European Breakfast - May 9

by Fran
Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:37:19 AM EST

"Each friend represents a world in us, a world not born until they arrive, and it is only by this meeting that a new world is born.”

Anais Nin


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
EUROPEAN NEWS
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:38:22 AM EST
Guardian: EU plans to go it alone with aid for Palestinians

· Humanitarian crisis could deepen, report warns
· Quartet seeks to bypass Hamas in providing funds

The EU is preparing to go it alone and channel emergency funds to the Palestinians if talks with the US, Russia and United Nations on setting up an international mechanism for easing their financial plight fail this week, senior officials indicated at the weekend.

Pressure for a swift agreement on supplying food and other aid directly to Palestinians as well as money to pay the salaries of health workers and teachers intensified when President Mahmoud Abbas and Ismail Haniyeh, prime minister of the Hamas-led government, failed to resolve the crisis over the weekend.

The US and EU suspended direct funding to the Hamas government early last month, leaving 165,000 public employees of the Palestinian Authority (PA) unpaid so far this month. According to a Brussels document, the crisis in Gaza and the West Bank could deepen in the next few months, leading to "greatly increased unemployment and poverty levels, and possibly the breakdown of law and order".

The "quartet" of peace mediators - the EU, US, Russia and UN - will discuss in New York tomorrow plans put forward by Britain and France for the "international mechanism" to bypass both Hamas and President Abbas and provide funds and aid through bodies such as the World Bank, IMF or the UN itself.

But Washington has resisted the idea of paying overdue salaries to workers in essential services such as health and education. Its tougher stance, with Israel's backing, is seen by some Palestinians as not so much an effort to change Hamas policies as to change the regime.

Benita Ferrero-Waldner, EU external affairs commissioner, who was in Egypt at the weekend, said: "We do hope there's a chance for a common agreement on this issue." She refused to set a deadline but admitted that the humanitarian crisis among Palestinians was worsening.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:45:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Independent:  Britain may give up its EU veto on home affairs

Europe's heads of government will be asked next month to weaken their hold over cross-border police and judicial co-operation in a move that could herald a new era of European integration.

The plan, to be debated at a summit in June, is designed to show the EU can shake off the political paralysis caused by the French and Dutch rejections of the European constitution.

The Commission president, Jose Manuel Barroso, said he would use the summit to call for countries to pool more powers in a "large number" of areas of police and judicial co-operation.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:48:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Somewhat related

The Economist: Shopping for low tax rates is no crime


THE difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance, Denis Healey, a former chancellor once said, is the thickness of a prison wall. Now, it seems, it is the thickness of a lawyer's brief. Two rulings this week, one European and one British, grappled with the conundrum of how authorities in one country levy tax on profits earned in another. The first makes it easier for British companies (and, by extension, other European firms) to cut their tax bills by setting up subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions, while the second makes it harder for British individuals to do the same.

In the first case, brought by Cadbury Schweppes, which makes soft drinks and confectionery, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) looked at whether Britain could impose a top-up tax on profits that Cadbury had earned in two subsidiaries in Ireland. It was no idle question. The Irish tax rate was just 10% while Britain's was 30%; the taxmen demanded the difference. On trial was the British practice of peering into a firm's heart, examining its motives for setting up a foreign subsidiary and imposing its own tax rates on profits earned there if it finds the impure desire to pay less tax.

Philippe Léger, the ECJ's Advocate General, ruled on May 2nd in a non-binding opinion that wanting to minimise tax is no crime: companies may happily shop around for the lowest rate when deciding where to establish subsidiaries. Ireland, Luxembourg, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia all have corporation-tax rates below 20% and stand to gain if firms are allowed to hunt for low tax rates as they do for low wages.

This was a blow for the British government, which is trying to protect its revenue base from the encroachments of European integration. Last year it failed in an attempt to ring-fence tax losses made by foreign subsidiaries of Marks & Spencer, a retailer. " We are seeing the ever-increasing erosion of member states' sovereignty on the issue of national tax ," says Mark Persoff of Clifford Chance, a legal firm.

So Europe is blamed because it "erodes national sovereignty", precisely because it says that European countries are free to play with corporate taxes as they see fit and corporations are free to take advantage of it across Europe?!?

The gall. Un-fuckin-believable.

Europe is bad, until it's needed for parochial reasons, and then it is needed to bang heads. But it's still blamed in the meantime.

Gah.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 04:32:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
while the second makes it harder for British individuals to do the same.

What was that about?

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 04:43:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Financial Times: EU delays Sofia and Bucharest decision

Bulgaria's prime minister yesterday appealed to the European Union not to "humiliate" his country, as EU leaders prepared to make Sofia sweat over whether it could join next year.

José Manuel Barroso, European Commission president, has decided to delay by up to five months a decision on whether Bulgaria and Romania should join the EU in 2007, to assess whether they are serious about tackling corruption and organised crime. His biggest concerns are over Bulgaria, where police and judicial reforms have so far failed to yield high-level prosecutions of criminal bosses or crooked politicians.

Olli Rehn, EU enlargement commissioner, has praised Romania's progress but has called on Sofia to be "much more vigorous" on crime.

Mr Rehn had hoped to be in a position to recommend an entry date for both countries in a report to EU leaders on May 16, but senior Commission officials told the FT the final decision would be delayed until the autumn, possibly until October.

The Commission wants to apply maximum pressure on EU applicants to meet high standards before they join, partly to assuage doubts in western Europe over the speed of enlargement.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:06:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Independent:  Blair backs down on 'full term' pledge but refuses to set a date

Tony Blair has conceded he will not serve a "full term" before standing down but rejected pressure from Labour MPs for him to announce his departure date.

The Prime Minister told the Parliamentary Labour Party last night that he would give "ample time" to his successor to take over before the next general election. He denied he would damage Labour's prospects by hanging on too long, saying: "My legacy is a fourth term for Labour."

Although two MPs, Andrew Smith and Geraldine Smith, urged Mr Blair to announce his departure timetable, most of those present appeared to welcome his assurances. There was growing speculation that he would quit in May next year after completing 10 years in Downing Street.

After a packed, one-hour meeting, critics welcomed Mr Blair's shift away from his previous formula that he would serve a full term. "We have been eyeball-to-eyeball and the Prime Minister just blinked," one said.

Earlier, Mr Blair had a meeting with Gordon Brown at Downing Street at which they held "talks about talks" on how to handle the succession and end the damaging infighting that has erupted since Labour lost more than 300 seats at Thursday's local elections.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:14:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Telegraph: Blair: I'll quit next year - trust me

Tony Blair abandoned his election promise to serve a full third term last night, indicating that he could stand down next summer.

Although he refused to set a timetable for his departure, saying that it would paralyse government, he anointed Gordon Brown as his successor and promised to give him sufficient time to establish himself before the next election.

As the Labour Party stood on the brink of civil war over the timing of the succession, the Prime Minister acknowledged that he could not go on to the end of his third term, which could last until 2009 or even 2010. He appealed to the party to calm down and trust him to "honour" his commitment to ensure a stable and orderly transition, "with the time plainly needed for my successor to establish himself".

At a packed meeting of Labour MPs at Westminster, Mr Blair spoke of allowing his successor "ample" time, saying that he wanted his legacy to be a "fourth term for Labour".

One of the MPs present said he expected Mr Blair to hand over to Mr Brown at the party conference in the autumn of 2007, giving the new leader 18 months to prepare for the next election. Although some MPs were critical of Mr Blair, party officials said the majority had been reassured by his promise to allow "plenty of time" for his successor.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:27:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Blair said no such thing. Ample time was his only comment, he gave no commitment to next year or 18 months or anything.

This is Clinton-esque, ample has now become the "is". It depends on what the meaning is.

Given that Blair, via John Reid, has made plain his view that Brown is Old Labour, it is obvious that Blair will hang on and on waiting like Rapunzel for somebody else to let his hair down for. And if the tower rots around him, then so be it.

David Cameron must be beside himself with glee.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:34:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Even with the naive title and somewhat 'reformist' text, did the appearance this article made me happy!

Frontpage intro translation:

The Progidy of the Left Could Fall Into His Sword

The air is getting thinner around Tony Bliar. This is not the first time there is rebellion against him in his party, but the politician admired abroad by many, for example [Hungarian PM] Ferenc Gyurcsány, won't be able to last much longer.

If Bliar's utterly disgusting stardom among European centre-left leaders could end, that will be the end of the Third Way 'New Left' and could lead to a continent-wide re-thinking.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:17:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Dream on, DoDo. Why the optimism?

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu May 11th, 2006 at 04:15:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Uh-oh! Don't tell anyone! You didn't see anything, did you?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu May 11th, 2006 at 04:26:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And so the Great White Disappointed's tenure is finally nearing its end.  If he had only told Bush to shove it....

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Thu May 11th, 2006 at 03:45:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Financial Times: Italy fails to elect head of state

Italy's feuding politicians failed to elect a head of state yesterday as tensions rose between Romano Prodi's incoming centre-left government and the outgoing centre-right coalition of Silvio Berlusconi.

Mr Prodi's coalition supports Giorgio Napolitano, 80, a former communist. Mr Berlusconi's coalition nominated Gianni Letta, 71, a former Berlusconi personal assistant

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:19:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC: Euro-constitution makes a comeback

The vexed question of what to do about the European constitution returns to the agenda this week.

It's nearly a year since Dutch and French voters said No to the draft constitution, throwing the process into turmoil.

Afterwards, the EU declared a "period of reflection". For the constitution's supporters, it was a time to examine the options: for its opponents, a time to put the constitution on ice.

But now the period of reflection is drawing to a close, although there will be no formal decisions on a way forward until the first half of next year, when Germany takes over the rotating presidency of the EU.

Commission proposal

On Monday, a two-day forum on the future of Europe opened at the European Parliament in Brussels. It is addressing topics such as globalisation, justice and security, and Europe's place in the world. But its underlying theme is the constitution.

On Tuesday, Estonia is expected to become the thirteenth of the 25 EU states to ratify. Finland is likely to follow suit, probably in the second half of the year, during its term in the EU presidency.

Later in the week, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, is expected to outline her policy on the EU and Germany's role within it, especially with regards to further enlargement.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:44:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
WORLD NEWS
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:39:17 AM EST
Tehran Times: S. Africa says IAEA only body to verify Iranian nuclear program

PRETORIA (IRNA) -- South African Deputy Foreign Minister Aziz Pahad said that International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is the only specialized body eligible to ensure that Iranian nuclear program is for civilian purpose.

"At the board of governors we consistently argued that we have not exhausted the IAEA processes. Indeed, they sent the issue to the Security Council before even Mr. ElBaradei presented his report. We were arguing that this is an unnecessary haste.

"Our argument was that we should give more time for the Iranians to comply with the remaining issues, since they had complied already. We cannot say that the remaining two issues cannot be resolved. We think that they can be resolved," he told IRNA.

"Of course, we defend the right of all the signatories to NPT to have the right to use nuclear power for peacefully means. We ourselves are working on that program, but, at the same time we understand that a climate of mistrust has been created and so we should now try to see what we can do within the rights of Iran's sovereignty and its right to have civilian nuclear technology to build confidence and I believe this is a big challenge for Iran to build that confidence, so that we don't allow the Security Council process to escalate.

"We have to wait and see if the Russians and the Chinese are going to allow the Security Council to pass the latest resolution on that issue."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:41:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Dawn: US proposes financial boycott of Iran

VIENNA, May 8: The United States has outlined a strategy for Iran to be `shunned by the international financial community' over its nuclear programme, Western officials said in recent interviews.

"The objective of this strategy is for the United States government and key overseas partners to pressure and isolate the Iranian regime by creating a dynamic in which the government of Iran, or key elements thereof, is shunned by the international financial community," said one official.

The financial front is clearly a key one in this drive, especially as it has a `relatively small cost' for Western nations and avoids `using oil or trade embargoes', the official said.

Non-proliferation analyst Mark Fitzpatrick said: "It's important for the West to have other sanctions options outside the United Nations and employing the United States' leverage on the international banking system is one that is very appealing to Washington."

"Financial measures are seen as the perfect sanctions that can directly impact the leadership and not the general public," Mr Fitzpatrick said at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) think tank in London.

He said the US administration had already last year authorised the Treasury and State departments to freeze the assets of companies or individuals `involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction' and three Iranian entities were named, including the Atomic Energy Organisation.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:03:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Seattlepi: Iraq tries to stop foreign insurgents

FORT TARIK, Iraq -- They look more like motels in rural America than forts in a war zone, but a string of low concrete structures are the U.S.-led coalition's first line of defense against foreign fighters trying to sneak into Iraq from Iran and Syria.

The United States has built or renovated nearly 260 forts along Iraq's borders, and installations like Fort Tarik south of the Iranian city of Mehran have taken on new importance because of the showdown with Tehran over its disputed nuclear program.

The small fort sits within sight of two Iranian border outposts, and a tour of Tarik on Sunday showed just how tough it can be for coalition forces to adequately patrol a remote desert landscape without a nearby town or village.

Border patrols based at Fort Tarik recently captured several suspected Iranian intelligence agents who had crossed into Iraq, a U.S. official said.

bold mine

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:42:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So they have not been able to renovate or build schools and hospitals, but they have been able to build and renovate almost 260 army installations, says a lot doesn't it?
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:43:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Baghdad is now getting an average of 1h of electricity a day.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 02:51:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Got a source on that?
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:22:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's see...
Juan Cole: Black Sunday Yields 81 Dead in Iraqi Bloodbaths - Interior Admits Death Squads (May 8 2006)
Dan Murphy reports from Baghdad that the situation in the capital is rapidly deteriorating. It is down to only 3 hours of electricity a day. 2500 persons have been killed in religious reprisal attacks since late February. And not only are the militias of religious parties powerful, but now each neighborhood is throwing up its own militia.
Ok, that's 3h a day... This is the source Cole quotes:
Christian Science Monitor: Death squads deepen division in Baghdad (May 08, 2006)
Today, Baghdad appears to be more divided and war-torn than at any point since the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime. Most basic services are at an all-time low (Baghdad is averaging about three hours of power a day) and traditionally mixed Shiite and Sunni Arab neighborhoods continue to feel the impact of the slow seeping away of their diversity as families flee across the city's confessional front lines.

But I have seen the 1h figure somewhere recently...
Riverbend: 2006... (2006 January 4)
Here we are in the first days of 2006. What does the `6' symbolize? How about- 6 hours of no electricity for every one hour of electricity? Or... 6 hours of waiting in line for gasoline that is three times as expensive as it was in 2005? Or an average of six explosions per day near our area alone?

...

"B. why has the price of these lousy CDs gone up so much???" I demanded from the shop owner who is also a friend, "Don't tell me your supplier has also pushed the prices up on you because of the gasoline shortage?" I asked sarcastically. No- supplies cost the same for him- he has not needed to stock up yet. But this is how he explained it: his car takes 60 liters of gasoline. It needs to be refueled every 2-3 days. The official price of gasoline was 50 Iraqi dinars before, so it cost him around 3000 dinars to fill up his car, which was nearly two dollars. Now it costs 9000 Iraqi dinars IF he fills it up at a gas station and not using black market gasoline which will cost him around 15,000 dinars- five times the former price- and this every two to three days. He also has to purchase extra gasoline for the shop generator which needs to be working almost constantly, now that electricity is about four hours daily. "Now how am I supposed to cover that increase in my costs if I don't sell CDs at a higher price?"


No, that's not it, either... Maybe under the Oval Office desk? Lemme look...
EPIC: Insurgent Attacks Leave Baghdad with One Hour of Electricity (4 May 2006)
An insurgent attack on a major power plant near Baghdad on April 30th has caused severe electricity shortages for nearly six million households.  For three consecutive days Baghdad residents have received less than one hour of electricity per day and the Ministry of Electricity said it would probably take a week or more to restore the power to its previous level, which was six hours daily.
With summer beginning and temperatures rising, residents are expressing frustration. "I've lost all the meat I had in my refrigerator because my generator's broken," said Baghdad shopkeeper Ahmed el-Zein. "Insurgents attack the plants to hurt the government, but it's the innocent population that suffers.
Officials say it will take about two years and massive funding to achieve the minimum power levels needed to sustain electricity for Iraq's population.
Bingo!
The EPIC piece refers to this othe one:
Reuters AlertNet: RAQ: In capital, frequent power cuts inconvenience thousands (03 May 2006)
Which is itself sourced from IRIN, the UN's Integrated Regional Information Network.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:39:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No doubt they're checking on techniques as practice for the Mexican and Canadian borders.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:37:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's see what the state of play in Iraq is, according to the UN's regional information network (IRIN):
Displaced from 2003 still homeless , say analysts (May 8)
Local aid agencies warn that families displaced immediately following the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 still remain homeless
Wasit residents protest fuel shortages, allege official corruption (May 8)
Residents of Wasit province, some 160km south of Baghdad, have accused local officials of corruption and collaboration with black-market fuel dealers.
UN report cites vast under-nutrition among children (May 8)
One in three Iraqi children is malnourished and underweight, according to a report released by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) in Amman on 2 May.
Government reiterates readiness to fight bird flu (May 3)
The government has said it is prepared to fight any new cases of bird flu and that the situation is under control.
In capital, frequent power cuts inconvenience thousands (May 3)
About six million households have suffered regular power shortages since 30 April when insurgents attacked a major power plant supplying the capital, causing serious problems for families without access to private generators.


By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:46:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Spiegel Online: OPINION - The Most Powerless Man in the World

US President George W. Bush isn't known for his willingness for giving interviews, but he recently sat down with German TV presenter Sabine Christiansen for 30 minutes. He answered her questions readily -- but also showed that he's become little more than a spectator of his own political decline.

A man and a woman sit in front of an unlit fireplace in the White House. The woman is Germany's most well known TV presenter. The man is the most powerful man in the world -- or at least that's how he's introduced before the interview begins. And yet what we're shown on German ARD public television Sunday night is really a trans-Atlantic misunderstanding. Sabine Christiansen, who asks George W. Bush about one pressing global issue after another -- and who is relatively insistent when it comes to human rights issues -- isn't really talking to the most powerful man in the world at all. In the spring of 2006, one-and-a-half years after Bush's triumphant re-election, she may in fact be speaking to the most powerless US president of all time.

In the past 60 years, only one American president had worse poll ratings 18 months after his election: Richard Nixon at the end of his stint in office. Bush could safely ignore those polls if everything else were okay -- but at the moment nothing is. For some time now, the president has become an observer of his own political decline. But the world of television often has little to do with reality and Bush's plunge was hardly an issue in the interview.

Iraq is a long way from developing into the model democracy that Bush wanted to create by toppling Saddam Hussein. Iran is pressing ahead with its nuclear program, unimpressed by Washington's threats. Compared to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahamdinejad and his fantasies about the annihilation of Israel, Saddam Hussein was a tinhorn despot.

From hawk to dove?

Bush's answer to the question of how he will respond to the threats from Tehran is a far cry from the hawkish rhetoric we've grown used to. Diplomacy, diplomacy, diplomacy -- that's what he's betting on, at least for now. The hawks in Washington are burned out; they have no answers to what's happening in Iran. Oh wait, there's also Latin America, where they're electing one leftist government after another. What would once have given rise to crisis meetings and secret military plans doesn't even seem to be worth a question anymore.


by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:46:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I amazed by this piece in Der Spiegel.  It seems to completely misread Bush and his administration.  The interviews cited don't back up the claim that the line has softened.  What's going on here?
by goinsouth (imgoinsouth@gmail.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:19:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
See also this diary on dKos about Bush's interview: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/8/224347/9374

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:15:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 04:30:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Guardian: US rejects Iran's first letter in 27 years after it ducks nuclear issue

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, sent a letter yesterday to George Bush - the first such communication for 27 years - offering an analysis of global issues and "new ways of getting out of the current delicate situation in the world".

The US last night rejected the letter as having no relevance. A US state department spokesman said: "Nothing in the letter addresses the issues on the table between Iran and the world, whether on the nuclear issue, terrorism or human rights."

He added: "Instead, it is a broad historical, philosophical exposition."
The 18-page letter, which did not directly mention the nuclear dispute but ranges over issues such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, came as the foreign ministers of the US, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China met in New York to discuss tabling a United Nations security council resolution against Iran.

The meeting marked the international debut of Margaret Beckett, the new foreign secretary. She met Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, for a one-on-one at the Waldorf hotel before sitting down to dinner with representatives from France, Germany, Russia and China.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:51:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
After meeting Ms Rice, Mrs Beckett made her first public comment as foreign secretary: "I am delighted to be here." She said she had heard so much about Ms Rice from her predecessor, Jack Straw, who enjoyed a strong rapport with his US counterpart, that "I feel as if I know you already". Ms Rice said they had compared backgrounds and how they had risen to their present positions in politics.

Mrs Beckett, still getting up to speed, had no public comment on Iran, while Ms Rice reiterated that the international community had to send a clear message that it could not develop a nuclear weapon.

Still getting up to speed... no public comments on Iran... For crying out loud, Ms. Beckett, it's not like you haven't been in the cabinet since 1997... Blair could have given you some instructions... You could have summoned a procession of experts (from the Foreign Office, from the MI6...) to your office between your appointment and your trip to the US in order to get "up to speed"... Arrgh!

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:03:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry, Beckett will still be getting up to speed in 2008/9. "9/11 ? Still reading the brefing about that"

Her performance at DEFRA merited sacking, not promotion.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:46:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd have a field day during the Questions period at the commons on this "getting up to speed" thing.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:48:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's tempting, but I think they'd be better advised to sit it out and keep it as a trump card for when you need it. Why bother trying when your opponents are doing your job far more viciously than you'd dare ?

Even the Independent said that John Reid only needed a blue badge to be a Conservative election agent.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:03:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
By "they" you mean the tories... I'm thinking Labour Backbenchers, Plaid Cymru, or the LibDems.

Plais Cymru seem more up to the task than anyone else, from what I've been gathering.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:08:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Guardian article is so poorly written it's not even possible to be sure whether they have seen the letter or not...

Reuters: Iran letter faults US, makes no nuclear proposals (Tue May 9, 2006)

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has written President Bush a rambling 18-page treatise detailing alleged American foreign policy misdeeds and defending scientific research as "one of the basic rights of nations."

The document, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters on Tuesday, argues generally that globally shared religious values should govern political life but makes no proposals for resolving the West's concerns over Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

Iran insists it is enriching uranium -- and improving its techniques -- solely to produce electricity for domestic consumption, while the West argues the program is a cover for making nuclear weapons.

The letter, received by the White House on Monday but not made public, was the first publicly announced personal communication from an Iranian president to his U.S. counterpart since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

At least Reuters claim to have seen the letter, while the Guardian engages in he-said-she-said.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:10:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Isn't the letter showing at least a willingness to talk by Iran?

Why isn't this grabbed as an opportunity (to find a solution, I mean, not for grandstanding)? Why do I even bother to ask such questions?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:17:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Haven't you understood yet that it's not for the US to solve allof the world's problems? Why should the US alone talk to Iran, instead of the broad International Community? </snark>

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:25:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Gulf News: Venezuela wants 50% tax on Orinoco projects

Caracas: Venezuela is seeking to raise income tax on Orinoco Belt heavy crude upgrading projects to 50 per cent from 34 per cent, President Hugo Chavez said on Sunday.

"Income tax on oil operations is 50 per cent, and they are still paying less than 50 per cent," said Chavez during his weekly Sunday broadcast. "They are at ... 34 [per cent]. We're going to take that to 50 per cent."

Four joint ventures with state oil giant PDVSA currently process some 600,000 barrels per day of heavy crude. Partner companies include Chevron, ExxonMobil, Norway's Statoil and France's Total.

Venezuela's Seniat tax authority earlier this year proposed a reform of the nation's income tax law to raise taxation on all upstream oil production to 50 per cent.

Energy Minister Rafael Ramirez, who is also president of PDVSA, told reporters in March he agreed with the proposed increase for Orinoco projects.

Venezuela's Congress will have to approve a reform of the income tax law

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 02:00:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
La Jornada: Mexicans Reclaim Lands That America Once Annexed

According to this op-ed article from Mexico's La Jornada, since the 1840s, Washington has tried and failed to hinder Mexicans and Latin Americans from entering what was once Mexican territory. Today Hispanics are regaining control - through the ballot box.

Mexico was not very populated when it gained its independence in 1821. Only 6 million inhabitants resided within its territory of over 4 million square kilometers [1,544,408.63 square miles]. Mexico's northern neighbor, [the U.S.] then of a similar size, had a population twice that of Mexico. Thanks to the reports provided to President Thomas Jefferson by Baron Alexander Von Humboldt during his stay in Washington, the Americans were well informed of the situation in the northern regions of New Spain. Despite their great natural resources, these immense territories, encompassing Texas, New Mexico and California, and lands as far north as the 42nd parallel, were nearly unpopulated. Only indigenous groups and close to 40,000 mestizos and descendants of the Spaniards lived there.

[Editor's Notes: Mestizos are people of mixed European and indigenous - Indian - ancestry. Baron Alexander Von Humboldt  was a German scientist who was stranded in Mexico when his ship ran aground].

Joel R. Poinsett, the first American ambassador to newly independent Mexico, made an offer to purchase these northern regions. The response of the Minister of Foreign Relations, Lucas Alaman, was that Mexico was not for sale. Alaman also succeeded in getting the United States to ratify the Treaty of Limits that Mexico had signed with Spain in 1819. This was achieved in 1833. However, this didn't end the ambition of the Americans. Anglo-Saxon colonists, many of whom had settled in Texas, sought to separate themselves from Mexico until they achieved their real goal: the annexation [of this territory] to the United States in 1845.

Two years later, this country began a war of conquest against Mexico. A new Treaty of Limits followed that war. Mexico lost half of its territory, one of the largest takeovers in world history.

[Editor's Note: The most important consequence of the Mexican-American War (1846-1848) was the resulting "sale" of the Mexican territories of California and New Mexico to the U.S. and recognition of the annexation of Republic of Texas. ].

Certainly it is true that Mexico had not been able to populate this enormous territory. But history often surprises us. What didn't happen then, in fact, happened much later. Just as in other countries, Mexico experienced a baby boom after the 1940's. Before that, the United States, thanks to the immigration of millions of Europeans and, on a smaller scale, Asians, had managed to populate its enormous territory. Soon, thousands of Mexicans were also attracted, hoping to take a stab at the American Dream. As time went on, this attraction grew to an extent that could no longer be contained.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 02:11:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Jerusalem Post: 'Iran can also be wiped off the map' (May 9, 2006)
Vice Premier Shimon Peres said Monday that "the president of Iran should remember that Iran can also be wiped off the map."

"Teheran is making a mockery of the international community's efforts to solve the crisis surrounding Iran's nuclear program," Peres told Reuters, adding that "Iran presents a danger to the entire world, not just to us."



By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 02:57:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ah, theres nothing like a bit of international name-calling to fill your heart with hope for a sane and peaceful future.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:51:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Aside from misquoting what Ahmadinejad actually said, this has a slight flavor of "my big brother's gonna kick your ass".

Juan Cole is all over this today:

Shimon Peres says he wants to remind Iran that it, too, can be wiped off the face of the earth, implying that Israel is capable of obliterating it with its nuclear arsenal. Peres also had the gall to blame Iran for provoking a nuclear arms race in the area!

There is no evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, as opposed to a still backward civilian energy research program. But if you were Iran's security establishment, what would you conclude you had to do after Peres's remarks?

The misquotation of Ahmadinejad, who actually quoted Khomeini as saying, "This occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time," now seems all by itself to be producing visions of nuclear war!



Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:29:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As if it were Iran's fault that Pakistan [its unfriendly neighbour to the Southeast] has the bomb.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:32:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Pakistan only has the bomb because they knew Iran might try to get the bomb. Think of it as pre-emptive deterrence.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:33:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Pakistan has the Bomb because India was getting it. And India got it because China had it, it being China that gave Pakistan what it needed to build a nuclear weapons program.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:34:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, Iran must have bribed the Chinese with oil to persuade them to get the bomb. It's Iran's fault, remember?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:35:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
China's first nuclear test was in 1964, after the 1960 sino-soviet split. So either the Soviets gave the bomb to the Chinese, or the Chinese developed it because the Soviets had it.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:41:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It was the Iranians I tell you. Wasn't there a commie in power there during the 60s?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:44:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That was before 1953, and he wasn't a commie.
Juan Cole: Ahmadinejad as W.'s Penpal - Ebadi warns of another Iraq (May 9 2006)
In any case, his letter to Bush holds no prospect of reducing tensions. It should be remembered that then Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh angered Washington in the early 1950s by nationalizing Iranian petroleum. Eisenhower slapped sanctions on Iran and destroyed its economy. Washington at that time thought Mosaddegh was a pinko, though in fact he was a relatively conservative aristocrat. At the height of the crisis, Mosaddegh wrote a letter to Eisenhower, which was ignored. Ike had the CIA overthrow the elected, parliamentary government of Iran and install the Shah as a megalomaniacal dictator. So the tradition of letter-writing by Iranian leaders at times of tensions with Washington isn't replete with successes. Of course, the Iranians took revenge for the heavy-handed US interference with their form of government. They made an Islamic Revolution in 1978-79, and more recently elected Ahmadinejad. What Washington wouldn't do to have that nice Mr. Mosaddegh back.
(emphasis mine)

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:48:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
nationalizing Iranian petroleum

Huh. That there is proof enough for me. Evil commie.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:49:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

At the height of the crisis, Mosaddegh wrote a letter to Eisenhower, which was ignored.

Sounds familiar? Desperate pinkos indeed.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 08:01:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Wasn't there a breakfast discussion (and a diary) on Saddam's last-ditch diplomatic efforts to stop a US invasion in 2002/2003 (basically, offering everything that the US was asking, and more, except for Saddam's head).

Desperate pinkos all of them.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 08:25:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
From 1953 to 1979, Iran was a US client.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:49:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So they could have passed US nuclear secrets to the Chinese so that they'd pass them to India!
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:50:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hmm...
Originally started under the Shah of Iran in the 1950s, with the help of the United States, the Iranian nuclear program is an effort by Iran to develop nuclear technology. (wikipedia)


By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:51:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Huh. I thought JC was referring to Israel.

Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 08:25:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
THIS AND THAT
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:40:09 AM EST
Khaleej Times: Ancient bronze horseman fished from Greek seas

ATHENS -- A Greek fisherman has netted the remains of a bronze horseman and an amphora, treasures from ancient Greece preserved for two millenia in the Aegean Sea, officials said yesterday.

The haul, which the man discovered in his nets off the island of Kalymnos last Tuesday, was delivered to police who then handed it over to archeology service officials, the culture ministry said in a statement.

Greece, as part of a program to recuperate and preserve ancient artifacts, offers treasure finders a reward worth 10 percent of the object's value to return it to state authorities.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 12:56:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yahoo: Newspaper Circulation Down, Web Readers Up

NEW YORK - Daily circulation fell 2.5 percent at U.S. newspapers in the six-month period ending in March, according to data released Monday, reflecting the industry's ongoing struggle to retain paying customers amid competition from the Internet and other media outlets.

The Newspaper Association of America, analyzing data from the Audit Bureau of Circulations, also reported that Sunday circulation fell 3.1 percent at the 610 newspapers reporting those figures. The 2.5 percent decline in average paid weekday circulation was based on data from 770 newspapers reporting to the Audit Bureau.

The overall decline in both weekday and Sunday circulation were approximately the same as those given in the previous six-month reporting cycle for the period ending last September.

Newspaper circulation has been in general decline for years as many people, particularly young adults, turn to other media outlets including cable TV and the Internet for news and information. Also, tougher rules on telemarketing have forced newspapers to find other ways to attract new readers.

Despite the decline in paid copies, newspapers are seeing a greater number of visitors to their Web sites. The NAA also reported Monday that newspaper-run sites had an overall 8 percent increase in viewers in the first quarter.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:11:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
accounting web: Research Shows Myths Behind U.S. Social Mobility

AccountingWEB.com - Apr-19-2006 - Is there any more 'American' story than the immigrant who earns success through hard work, determination and sheer grit?

This story is ingrained in the American psyche, but recent research is exploding the myths of the land of opportunity. Perhaps the United States was never a classless society, but it is certainly more rigid today than ever. These days, if you're born into a poor family, you're likely to die poor. If you're born into riches, you'll stay rich. If your parents are middle-class, the chances of ending up on a higher rung of the economic ladder are far smaller than you might think.

According to research cited in a new paper written by Alan Berube, a Brookings Institution scholar and metropolitan policy expert, the U.S. is becoming increasingly less socially mobile. Across the 1990s, about 40 percent of U.S. families ended the decade in the same income bracket in which they began, versus 36-37 percent in the 1970s and 1980s. More than half the families at the bottom were still there after 10 years.

Several serious examinations of class mobility-or more accurately the lack thereof-are drawing attention to the barriers that hinder movement from one social class to the next. As the divide between the haves and have-nots grows, the more difficult it is to climb from one rung to the next, Berube wrote.

He pointed out that in 2004 and 2005, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, have all written series of articles on the subject of whether and how Americans are moving up the ladder. And in the United Kingdom, the issue has taken central stage in the public debate, Berube said in "Overcoming Barriers to Mobility: The Role of Place in the United States and UK."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:23:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's saddening to start the day with yet another example of America hatred on this site.

Afew RED-HOT HATE Technology ™
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 02:18:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Independent: 'Robin Hood' gang rob gourmet stores in bid to feed Hamburg's poor

They dress up in pink catsuits, have names like "Spider Mum" and feel a social obligation to plunder the most expensive restaurants and gourmet delicatessens in town as part of a campaign to help the poor.

Last week the well-heeled citizens of Hamburg's Altona district got a taste of their antics when 30 of them marched into the city's luxury "Fresh Paradise Goedeken" supermarket and walked out five minutes later with €15,000 (£10,000) worth of stolen goods.

The gang's booty included magnums of Champagne at €99 a bottle, filets of Japanese Kobe beef at €108 a kilogram, legs of venison, a salmon and several boxes of Valrhona chocolate.

Before leaving, gang members thrust a bouquet of flowers into the hands of a shop assistant. Attached was a handwritten note which proclaimed: "Survival in the city of millionaires would be impossible without us!" It was signed by "Spider Mum", "Santa Guevara" and "Multiflex".

Another note later released by the gang insisted that the haul had been distributed to Hamburg's needy, to the "social workers, cleaning ladies and minimum-wage earners". It added: "The places of wealth in this town are as numerous as the opportunities to take it."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:32:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Heh!

Reminds me of a funny Japanese movie from the eighties, in which the widow of a gourmet wants to become Japan's best noodles cook, and learns the trade in a spoof on karate/kung-fu films. One of the 'masters' she learns from is a homeless ex-gourmet with a following of other homeless cooks, who'd sneak into the kitchen of luxury restaurants after they're closed to cook this or that specialty.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:31:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:24:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Wow, I'm not the only one here who saw it!

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:42:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It was quite famous in the "Anglosphere." One of those "cult status" movies, I guess.
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:24:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I remember it being shown in Madrid, but I missed it.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:29:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I came across it by chance on Arte and loved it. It seems to have quite a cult following. I think it's been mentioned a couple of times here on ET before. (Though site google says not...)
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:31:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hardly Robin Hood's given that they stole luxury goods largely useless to the poor. Champagne ??!! Sorry, that is not what poor people need.

A fun stunt I'm sure, but it sounds like it was more by way of a free feast for themselves.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 05:55:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hardly Robin Hood's given that they stole luxury goods largely useless to the poor. Champagne ??!!

I don't think the poor desire to enjoy luxuries any less than the rich. Emergency rations of dried bread for the poor, champagne and salmon for the rich, that's still a rather ugly class system. Besides, another point of such a protest is the obscenely high price of food for the rich, which could have fed dozens to thousands of poor with 'normal' food.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 08:29:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I didn't mean to imply that poor people didn't want to have access to luxury items, it was just that anybody really concerned for their welfare would have made different choices.

However your second point about the relatively high price of luxury food in the proximity of such deprivation needed to be made. But that leads to a wider connection these people seemed reluctant to draw.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:05:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But that leads to a wider connection these people seemed reluctant to draw.

!?

I thought that conclusion was obvious in the story. Maybe we have a cultural issue here?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:07:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BTW, what appears to be the original of Indy's article appeared in the Hamburger Morgenpost. I see Indy shortened it a bit, messed up some minor details and was imprecise in translation.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:16:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I also checked an on-line forum for German jobless, where this was quoted, and the overwhelming majority commented positively.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:19:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I also found a short 'action report' issued by an apparent participant. (In German!) Their letter was a lot longer than quoted in the news articles, and 'explained' the superhero costumes to symbolise the struggle of the working poor under Germany's new 'flexibilised' labour rules.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:28:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Besides, another point of such a protest is the obscenely high price of food for the rich, which could have fed dozens to thousands of poor with 'normal' food.

That doesn't make any sense to me. What normal food could the champagne be turned into? Do you mean it's obscene that some people can afford it and others can't?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:23:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's the money, not the champagne, that feeds the poor with normal food.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:26:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yep. Sorry for not realising this can be read two ways in English.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:30:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They'd be better off protesting the obscenely low price and quality of food for the poor.

There's a thought that hadn't occurred to me: modern industrial farming reduces the price of subsistence for workers to a very low level, reducing the theoretical minimum wage that they can be paid. If base-line food was more expensive you'd have to pay the poor more or they'd starve, fail to reproduce and you'd run out of workers.  Or at least have to outsource overseas.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:28:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why not both? A fish shipped halfway around the world to be sold for €100 is no less polluting way of feeding than eating factory food.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:35:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, but it doesn't really matter if it's expensive: not many people can afford it so it's a small part of the problem. Luxury foods have always been shipped around the place and always will. It's the mass shipping of stuff and the mass feeding of crap to the poor that's really a problem.

I'm not entirely sure what that protest is meant to achieve. It wasn't clear from the article I read.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:41:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
not many people can afford it so it's a small part of the problem.

If it is a per capita fifty times bigger problem, then that not many can afford it is not really an argument.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:48:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What? We either have wires crossed here or I'm going mad.

If (say) 1% of people can afford to have a fish shipped to them then that is  a much smaller problem than the 99% of people having Thai chicken fillets shipped to them. Which problem do you solve first? Which is actually a problem?

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:57:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
???

If producing luxury foods for one person wastes 50 times more resources than producing cheap factory food for one person, and 1% buy luxury foods while the rest eats factory food, then it's 50 to 99 - two big problems.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 10:32:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It diverts resources away from producing food that might feed the poor.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:52:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And we're short of food to feed the poor?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:55:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If we're to produce it organically rather than factory-style, then it may be.

On the other hand, I see I led the debate off-track with ill-chosen words. The issue wasn't really food, it was social differences, and who benefits and who enjoys what is produced. I translate some more from the letter of the guys:

...Superflex is familiar with all kinds of work contracts: part-time, full-time, practicum. All the stress led to a welcome mutation of his molecules. Operaistorix survived the last few years with an unemployment module. Thanks to his unheard-of agility, he managed so far to avoid visits by the Labor Office and One-Euro-Jobs. The mutant body of SpiderMum was born somewhere between daycare, unpaid and paid cleaning. Cleaning agents and washing mop turn into weapons in her hand. Santa Guevara detracts himself from controls and disappears without a trace. That way, he manages to escape the boredom of callcenters and university seminars again and again.

...without the abilities of superheroes, it is impossible to survive in the city of millionaires [some Hamburg districts are Germany's top gated communities for the richest]. Altough we produce the richness of Hamburg City, we don't have much of it. This doesn't have to stay so. ...the places of richness are as numerous as the possibilities to take away this richness. One question remains: where do you apply your superhero powers? Simply just come to the Euromaydayparade on 1 May...



*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 10:53:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We're not. Famine is a political, not economic issue (Amartya Sen dixit)

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:42:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Times: The king of fraud flies in to help banks beat menace of ID theft

ONE of America's most famous fraudsters arrived in London yesterday to warn Britain about identity theft.
Frank Abagnale, 58, whose life story inspired the Leonardo DiCaprio film Catch Me If You Can, is to advise banks, utility companies and large retailers on how to combat fraud.

His advice to the Government is that identity cards will provide new and greater opportunities for identity theft. And he has told the public: never trust e-mail, buy a "criss-cross" shredder and employ a security company to monitor your bank account 24 hours a day.

Mr Abagnale's CV includes a five-year spell in which he cashed $2.5 million (£1.3 million) from bad cheques, successfully assumed eight identities and passed himself off as a paediatrician, a lawyer and a pilot for Pan Am.

When he was finally arrested in 1969, Mr Abagnale was wanted by authorities in 26 countries and, after serving sentences in France and Sweden, was returned to the US and jailed for 12 years.

In 1974 he was released on the condition that he worked for the FBI. He has since worked for the US Government for 30 years and built a business advising American banks and companies on fraud prevention. He told The Times yesterday that identity theft, which began in America, was rapidly taking hold in Britain.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 01:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
NYT: Aid Workers Are Said to Abuse Girls

LONDON, May 8 -- Liberian girls as young as 8 are being sexually exploited by United Nations peacekeepers, aid workers and teachers in return for food, small favors and even rides in trucks, according to a new report from Save the Children U.K.

The report said the problem was widespread throughout Liberia, a small country struggling to get back on its feet after a long and bloody civil war.

Save the Children based its findings on interviews with more than 300 people in camps for displaced people and in neighborhoods whose residents have returned after being driven away by war. They said men in positions of authority -- aid workers and soldiers, government employees and officials in the camps -- were abusing girls.

"All of the respondents clearly stated that the scale of the problem affected over half of the girls in their locations," the report said. "The girls reportedly ranged in age from 8 to 18 years, with girls of 12 years and upward described as being regularly involved in 'selling sex,' commonly referred to as 'man business.' "

In a statement from Liberia, the United Nations said that eight cases of sexual abuse and exploitation involving its workers had been reported since the beginning of the year and that one staff member had been suspended, Reuters reported.



Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:03:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Save the Children: Children in Liberia Victims of Sexual Exploitation, Study Finds (May 8, 2006)
Following a study in Liberia, Save the Children UK has reported finding the exploitation of children by humanitarian workers, peacekeepers and local businessmen to be prolific. The study was conducted in temporary camps for those displaced by the civil war and amongst those recently repatriated to their towns and villages of origin after the end of the war.

Despite commitments made in 2002 by non governmental organizations, the United Nations and peacekeepers to improve the worldwide monitoring of recruitment and staff conduct, vulnerable children are still exchanging sex for basic necessities such as money to attend school or food to feed their families.

(link to PDF report)

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:13:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
UN Liberia: UN mission pushes zero tolerance policy on sexual exploitation and abuse (8 May 2006)
Pursuing the United Nations policy of zero tolerance of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) by its staff, the UN Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) has reported eight cases for investigation since the beginning of the year, one of which has been substantiated with the person involved immediately suspended. The other investigations are continuing.

"The United Nations in Liberia is committed to prevent, identify and sanction the abhorrent practice of sexual abuse and exploitation in full compliance with the Secretary-General's Bulletin `Special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse' and its policy of zero tolerance," the mission said in a statement.

Secretary-General Kofi Annan instituted the policy following allegations in 2004 against peacekeepers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).



By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:18:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
UNMIL: Statement of the United Nations in Liberia on the issue of Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (07 May 2006)
The United Nations in Liberia takes the issue of sexual exploitation and abuse seriously and is currently implementing a range of measures to address the matter. The United Nations recognizes the urgent need to raise awareness about SEA and in this regard takes note of the release of the Save the Children UK Discussion Paper entitled "From Camp to Community: Liberia study on exploitation of children."

On several occasions the United Nations met with Save the Children UK to discuss the issue of SEA and to offer a collaborative approach to intensify actions against SEA. On these occasions the United Nations has sought information on specific cases to prevent and sanction SEA. Although Save did not discuss the ultimate findings or recommendations of its report with the United Nations, the Organization will continue to vigorously pursue its activities to prevent and deal with SEA. The United Nations is committed to continue to work with national authorities and other partners in an effort to ensure a common, effective approach to deal with SEA.



By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:20:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Watch oil and gold go through the roof

Iranian letter is dismissed by U.S. as negotiating ploy
Rice says the missive doesn't address the issues
by Shockwave (shockwaveatinorbitdotcom) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 03:02:44 AM EST
I can't believe none of you have picked up this one one (in WaPo!) yet.

For Sound Energy Policy, Don't Look to Congress

Congress thinks we're stupid. Maybe we are. We, most of us, refuse to accept that we are living in a world of rapidly increasing demand for declining fossil fuel resources.

We believe more oil is to be found around the corner, in the next country, beneath the ocean, under or in the next rock. Maybe it is.

But people who have spent much of their professional lives looking at this issue say it really does not matter that more oil is waiting to be found somewhere. They believe there will never be enough of the stuff to fuel, feed, clothe, house and move a constantly growing global population.

Those people include Vice President Cheney, White House energy adviser Matthew Simmons and, believe it or not, President Bush.

[...]

People enjoy poking fun at Bush, portraying him as something of an errant fraternity boy. But this president is nobody's dummy. He fully understands the concept of "peak oil," the high point of the bell curve at which 50 percent of the provable reserves in any oil field have been recovered.

Oil is plentiful on the upside of the curve. It is less available, substantially more difficult and enormously more expensive to retrieve on the downside.

[...]

Hirsch and his colleagues last March completed a study for the Department of Energy. Maybe it was too difficult for Congress to read. Certainly the title was forbidding: "Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation and Risk Management."

[...]

Hirsch and his colleagues put it clearly in their report to the Department of Energy:

We eventually will not have enough oil to fuel our enormously wasteful American way of life.

Global oil production is peaking.

[...]

In plain English, that means America's cheap-oil ride is over.

[...]

That starts with political leaders telling the American people the truth, as Bush did in his "addicted to oil" comments. It means mandated increased vehicle fuel economy accompanied by increased taxes on gasoline, engine displacement and vehicle size. It means getting over our social and racial biases, which still keep certain people out of certain neighborhoods, and coming up with a truly efficient, democratic mass transportation system.

"Waiting until world conventional oil production peaks before initiating crash program mitigation leaves the world with a significant liquid fuel deficit for two decades or longer," the Hirsch report said.

Wake up, Congress. Wake up, America. We are a part of that world.



Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 04:57:00 AM EST
I think this is the WaPo Kool-aid trying to persuade people that the republicans are on top of the situation.

However, all policy activities I've heard of are in direct counter to the idea of a recognition of this reality. And until policy changes, then all statements to the contrary are froth and nonsense.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 06:07:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Didn't you post it yesterday? So someone on ET caught it...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 08:00:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, well, but no one commented it. I think it is quite a thing that we now know they are talking about peak oil in the Heart of Darkness itself.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue May 9th, 2006 at 09:10:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]