A Very British Coup

by Helen
Tue Jul 11th, 2006 at 03:50:14 PM EST

The drama series, first shown in 1988, was adapted from Chris Mullin's (now a labour MP) book of the same name. I was reminded of it by seeing in the TV listings that it was to be repeated. So I thought it might be worth laying out some of the ideas in the script of how undemocratic forces can usurp a Govt to see if anybody recognises situations from the wrold today.

Set in the late 80s, it portrays a Britain where a strongly socialist (yea, it's fiction alright) Govt was elected with a strong anti-nuclear stance. However it finds ranged against it an entrenched set of powerful forces determined to thwart their "treasonous" intentions by any means necessary; up to and including the "very British" coup itselfgb, aka gentlemanly blackmail.

These forces include the unelected para-state which comprises the upper echelons of the civil service, the military, the media, the police and judiciary and finally and most crucially the secret services who the new govt rapidly find are far more powerful than Parliament. Yet all of these owe allegiance to the Monarch rather than the elected Prime Minister and leads to powerful people asserting the right to act on Her behalf in order to protect their understanding of Britain. All to the detriment of the will of the people.

Also, acting as a backdrop to these machinations, and more controversially, is the portrayal of Britain as an occupied country. The presence of American armed forces on British soil is (a) deeply embarrassing (how impotent is a country that doesn't even feel able to defend itself?), and (b) deeply undemocratic.

These forces conspire to bring about a series of crises that test the Govt almost to destruction.

The book finishes differently from the highly recommended TV adaptation. Without giving the ending of the latter away, the final showdown between the PM, Ted Perkins, and his intended nemesis, the head of the secret service, is political drama at its most thrilling & powerful.

I understand that most here will never see it, but given the recent stories coming from Italy about secret service machinations, blackmail and secret deals, the recent accusations and counter accusations of corruption in France, let alone all that is now being revealed about the manipulations of information by the White House and its prescience and resonance is obvious. See it if you can, or hire the DVD.


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Ah yes. The dear dead days when a socialist government was not so incredible that it could be portrayed in fiction.

As I recall the Prime Minister in the TV series was rather more a man of the people than the real leaders of the British left tended to be. More a dangerous lefty council leader, like David Blunkett of the Peoples Republic of South Yorkshire (I wonder what happened to him and how he turned into the right of sensible, fun loving national politician we all loathe), than the national figurehead of the left Tony Benn.

It is absurd that we still have US forces based in Europe, fifteen years after the fall of the Evil Empire. It is almost as absurd as still having British forces based in Germany. They serve no apparent purpose and a rational foreign and defence policy would perhaps send everyone home.

Another thought is that we should follow the example of Nepal and strip the monarchy of its political functions as well as transferring command in chief of the (no longer Royal) armed forces to the Prime Minister.

by Gary J on Tue Jul 11th, 2006 at 04:36:52 PM EST
Another thought is that we should follow the example of Nepal and strip the monarchy of its political functions as well as transferring command in chief of the (no longer Royal) armed forces to the Prime Minister.

Yikes, I know that Tony rules in loco regina, but I'd really rather not make it official.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Jul 11th, 2006 at 05:00:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes that is the problem. Do we trust the political leader of the nation with formal responsibility for the things he in practise controls, in normal circumstances? Or do we give that role to a figurehead with reserve powers to overthrow the leader with a Parliamentary majority, in extreme circumstances.

Most people in Britain would prefer Queen Elizabeth to have the power rather than a politician. But what do you do if a monarch, like King Gyanendra of Nepal, decides that the politicians are so useless that a spell of absolute monarchy is in order?

As I understand it one of the issues A Very British Coup explored was the way the monarchical structure of the state might constrain a government trying to act in ways disapproved of by elite groups. In effect the Westminster model of responsible government is a house of mirrors. The person who in theory is merely the  monarch's adviser in fact controls the situation, but this rests upon non-legally enforceable conventions not a proper codified constitution.

by Gary J on Tue Jul 11th, 2006 at 06:26:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, King Ganyendra's spell of authoritarian monarchy may result in a Republic. Political systems don't last forever, and having a properly codified constitution doesn't prevent them from changing de facto while staying the same de iure.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 11th, 2006 at 06:54:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Glad to here Sir Humphrey Appleby's alive and well.

Thought at first Helen might be writng about Morkie Thatcher's recent foray in Africa.

"When the abyss stares at me, it wets its pants." Brian Hopkins

by EricC on Wed Jul 12th, 2006 at 10:18:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hee. Probably still sub judice.

Plus I doubt I could write about that poisonous little toad without saying something very bad indeed.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 12th, 2006 at 12:22:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I would have thought that after that particular escapde, there would have been some very upset dogs of war, who but for a desire not to upset his mother, would  have taken their frustrations out on him.

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Thu Jul 13th, 2006 at 11:13:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Waiting till she dies. Then.....ffttttttt

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 13th, 2006 at 04:35:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]