European Tribune

Blair to Resign This Month?

by Londonbear
Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 07:27:58 AM EST

This is one of those "I feel it in my waters" speculations that are sometimes good indicators of a mood and sometime just insubstantial musing but here goes.

I have a suspicion that we may see a Blair resignation as  Labour Leader within the month.


These feelings have been prompted by a couple of developments today. The first is that Blair has cut his holiday in Florida short to return to deal with what looks like a developing crisis in the Northern Ireland peace process, the second is a speech by Home Secretary John Reid.

The Northern Ireland position has developed into one of those - "you go first" "no you go first" situations. The Northern Ireland Assembly is suspended and direct rule from Westminster has been imposed because of the failure of the two main parties in the Assembly to agree on a power sharing executive. Ian Paisley's DUP will not work with Sinn Fein unless SF agree to work with the Police Service fully. SF has a traditional hosility to the police from the days of the Northern Ireland Constabulary. That was overtly sectarian on the side of the protestants and the republican movement has refused to accept a change since the NIC was abolished and the new Police Service started.

Sinn Fein has now agreed to hold an Ardesh or party conference to discuss this policing issue this month but providing there was a positive response to the decision by the two governments and the DUP. The DUP wanst action before they comment so we are in a Catch 22. If the Executive is not agreed by the end of March the governments have threatened to abandon the whole process (the exact date is a bit variable as the clock tends to be stopped in the processes, a bit like EU negotiations).

I am in two minds about this indicator. One side tells me that Blair will hang on in an attempt to make this his "legacy". The other tells me that he would not mind it going wrong but does not want to take the blame. Failure would destroy the legacy of Mo Mowlem, the late MP who was the facilitator if not the architect of the peace process. The affection she is held in after her untimely death must grate with the Dear Leader. Blair may want to resign in time for a decision to have to be taken by his successor. Resigning this month would just about make that timetable if the Leadership was uncontested.

That brings me to the second aspect. The vultures are starting to circle in an attempt to grab the best bit of his corpse, the post of PM. Brown has long been seen the obvious candidate but in a speech today John Reid was making coded indications that he would run. His theme chimed with that of Blair's New Year message to his party, that the New Labour project should continue. He also damned Brown with faint praise. Reid is likely to be the first to start floating balloons about standing in the election. This will have two effects. The speculation on timing will be constant and no government business will be noticed as the constant reports of this MP or another vying for the Leadership or Deputy will be a constant theme from now on. Every press conference and every PM Question time will have a "when are you going?" moment to get through.

May also brings the round of devolved elections and having Brown in place will leave him getting the blame for losses. That legacy thing again.  

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Interesting. How about this?

The Guardian: Brown may have to wait until summer before taking charge (January 2, 2007)

For how long and for what purpose? That is the question that hangs over Tony Blair as he enters his tenth and final prime ministerial year. But the prime minister is not keen to go soon, as his new year message makes clear. He still believes he has a distinctive contribution to make before he quits.

He has even said he hopes to be prime minister when the Germans host the G8 summit in Heiligendamm in June.

But it is going to take consummate political management by Mr Blair to stay in office until then. There is a possibility that Labour MPs will reignite the rebellion of last September and seek an early date for his departure. If the Cameron poll lead starts to stretch, if the police inquiry into cash for honours swamps all Downing Street initiatives, or if the Welsh and Scottish Labour Party fear a wipe-out under a Blair-led campaign in the May elections, then the clamour for Mr Blair to go in March could grow.



Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 08:27:55 AM EST
I sure hope so.

There's one "leader" I'm looking forward to seeing the back of.

"C'est un scandale !"

by redstar on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 10:37:03 AM EST
The strategy seems to be: have Blair quit early, see both Northern Ireland and Scotland explode in Brown's hands within 6 months, replace him with Reid. Arrgh!

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 11:04:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You're right about Reid being the heir apparent in BlairLand. There have been enough coded messages from the Politburo making that clear.

But Blair is enough of a narcissist to hang on for as long as he can. He desperately wants to match Thatcher's decade.

So I'd guess it goes like this - nominal hand over to Brown after threats of a vote of no confidence, a nasty leadership battle that could go either way, and a split shell of a party with no popular support that's easy pickings for the Tories in the next election run.

Followed by the departure of Scotland from the Union, leading to a permanent Tory majority, with the LibDems limping along in second place as a micro-opposition.

(Does anyone outside of the UK have a spare bedroom I could borrow for a while?)

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 02:24:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I do.

But given your Tories are arguably slightly to the left of America's Democrats, I'm not sure it's what you're looking for.

"C'est un scandale !"

by redstar on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 03:48:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We could ask Barbara whether she'll let you her flat in Český Krumlov.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 05:17:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Heh, not a year ago I was at an exhibition of paintings of Egon Schiele in Vienna, many of which depict Český Krumlov/Krummau an der Moldau.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 06:16:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As you may know there is an Egon Schiele museum in Krumlov, where he lived and worked.
In 1911, Schiele met the seventeen-year-old Valerie (Wally) Neuzil, who lived with him in Vienna and served as model for some of his best paintings. Very little is known of her, except that she had previously modelled for Gustav Klimt and might have been one of his mistresses. Schiele and Wally wanted to escape what they perceived as the claustrophobic Viennese milieu, and went to the small town of Český Krumlov (Krumau) in southern Bohemia (the place where Schiele's mother was born, and nowadays the site of a museum dedicated to Schiele). Despite Schiele's family connections in Krumau, he and his lover were driven out of the town by the residents, who strongly disapproved of their lifestyle, including his alleged employment of the town's teenage girls as models.
Ah, the prodigal son.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 06:22:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Is Brown smart enough to have a counter-strategy in his drawer?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 05:18:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Perhaps Tories should do nothing (in public), sit and wait when power will fall into their lap. They already moved to the centre with deceptive Cameron's leftie image, fortunately LibDems have chosen the wrong elderly leader, and you know all about Labor. It's time for the ground work to unseat Laborists and LibDems in shaky constituencies.  
by FarEasterner on Thu Jan 4th, 2007 at 08:17:01 PM EST
Trouble with "ground work" is that the Tories are not a grass-roots party.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 05:18:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Do you mean that they were party with power for so long that all partyworkers disappeared and when they were unseated by Blairites there was not much left of effective party-machine?
by FarEasterner on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 05:37:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Tory is a rural and upper-middle-class to upper-class party. It never had much by way of grass roots (compared with the Labour Party which used to represent the working class and still has strong ties to unions). In addition, tha national party machine is often at odds with the local parties (having trouble getting their women and minority candidates of choice past the local nomination procedure).

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 05:57:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually it is the Labour Party which has suffered the most from loss of ordinary workers. Many of the traditional grass roots were true socialists through the union movement. Many have been put off by the "New Labour" project and even more deserted because of the Iraq war. If they did not actually resign the party, they gave up a lot of voluntary work. In the UK parties depend on grass roots to stuff envelopes with literature and even deliver door to door. At general elections you are allowed one document delivered free via the post and campaign cost limitiations mean you cannot afford to send another through the mail. People are also needed to do low level fund raising and the other administrative work in running the party and elections.

While the Labour party lost a lot of young and middle aged activists who did this, the Conservatives have always relied on the serried ranks of blue rinsed little old ladies who they could rely on. Their social side has reduced a bit but they still generate these gangs of pensioners to do the work. Ironically Cameron stands to lose some of these people who are usually very right wing in his attempts to gain the centre.

by Londonbear on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 09:10:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
My guess is that Blair will go shortly after his tenth anniversary. Probably in time for Brown to participate in  the German conference.

Money is a sign of Poverty - Culture Saying
by RogueTrooper on Fri Jan 5th, 2007 at 06:09:07 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]