands in the Western Great Plains are becoming unproductive. Large areas of Kansas, Nebraska and the Western Dakotas are losing population since farming is no longer viable.

Wait, there's more: the Lakota Sioux as a tribe have never recognized the government payoffs for their land. They signed treaties, broken by the US gov't., granting them the Black Hills (Paha Sapa), and most of Nebraska and the Dakotas, for "as long as the sun shines and the grass grows."

An excellent book for hearing the perspective of the Native Americans is "Neither Wolf Nor Dog: On Forgotten Roads with an Indian Elder" by Kent Nerburn. (ISBN I-57731-233-3) It was dictated by a Lakota elder and is a deeply moving account of how the Lakota see White culture.

by US Blues on Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 11:30:54 AM EST
a.k.a., "stolen territory".  Thanks for your comments and additional information.

We cannot solve the problems of today using the same thinking that produced them. (Einstein) http://www.noquarterusa.net
by DrKate on Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 11:41:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The whole Native American issue is a complete mystery to most people over here, and diaries aimed at us are greatly welcomed: some of the cross-posted diaries on the issue are very much internal US politics that don't make any sense to clueless Europeans.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Aug 27th, 2005 at 12:51:48 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]