Iraq's oil law: what does it say?

by talos
Wed Feb 21st, 2007 at 11:04:22 AM EST

Raed Jarrar has obtained a copy of the Iraq Oil Law that will be heading to the Iraqi cabinet for approval. Jarrar has translated the Law in Eglish [pdf here] and comments that:

...This law legalizes PSAs (production sharing agreements) in Iraq. Iraq will be the only country in the middle east with such contracts privatising Iraqi oil and giving foreign companies crazy rates of profit that may reach to more than three fourth of the general revenue. Iraq and Iraqis need every Dinar that comes from oil sales. In addition to the financial aspects of this law, it can be considered the funding tool for splitting Iraq into three states. It undermines the central government and distributes oil revenues directly to the three regions, which sets the foundations for what Iraq's enemies are trying to achieve in terms of establishing three independent states.

From the diaries -- whataboutbob


In an interview to Amy Goodman at Democracy Now!, Jarrar reports among other things that:

Iraq will not be capable of controlling the levels -- the limits of production, which means that Iraq cannot be a part of OPEC anymore. And Iraq will have this very complicated institution called the Federal Oil and Gas Council, that will have representatives from the foreign oil companies on the board of it, so representatives from, let's say, ExxonMobil and Shell and British Petroleum will be on the federal board of Iraq approving their own contracts.

while in the same show, Antonia Juhasz concurs that:

...the law certainly opens the door to US oil companies and the Bush administration winning a very large piece of their objective of going to war in Iraq, at least winning it on paper. The law does almost word for word what was laid out in the Baker-Hamilton recommendation... which is, at the very basic level, to turn Iraq's nationalized oil system, the model that 90% of the world's oil is governed by, take its nationalized oil system and turn it into a commercial system fully open to foreign corporate investment on terms as of yet to be decided. So it leaves vague this very important question of what type of contracts will the Iraqi government use. But what it leaves clear is that basically every level of the oil industry will be open to private foreign companies.

...it introduces this very unique model, which is that ultimate decision making on contracts rests with a new council to be set up in Iraq, and sitting on that council will be representatives -- executives, in fact -- of oil companies, both foreign and domestic...

I've taken a look at the draft law - but I'm no expert, so I'd be interested in the reactions and analysis of people here at the ET who are much more knowledgeable about what this law might mean and what its effects would be. How unique is the proposed model?

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
This sounds like what was done in South America in the last century - and has been undone by various leftwing Bolivarists. More specifically, it is of the type of agreements that have been broken recently in Bolivia.

Ugh. It really was for oil... Bush and Cheney are at least proving their obedience to Big oil.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Feb 20th, 2007 at 09:47:10 PM EST
It was about more than oil, although that is by far the most profitable portion of the Iraqi economy.  It was about creating a laissez-faire utopia, a kind of Chile but much more pure, where the principles of the radically free market would produce undreamed of prosperity at home and profit for the foreign owners.  The Republicans have been unable to do this even in the United States, but they could do it in an occupied country.  So what you have is a melding of Anglo free trade imperialism, so beloved by the Victorians, and a 20th century anti-communist ideology.  
by bellumregio on Wed Feb 21st, 2007 at 08:49:52 AM EST
I think oil is the primary objective, but there are ancillary geo-political considerations.  Almost a year and a half ago, I came across a commentary by Robert Higgs that remains (in my opinion) the most succinct analysis of the underlying Bush administration's plans for Iraq:

By effectively controlling the region, the U.S. government would attain several of its cherished ends. First, it would eliminate or greatly diminish the threats posed to Israel by countries such as Syria and Iran. Second, it would control much of the oil and gas extraction and transportation in a region believed to be richly endowed with untapped deposits of those prized fossil fuels. Third, it would butt up against the Russians and the Chinese, excluding them from hegemony or substantial influence in the lands of the Great Game. Fourth (but merely incidental, you should understand), important supporters of the Bush team would make tons of money: Halliburton, Bechtel, Chevron, Unocal, Shell, and the rest of the good old boys, not to mention the arms suppliers and the mercenaries.

I strongly urge you to read the entire article.

"Beware of the man who does not talk, and the dog that does not bark." Cheyenne

by maracatu on Thu Feb 22nd, 2007 at 07:43:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Jerome wrote an article about these agreements about a month ago:

http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2007/1/7/142841/2841

I guess the big news here is that someone has translated the new law into english. As a cynic, I might say that they could have saved themselves alot of trouble if they just got hold of the original law before it was translated into arabic.

I have no idea how bad this new law will be for iraqis. I guess the oil people around here might be able to say something thought, if they have the time or inclination to look at the thing.

by Trond Ove on Wed Feb 21st, 2007 at 09:17:49 AM EST
If I understand correctly, when Jerome wrote that post, the issue was PSAs mainly. Now there seems to be more info on the table - that despite the valid point that Jerome was making that you can legislate whatever you want... as long as there is a raging civil war and/or an armed liberation struggle, no one in their right mind would invest there.

The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake
by talos (mihalis at gmail dot com) on Wed Feb 21st, 2007 at 10:14:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]