|
by Steven D
(Also front paged at Booman Tribune)
Where to begin? Politics or violence? Violence or politics? How about this story that combines a lot of both:
BAGHDAD, Iraq -- A sister of Iraq's new Sunni Arab vice president was killed Thursday in a drive-by shooting in Baghdad, a day after the politician called for the Sunni-dominated insurgency to be crushed by force. [...] What's astonishing about this story is that this is the second family member of this prominent Iraqi politician to be killed in two weeks. Think about that. Imagine if Vice president Cheney's sister, Susan, had been shot and killed leaving her home just weeks after his brother Bob had been gunned down in Washington D.C. Imagine the panic and sense of crisis that would ensue. Then combine that with a security situation where rival gangs of armed men roamed the streets of our Nation's capitol, unchecked by any legitimate law enforcement authority, because the police were either outgunned, or infiltrated by members of these various gangs, who also had embedded themselves within the National Guard forces that had been brought in assist the with the security situation in the Capitol. You cannot divorce the political situation in Iraq from the violence. They go hand in hand. Then again, we don't have a population which has been bombed, shot, illegally detained, tortured, raped, starved and which lacks adequate water, medical treatment, waste disposal and electrical power. Oh, and one other thing -- we aren't a nation occupied by a foreign power who refuses to leave even as their very presence fuels the continuing cycle of violence. But I digress. Follow me below the fold for the rest of the latest news from Iraq . . .
Meanwhile, out in the country, American forces are not the only targets of insurgent attacks, as evidenced by this story regarding Romanian and Italian troops stationed near Nasiriyah in southern Iraq:
A bomb blast rocked an Italian convoy at a base in southern Iraq on Thursday, killing three Italian soldiers and a Romanian, the Defense Ministry said. Something tells me that our Italian and Romanian coalition partners may decide to accelerate the withdrawal of their forces after this incident. Most of these troops have been stationed in what were perceived to be relatively "safe" regions where Shi'a populations were predominate. This attack senss the message that no area is safe anymore, Sunni or Shi'a. Meanwhile, not saying we've managed to install a Shi'ite theocracy in power as a result of our invasion, but I do find it significant that this was one of the first official acts of newly appointed Prime Minister al-Maliki:
NAFAJ, Iraq - Iraq's Shi'ite Prime Minister-designate Nuri al Maliki, who is forming a government of national unity, on Thursday met with top cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, one of Iraq's most influential men.
Literally a day after he meets with the US Secretaries of State and Defense, Rice and Rumsfeld, who does the Prime Minister of Iraq visit to consult and discuss the critical issues facing his nation? Why a Shi'ite religious leader who holds no official position in the government, who did not run for any office, and who claims he has no desire to directly participate in his country's politics. Of course, this shouldn't surprise anyone, since Sistani has been a mover and a shaker behind the scenes in Iraq from before George Bush declared "Mission Accomplished." From all reports he is the one authority to whom all of the political parties in the Shi'ite alliance pay homage. Nonetheless, this visit reinforces the perception that Shi'ite rule in Iraq will also include a significant role for Shia religious leaders. Not exactly the type of democracy Mr. Bush promoted in the US media as the goal of our policy in Iraq. But getting back to that well publicized trip by Ms. Rice and Mr. Rumsfeld, we know how it's being spun in the US, but how exactly do the Iraqi's themselves feel about what it accomplished? This article from the LA Times (via the online edition of the Boston Globe) attempts to answer that very question:
Surprise visit by Rice, Rumsfeld gets mixed reviews in Iraq Guess that whole sovereignty thing is going to their heads. They're actually telling George Bush to just butt out. Not to worry, though. I'm sure he'll never hear about this from Condi and the Donald. Why spoil his day with any bad news, right? By the way, here's some more news I bet doesn't cross the President's desk today (from the WaPo story I first linked above):
The clashes northeast of Baghdad occurred when insurgents attacked four Iraqi police checkpoints in Baqouba, a Sunni-Shiite city 35 miles northeast of the capital, police and residents said. U.S. forces have been gradually turning over security responsibilities to Iraqis. 134 Iraqis dead from violence since Saturday? A mere pittance to pay for the onrushing tide of Freedom and Democracy in Iraq. Besides, as we all know, the US doesn't do body counts. Officially, that is. And just in case you thought that the chaos in Iraq only involved the Iraqi people, let me leave you with these two troubling stories, the first involving Iran:
According to pro-PKK websites, the Iranian armed forces launched a major attack on PKK positions in the areas of Haci Umran ve Berdesor near the border with north Iraq. and the second, our good friend and NATO ally in the region, Turkey:
Disturbed by the Turkish Armed Forces' troop deployment to the border to prevention terrorist infiltration, Iraq issued a diplomatic note asking Turkey "to stop hot pursuit." Good thing the Kurds are our friends, too. I'm sure that our influence with them will help us sort this all out and make everybody happy again. Right? Right?
|
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . Search . Search (Google) . Archives (Wiki) Art, Economics, Energy, Environment, EU Politics, Mech & Tech, By Country Login
|
||
|
Your Daily Dose of Iraq | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Your Daily Dose of Iraq | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||
| ||||