About Motorola incident - this story was developing in spring before Putin's campaign against corruption in Customs.
I don't remember exactly what was the deal about and may recall wrongly but overall it was avout save facing exercises. Officials sized Euroset imported phones on suspicion of contraband because of irregularities in documents. One might suspect covert demands of paybacks from Euroset. Then they found documents were right, however origin of phones - Brazil was still suspicious for Motorola has no factories in that country. Thereafter custom officials could not substantiate their claims though anyone sensible already realized Euroset was indulged in grey imports (probably Chinese phones were reimported through Brazil). Customs hastily arranged non verified expertise on violation of safety standards and rushed to destroy mobile sets. All process was in great details was publicized by Russian media, this is another rebuff for critics accusing Russian press in lack of freedom.
One may only wonder about motives behind recovering such old stories by Western press now. Westerners usually give some facts and spin them around convenient anti Russian lines of thought.    

Here is an article in an industry news site, which mainly presents the case as Motorla vs. unfair Russian regulators.

Here is a link to another article in the St. Petersburg Times, but which I think may have originated at the Moscow Times.  This one focuses on the patent dispute angle, downplaying the original seizure.

Unsurprisingly, once I found a Russian source on the matter, things started to become a bit clearer.  I am not sure where exactly he originally wrote, but at Mobile Review.com, they have translated and (re) published a series of articles by Eldar Muratzin on the Russian celluar industry, and it's difficulties with the government.  One thing that becomes clear is that this, at least originally, was not a dispute with Motorola at all, but between the Russian cellphone distributor Euroset, and the government.

One the particular seizure in question, there is this longish piece which implies that the problem may well be officials in the government looking to shake down the industry.

This piece, from August of 2005, talks of another large scale seizure of cellphones.

What I find really odd, along with FarEasterner, is why the US press decided to pick this issue up recently, and in terms of a patent conflict between the US company Motorola and another Russian firm.  Why, if this seizure was another issue entirely, is it being linked now to the patent dispute case in the US media?  And furthermore, why on Earth is this issue getting as much play in the media as it is?  Googling the issue, I saw that the basic NYT piece had been picked up by a paper in Arkansas! (a small, rural state on the Mississippi)

A Russian can obtain a patent from Rospatent even thouhg it violates both the Paris Convention and the WTO requirements both of which Russia is supposed to be operating to.

Once he has this patent he can then legally extort money from any Western company even if the product concerned is patented in the West or is indeed not patentable.

If the company concerned does not pay these "licence" fees then the Russian organisation can take him to court under the criminal code. This means that all official legal costs are borne by the state and not the individual.

Because the justice system is so corrupt in Russia any Western company involved in such a fight has the deck loaded against them and has virtually no chance of winning.

Even if the Western company obtains a valid patent, that is not guarantee that he will not fall into this situation as Rospatent is also corrupted and as such a patent can be withdrawn.

It is a very ugly situation and one which the Russian Government seems to be completely dis-interested in. The suspicion is that many of these situations involve high ranking officials in not only the government, but the Police and also the Justice system.

Motorola ia just one of a numbre of companies involved with such situations. Another example which was recently resolved was the infringement of intellectual property involving the Starbucks name.

Anyone seeking to do business in Russia should be aware that what the government says and what actually happens are poles apart.