Is it Safe to Take the Train?

by p-------
Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 10:47:51 AM EST

(with apologies to DoDo)

Well, I think it is… But there has been another train crash, this time in Rome where one person was killed and about 110 were injured when two metro trains collided during the morning rush hour. It seems like every few weeks I’m reading about another train accident in Europe. Acc’d. to the BBC, I’m not imagining things. They’ve an extensive list of some of the worst train accidents in Europe in the past decade. The following are just those in the past year or so.

17 October 2006: Two people are reported killed and around 60 injured when two metro trains collide at Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II station in Rome.
(Uhm, this information contradicts their own article on the Rome crash… perhaps to early to know the facts?)
11 October 2006: Five people die when a goods train and a passenger train collide in France just south of the border with Luxembourg.
September 2006: A magnetic monorail train collides with a maintenance wagon, killing 23 people, during a test-run near the town of Lathen in Germany.
August 2006: Six people are killed and at least 36 injured in a passenger train derailment in northern Spain.
June 2006: At least 30 people are killed and a dozen hurt in a metro train crash in the eastern Spanish city of Valencia.
January 2006: At least 39 people die and 135 are injured - many of them skiers - when a train plunges down a ravine after its brakes fail in Podgorica, Montenegro.
January 2005: A crowded Italian train collides head-on with a freight convoy in thick fog near Bologna, Italy, killing at least 14 people and injuring more than 50.

So, I am wondering, is this apparently high rate of train accidents simply reflective of the fact that more people take trains? Or does it have something to do with the types of trains (high speed and such)?

Trains ARE very safe, answers DoDo in the comments with graphs


From this list at Wikipedia, it would appear that train accidents are on the rise.:
• January 23, 2006 – Bioče train disaster: A passenger train crashes into a ravine near Podgorica, Serbia and Montenegro killing 46 and injuring 198. [32]
• February 16, 2006 – Serres, Greece: An inter-city train strikes a truck at a grade crossing near Serres and derails. A passenger and the truck driver are killed, and twenty others on board the train are injured.
• March 13, 2006 – Austin, Texas, United States: Tara Rose McAvoy, 18, the reigning Miss Deaf Texas, is killed by the snowplow on a 65-car Union Pacific freight train while walking alongside the tracks and text-messaging her parents. The train sounded its horn repeatedly and attempted to apply the emergency brakes but could not stop before hitting McAvoy. [33]
• April 15, 2006 – Gubuck, Java: Thirteen die and 26 are injured as two trains collide and wreckage falls into a paddy field. One Swiss man was among the injured. Human error by the driver was officially blamed for the crash. [34]
• April 16, 2006 – Drama, Greece: A train from Alexandroupolis to Thessaloniki hits a truck near the town of Drama; three of the four carriages derail. At least 4 dead, including the two occupants of the truck, 40 injured. A small fire also later broke out in the wreckage. The dead truck driver was blamed for ignoring safety rules for level crossings. [35][36]
• April 28, 2006 – Victoria, Australia: A V/Line VLocity high-speed train is derailed when struck by an 18 wheeler truck, killing two and injuring 28 on the Ballarat to Ararat line.[37]
• June 3, 2006 – Ngungumbane rail crash, Zimbabwe: two trains travelling in the same direction collide at a crossing loop.[38]
• June 12, 2006 – Netanya, Israel: A passenger train from Tel Aviv to Haifa derails after colliding with a lorry on a level crossing, killing five and injuring more than 100. [39]
• July 3, 2006 – Valencia metro accident in Valencia, Spain: A Valencia Metro train derails after leaving Jesús station, killing 41 and injuring at least 47. The records of the train's black box show that the train passed a bend where the speed is limited to 40 km/h at 80 km/h. [40][41]
• July 11, 2006 – A series of bomb attacks strikes commuter trains in Mumbai, India, killing at least 200.[42]
• July 14, 2006 – Luxembourg: A man sets a newspaper alight on board a train, resulting in a fire that injures 31, with seven people suffering critical injuries. The culprit is suspected to have a mental disorder.[43]
• August 21, 2006 – Egypt: Two trains collide in the town of Qalyoub, 12 miles north of Cairo, killing 57 people and injuring 128.[44]
• August 21, 2006 – Spain: A speeding eastbound RENFE intercity train derails in Villada, 40 km west of Palencia, leaving six people dead and 36 injured.[45][46]
• August 27, 2006 – Zimbabwe: Five people are killed in a head-on collision between a passenger train and a freight train 30 km south of Victoria Falls. [47]
• September 4, 2006 – Egypt: A passenger train collides with a freight train north of Cairo, killing five and injuring 30.[48]
• September 22, 2006 – Lathen, Emsland, Germany: 21 passengers and two maintenance workers die and many more are injured when a German Transrapid train collides with a maintenance of way vehicle on the system's test track near the Netherlands border. See also: 2006 Lathen maglev train accident.[49][50][51]
• October 11, 2006 – 2006 Zoufftgen rail crash, near Metz, France: Passenger and freight service collide at Zoufftgen, Moselle, close to the Luxembourgish border. 5 people, including the drivers of both trains, are killed and 20 more are injured in the accident.[52]. The accident is ascribed to human error in the controlling signalling centre in Luxembourg.
• October 17, 2006 – Rome Metro collision, Italy: Two metro trains collide at Rome's Vittorio Emanuele metro station, killing at least one person and injuring around 60 people.[53]

I don’t know if this is simply due to an increase in reporting or knowledge of contemporary events, or if it is reflective of something else. Is it just that more people are taking the train? Difficult to imagine, when cars are more readily available than ever before. At any rate, it doesn’t look like the last few years have been good for train–riders. I would be really interested in any insights. For the record, I imagine it is much more safe to take the train than to drive.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
When will news programmes ever start with the full list of the deadly car accidents of the day?

If TV showed the carnage of death and injury that occurs on a daily basis, maybe people would start carign about real dangers instead of focusing on noisier but ultimately irrelevant things like train accidents or terrorist attacks.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 10:57:13 AM EST
I'd like some apologies too! ;-)

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 10:57:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd like an apology myself, for having to deal with commenters who only read the title and not the rest of the bloody story!

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
by p------- on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:25:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I did read your story, and nowhere do you actually make the point that things are getting worse. Do you have numbers for 2005, or for earlier years? Numbers for high speed trains vs others?

This is just a list of accidents with no perspective and a sensationalistic title.

And I'm sorry to snap at you, but this is a hot button for me.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:29:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Nowhere?  Have another read...

I was relying on the Wikipedia lists, which show a pretty big increase in accidents over the years, but was really hoping that people who knew more about these things could pitch in with better information instead of changing the subject and calling my story irrelevant.  

It might be a hot button issue for you, but frankly, and more importantly, it is an issue for everyone.  I would love for everyone stop driving and start taking public transportation.  Cars are undoubtedly unsafe, in a myriad of ways.  But shouldn't we ensure that the trains we want people to ride are also safe?   The Chicago CTA hasn't had a fatal accident since the 1970's while infrastructurally, it is a mess.  But I'm always reading about train accidents elsewhere.  It makes no sense to me.  I want to understand what's going on.  Are the Europe accidents just statistically "irrelevant" given the amount of usage?  Or are there other factors?  

And frankly, if you want to sell the world on not driving, you need to find a better way to respond to these questions.  

The title was snark, the story was sincere.  

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

by p------- on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 12:00:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But you posted just the list for 2006. I guess your point is that the number of accidents this years looks to be higher than in previous years, but that was not apparent to me initially.

But how does that compare to increases in traffic (which you can count in number of trips, number of trains, number of kilometers, number of tons, number of passenger-kilometers, numbers of ton-kilometers)?

And how does that compare to accident rates for other transportation modes (again, using the various criteria above)?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 12:13:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But how does that compare to increases in traffic (which you can count in number of trips, number of trains, number of kilometers, number of tons, number of passenger-kilometers, numbers of ton-kilometers)?

Yes, well, that's what I want to know!

And how does that compare to accident rates for other transportation modes (again, using the various criteria above)?

You want to compare one thing, trains v. cars, which we all know the answer to -cars are more dangerous- and why this is the case; I want to compare another trains now v. trains then, which I don't know the answer to -are they really becomeing less safe?- and if so, why?  

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

by p------- on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 12:23:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Soon I post some graphs that shall answer your questions in another top-level comment.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 04:12:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks!

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
by p------- on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 06:47:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In Spain the number of people who died over a given weekend is generally part of the news, especially when there is a long weekend or the start or end of a major holiday season.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:05:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I was actually looking for a serious answer to what looks to me to be a rise in the number of accidents.  I already pointed out that cars are less safe and am totally pro-train.  But accidents seem to be becoming more common. I'm curious as to why.

I think it is a perfectly reasonable question.  Or are we not allowed to ask these questions?  

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

by p------- on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:20:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Whether or not the number of accidents is rising or falling, I'd seriously doubt that the mortality is doing anything but falling. Modern trains are all-metal shells designed to maintain their structure during most high-speed impacts.

These should be compared with the wooden bodied or metal constructions common as little as 20 years ago. They had little structural integrity and would come apart at even moderate speeds, throwing the passengers all over the track.

Take the Hatfield train crash a few years back. A train left the track on a high speed bend at 100 mph (okay not high speed by French standards but...). 4 people died and only one carriage was significantly damaged. 25 years previously the death toll could have been in the hundreds.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 02:59:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
These should be compared with the wooden bodied or metal constructions common as little as 20 years ago.

You still had 'em in Britain 20 years ago!?!?

At least for the Continent, I must paint a different picture.

The horrific casualties from crashes involving carriages with a wooden or cast-iron frame prompted a programme (starting out from Germany, where the worst of these accidents occured) to phase out the latter completely already before WWII, and continued after the post-war shortages subsided. From the fifties, there have been international standards for express car construction, and passenger cars were not far behind in structural strength.

What railway cars lacked and most still do is crash zones to swallow energy. But I shall give a hint that that doesn't matter that much. Crash zones are useful only at low speeds, say 30 km/h. Above that, you must hope that if the train gets in trouble, it has somewhere to go. If it has room, passengers may be shaken or thrown around, but it should stay in one piece (as happened at Potters Bar). But if not, passengers will be crushed, whether by an entire carriage turning into "crash zone" or by inertial forces banging them against seats or walls in a rigid carbody: the energies involved are just too big. (Talking of which, I once met a taxi driver who used to be a rail accident investigator during 'communism'. He talked of an accident then held secret, when during a military exercise, Soviet Red Army officers slept in a sleeper wagon, whose brakes weren't pulled -- and rolled down the hill, crashing at the back of a freight train with 160 km/h. The car stayed in one piece. The military wouldn't let them in until they removed the corpses, but he told of the horror of all walls having been splattered with blood.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 03:52:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You still had 'em in Britain 20 years ago!?!?

Yea, it was only when the MkII fleet were phased out after Clapham in the mid 90s that we finally got rid of them.

The UK railway infrastructure has, like so much else in the UK, always been resistant to learning from best practice abroad (unless it's American).

eg The BR standard steam engines designed after WWII were laughable in comparison to pre-war French designs.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 04:38:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
With those details, I did some read-up.

The Clapham disaster involved MkIs, which were weak, but metallic, and at least one source (see last entry here) claims they were unfairly demonised (e.g. weak but not THAT weak), while Wiki quotes a source at length about MkI's role in the post-war reduction of traffic deaths. Still, MkIs were below UIC norm (in fact, they were used for the research done as basis for the UIC norms!), as they had a stong steel underframe but a separate carbody. Regarding wood, you must have meant the wooden panels inside (the latter was true of the first MkII too). I also found that post-Clapham, your railways adopted crashworthiness norms stricter than UIC stiffness norms (twice as strong forces on some points), meant to protect up to 40 mph, a speed under which most British rail accidents are said to happen.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 05:37:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BTW, I posted this, so are you saying it is irrelevant?

Because I can stop.

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

by p------- on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:21:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If you ask yourself this question then others will, too. If a debunking is in order, then let it take its course. An impression is legitimate, whatever the facts.
by Nomad on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:53:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think your article is irrelevant. It deserves an honest hearing.  As you've pointed out, the issue isn't cars.  Everyone knows cars are not as safe or as efficient (if that must be stated) as public transport.

I suspect the increased numbers of train accidents (if this is statistically correct) have a lot of causes, especially since the cases you cite occurred in different countries and even different continents. We do have a lot of accidents here in the US, even if not in Chicago.  I'm always hearing about Amtrak derailings or Metro accidents.  The causes are varied.  Everything from overly tired or alcohol impaired drivers who miss signals, or don't reduce speeds as required for track conditions, to faulty signaling devices, to poor track/road bed conditions.  Each of these conditions demands a separate solution.  Nevertheless, the answer to the basic, albeit a snark, question is undoubtedly Yes.

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears

by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 12:37:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suspect the increased numbers of train accidents (if this is statistically correct) have a lot of causes, especially since the cases you cite occurred in different countries and even different continents.

Yes, the multiple cause thing is my answer. In the UK a change in the ownership/control structure through a process of privatisation led to a catastrophic fall in safety concerns. Numerous small accidents were bracketed by a series of high profile crashes, almost all due to collapsing infrastructure, finally forced the companies to act.

The public still want a return to public control due to widespread disillusion with the ineffectiveness of the privatised railway. Sadly the govt is too frightened of the Daily Mail and the Murdoch papers to do anything that might be mistaken for effective management of the railways.

I cannot comment on problems in other countries.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 03:05:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sadly the govt is too frightened of the Daily Mail and the Murdoch papers to do anything that might be mistaken for effective management of the railways.

and they say the days of public human sacrifice are dead :-)

besides, train crash headlines sell papers.

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 09:51:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Tara Rose McAvoy, 18, the reigning Miss Deaf Texas, is killed by the snowplow on a 65-car Union Pacific freight train while walking alongside the tracks and text-messaging her parents. The train sounded its horn repeatedly...

You can't make this stuff up. No one would believe it.
by dmun on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:05:01 AM EST
She was probably listening to her Ipod, too.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:07:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A number of incidents can be put down to objects/people on the tracks, but I also wonder how much comes down to a failure to properly maintain the infrastructure?

It's been a big deal in the UK following on from some high profile collisions/derailings over the last few years and a lot of investment has been needed to sort the tracks out.

It also draws us into the debate on privatisation of public services...

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:44:47 AM EST
I don't know what the totals come to, but I'd guess we're looking at perhaps a few thousand deaths worlwide over the last decade.

That's an excellent safety record. It's better than the airline industry can manage.

I know for sure that trains in the UK are now extremely safe. The last few high profile accidents have all been caused by motorists. Otherwise fatalities average to something like 10-20 per year. And that's mostly because of a handful of very big accidents a few years ago.

For comparison, car fatalities in the UK run at more than 3,000 per year. I don't know what the figure worlwide is, but it's certainly going to be a non-trivial number.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 02:06:43 PM EST
In 2004, 9'309 train accidents did occur in EU-25, with 1'483 fatalities (collision, derailment, level-crossing, rolling stock in motion), but only 84 were passengers. Collisions and derailments are counting for 39 cases. (Eurostat, 2006 full report)
by Hansvon on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 05:01:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure where they got 96 for the number of UK fatalities, but that doesn't seem to be accurate. See:

http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2004/e04132.htm
http://www.hse.gov.uk/PRESS/2005/e05098.htm

for the official UK figures.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 09:30:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the solution is in the fine print, in the Annex of the press report about the 2003/4 report: the topline figures excluded trespassers and suicides.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Oct 18th, 2006 at 10:50:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Erm, to sum up what others said with some additions:

  • Train accidents, like plane accidents, are spectacular, and often affect a large number of people. Yet per the number of passengers or passenger-kilometres, trains are more safe than any other mode of transport (IIRC including walking).

  • There is indeed much more passenger transport over here than over there (though with freight, it's just the other way). (BTW, do you ride planes? Whether yes or no, are you bothered by news of plane accidents?)

  • What you posted is a Wiki list, not a statistical sample. Earlier years have fewer accidents because the record is incomplete. People can insert any minor accident that happens now, but won't bother to dig up the news records about every car crossing at red light or suicide jump.

  • Indeed the most common type of "train acident" is in truth a car accident, i.e. when a driver ignores a red light or even drives around the bars to cross the tracks. According to police statistics, in over 95% of cases the driver is at fault, yet in many places drivers will complain why the railroad 'doesn't do something'. But a result is that in most European countries, a significant part of money on railway infrastructure is spent on road under/overpasses.

  • Ah, that text-messaging girl. I hear of the most ridiculous train-car/pedestrian accidents from the USA. I don't really understand why -- yes there is car culture and all, but still there are a lot of freight trains around, and even if people don't know that trains are among the stiffest vehicles on Earth (I suspect even a collision between an oil tanker and a modern American Diesel locomotive would be 'won' by the latter: rail vehicles must have the strength to master the forces within miles long trains), one should have a basic sense of its mass, that it won't just stop next to you like a car. But I saw videos of idiots stopping right on the tracks in a traffic jam, or read of Houston drivers crossing in front of a tram...

  • I'm not aware of any rise in the number of accidents. There has been some country-specific waves. In Britain, in the wake of privatisation, everyone saved money on track maintenance -- the result was a wave of accidents (but IIRC with less a hundred deaths total), followed by a massive repair programme from tax money. But this was years ago. More recently, in Spain, Greece and Turkey, the results of governments pushing for modernisation on the cheap (e.g., slimming down projects by leaving away safety-relevant parts and redundancies, often nationally waiving existing international standards) had some unfortunate results. In ex-Yugoslavia, railways are still reeling from the devastation and neglect during the wars, today especially in Serbia.

  • Why do you say high-speed? There is no high-speed accident on the quoted list. High-speed trains are even more safe than other types of trains.

  • I note that trains, being fixed-track vehicles, can be fitted with rather well-tuned and extensive safety systems. On better networks, nowadays most real train accidents (e.g. ones not involving cars) happen under two circumstances: (a) the safety system is temporarily deactivated due some works, and dispatchers aren't used to the fallback system (I suspect this must be behind that Spanish metro accident, didn't yet read the details), (b) shunting or multiple trains at stations trick the system.


*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 03:34:37 PM EST
Hansvon brought the statistic on how much of the train deaths are actually riders of those trains.

I add that sometimes suicide can be a big factor. In the seventies-eighties, when Hungary led the world with suicide rate, jumping in front of trains was a favored method (juming in front of the subway is still one, happening multiple times a year). As a result every Hungarian train driver had this trauma at least once.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 05:42:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Some graphs taken from this German pdf:

Total number of car, train traffic deaths per year in Germany (note: the 1991 spike comes from switching from Wet German to all-German data, train deaths include cars hit in crossings):

Image Hosting by PicsPlace.to

Deaths per billion passenger-kilometres in 2004 in Germany -- motorised private vehicles, busses, trains:

Image Hosting by PicsPlace.to

Comparison of absolute number and rate per passenger-kilometre of wounded, again 2004 in Germany (green is Other, the rest like on previous graph):

Image Hosting by PicsPlace.to

European comparison of the rate of traffic deaths per billion passenger-kilometre for private motorised vehicles and trains in 2002:

Image Hosting by PicsPlace.to

Missing from this comparison is airplanes, but as I recall, in some years it's rail that's better and in others planes, depending on which has a major accident.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 04:32:44 PM EST
"I don't know if this is simply due to an increase in reporting or knowledge of contemporary events, or if it is reflective of something else. Is it just that more people are taking the train? Difficult to imagine, when cars are more readily available than ever before."

More news coverage, networks with 24 hours a day to focus on the news, more possible conflicts of pedestrians and motor vehicles with trains.

The list, however, is incomplete.  It would be extremely difficult to keep track of the (usually minor, but at least once a month somebody dies) collisions involving cars or pedestrians breaking basic safety rules in the Chicago, Illinois area alone.  (That doesn't begin to address the similar frequencies of such collisions in the big cities of Texas or California, where there are also ample opportunities for pedestrians and drivers to get in the way of trains.)

Stephen Karlson ATTITUDE is a nine letter word. BOATSPEED.

by SHKarlson (shkarlson at verizon dot net) on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 07:54:54 PM EST
In the U.S. there is a concerted effort to get rid of grade crossings, which are the biggest railroad accident problem in rural areas. The number of crossings is surprizingly high:

Across its 32,000-route-mile network, BNSF has approximately...27,500...highway-rail at-grade crossings, including about 18,000 public crossings and 9,300 private crossings.

Around 1000 people altogether die in railroad accidents, most of them at grade crossings. In most years of the last two decades, the number of railroad passenger deaths in the U.S. has been in the single digits.

The train itself is safe, but crossing the tracks isn't.

by asdf on Tue Oct 17th, 2006 at 11:50:45 PM EST
In Italy, our worst historical rail disasters were due to far-right, Gladio-linked terrorist bombings etc. during the 1960s through 1980s - those were the big killers.   I was horrified at the news of yesterday's subway accident, terribly sorry at the girl's death and all those people wounded and shocked - the accident seems to have been due to the "system" advising drivers to deliberately discount certain safeguards to speed up peak-out traffic flow, catch up on accumulated delays, plus too much overtime (100 hours per month). The train-drivers' union had been warning about this for a couple of years. There have been several rail accidents here recently, mostly on fairly minor lines, due either to human-factor or poor maintenance snarlups or to freak accidents such as a vehicle from a motorway overpass or parallel road going out of control and landing on the tracks in front of a train!  Sad and very shocking for those involved but no big-big fatalities, nothing compared to road-accident stats!

"Ignoring moralities is always undesirable, but doing so systematically is really worrisome." Mohammed Khatami
by eternalcityblues (parvati_roma aaaat libero.it) on Wed Oct 18th, 2006 at 12:00:49 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]