Why the Left Loses

by ATinNM
Thu Feb 22nd, 2007 at 10:38:44 PM EST

Yippie!

I've got 12 pieces ready for sale and I'm celebrating by getting throughly roasted on, what is affectionly known in the States as, "Three-Buck Chuck" wine.

As a result of imbibing 2 bottles I'm feeling particularly revolutionary and ...

there has been a call for more diaries (the fools, the fools) ...

here goes ....


The Left loses from the plain and simple fact we don't 'get' the current environment.  

As Leftists we have the vague assumption people use their brains when thinking about the Public Good.

Nope.

The sad fact:  Most people don't know beans about politics, less about economics, and even less about the Civic Good.  They don't know about this stuff because there is no readily available medium discussing this stuff.  What there is, is media controlled by the trans-national corporations and other Scum-of-the-Universe.  (Can you say, "Murdoch?")

One this is recognized things become a whole bunch simplier.  

First, journalists - at least in the US, and I've met more than a few - aren't the sharpest tool in the drawer.  I mean, these people take 4 years to learn how to write a 1,000 word essay answering Who, What, When, Where, and Why.  Most people, of moderate intelligence, can 'get' this in - oh - six months, 8 months at the outside.  

Second, in order to get a job they have to be - duh - hired.  

So.

You're Daddy, or Mommy, Big-Bucks.  You want to, in so many words, rape the Planet.  Who are you going to hire?  Someone with 3 neurons to rub together or Joe/Jane Numb-Nuts with the brains of jelly and the morals of a whore?  Gosh.  It gets real simple, don't it?

So we get a mass media run by on-the-make simpletons spewing out whatever their paymasters wish.  

And if you think I'm a paranoid, elitist, froth-mind -- Look at the crap they're presenting!  

How can anybody with a slight toehold on reality accept this:

As the rich get richer the riches they spend will trickle down to the average working slob.

What on God's Good Green Earth could ever give anybody the impetus to take this seriously?  Especially when this little meme is tossed into the mix:

Greed is good.  Maximizing Greed helps the economy

Ok.  We have a bunch of greedy (i.e., those who think grabbing as much moola as they can is the sole goal of human existence) people, laying their hands on as much money as they can, and then they ... spend it for the Public Good.(!)  

Say WHAT!?!

Yet in any mass medium you care to consume this will be presented as the height of rational thought.  Serious journalists with serious miens using serious tone-of-voice on serious news (sic) programs will trot this baloney out and get serious money to do so ... while the Bosses chortle.  

We on the Left have to start realizing a communicatory environnment run by our enemy is not going to be shouting our message.  If we're lucky they will mention, out of context, a slant on an issue which they will promptly smear, obfuscate, and lie about.  

Watch a news broadcast.  Carefully look at not only what they say about our issues but also where they position, in the broadcast, what they say about our issues.  To quote Mr Triloqvist, "Heap big magic in them thar thing-gummies."  (Ok, loosely quoted.  Very loosely.  In fact ... he never actually said that, but he could have said that and, perhaps, he should have said that and anyway its all relative.)  

Hidden persuaders are hidden un-persuaders turned on their heads.

If you're Joe/Jane Worker busting your butt trying to ... um ... eat & pay the rent ... how much time can you spend reading Locke, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Proudhon, Veblen, Wittgenstein, Keynes, & etc, etc, et al to get a handle on the discussion?  You can't.  It's impossible.  JW depends on the media.  As JW depends on the media, and everything JW hears, sees - breathes - in this media environment is presented oh so slickly and oh so well and oh so against JW but ... JW doesn't know that because (I'm sorry to say) we have failed!

We, on the Left, have failed to grasp the shift in Public Opinion as molded by the plutocrats who own the means of the production of Public Opinion.  

And that's why we lose.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Funny - you sound exactly like me on Jallu (a superb Finnish branvin or burnt wine) ;-)

One day we have to get drunk together and then go out and vomit on Murdochs. I am a non-violent person, but I do not consider soft projectiles to be violence. I have not yet given up hope that the Narri Approach (That's Finnish for Jester) - ie hitting those in power on the head with an inflated pigs' bladder - will be effective.

What we need is more Ridicule! It is a powerful weapon against the pompous. But one blow is never enough - drip drip drip.

Now go and join the Bald One in rehab. And take care ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 02:16:35 AM EST
I suggest you two write a joint drunk diary...

"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char
by Melanchthon on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 06:53:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You think AT did this alone?

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 09:43:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hey, that's my job !!!!

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 03:37:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Funny - you sound exactly like me on Jallu (a superb Finnish branvin or burnt wine) ;-)

That must have something to do with the fact that I find both of you barely comprehensible and strangely inspiring at the same time.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 08:22:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You surely know the Indian concept of the Mast - The Holy Idiot?

Actually I grew up on Lawrence Lipton's 'The Hoy Barbarians'

 "When the barbarians appear on the frontiers of a civilization it is a sign of crisis in that civilization. If the barbarians come, not with weapons of war but with the songs and ikons of peace, it is a sign that the crisis is one of a spiritual nature".

I produced a revue at school while in the Sixth Form of my grammar school in aid of the Congo Relief Fund (1960 or 61?). One sketch I wrote featured Jack Kerouac, so I've been at this subversive stuff quite a long time ;-). With about 600 parents, teachers and pupils in the Great Hall of a school founded in 1444, it gave me a tremendous buzz to screw with their minds. The feeling's never quite receded.

The Headmaster was very pleased though with the money we raised, and in an unprecedented gesture, came on stage and shook our hands. I am not sure he fully understood what we were up to...

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 09:40:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Naturally, Migu, in no way way am I comparing you to a headmster 8-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 09:41:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That would be Jerome. I'm just the science teacher.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 05:02:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And Colman would be...?

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Feb 24th, 2007 at 01:27:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So you could be a fundraiser for ET...

"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char
by Melanchthon on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 10:45:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]


"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 07:28:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hey, I never knew that! Thanks...An image to ponder on

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Feb 24th, 2007 at 01:29:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Image and Myth, one hand washing the other.  

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.
by ATinNM on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 08:19:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Having more than a few drinks together sounds dangerous - fun! - but dangerous.  If you're ever in the States let me know and I'll get there.  Somehow.

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.
by ATinNM on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 07:18:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The chances of me coming to the States again get slimmer and slimmer, sadly. Though I have some old Jewish comedy friends from Boston  who have a house in NM which they plead with me to visit.

I just feel so uncomfortable flying for environmental reasons - even though I have always loved being up in the air, and have flown in almost every type of flying machine.  

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sat Feb 24th, 2007 at 01:39:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
pig's bladders -- not nearly persistent enough :-)  when it comes to soft projectiles I favour the Biotic Baking Brigade.

but Murdoch... I am not sure what fate is truly appropriate for that awful man.  maybe a life sentence trapped in a small cell with an indestructible TV playing, endlessly and loudly, the crap that he funded and broadcast.

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 02:51:53 AM EST
Wow, you are so sadistic!! :-D
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 03:08:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good diary - much better than saving your hair!!! :-) And so true.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 03:10:31 AM EST
Of course I mean shaving of the hair...
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 03:10:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
From Propaganda (Published 1928) by Edward L. Bernays The book available in its entirety, in pdf format, via the link above. It is listed as being in the public domain. Read it, it is a lovely book!
If, for instance, I want to sell pianos, it is not sufficient to blanket the country with a direct appeal, such as:

"YOU buy a Mozart piano now. It is cheap. The best artists use it. It will last for years."

The claims may all be true, but they are in direct conflict with the claims of other piano manufacturers, and in indirect competition with the claims of a radio or a motor car, each competing for the consumer's dollar.

What are the true reasons why the purchaser is planning to spend his money on a new car instead of on a new piano? Because he has decided that he wants the commodity called locomotion more than he wants the commodity called music? Not altogether. He buys a car, because it is at the moment the group custom to buy cars.

The modern propagandist therefore sets to work to create circumstances which will modify that custom. He appeals perhaps to the home instinct which is fundamental. He will endeavor to develop public acceptance of the idea of a music room in the home. This he may do, for example, by organizing an exhibition of period music rooms designed by well known decorators who themselves exert an influence on the buying groups. He enhances the effectiveness and prestige of these rooms by putting in them rare and valuable tapestries. Then, in order to create dramatic interest in the exhibit, he stages an event or ceremony. To this ceremony key people, persons known to influence the buying habits of the public, such as a famous violinist, a popular artist, and a society leader, are invited. These key persons affect other groups, lifting the idea of the music room to a place in the public consciousness which it did not have before. The juxtaposition of these leaders, and the idea which they are dramatizing, are then projected to the wider public through various publicity channels. Meanwhile, influential architects have been persuaded to make the music room an integral architectural part of their plans with perhaps a specially charming niche in one corner for the piano. Less influential architects will as a matter of course imitate what is done by the men whom they consider masters of their profession. They in turn will implant the idea of the music room in the mind of the general public.

The music room will be accepted because it has been made the thing. And the man or woman who has a music room, or has arranged a corner of the parlor as a musical corner, will naturally think of buying a piano. It will come to him as his own idea.

Under the old salesmanship the manufacturer said to the prospective purchaser, "Please buy a piano." The new salesmanship has reversed the process and caused the prospective purchaser to say to the manufacturer, "Please sell me a piano."

Under the old economic order, Capital exploited Labour. Under the new one, Labour asks Capital: "Please exploit me!" It comes to him as his own idea.
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 04:03:55 AM EST

Under the old economic order, Capital exploited Labour. Under the new one, Labour asks Capital: "Please exploit me!" It comes to him as his own idea.

Worth emphasising.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 05:26:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed, corporations made big leaps forward in selling techniques. Those techniques work so well, you can sell an obviously stupid war!

It may be argued whether those techniques are new, or whether they indeed touch deep inclinations of people. Or maybe the point is that those techniques were applied so aggressively, overwhelmingly, that they met no opposition. The modern consumerist psychology is really dominated by what Reagan and Teacher (or they advisors) wanted everyone to think.

In evolutionary terms, the consumerist shift is significant, even if people have "always" been like this. The scale and tempo do matter.

It looked not so long ago that the Third way of Clinton/Blair/Dutch-purple will leave conservatives hopeless. But suddenly, the progresive/liberal leaders were out of favour just out of pure boredom. (I still have that impression, especially regarding America.) There is now indeed much talk of Left problems and Right dominance. But that talk is integral part of the situation - while the Left kept their impressions of conservatives' dominance unvocal, conservatives unleached a tsunami of liberals' hate. Suddenly, verbal battlefield became most relevant, and the Left went down clueless.

It may be so that conservatives' task was easier than of the Left; their "ideas" might be easier acceptable, ours more difficult to explain. But restraint from assailing people with any "brainwashing
" might have played a big role as well. Probably, human mind does seek "alpha" guidance or leadership. If we do not provide persistent answers, someone else's will be picked up. If verbal initiative come from one side only, consequences might be as terrible as poorely matched civilisation clash.

The public framing or perception is firmly controlled by conservatives. The Left somehow bought the inferior role for themselves, and do not really counter the established perception. But the perception is precisely established, by a well thought, well financed and purely opposed work.

Conservatives found an empirical way to marginalize the Left in public perception. Much was determined in the United States, and the 2000 media model (deregulated, controlled by big capital) is now freely copied in France, even Sweden. The US conservatives might have been looking exactly for such an epirical model, or even learning from manipulations in developing countries or Russia.

If this aspect of verbal intensity is true or relevant, the Left might not have been lost badly yet. They need to learn anew how to sell their ideas, and they need to counter the particular media model conservatives are now employing.

Purely conservative govenment has deep problems of their own. Especially now, when folly of corporate rulling is getting more obvious. But the danger is, before conservatives will deservedly go down, they might take down the whole world (due to military escalation, economy collapse, or global warming). It is therefore foolish to wait for better times.

P.S. Excuse me if I mistaken, but I vaguely remember that some 10-15 years ago, populism meant appeals to lowest taxes, less regulation, or nationalist instincts. If the definition was indeed turned around, some did a sizeable job.

by das monde on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 05:36:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the US the divorce of Unions and the Left marginalized both movements.  The Unions lost their sense of broader horizons.  The Left lost touch with reality.  

In the US the various pieces of a libertarian-socialist movement exist: co-ops, credit unions, unions, intellectuals, organizers, mutal insurance companies, special interest groups, & etc.  What doesn't exist is an over-arching organization committed to bringing all these groups into one place to talk and find common ground.  

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.

by ATinNM on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 07:35:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
is much much much worse.... you ahve a anrrative so far to the right in economic issues that is hard to foresee...  I hope France does not become one..

Media, media and media... I am sorry to say .. but it is the only thing that the US left needs to wing now... jsut they need to control a part of the media.

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 06:08:24 AM EST
They also own the means of communication, which disseminates "opinion".

This can change.

Freiheit ist immer Freiheit der Andersdenkenden

by redstar on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 08:12:34 AM EST
  1. The left "loses" because it takes money to run a propaganda campaign and people on the left usually have less of it. They are not motivated to become captains of industry.

  2. The left hasn't "lost", it has just suffered a temporary set back - and that mostly in the US. When asked people prefer more social services, not less.

  3. A large fraction of the population benefit from corporate greed in that they have money invested in the stock market via their retirement plans. They expect returns in the range of 10-15% (while in reality most long-term investments yield around 8%). This leads firms to do all sorts of things to boost short-term profit.

  4. Excess consumerism is partly voluntary. (Replacing shoddy items when they break may be forced consumerism.) This consumerism drives industry in the directions that produce the biggest profits. Hence the rise of the SUV's.

  5. I suggested reading the online book by Robert Altemeyer in my most recent diary. The relevant point is that those who rise to the top of social organizations tend to have an authoritarian, amoral personality type which is also highly correlated with conservative social positions. Liberals are not so driven to "win". Read the book!

As Pogo said many years ago: "We have met the enemy and he is us."

[For non-US readers, Pogo was a semi-political comic strip starting in 1948 and running for about 40 years.]

Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 09:21:56 AM EST
Those who want it the most are the ones that win.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 02:14:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I must be catching a cold this morning... I feel icky. ;-)

Please excuse me for not responding but I have to go saw my head off.

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.

by ATinNM on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 11:05:53 AM EST
Don't throw it away, it might come in handy.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 12:33:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't see why.  I don't seem to use it.

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.
by ATinNM on Fri Feb 23rd, 2007 at 07:56:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Is it not a global world?  One can Google "left gatekeeper" and get suitable answers.  The "left" is merely an echo of the right, a part of the industry of deception.  To make 30% return on investments someone must get exploited, someone must give up a piece of their lifestyle, hey, an unmanned factory can spit out 5000 widgets per hour right, the China factory can fill the orders of thousands WalMarts with vise grip tools which fall apart on the first use, Hell the China factory can put out millions of "energy saving" twisty flourescent lamps for less than the price of the raw materials in the EU.  Yes, this is "free" trade.
www.prisonplanet.com
Sometimes even the "tin foil hat" sites have more common sense than the "experts"?
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
by Lasthorseman (Lasthorseman@comcast.net) on Sun Feb 25th, 2007 at 09:53:50 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]