European Tribune

European Breakfast - September 27

by Fran
Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:25:44 AM EST

"Interestingly, according to modern astronomers, space is finite. This is a very comforting thought-- particularly for people who can never remember where they have left things."

Woody Allen


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
EUROPE
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:26:33 AM EST
Reuters: U.S., EU spar in private on terrorism

It began near the end of the meeting, according to one participant, when Tuomioja said ministers were bound to be asked if they had discussed the issue of secret Central Intelligence Agency prisons for suspected terrorists and "rendition flights" to transfer prisoners to states where they may face torture.

Since the matter was not on the official agenda, he suggested they should all agree to say it had not been discussed and that they had agreed on all the points on the agenda.

According to the participant, Rice responded by saying all countries must keep up the fight against terrorism, noting that the discovery of an alleged plot in Britain last month to blow up transatlantic aircraft showed the persistent danger.

Tuomioja replied: "We all agree on the need to fight terrorism but we should do so in a way that does not create more terrorism in the future."

Rice shot back: "Let's deal with those who are trying to kill us now and leave the future for some other time."

Unwilling to leave her the last word as the meeting broke up, Tuomioja added: "The future is with us today."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:28:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why, oh, why don't they say this in public?

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 04:10:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Because, like the Democrats, they refuse to acknowledge how extreme and dangerous this lot are to world peace. Refuse to accept they have an Orwellian agenda of militaristic imperialism that is all-america forever.

As Joshua Holland's interview of Greg Landin on Alternet discussing his book "Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism"

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/42073/

Taking the second part first, I think that's right. The war on terror or its component parts -- gaining public acceptance of torture, for example, or rendition or the war in Iraq -- is as much a domestic affair as it is a foreign one. If you read the writings of neocon intellectuals like Christopher Caldwell or William Kristol, it's all about steeling America's domestic culture and making the population more resistant to pain, both ours and the pain we inflict on others. And it seems that it's not just that they look at America's political culture and see dissent or anti-militarism, but they really see a culture of weakness, and they expected that the war on terror would bring about a restoration of American strength.....................................

But at the same time, pushing against that retrenchment, you see a radicalized generation of anti-Communist militants and Vietnam veterans -- Oliver North is a good example -- and they're committed to refighting Vietnam. And what they do in Central America is that even as the military high command is putting up these firewalls designed to limit U.S. military intervention, they're advancing a vision of military force where there's no division between politics and warfare; where the goal -- certainly in Nicaragua -- is to launch a democratic revolution. In El Salvador it's the same thing. The objective there is not just to defeat the insurgency but to implement the most ambitious project of nation building since the end of Vietnam. So there are two tendencies kind of working at crosscurrents: Central America is the place where the more inflamed wing of the anti-Communist movement is given free rein. But what is key is that it is unleashed in the negligible region just at the same time as the Cold War is being brought to a close. So while you could make a credible argument that the Cold War was won through policies of moderation -- because containment worked, because Reagan was willing to engage with Gorbachev -- these neocon militarists could point to Central America and take the lesson that it wasn't containment or negotiation or restraint that won the day but rollback and aggression. They then take their perceived victory and extrapolate it to the entirety of the Cold War. So it becomes almost a metaphor -- or it becomes a framework for the way a lot of these people view the rest of the world. In that sense it was just a short step from the kind of militarism in the name of democratic revolution in Nicaragua under Reagan to Bush's launch of his global democratic revolution to rid the world of evil.



keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:04:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think they're afraid of what the reaction of the populace may be if it suddenly becomes OK to call a spade a spade.

And they're afraid of US retaliation, exactly what form Rice has promised them I'm not sure.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:07:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But if they had a spine they would surely realise that making such threats public would fatally damage the Bush administration.
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:27:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Before US published opinion? I doubt it.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:31:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It depends on the threats.

I think Bush is hanging by a thread at the moment, and if the Repubs don't steal the election he's going to be thrown to the wolves.

It's very close to a tipping point, and I don't think it would take much to push it over.

Pressure from Europe, which is supposedly friendly and an ally, would not be a bad thing.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:17:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think everyone is holding their breath for November. If the Democrats take the Congress things might unravel fast.

I am still wary of wishful thinking on my part.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:20:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Spiegel Online: LETTER FROM BERLIN - Seven-Year Itch After Just 10 Months

Less than a year after Chancellor Angela Merkel came to power, all pretence at harmony in her left-right coalition has evaporated. Analysts are dismissing speculation that the deep internal rifts over her flagship healthcare revamp will bring down her government. But hopes for meaningful reforms have faded.

At the start of Chancellor Angela Merkel's reign last November, the members of her power-sharing coalition got on so well that they purred pet names at each other. Peter Struck, the grouchy, gravel-voiced chairman of the Social Democrat members of parliament, was fondly called "Strucki-Bear" by his conservative counterpart Volker Kauder, who in turn became "Kauderle", roughly translated as "Kaudiepie".

The two parties which had fought each other for almost 40 years promised to bury the hatchet, put their own interests aside and work together for the greater good of Germany. They hammered out a coalition agreement in four weeks of talks during which both claimed the working atmosphere had steadily improved. "As long as we trust each other personally, we'll make it," Merkel said at the time.


by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:37:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Spiegel could have simply titled this "The Honeymoon Is Over" or some such, but noooo, it has to sound like a marital crisis is imminent.

But I guess what really pisses me off here is:

The two parties which had fought each other for almost 40 years promised to bury the hatchet, put their own interests aside and work together for the greater good of Germany.

This sounds way too much like Wilhelm II's declaration on the eve of WWI that, "I know no parties any longer, only Germans" (quoted from memory). And we all know where that ended. That Charlie Chaplin lookalike also talked a lot about "the greater good of Germany".

And even aside from that, this is not what parliamentary democracy is all about. One would think that Der Spiegel would know this (and write accordingly), instead of implicitly discrediting democratic process.

"Ideas or the lack of them can cause disease." - Kurt Vonnegut

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:24:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Independent: Blair's long goodbye

PM praises Brown as 'remarkable man' but aims to stay on for nine more months after Labour accords him rapturous reception

 Tony Blair won a rapturous response from the Labour Party faithful with an inspired farewell address that he hopes will enable him to remain in Downing Street for another nine months.

The Prime Minister began his intended "long goodbye" by warning Labour that it would lose power unless it kept up the pace of his reform agenda.

In his 13th and final speech to Labour's annual conference as party leader, the Prime Minister fired a powerful parting shot, urging his party not to retreat to the "comfort zone" which consigned it to 18 years of opposition before 1997.

Mr Blair hopes the enthusiastic response he won from emotional Labour delegates will give him the breathing space to remain in power until next July.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:40:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Times Online: EU's latest entrants given ultimatum over crime

A LONG list of urgent reforms to combat persistent corruption, money laundering and human trafficking was demanded yesterday by the European Union as the price of its green light for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania.

The agreement to complete Europe's absorption of every Warsaw Pact country outside the former Soviet Union will take effect on January 1, bringing the EU's population up to half a billion, José Manuel Barroso, the European Commission President, said yesterday.

But the threat of sanctions, including withholding a quarter of farm and regional payments as well as refusing to recognise court judgments unless judicial independence is guaranteed, will hang over the two countries from Day 1. Bulgaria was also told that its aircraft might not even be allowed to fly into the EU area unless rapid improvements were made to aircraft safety standards and flight crew licensing before the end of the year.

Workers from the two countries will face restrictions in many EU countries, with Britain confirming yesterday that it will allow only gradual access to jobs after the public backlash against the estimated 600,000 arrivals from the ten countries that joined in 2004.

[Murdoch Alert]
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:51:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC: Quiz: Bulgaria and Romania

Bulgaria and Romania will find out on 26 September whether they are to join the European Union on 1 January 2007, or at a later date.

Either way, they will be the next countries to join the EU - taking the number of members from 25 to 27.

But do you know the first thing about them?

Find out by taking our quiz, with 10 questions on history, sport, culture and wildlife.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:05:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
On Radio 5 they established that after Stoichkov, the most famous bulgarian was "Great Uncle Bulgaria" - a cartoon character from the 70s.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:07:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We just had Veselin Topalov in the breakfast yesterday.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:09:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hey, I got 9 out of 10 right. I guess I know something afterall...or at least I'm a good guesser on the stuff that I don't know.
by gradinski chai on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 08:01:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I got 8 out of 10 right, and I didn't really know more than 3 of the answers...

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 08:07:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC: Irish PM's loan admission gambit

It was not Bertie Ahern's first on-screen appearance of the day.

As part of a big-screen video presentation shown before Tony Blair's farewell speech at the Labour conference in Manchester, Mr Ahern paid tribute to the UK prime minister's efforts in Northern Ireland.

Over the years, the pair have developed a close political relationship as they have clocked up the miles on trips to Belfast and elsewhere to meet Northern Ireland's parties.

His later appearance, on prime time Irish television, was of much more importance.

For several days, opponents - and some allies - had called for him to make a full statement on the issue of payments from businessmen that has been following Mr Ahern every step of the way.

Over the weekend, at the biggest sporting event ever to come to Ireland, golf's Ryder Cup, reporters had tried to question him about the cash gifts he received back in the 1990s.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:53:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Won't make much difference, I think. We more or less expect Fianna Fail politicians, in particular, to have been a bit dodgy.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:56:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Dawn: Switzerland termed best economy

GENEVA, Sept 26: The United States fell to sixth place in the World Economic Forum's global competitiveness rankings for 2006, ceding the top place to Switzerland, as macroeconomic concerns eroded prospects for the world's largest economy.

In a report released on Tuesday, the forum said Washington's huge defense and homeland security spending commitments, plans for further tax cuts and long-term potential costs from health care and pensions were creating worrisome fiscal strains.

"With a low savings rate, record-high current account deficits and a worsening of the US net debtor position, there is a non-negligible risk to both the country's overall competitiveness and, given the relative size of the US economy, the future of the global economy," it said.

While stressing that US dominance in education and innovation should keep the country among the world's most competitive "for the foreseeable future," the report said economic concerns had made other countries more attractive for business leaders.

US Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said in Washington that the decline in America's competitiveness would accelerate unless the country made reforms.

"We need to clean up our own backyard to make sure our economic and legal policies welcome capital instead of drive it away," he said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:56:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Independent: US slides down competition league - Concern over America's growing twin deficits. Survey says UK workforce 'poorly educated'

The UK has slipped one place to 10th as one in five of the business leaders polled said that Britain had an "inadequately educated" workforce.

In its annual assessment of the competitiveness of 125 countries, the WEF said a number of weaknesses in the US, particularly related to macroeconomic imbalances and the institutional environment, were beginning to "erode the country's overall competitiveness potential".

Augusto Lopez-Claros, the chief economist and head of the WEF's global competitiveness network, said the US would remain one of the most competitive economies in the world for the "foreseeable future".

But he warned: "With potentially open-ended expenditure commitments linked to defence and homeland security, ongoing plans to lower taxes further, as well as other longer-term potential claims on the budget, the prospects for sustained fiscal adjustment seem not too bright."

He said the low savings rate in the US and the country's record current account deficit posed a "non-negligible risk" to its overall competitiveness and the future of the global economy itself, given the relative size of the US.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:19:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What exactly is the definition of 'competitive'?
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:31:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
France tumbled down in the ranks because of "deficits" and "rigid labor markets" (I wonder how these were deemed worse, even relatively speaking, than a year ago, but there you go)

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:11:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC: Europeans urged to eat less fish

The conservation group WWF is calling on European consumers to think twice before they eat fish.

A WWF report says much of the fish sold in Europe is the product of illegal, destructive or wasteful fishing.

The report warns that continuing to buy it will bring many fish stocks to the brink of extinction.

One of the main casualties is plaice. The report says about half the plaice caught are too small and are thrown back - by which time most are dying.

Justin Woolford, of the WWF's European fisheries campaign, says such a buoyant market encourages unsustainable fishing practices.

"We've got too many boats chasing too few fish - there's a lot of illegal fishing going on as well," he said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:02:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I try to eat from suppliers committed to sustainable supplies.

I've almost given up on white fish cos I don't believe it's sutainable anymore.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:05:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Guardian: Brits 'most debt in Western Europe'

Overspending Britons are responsible for a third of all unsecured debt in Western Europe, according to a report.

Figures from analysts at Datamonitor found that the UK consumer credit market hit £214 billion last year, making it the most indebted country in Western Europe.

The average Briton owes just over £3,000, almost twice as much as his continental cousin.

The report's authors put the high figure down to the UK's "insatiable appetite for credit".

Major countries on mainland Europe have a culture of savings and frugality, with people in France and Germany particularly averse to debt, according to analysts.

But this situation could change, with consumer credit growth in Europe outstripping the UK and providing an opportunity for lenders faced with a UK market that is reaching saturation point, the report says.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:23:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Does this include property debt ? Britain is culturally committed to ownership to a degree apparently unknown in Europe.

Credit card debt is different and optional in a way property debt is not.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:10:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Unsecured debt excludes mortgages.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:11:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But includes debts incurred for the purchase of property that isn't secured against the purchase - top-ups borrowed for "holidays" because there was a mortgage ceiling of 92% or whatever. Happens all the time.

There's also unsecured debt on investment property and I don't know where that falls or what it does to the averages.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:15:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Another thing unsecured debt includes is agreed overdrafts on current accounts.
Figures from analysts at Datamonitor found that the UK consumer credit market hit £214 billion last year, making it the most indebted country in Western Europe.

The average Briton owes just over £3,000, almost twice as much as his continental cousin.

The average has been taken for each man, woman and child in the UK. I don't know many under-18s with unsecured debt.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:30:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And some people have multi-million pound overdrafts, which sort of screws the average.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:39:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Reuters: U.S. strikes deal to hand over naval base to Iceland

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department said on Tuesday it had reached agreements with Iceland to turn over the U.S. Naval Air Station at Keflavik, which is to be formally closed on September 30.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization base, a listening post that tracked Soviet submarines during the Cold War, in recent years has provided air cover for Iceland as well as conducted search and rescue missions, a U.S. official said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:29:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Deutsche Welle: Germany Opens Dialogue With the Country's Muslim Community

Germany hosts its first-ever "Conference on Islam" in Berlin on Wednesday and aims to improve interaction with Muslims living in Germany. But some Muslim groups have been critical in the run-up.

Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble will welcome delegates from Germany's Muslim communities, as well as representatives from federal, state and communal levels to Berlin's historic Charlottenburg Palace on Wednesday.

"Three million Muslims live in Germany. They are a part of Germany's present and future, just as Islam is, after all, a part of Europe," Schäuble said in an interview published Tuesday in the daily Süddeutsche Zeitung. "We have to and want to take note of this."

Over the next two to three years, the 30 participants taking part in the conference are supposed to address the major issues that affect the coexistence of Muslims and non-Muslims in Germany.

Schäuble said the conference also aimed to find better solutions for integrating Muslims into German society, adding that he wanted Muslims in Germany to become "German Muslims," according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:55:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
NYT: Opera Canceled Over a Depiction of Muhammad

BERLIN, Sept. 26 -- A leading German opera house has canceled performances of a Mozart opera because of security fears stirred by a scene that depicts the severed head of the Prophet Muhammad, prompting a storm of protest here about what many see as the surrender of artistic freedom.

The Deutsche Oper Berlin said Tuesday that it had pulled "Idomeneo" from its fall schedule after the police warned of an "incalculable risk" to the performers and the audience.



"Ideas or the lack of them can cause disease." - Kurt Vonnegut
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:50:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Le Figaro: Do flights to United States face paralysis?

A marathon is under way in Brussels. European officials have until 30 September to reach an agreement with their US counterparts on the personal data of passengers flying from Europe to the United States that airlines must supply. Otherwise airlines will find themselves caught between two stools. Either they continue to submit to US demands, in which case they will be breaking European law. Or they do not convey the disputed information, in which case they could be banned from landing in the United States or fined several thousand dollars...

....
Overall, the United States is demanding 34 pieces of information - and even more, in the future. There is no problem as regards civic status, nationality, height or profession. The so-called APIS (Advance Passenger Information System) data is shown on passports. The requirement for US addresses is no longer challenged either. But other strictly personal information is questioned by the European Court. For instance, ticket payment method, e-mail address, food preferences (which could indicate a religion or state of health,) private telephone number, and so forth.

There is also disagreement about how information should be conveyed. At present this takes place by means of the "pull" method: the United States seeks information on companies' databases. The EU wants to introduce a "push" method: airlines would send a selection of information compatible with EU laws. Last, negotiations also cover the financial aspect: the gathering and transmission of information costs money. It will of course be necessary to identify who should pay. If it is the airlines, these costs will be passed on to passengers...

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:00:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Close air traffic. If it's unsafe, it's unsafe. We cannot take that risk in today's world.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:13:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Or better yet: All passengers must write their names on a yellow Post'It. After being subjected to intense graphological analysis and testing for explosive, poisonous (or invisible) ink and screened against a database containing the names of five actual (and misspelled) terrorists plus the scanned telephone books of 10 (non-Mid-Eastern) metropolises selected at random, the slips are placed on the passengers' assigned seats and flown to their destination.

Each Post'It will be allowed to carry up to 3 ounces of personal liquids/gels, as well as any bottled water they purchase in the "sanitized" departure area after clearing security.

Regrettably, transporting actual passengers is indeed too great a security risk.

"Ideas or the lack of them can cause disease." - Kurt Vonnegut

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:59:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Screw them. Europe has bent over backwards repeatedly (we have even changed our passports twice) to satisfy the US' creeping requirements. It's never enough. At some point you have to say no.
Overall, the United States is demanding 34 pieces of information - and even more, in the future. There is no problem as regards civic status, nationality, height or profession. The so-called APIS (Advance Passenger Information System) data is shown on passports. The requirement for US addresses is no longer challenged either. But other strictly personal information is questioned by the European Court. For instance, ticket payment method, e-mail address, food preferences (which could indicate a religion or state of health,) private telephone number, and so forth.
Is this a decision that the member states or the Commission can take by themselves, or do we need a public debate aboutt privacy in air travel?
airlines will find themselves caught between two stools. Either they continue to submit to US demands, in which case they will be breaking European law. Or they do not convey the disputed information, in which case they could be banned from landing in the United States or fined several thousand dollars...
I suppose one possibility is for the airlines to display a big fat notice on their websites when you buy a ticket: "to purchase this ticket you must agree to release the following 30+ pieces of information to the US government: <list>Check this box to agree to these conditions".

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:39:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure they're even allowed do that under EU data protection law - they can't guarantee the security of that information at the other end.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:57:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, then.

Is anyone ready to sue the EU or the member states when they decide to buckle to US demands?

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 04:07:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
we can tip off consumer agencies on it. Consumer Association (or is it Which? now?) in UK, Consumentenbond in the Netherlands, etc. They've the funds and legal advisors to sue.
by Nomad on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 08:55:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the UK there is the charity Liberty, I believe.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 09:33:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Question: is this all about saving the Visa Waiver Program yet again? Ditch it.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:02:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Reuters: Politicians slam Berlin opera for canceling Idomeneo (Sep 26, 2006)
The decision was taken after Berlin security officials warned that putting on the opera as planned would present an "incalculable security risk" for the establishment.

In the production, directed by Hans Neuenfels, King Idomeneo is shown staggering on stage next to the severed heads of Buddha, Jesus, Poseidon and the Prophet Mohammad, which sit on chairs.

Two weeks ago Pope Benedict sparked outrage in the Muslim world by quoting, in a speech in Germany, from a medieval text linking the spread of the Islamic faith to violence.



Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:31:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
WORLD
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:26:51 AM EST
VoA: Blix Urges Security Guarantees for Iran

Former U.N. weapons inspection chief Hans Blix says Iran should be given security guarantees in exchange for an agreement on Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Blix, who headed the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, testified before a House subcommittee examining the current state of global nonproliferation efforts.

Well known for his criticism of what he calls exaggerated U.S. and British intelligence assessments of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction capabilities, Blix told lawmakers he hopes similar mistakes are not made when it comes to Iran:

"One of the lessons of the intelligence in the Iraq affair is that one should take international verification and inspection more seriously," said Hans Blix. "I think there was a tendency to disregard what comes out of an international organization and to give automatic or much greater credence to intelligence."

Calling Iran and North Korea acute cases confronting the world, Blix nonetheless says he does not believe it can be concluded that Iran intends to build a nuclear bomb.

While the six-party negotiations with North Korea have included discussion of security guarantees, he suggests there have been no similar efforts by the U.S. where Iran is concerned:

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:30:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
MoA: We Are All Targets Now

The White House is further rewriting the torture and self-absolution legislation that is currently sailing through congress.

Now the real targets turn out to be you and me. The new version of the law would allow the CIA and the U.S. military:

indefinite detention of anyone who, as the bill states, "has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States" or its military allies.
....
We further learn:
The definition applies to foreigners living inside or outside the United States and does not rule out the possibility of designating a U.S. citizen as an unlawful combatant.

....
But that is not what the law says. The law is about "hostilities against the United States and it military allies", not about "terrorism".

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:32:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Via this diary:

THE NIE just released apparently includes this:


Anti-US and anti-globalization sentiment is on the rise and fueling other radical ideologies. This could prompt some leftist, nationalist, or separatist groups to adopt terrorist methods to attack US interests. The radicalization process is occurring more quickly, more widely, and more anonymously in the Internet age, raising the likelihood of surprise attacks by unknown groups whose members and supporters may be difficult to pinpoint.


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:15:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Beware the leftist blogofascist terrorists.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:42:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Indefinite detention of foreigners living outside the US? After the Hague Invasion Act, this is not entirely surprising.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:49:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Debka File: Iran and Turkey Prepare for War in Iraqi Kurdistan

Referring to the recently appointed special US coordinator Gen. Joseph Ralston, Gul expressed his hope that a resolution would be imminent.

The threat was implicit and impatient. Washington was given to infer that Ankara is on the point of deciding whether or not to capture Kirkuk, a step that would undermine a pivotal political and economic base of the Baghdad government and harm US interests in Iraq.

This conversation, which was not nearly as amicable as it looked from the press photos, was clouded by a disturbing incident: A semi-official American military publication recently ran a new map showing parts of Turkish and Armenian territory marked "Kurdistan."

This map fueled suspicions in Ankara and the Armenian capital Yerevan that the US high military command was in on a plan for Iraqi Kurdish forces led by President Jalal Talabani and Masoud Barzani to help themselves to territory in Turkey and Armenia in a counter-attack to a potential Turkish-Iranian military move in Kurdistan.
This kind of mistrust has lent wings to Ankara's resolve to go forward against Kurdistan - the sooner the better.


by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:33:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thawra Al-Wada: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

In July, the American Armed Forces Journal published an article entitled, Blood Borders  , wherein the author, Ralph Peter (a pseudonym perhaps) writes of a vision for a New Middle East based on hitherto unknown maps.

These maps may have been officially prepared and then leaked to the media, or they may have originated at American research centers. But subsequent statements by the American Secretary of State [Condoleezza Rice] since the Israeli aggression against Lebanon about the "birth pangs of a New Middle East" gives this forecast added importance, if not the outright endorsement of the highest levels of the American administration.

This new vision for the Middle East is based on a geographical re-division of the region based on nationality and sect, and the writer views the justifications for such a division as follows:

The borders of the current Middle East cause much of the ethnic and sectarian strife within or between states, and that this has resulted in the taking of unconscionable measures against ethnic and religious minorities, and instability across the entire region.

This is from August, but it has shown up only now, with the Debka File on Watching America. This Link includes pictures of maps, one with the new borders.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:35:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
My google skills are failing me, but we deginitely commented a bit on the original article and maps when they came out.
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:32:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The first message was routine enough: a "Prepare to Deploy" order sent through naval communications channels to a submarine, an Aegis-class cruiser, two minesweepers and two mine hunters. The orders didn't actually command the ships out of port; they just said to be ready to move by Oct. 1. But inside the Navy those messages generated more buzz than usual last week when a second request, from the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), asked for fresh eyes on long-standing U.S. plans to blockade two Iranian oil ports on the Persian Gulf.
(Hat tip to rg)

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:35:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry, this was supposed to be attached to MillMan's comment...

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:50:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Asia Times: What a US recession means for China

The risk of economic recession in the United States in 2007 is increasing rapidly. Rather than overly tight monetary policy at the Federal Reserve, the declining value of US homes is undermining personal consumption expenditure. The decline in home values is likely to accelerate next year as housing oversupply is met by increasingly weaker demand for new homes.

....
How China can cushion the blow
A sharp slowdown or contraction of real personal consumption expenditure growth in the US in 2007 will lead to much slower economic growth in China. China's export growth could be flat or even negative while investment growth could be cut in half. In addition, rationalization in China's export sector could lead to much higher urban unemployment, especially among China's migrant workforce. This could heighten already increasing social instability, further undermining private consumption growth and economic growth in China.

A US economic downturn next year will undoubtedly have a strong negative impact on China's economy. However, this impact could be mitigated by the government's marshaling of China's considerable resources, including the country's nearly US$1 trillion of foreign exchange reserves. In addition to these reserves, China has enormous fiscal resources that it can employ to boost the economy either directly or indirectly through the country's massive state-owned banking system - not exactly music to the ears of foreign investors who have poured money into China's banks.

Though dependent on consumer demand in the United States, China's economy could easily withstand a US economic recession because of its vast resources and its ability to extend these resources through the still-dominant state-owned economic structures. As a result, slowing US economic growth does not imply a significant reversal in global commodity prices, especially oil prices. Even if economic growth in China slows to 5% in 2007, demand for energy and crude oil in China will remain quite strong.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:35:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Guardian: Intelligence report blow to Bush's war on terror

George Bush yesterday suffered a blow to his argument that the removal of Saddam Hussein had made Americans safer after he ordered the release of an intelligence report warning the war in Iraq had become a "cause celebre for jihadists".

Mr Bush's decision to declassify a small portion of a leaked National Intelligence Estimate, six weeks before the midterm elections, was seen as an attempt to get in front of Democratic critics, led by Bill Clinton, who accuse the administration of not doing enough to catch Osama bin Laden.

After five years of relative civility, the unspoken entente cordiale between the Bush and Clinton administrations to avoid assigning blame for the 9/11 attacks came to an abrupt end yesterday, with both leaders and their aides fighting for their respective legacies. But Mr Bush's "war on terror" narrative was contradicted by the report.

"The Iraq jihad is shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives; perceived jihadist success [in Iraq] would inspire more fighters to continue the struggle elsewhere," it said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:47:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Different Planet Dept.

WaPo: Sobering Conclusions On Why Jihad Has Spread

In announcing yesterday that he would release the key judgments of a controversial National Intelligence Estimate, President Bush said he agreed with the document's conclusion "that because of our successes against the leadership of al-Qaeda, the enemy is becoming more diffuse and independent."

But the estimate itself posits no such cause and effect. Instead, while it notes that counterterrorism efforts have seriously damaged and disrupted al-Qaeda's leadership, it describes the spreading "global jihadist movement" as fueled largely by forces that al-Qaeda exploits but is not actively directing. They include Iraq, corrupt and unjust governments in Muslim-majority countries, and "pervasive anti-U.S. sentiment among most Muslims."



"Ideas or the lack of them can cause disease." - Kurt Vonnegut
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 04:08:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"pervasive anti-U.S. sentiment among most Muslims."

And pretty much everyone else who isn't stupid, or has their snout in the neoCon trough.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:38:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
WaPo: n Lebanon, a War's Lethal Harvest - Threat of Unexploded Bombs Paralyzes the South

The scourge of munitions from the cluster bombs now littering southern Lebanon, mostly American-made but some manufactured in Israel, will be a "lasting legacy," the United Nations has said. U.N. officials estimate that the Israeli military fired 90 percent of the bombs during the last 72 hours of the conflict, which began on July 12 after Hezbollah fighters seized two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid and ended with a cease-fire on Aug. 14. As many as 1 million of the bomblets are unexploded, they say, wounding or killing three people a day. The threat of stumbling across a bomblet has paralyzed life in parts of the south that depend on the harvest of tobacco and now-abandoned groves of bananas, olives and citrus.

....
U.N. officials have said they are still grappling with a problem whose scope has grown by the day. About 100 de-miners on contract to the United Nations are trying to defuse munitions in which as many as two in five of the bomblets failed to detonate. They said many of the bomblets might have failed to explode because they struck soft ground, were snared in trees or other obstructions or were fired too low to the ground to detonate on impact.

Early on, officials estimated that cluster munitions littered 400 sites, anywhere from a house to an entire village. The number now stands at 590, and U.N. officials said they are dumbfounded by the intensity of the firing in the war's last days, when it was clear a cease-fire was approaching.

"It's impossible for me to work out what the logic was," said David Shearer, the U.N. humanitarian coordinator for Lebanon. "To me, it just seems outrageous that it would happen as it did."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:36:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Nation - War signals?

As reports circulate of a sharp debate within the White House over possible US military action against Iran and its nuclear enrichment facilities, The Nation has learned that the Bush Administration and the Pentagon have moved up the deployment of a major "strike group" of ships, including the nuclear aircraft carrier Eisenhower as well as a cruiser, destroyer, frigate, submarine escort and supply ship, to head for the Persian Gulf, just off Iran's western coast. This information follows a report in the current issue of Time magazine, both online and in print, that a group of ships capable of mining harbors has received orders to be ready to sail for the Persian Gulf by October 1.

editorial: the article is worth reading. I go back and forth on my guess as to what will happen when thinking about the players - Bush, in his own universe, thinking this will secure his legacy; hawks at the pentagon; realists at the pentagon; the democrats and some republicans who are opposed - ultimately there are too many unknowns.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:40:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
sorry if this was posted already, I just noticed the publication date of 9-21.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:43:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The first message was routine enough: a "Prepare to Deploy" order sent through naval communications channels to a submarine, an Aegis-class cruiser, two minesweepers and two mine hunters. The orders didn't actually command the ships out of port; they just said to be ready to move by Oct. 1. But inside the Navy those messages generated more buzz than usual last week when a second request, from the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), asked for fresh eyes on long-standing U.S. plans to blockade two Iranian oil ports on the Persian Gulf.


Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:51:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It would be funny if it wasn't so dark. You are entirely correct that US Iran policy is the subject of a struggle between powerful players inside the government. I don't think any of us who are outside those circle have a good sense of who is winning the struggle or indeed just who is siding with whom exactly.

This inexact art of appreciating the motives of top apparatchiks in order to predict policy has a name, it's called Kremlinology and that's the dark bit to me. It may have been inevitable, but we weren't supposed to end up doing Kremlinology over war declarations, opinion polls were supposed to be the strongest tool of analysis...

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:39:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Asia Times: Putin - no more Mr Nice Guy.

The article by Joseph Stroupe who recently published a book on energy security has three parts.

At the third annual meeting known as the Valdai Club, a meeting between President Vladimir Putin of Russia and Russia-watchers made up largely of Western political scientists and academics and held this year on September 9, Putin acknowledged Russia's great and mounting global energy leverage, but he also delivered an ostensibly reassuring promise that Russia would not use its rapidly intensifying and expanding global energy leverage to dominate others like "a superpower" would.

The Valdai Club has become a choice forum for Putin to attempt to allay Western fears over Russia's increasingly assertive and independent course and to polish Russia's image abroad. As such, one must realize that at a forum that is obviously slanted toward achievement of such political and public relations goals, the statements and claims made are specifically designed to accomplish the forum's purpose, and one must apply the appropriate subjectivity filters when analyzing them.

The hard fact is that a series of powerful arguments and irrefutable evidence exist to render completely hollow Putin's promise to "play nice" with mounting Russian global energy leverage. Even if Putin's promise is truly sincere and heartfelt, trends and forces not nearly under his control will soon dictate an outcome precisely opposite of his soothing promise, rendering it completely empty. How so? And what are the powerful arguments and irrefutable evidence that establish beyond any doubt the accuracy of such a conclusion?

by FarEasterner on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:48:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
THIS AND THAT
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:27:22 AM EST
 BBC: Planets have scientists buzzing

A new wide-field survey of the sky has made its first major discovery - two planets orbiting far-distant stars.

The SuperWasp project uses camera lenses and super-sensitive detectors to monitor stars for tiny dips in light that might betray a passing planet.

The UK-led project identified a number of "suspects" and then handed the data to a French observatory for checking.

It used an instrument to analyse the light from the stars in detail and confirm the presence of the planets.

"To get these two we had to survey about 1.1 million stars and then go though several stages of filtering. It's a bit like panning for gold," Professor Andrew Collier Cameron from the University of St Andrews told BBC News.

The two extrasolar (outside our Solar System) planets, now known as Wasp-1b and Wasp-2b, are in the constellations of Andromeda and Delphinus.


by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:32:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Deutsche Welle: Watercolors Allegedly By Adolf Hitler Go Up for Sale

Watercolors supposedly painted by Adolf Hitler are to go up for auction in England on Tuesday. Some say they're forgeries, but collectors from around the world have apparently expressed their interest.

Adolf Hitler apparently painted the watercolors while he was serving in the German army during World War I, after which they were hidden away for more than 60 years.

The 21 paintings and sketches -- mainly portraying landscapes, churches, woodland and houses -- have attracted strong interest from collectors in Russia, the United States and South Africa.

Collectors are unlikely to be the only ones present when the works are auctioned off on Tuesday in the quiet town of Lostwithiel. Television crews ranging from the BBC to Al Jazeera have announced they will report on the event in Cornwall.

"People have been ringing up every day about it," Ian Morris, auctioneer at Jefferys, told Reuters news agency.

Expecting a large audience, the auctioning house switched the sale from its showroom to a local hotel to allow more space for bidders.


by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:36:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

"And and that's me with Reich, my dog, and I'm killing mean mean French men and Jews, and we're all wearing yellow, I love people with yellow, and I love you mommy"

by Alex in Toulouse on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 04:52:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
NYO: @$#&*% Ken Burns! PBS Scrubbing G.I. Mouths With Soap

WWII Memory Film May Get Bleeped for F.C.C., Bush's Indecency Fines; Even Frontline Quivers; Oath Can Cost $325,000; Lowell Bergman Explodes

War can be hell on public television. It just can't contain any "fucks" or "shits" before 10 p.m.

Scenes of war on PBS in which soldiers use profanity have been cut or elaborately avoided in two upcoming Frontline documentaries. According to the journalists and PBS executives responsible, these edits have been made for one reason: fear of the Federal Communications Commission.

On Oct. 3, at 9 p.m., PBS will air Return of the Taliban. Its producer and writer, Martin Smith, is now sanitizing a sequence of the documentary.

"Some Canadian soldiers are fighting," Mr. Smith said. "They're in combat, and they're going, `Fuck!'"

After consultation with PBS executives and lawyers, Mr. Smith decided the scene is not worth "going to the mat for." Either he'll bleep the "fuck," or scrub the scene altogether, before the film airs.

"It's a really sorry state of affairs if we're Disney-fying combat," Mr. Smith said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 12:44:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just dub the dialogue.

'Blimey!'

'Oh deary me!'

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:41:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Warning, gratuitously long blockquote ahead:

From Monty Python's The Meaning of Life. a true story of gentlemen at war.

                      The First Zulu War.

                    Natal 1879 (not Glasgow)

          [Inside a tent.]

Pakenham-Walsh: Morning Ainsworth.

Ainsworth: Morning Pakenham-Walsh.

Pakenham-Walsh: Sleep well?

Ainsworth: Not bad. Bitten to shreds though. Must be a hole in the
     bloody mosquito net.

Pakenham-Walsh: Yes, savage little blighters aren't they?

First Lieut Chadwick: [arriving] Excuse me, sir.

Ainsworth: Yes Chadwick?

Chadwick: I'm afraid Perkins got rather badly bitten during the
     night.

Ainsworth: Well so did we. Huh.

Chadwick: Yes, but I do think the doctor ought to see him.

Ainsworth: Well go and fetch him, then.

Chadwick: Right you are, sir.

Ainsworth: Suppose I'd better go along. Coming, Pakenham?

Pakenham-Walsh: Yes I suppose so.

          [Chadwick leaves. Ainsworth and Pakenham-Walsh thread
          their leisurely way through the line of assegais.
          Pakenham-Walsh's valet is speared by a Zulu warrior but
          Pakenham-Walsh valiantly saves his jacket from the mud.
          They enter Perkins's tent. Perkins is on his camp bed.]

Ainsworth: Ah! Morning Perkins.

Perkins: Morning sir.

Ainsworth: What's all the trouble then?

Perkins: Bitten sir. During the night.

Ainsworth: Hm. Whole leg gone eh?

Perkins: Yes.

          [As they talk, the din of battle continues outside.
          Screams of dying men, crackling of tents set on fire.]

Ainsworth: How's it feel?

Perkins: Stings a bit.

Ainsworth: Mmm. Well it would, wouldn't it. That's quite a bite
     you've got there you know.

Perkins: Yes, real beauty isn't it?

All: Yes.

Ainsworth: Any idea how it happened?

Perkins: None at all. Complete mystery to me. Woke up just now...
     one sock too many.

Pakenham-Walsh: You must have a hell of a hole in your net.

Ainsworth: Hm. We've sent for the doctor.

Perkins: Ooh, hardly worth it, is it?

Ainsworth: Oh yes... better safe than sorry.

Pakenham-Walsh: Yes, good Lord, look at this.

          [He indicates a gigantic hole in the mosquito net.]

Ainsworth: By jove, that's enormous.

Pakenham-Walsh: You don't think it'll come back, do you?

Ainsworth: For more, you mean?

Pakenham-Walsh: Yes.

Ainsworth: You're right. We'd better get this stitched.

Pakenham-Walsh: Right.

Ainsworth: Hallo Doc.

Livingstone: [entering the tent with Chadwick] Morning. I came as
     fast as I could. Is something up?

Ainsworth: Yes, during the night old Perkins had his leg bitten
     sort of... off.

Livingstone: Ah hah!? Been in the wars have we?

Perkins: Yes.

Livingstone: Any headache, bowels all right? Well, let's have a
     look at this one leg of yours then. [Looks around under sheet]
     Yes... yes... yes... yes... yes... yes... well, this is
     nothing to worry about.

Perkins: Oh good.

Livingstone: There's a lot of it about, probably a virus, keep
     warm, plenty of rest, and if you're playing football or
     anything try and favour the other leg.

Perkins: Oh right ho.

Livingstone: Be as right as rain in a couple of days.

Perkins: Thanks for the reassurance, doc.

Livingstone: Not at all, that's what I'm here for. Any other
     problems I can reassure you about?

Perkins: No I'm fine.

Livingstone: Jolly good. Well, must be off.

Perkins: So it'll just grow back then, will it?

Livingstone: Er... I think I'd better come clean with you about
     this... it's... um it's not a virus, I'm afraid. You see, a
     virus is what we doctors call very very small. So small it
     could not possibly have made off with a whole leg. What we're
     looking for here is I think, and this is no more than an
     educated guess, I'd like to make that clear, is some
     multi-cellular life form with stripes, huge razor-sharp teeth,
     about eleven foot long and of the genu felis horribilis.
     What we doctors, in fact, call a tiger.

All in tent: A tiger...!!

          [Outside, everyone engaged in battle, including the
          Zulus, breaks off and shouts in horror:]

All: A tiger!

          [The Zulus run off.]

Pakenham-Walsh: A tiger - in Africa?

Ainsworth: Hm...

Pakenham-Walsh: A tiger in Africa...?

Ainsworth: Ah... well it's probably escaped from a zoo.

Pakenham-Walsh: Well it doesn't sound very likely.

Ainsworth: [quietly] Stumm, stumm...

          [A severely-wounded Sergeant staggers into the tent.]

Sergeant: Sir, sir, the attack's over, sir! the Zulus are
     retreating.

Ainsworth: [dismissively] Oh jolly good. [He turns his back to the
     group around Perkins.]

Sergeant: Quite a lot of casualties though, sir. C Division wiped
     out. Signals gone. Thirty men killed in F Section. I should
     think about a hundred - a hundred and fifty men altogether.

Ainsworth: [not very interested] Yes, yes I see, yes... Jolly good.

Sergeant: I haven't got the final figures, sir. There's a lot of
     seriously wounded in the compound...

Ainsworth: [interrupting] Yes... well, the thing is, Sergeant, I've
     got a bit of a problem here. [With gravity.] One of the
     officers has lost a leg.

Sergeant: [stunned by the news] Oh no, sir!

Ainsworth: [gravely] I'm afraid so. Probably a tiger.

Sergeant: In Africa?

Ainsworth and Pakenham-Walsh: Stumm, stumm...

Ainsworth: The M.O. says we can stitch it back on if we find it
     immediately.

Sergeant: Right sir! I'll organise a party right away, sir!

Ainsworth: Well it's hardly time for that, is it Sergeant...?

Sergeant: A search party...

Ainsworth: Ah! Much better idea. I'll tell you what, organise one
     straight away.

Sergeant: Yes sir!

          [Outside dead British bodies (of the other ranks) are
          everywhere.]

Sergeant: [apologetically] Sorry about the mess, sir. We'll try and
     get it cleared up, by the time you get back.

          [They walk through the carnage. Orderlies are cheerfully
          attending to the equally cheery wounded and the only
          slightly less cheery dead.]

A dying man: [covered in blood] We showed 'em, didn't we, sir?

Ainsworth: Yes.

          [He gives a thumbs up and dies.]

Sergeant: [addressing a soldier who is giving water to a dying man]
     We've got to get a search party, leave that alone.

Another cheery cockney: [with an assegai sticking out of his chest]
     This is fun, sir, init... all this killing... bloodshed...
     bloody good fun sir, init?

Ainsworth: [abstracted] Yes... very good.

          [He waves and moves on.]

A severed head: Morning, sir!

Ainsworth: Nasty wound you've got there, Potter.

Severed head: [cheerily] Thank you very much sir!

Ainsworth: Come on private - we're making up a search party.

Another terrible casualty: Better than staying at home, eh sir! At
     home if you kill someone they arrest you. Here they give you
     a gun, and show you what to do, sir. I mean, I killed fifteen
     of those buggers sir! Now at home they'd hang me. Here they
     give me a fucking medal sir!

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:57:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
ITPRO (via SlashDot): Remember the forgotten hero who saved the world Colonel Stanislav Yefgrafovich Petrov

(A little late, but still worth remembering...)

Anyway, at 40 minutes past midnight on the 26th Petrov looked up and saw a missile launch from a United States silo had been detected by one of his satellites. Now you might expect panic at this point but missile command tends to attract the serious, sober type, probably the type of people who smoke a pipe and sew leather patches on their jackets, and Petrov kept his head.

He knew the satellite had been reported as suspect and decided to hold off on informing the high command. Then a second missile launch was picked up, and shortly after another, and another and another. Petrov knew that if he waited until he could confirm the launches with ground radar it would be too late for his country, he and his family would die and the Yankees would win the Cold War.

Thankfully for us he thought before acting. He reasoned that it was illogical for a surprise attack to launch missiles one after the other - instead you'd launch everything you had and hope to wipe out the enemy before they reacted. He left the launch button alone and thankfully the missiles proved to be ghosts.

Myself and millions other slept peacefully in our beds that night, blissfully unaware of how close we came to fiery death or a worse existence than we could imagine if we had lived. Had the missiles flown Britain would, according to government war plan projections, currently be at a medieval level of technology in most places, having lost 90 per cent of its population.

Petrov was reprimanded and now lives in the scientific community of Fryazino in Russia. He was honoured this year in a ceremony at the United Nations and has been honoured with two World Citizen Awards. So take some time out today and say your private thanks to the man who saved the world.



Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.
by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 01:13:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Wall Street Journal: What Do You Know?
If you're an American college student, probably not much.

A study released this week by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute -- www.americancivicliteracy.org --  ... concludes that "America's colleges and universities fail to increase knowledge about America's history and institutions." In a 60-question multiple-choice quiz ,"college seniors failed the civic literacy exam, with an average score of 53.2 percent, or F, on a traditional grading scale." And at many schools "seniors know less than freshmen about America's history, government, foreign affairs, and economy."

...

Among college seniors, less than half--47.9%--correctly concluded that "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal" was from the Declaration of Independence. More than half did not know that the Bill of Rights prohibits the governmental establishment of an official religion, and "55.4 percent could not recognize Yorktown as the battle that brought the American Revolution to an end" (more than one quarter believing that it was the Civil War battle of Gettysburg that had ended the Revolution).

The questions about more recent matters produced more accurate answers. More than 80% of students could identify Franklin D. Roosevelt's programs as the New Deal, 79% knew that Brown v. Board of Education ordered an end to racial segregation, and 69% were aware that GDP was the best measure of output of our economy.

...

As for the 50 colleges that participated in the program, the best-scoring students were not from the institutions one might expect. Rhodes College, Colorado State University and Calvin College were the top three, with senior students averaging between 9.5 and 11.6 percentage points higher than freshmen.

At the other end of the scale were 16 schools that showed "negative learning"--that is, seniors scored lower than freshmen. Cornell, UC Berkeley and Johns Hopkins were the worst three, their seniors scoring between 3.3 and 7.3 percentage points worse than their freshmen. And on the negative list were some other very prestigious universities: Williams, Georgetown, Yale, Duke and Brown.

How did these educational failures come to pass? ... Seniors at the top test-scoring colleges "took an average of 4.2 history and political science courses, while seniors at the two lowest-ranked colleges . . . took an average of 2.9 history and political science courses." Similarly, higher ranked colleges spent more time on homework, 20 hours a week at fourth-ranked Grove City College and 14 or 15 at low-ranked Georgetown and Berkeley.

...

The study found that "73 percent of seniors' families at Grove City and Harvard [ranking 4th and 25th, respectively] discussed current events or history on a weekly or daily basis," whereas only half did at low ranked Berkeley and Johns Hopkins.

The author prefaces his article with a quote from Thomas Jefferson:

"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power."

Thomas Jefferson    
letter to William Charles Jarvis    
Sept. 20, 1820

I'm afraid I would fail this test myself.

Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 02:47:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Intercollegiate Studies Program and the WSJ are morons. No-one is teaching "US Civics" in political science classes in college and I'll go further and say they shouldn't be either.

If you want to teach civics, then school is the place for that. Not university. And if they haven't got it by the end of school, then it is a failure, but not one we should be expecting universities to fix.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 03:50:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And if they haven't got it by the end of school, then it is a failure, but not one we should be expecting universities to fix.

Actually, universities in the U.S. generally expect to teach first year students how to write properly.  I agree it's a shame, but so is the fact that George Bush is president of the United States.  Better to try to fix the problem (at the college level if necessary in the short-term) than throw our hands in the air like we just don't care.

Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 04:36:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, on second thought though, whe