|
by edwin
There is much to do about the evils of Bush and the United States. There is far less about the actions about various Western countries.
Bush has become a smoke screen for torture, murder, and even the war crime of aggression. It's all Bush's fault that we are involved in [your choice of morally outrageous behaviour]. The answer is no. There is a slime that underlies Europe, and the rest of the western world is there, bubbling away just below the surface. Bush has become a convenient lie to cover the slime with. At least there is certain honesty in the way Britain commits its class A war crimes. Canada should be everyone's favourate hypocrite. Unable to get popular support for war crimes from the general population, Chrétien (Liberal), Martin (Liberal) and now Harper (Conservative) have all been engaging in secret wars. Forget the Sponsorship Scandal. People were hung at Nuremberg for the crimes these men have participated in.
Ottawa now admits that some Canadian soldiers are in Iraq, even though Canada refused to join the U.S.-led war against Saddam Hussein.
Prime Minister Chrétien says Canada isn't at war with Iraq. But he conceded that some Canadian soldiers could be with U.S. and British troops inside the country. "It's possible," he said, "but they are not in combat roles." Canada was and is not only involved, at one point a Canadian General was the number 2 man in the war of aggression.
Brigadier-General Walt Natynczyk is deputy commander of the U.S. Army's Three Corps, which is to take command in Iraq next year, and he has already been given approval to engage in "military operations up to and including participation in hostilities" under a recently declassified order from the head of the Canadian Forces. http://www.rightnation.us/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t22232.html originally form the National Post. Least anyone have any lingering confusion about what Canada feels about is Iraqi involvement:
OTTAWA - Her Excellency the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean, Governor General of Canada, today announced the awarding of five Meritorious Service Decorations (military division) to individuals whose specific achievements have brought honour to the Canadian Forces and to Canada. Recipients will be invited to receive their decorations at a presentation ceremony to be held at a later date. http://www.gg.ca/media/doc.asp?lang=e&DocID=4653 Just to make sure there is no misunderstanding at all:
On January 24, 2006, Governor General Michaëlle Jean awarded him the Meritorious Service Cross. http://www.arabamericannews.com/newsarticle.php?articleid=7322 The US is attempting to target Iran next. The point is that the US is probably not going it alone. There was lots of verbal protest about US evil deeds, but from rendition to aggression the West has found it convenient to go along with the US - all the time making faint protesting noises. In effect "NO" means "YES". And now the other shoe is dropping and perhaps slightly more strident protesting noises are being made. The question is - does "NO" still mean "YES"? Certainly the actions of those countries that participated in Clinton's rendition initiative, and those countries that have engaged in activities in Iraq have helped to set up the invasion of Iran. It's time to stop having a good time bashing Bush and the US. Bush is a problem, but the problem is not Bush. Similarly the US is a problem, but the problem is not the US.
We need to occasionally look in the mirror. Most, if not all of the West has helped to create the conditions where the invasion of Iran is now possible. It's been decades, in the making. It is a landscape of torture, war, short-term convenience over human rights, and might makes right that must be changed. |
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . Search . Search (Google) . Archives (Wiki) Art, Economics, Energy, Environment, EU Politics, Mech & Tech, By Country Login
|
||
|
Creating a landscape of war while engaging in faint murmurs of protest | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Creating a landscape of war while engaging in faint murmurs of protest | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||
| ||||