|
by DoDo
Who has the upper hand in corruption? The private payer who finds the weakest link and has enough money to roll over laws and law-abiding competitors, or the public official who can erect stumbling blocks if his personal black tax isn't paid?
Sometimes either, sometimes there is symbiotic entanglement between politics and business, sometimes it gets more complex. Here is an example for the latter from Hungary.
Non-partisan corruption...
In the USA, business lobbies are usually closely aligned with one of the big parties, but pay some dues as insurance policy to the other party, too. In much of the formerly communist countries, a more strict party-businessmen alignment is typical. However, at least in Hungary, there is a distinct line among the scandals of the democratic 16 years, which concern reckless businessmen with no party alignment, who in their hubris thought that tainting all with 'generosities' will make them immune from prosecution. Well that didn't exactly work out for either of them, the parties may have washed each others' hands but let these guys fall. The worst (in money terms) of these was one Gábor Princz, boss of the then half-state Postabank. He dished out large sums of money as credits to various companies not fit to re-pay them, or as sponsorship for various events. His beneficiaries included various parties or party-aligned businessmen, and his good relations went as far as stopping the publication of sensitive material by newspapers he owned at the request of party heads. This didn't save him after the elections in 1998, when the then formed government led by right-populist Fidesz booted him and took over the shop (I mean bank). And here begins a second story. ...to meta-corruption Two independent accountants put the bank's loss from bad credits at 90-95 billion Forint (c. 380-390 million ECU() in then prices). But then the new bank bosses requested a third audit, whose final report the accounting firm curiously didn't want to own, which pushed up losses to 154 billion Ft (640 million ECU()). And then it gets interesting. To consolidate the bank, a state-owned firm was supposed to buy the dead credits from the bank, and attempt to collect the dues - e.g. take over indebted limited companies and sell them. Except, about one-fifth went somewhere else: a small firm (founding capital was the ten-thousandth of the wealth received) established by the bank's bosses, thus outside direct public oversight. Due to the over-consolidation, a lot of not-so-bad companies were involved. But, according to purported internal documents published last week, this workout firm worked with a great deficit - and that because it sold companies well below market value. Sold them to businessmen close to the then new government. Who in turn - this was known before - got large orders from the government without competing, while often working at deficit themselves. And some of which today pay campaign contributions for Fidesz's election campaign.
If the story is true, then we have a party with a grand program to establish its own corrupting business circle, to compete with that of the Socialists. Down the road towards an ugly two-party system.
|
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . Search . Search (Google) . Archives (Wiki) Art, Economics, Energy, Environment, EU Politics, Mech & Tech, By Country Login
|
||
|
Non-partisan corruption, meta-corruption | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Non-partisan corruption, meta-corruption | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||
| ||||