|
by DoDo
Having no clue about pre-existence of such terminology in English, I invented this English name for certain trains connected by nothing but appearance: streamlined multiple units that have, for one reason or another, an elevated-level forward-looking compartment on their end cars.
Let's start with an example from Sweden: the Swedish state railway (SJ) series Y3 "Kamelen" (='Camel'). Cars for four diesel multiple units (DMUs) were built in Germany in 1966. The end cars showcase a long hump with the driver's cabin and a panoramic passenger compartment, with the diesel equipment (motor cars) resp. a lower floor with seats (driving trailer) underneath.
Germany
Starting a non-straighforward evolution, the grandmother of the German 'hump-nosed' trains was the famed Schienenzeppelin, a propeller-driven fast railcar designed by one Franz Kruckenberg. Fast diesel railcars of the time had the driver crammed into a small place in front of the noisy motor, behind a nose that was more stylish than truly aerodynamic. The Rail Zeppelin however had a long aerodynamic nose, broken at the top end by the windshield (forced by the limited window strength of the time). The Rail Zeppelin was a dead-end, despite setting a world record of 230.2 km/h in 1931. But, with propeller removed, it served as a testbed for a less exotic, but much less well known, yet more influential work of Kruckenberg, that was named for him:
The room under the aerodynamic hood was used for the engine, with other machinery under the driver's cabin. The sole prototype achieved 215 km/h in summertime speed trials. But its axle bearings weren't up to the hardships, and the summer was that of 1939 -- and right at the outbreak of WWII, all diesel-powered fast trains were mothballed, to spare fuel for the tanks & warships... Only parts of the stored-away prototype could be salvaged by a museum in Dresden when it was scrapped in 1958. However, SVT 137 155 was the mother of the most celebrated DMUs of both Germanys. The young West German railways (DB), after the failure (unstable running) of two light luxury DMUs (class VT 10.5), ordered a much more solid construction, class VT 11.5 (later renamed series 601). The 9 trainsets (+ spare tractor head) were for the TransEuropExpress (TEE) service, a joint project of the West European railways from 1957. Paralleling similar ill-considered ideas across the pond (see below), the concept was to compete with air traffic with fast all-first-class luxury trainsets that can pass borders easily. (Problems were, at 160 km/h these trains were still not fast enough, the luxury passenger circle not big enough, and trainsets too short for mass traffic.)
Five 'half-trains' were also delivered to the Danish State Railways (DSB) in 1963 (series MA "Lyntog"), which had a driving trailer at the other end, but also with elevated cab, to have room for a 'walk-through' front door to link up two trains. The same year the East German DR received the first of its eight VT 18.16 (later renamed series 175, much later all-German series 675). They were kind of a prestige counter-project to DB's trains, and made an impression even across the Iron Curtain on international runs.
In 1970, DB also rebuilt four of its tractor heads with turbine drives (class 602), but that wasn't a first. Nor the originals. North America The very first US streamlined DMU, Union Pacific's M-10000 "Tin Worm" prototype from 1934, featured an elevated 'turret cab', above large (and IMO ugly) air intakes. Some later members of UP's series, copying Illinois Central's #121 "Green Diamond" or "Tobacco Worm" (all 1936), had fronts like diesel locomotives of the era, but the roof again fell off behind the cab -- another distinctive hump-nosed look. In the fifties, the locomotive of the failed Aerotrain also sported a similar cab-hump.
The most famed North American trains with a hump on the nose were the six TurboTrains built by United Aircraft in 1967 (originally five for Canadian National and one for DoT). They were powered by turbines, which were strong yet relatively small, so a similar 'hump' with panoramic view could be placed upon them as on the SJ Y3. In North American terminology, this design was christened 'dome motor car'. The UAC Turbo was a real forerunner of high-speed trains, even incorporating passive tilt technology, but although it still holds the US rail speed record at 274.9 km/h (170.8 mph) and the Canadian at 226.3 km/h (140.6 mph), it was a failure: the turbine technology wasn't really rail-worthy, and the Oil Crises made their high consumption a problem.
Italy Italian high-speed developers chose electric multiple units (EMUs) early on -- in fact in Mussolini's time (ETR200-ETR240 family), but due to mismanagement and corruption, projects suffered continuous delays for half a century, thus Shinkansen and TGV could steal the limelight. Still, in 1953, the state railways FS received two series ETR300 "Settebello" seven-car luxury EMUs for (originally) 160 km/h. Electric equipment fit under the floor, but the driver's cabin was placed in a hump, to have panoramic compartments of an entirely different kind: looking forward. Later the trains were also involved in TEE traffic, and received a third twin, and in 1960 4 four-car sisters (ETR250 "Arlecchino").
The Netherlands None of the above trains lived up fully to expectations. Not so the class Plan Z/ICM "Koploper" of the Dutch state railways NS. 94 three-car EMUs (series 4000) and another 50 of the 4-car version (series 4200) were built for IC service from 1977. The driver's cabin was elevated to get around the problem of the fixed length of EMUs: two trains can be coupled with the noses opening into a gangway. (Like the second endcar of the DSB "Lyntog"-s, but also CN's Turbos.)
Japan When national railways JNR built its first super-express in 1958 (series EC20, later 151), they wanted to have good linesight for the driver at high speed (Japan has small narrow-gauge railways; a 151 set a narrow-gauge world speed record of 163 km/h in 1959) and keep loud electric equipment away from passengers -- hence it got a DB VT 11.5-like 'bonnet' front. The series 151 not only led to the (flat-roofed) Shinkansen, but spawned a very large family of 'hump-nosed' EMUs for JNR and its private successors (DC sisters series 161, 181, 183, 189, AC sisters 481, 483, 485, 489, and their night-train versions 581, 583, later JR Hokkaido DC sister 781; and the dual-system 443 and diesel-electric hybrid 190/191 inspection trains), most of them with the newer flat fronts (more like the NS "Koploper") called 'walk-through' (though few really had front doors).
More modern descendants at JR East (the DC E351 "Super Azusa", dual-system 651 "Super Hitachi", E653, AC E751) and JR Hokkaido (789) got more stylish fronts. From 1960 the same or similar 'bonnet' and 'walk-through' fronts were also used in DMUs (old JNR series D[iesel]c[ar]80, Dc81, Dc/N183, and JR Hokkaido's newer tilting trains Dc261 "Super Soya", Dc281 "Super Hokuto", Dc283 "Super Ozora").
The elevated cab behind panoramic front design (like FS "Settebello") is also widespread. JNR had some (rebuilt series 165, Dc183-1000 subseries); but from the early sixties, it was two privates that made most use of it: Nagoya Railroad (first Panorama Cars: series 7000, 7500) and Odakyu Express Railway (Romancecar series 3100 NSE, 7000 LSE, 10000 HiSE, 50000 VSE).
|
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . Search . Search (Google) . Archives (Wiki) Art, Economics, Energy, Environment, EU Politics, Mech & Tech, By Country Login
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Occasional Train Blogging: Hump-Nosed Trains | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Occasional Train Blogging: Hump-Nosed Trains | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||