Levels of enlightenment (or of paranoia)

by leftymathprof
Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 04:46:23 AM EST

In recent months, as I've become politically awakened, I've become aware of the consensus trance.  When I walk down the street, most of the people around me are seeing an entirely different world than what I am seeing. But how can we fight against the consensus trance?  If you simply tell someone "you've been lied to, and almost everything you believe is wrong," they're much more likely to dismiss you as a crackpot than to actually listen to you.

Evidently you can't tell people everything at one time.  You've got to open their eyes gradually (though it gets a little easier once they get to level yellow and they understand that the mainstream news media are not reliable).  So I've devised a scale of enlightenment, or maybe I should call it a scale of paranoia; it's listed below.  Try to gauge your audience, and try to talk at just one level above where you think they are.

From the diaries - afew


I'm no expert, so this scale probably has some room for improvement. Heck, I'm not certain of any of this. In this crazy world, I think anyone who is 100% certain of anything is insane. I merely present things as I am mostly sure they are. Personally, I'm at level orange or red, but I'm starting to find level black at least plausible.


PARANOIA LEVEL WHITE. The world is just as it seems to be -- as it is presented on Fox News and CNN News. After all, those are full-time professional news programs, so those people take their jobs seriously. And they can't be lying -- they wouldn't get away with that. So everything is under control; the war is being managed by the best people possible; all I need to concern myself with is what color S.U.V. I should buy.


PARANOIA LEVEL GREEN. Hey, things are really screwed up. The war is going badly, the middle class is shrinking, global warming is accelerating, and most Americans can't afford good healthcare. These are FACTS. Fortunately, our government and our business community are watching out for us, protecting us and our "national interests," and so everything will be fine after a while.


PARANOIA LEVEL BLUE. Things are screwed up because Bush is incompetent. But he meant well, his policies were reasonable, and the conventional system is adequate. In a couple of years we'll replace Bush, and then everything will be fine.


PARANOIA LEVEL YELLOW. Bush did not mean well -- or at least, not well for you and me. He is a greedy s.o.b., who is taking advantage of every opportunity to enrich himself and his friends, and really doesn't give a damn about the rest of us. The unpreparedness of our soldiers and the drowning of New Orleans both resulted not from incompetence but from indifference. The attacks of 9/11 were welcomed as an unexpected bonanza, an opportunity to seize power. The conservatives believe that the end justifies the means, that father knows best, and that the end justifies the means, so they feel free to lie about anything and everything.   The wealthy control the mainstream news media, and so television and newspapers underemphasize or entirely omit the concepts of class struggle, scapegoating, questioning authority, caring about other human beings, the real reasons for wars, and so on.


PARANOIA LEVEL ORANGE. Bush and company are not incompetent or indifferent. They are very competently carrying out an agenda, but it is not the agenda that they state in public. They are Calvinists or social darwinists, so they actually believe they are making the world a better place by being greedy.  They believe that the elite is somehow "better" than other people, and thus feudalism is the most desirable form of government.  They believe that they and their friends deserve to be rich, and the poor deserve to be poor, and it wouldn't be so bad if the middle class became poor too. Bush and company are intentionally looting the treasury, running up the national debt, and bankrupting us all, in order to give themselves an excuse to destroy health insurance, social security, and other aspects of the social safety net, because the so-called "conservatives" believe that the social safety net promotes a culture of dependency.


PARANOIA LEVEL RED. Bush and company are not just social darwinists. They are malicious lovers of power. As Orwell said in his book "1984," making other people do your bidding is not a sure test of power, for they might have chosen to carry out your decisions for reasons of their own. The ultimate test of true power over other humans is the ability to make them suffer. That is the only reason for continuing with torture after it has been proved an unreliable source of information. And some of the current administration were complicit in planning the attacks of 9/11.


PARANOIA LEVEL BLACK. Bush and company have no intention of stepping down in January 2009. They've already gotten rid of Habeus Corpus, Posse Comitatus, and much of free speech. The concentration camps have been ready for us dissidents since Reagan set them up 23 years ago, but recently Halliburton has been adding more to the camps. All they need is to put together another 9/11, because they know that the American public will believe anything it sees on mainstream television.
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Poll
At what level is your own viewpoint currently?
. WHITE: Experts agree, everything is fine. 0%
. GREEN: Things are screwed up, but the experts are fixing it even as we speak. 0%
. BLUE: Bush meant well but is incompetent. Soon we'll replace him and everything will be fine. 0%
. YELLOW: Bush is indifferent, and a greedy liar, and the wealthy control the news media. 11%
. ORANGE: Bush and company are intentionally trying to rob and cheat us all. 44%
. BLACK: They'd also like to torture us, and they intend to quite soon. 44%

Votes: 9
Results | Other Polls
Display:
Evidently you can't tell people everything at one time.  You've got to open their eyes gradually (though it gets a little easier once they get to level yellow and they understand that the mainstream news media are not reliable).  So I've devised a scale of enlightenment, or maybe I should call it a scale of paranoia; it's listed below.  Try to gauge your audience, and try to talk at just one level above where you think they are.
At last, a lefty who understands the Overton window!

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 09:37:51 AM EST
I'd like everyone to welcome leftymathprof to ET. I greatly admire his mathematical work.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 09:39:37 AM EST
Welcome leftmathprof, maybe someone will finally understand some of the things Migeru says! ;-)
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 09:47:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, come on, Colman does just fine.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 09:47:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think Metatone was talking about the scientific bits...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 04:24:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Absolutely! Welcome!

Migeru will give a you a quick course in PNing, I trust.

Other than that it's every equation for itself, women and children first. And may the best number win.

I too am hovering on Alert Level Black. I find no other explanation for all of the phenomena we are witnessing.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 10:19:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Alert level Blue is for the Democratic Party.

Alert level yellow is for Daily Kos.

Alert level Orange is probably the editorial opinion over here.

This diary needs a poll: what level are you?

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 10:24:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd say we tend to a dark red really.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 11:32:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll be damned if I can make up my mind, honestly.  I tend to swing from Blue to Dark Red with moods.  Borders on a need for medication, really.

Where's your motherf*%&ing flag pin?
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 12:01:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Scratch that: Yellow, not Blue.

Where's your motherf*%&ing flag pin?
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 12:02:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll go for Bordeaux...

"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char
by Melanchthon on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 04:27:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I run between orange and black. If I'm really tired, I can drop down to yellow, but those are getting rarer.

"You can't be a successful crook with a dishonest face, now, can you?" -The Fourth Doctor
by lychee (lychee9393 A yahoo D com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 10:45:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm black: I'm thinking that barricades maybe need to be manned (and womanned) at some point in the future. ;-)

I don't know whether it is normal or not, but I've got a lot more bolshie in the last couple of years, and it probably started around 1990. I thought one was meant to become more conservative as you get older?

At this rate, I'll be a terrorist with senior moments in a few years from now. "Which direction was I meant to shoot?" "Sorry, tell me again, who are we fighting?"

It actually - now I come to think about it - could be a win-win socially, if we only allow people over 80 to fight wars. Firstly they are not going to do much damage to each other. Even an armoured wheelchair is not exactly WMD. And there won't be many cases of handbagshock to flood the hospitals. Many will forget what they are meant to be doing, or start playing cards. But at least it gives them something to do. A little activity is good.

Secondly, any collateral damage will reduce pensions to be paid out. Sad, but there you go.

But actually most of them would become ambassadors for their countries - they just need to share photos of their grandchildren with the 'enemy'. Lay down their arms, and stretch out their arms to embrace.

Let's forget war. It has never ever done anything good for people.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 11:44:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
:D You are WARPED!  

"Let's forget war. It has never ever done anything good for people."

First line of Sun Tzu:  Best way of fighting is not to fight.  

The rest of the book is, "Okay, so you screwed up.  Now what."

by Gaianne on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 02:32:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I know, I know. It's what is so great about writing, as opposed to being a scientist. You can just make stuff up ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 02:59:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Couldn't prove people get more conservative as they age by me.  

Still crazy after all these years.

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.

by ATinNM on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 01:52:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Precisely...

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 10:55:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed, welcome, leftymathprof!

Where's your motherf*%&ing flag pin?
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 12:00:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Welcome leftymathprof!



Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.

by ATinNM on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 09:25:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
there are many more people than we think waking up from the 'consensus trance', as you put it so well.

reading gurdjieff, ouspensky and colin wilson back in the 60's, helped me understand the phenomenon, especially as it helped explain why emotional alienation was the only existence on offer.

we are surrounded by sleepwalking humans, walking and talking in their dreams, some most convincing in their verisimilitude...

squeezed fearfully into the shrinking gap between internal cognitive dissonance and an external world gone apparently cuckoo, is it any wonder people run for the oblivion of idiotainment?

gurdjieff also pointed out in his teachings that it is better to stay asleep, rather than wake up incompletely, and it takes a special kind of inner strength not to falter and end up between the two, neither here nor there...

i believe that what we don't work out internally, we project onto our reality, so as to see it mirrored.

it's a lot more energetically elegant to do it the first way, but there is so little in the way of durable inner reference points, in the moral black hole caused by bad religion and psychic trauma/abuse, that people are unaware they hold the keys to understanding themselves better, and therefore what they need and therefore want, in their own hands.

presently the most asleep ones are slaves to others agendas.

once we learn to displace negative belief-systems with positive experience of natural feedback loops, (virtuous cycles), then we open the door to allowing much more interesting phenomena to occur, such as telepathy, soul teachers, synergy, and synchrony, (serendipity, if you will).

finding something to love that extends beyond the normal emotional parameters, that allows you to get really visceral, helps enormously to unbox our thinking, i've found.

music, dance and bodysurfing have been especially liberating in this regard.

great diary, have visited all the colours many times...

paranoia is just the modern term for survival instinct. it used to warn us about wooly mammoths, now it's exxon we need to keep our eye on.

people don't like to be woken up, generally...if you take on the job of awakener, you take on some of that person's essence too, and become partly responsible for not leaving them in limbo.

you better have a good new narrative!

if this sounds like 'let them sleep', maybe i'm unsure.

i definitely believe in trying to find a way to get under their sleeping earlids and sounding some kind of (hopefully gentle) alarm, but nature's doing a much better job!

ecology is an ideal precipitating agent, as it's impersonal to most people, and yet needs to (and will) become much more personal indeed.

welcome to ET!

There are no blank spots on the map any more, anywhere on earth. You want a blank spot on the map, you gotta leave the map behind. Jon Krakauer

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 10:36:56 AM EST
A great comment, Melo! We must have been reading the same books at the same time ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 11:46:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a good explanation for why people consistently act against their own best interests and those of a sane society.

But it has always been this way.  See Epictetus, for instance.

In regard to the strange virus that has taken hold in the dozing population of the US:  I agree that the Bush administration has an elitist agenda and divine authorization to look down on the little people and take advantage of them.  Indeed, that is the agenda--to destroy the government and take as much money as possible because "We are the elect".  

However, the flaw here is that they do not do it perfectly.  Their incompetence is actually causing people to stir in their sleep and blink.  Why do our children keep dying in Iraq?  That's an uncomfortable question. But hardly as important as how Britney Spears is doing in rehab and who the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby is.

If Bush is really lucky there will be a celebrity murder.  Then attention will rapidly shift away from his thousands of failures.

by Plan9 on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 08:50:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well I think there's enough going wrong at the moment that we'd need a particularly messy celebrity suicide, or for one celebrity to kill another. Any particular right wing celebrity you'd bet on to comit murder for the party?

anyone fancy a sweepstake?

Interviewer: What do you believe is behind this recent increase in terrorist bombings? Helpmann: Bad sportsmanship

by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 12:30:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He's become more centrist lately.  But as well as being a movie star and a politician he has a lot of experience as the Terminator and he is married to a Kennedy.  

Ideally from the GOP standpoint he would terminate a Hollywood leftist,like David Geffen or Barbra Streisand, thus disrupting funding to Obama and Clinton and changing the outcome of the presidential election.

If the trial took months very few Americans would even remember there was an election.  Many who did would receive to leave their TVs to go to the polls.

by Plan9 on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 02:44:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Under the assumption that Bush is really a puppet, the puppet masters might stage a Bush assassination (though a failed assassination attempt would do, too). This is also a possible answer to geezer's thid question downthread.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 05:50:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, I've got a great narrative, though I don't think it's really new.  The narrative is that altruism is its own reward, because it feels really good.  I think the best current expositor of this is Michael Lerner, author of the book "The Left Hand of God," but it was also put very simply years ago by Mammy Yokum when she said "good is better than evil because it's nicer."

The conservatives who think they can buy their way into heaven really don't know what they're missing.  Consumerism does not bring meaning into your life.  Reagan told people that the "American dream" is to get rich so that you can lie idly beside a pool for the rest of your life, but that looks pretty stupid to me.  I'd much rather be doing meaningful and productive work than be idle.  The trick is, what makes work meaningful?  It is the connection of that work to some sort of meaningful wider community.  Ultimately we all want to feel like we belong to, and are part of, something bigger than ourselves.

My local progressives calendar emphasizes that community.  Lately I've been having a lot of fun handing out cards that promote the calendar (see card at right).  I don't just walk up to people and start talking about the calendar.  But whenever I'm already in a conversation, if I can find a way to mention the local community, I do, and then I hand out a card.  It's become a sort of game I play, to see how many cards I can hand out in a week.  For instance, yesterday at a protest demonstration, I struck up a conversation with a policeman, and ended up handing him a card; I was real pleased with myself for that.

by leftymathprof (leftymathprof at yahoo dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 12:12:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
well said!

your new narrative is perfect, what a lovely one to wake up to.

progressive is the new kewl...

humour is a weapon of mass instruction...

and that pic tickled my funnybone!

There are no blank spots on the map any more, anywhere on earth. You want a blank spot on the map, you gotta leave the map behind. Jon Krakauer

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 09:32:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The most vexing thing about the Right Wing 'Myth of the Rugged Individual' is: it's a bunch of ba-hooey¹ on the face of it.  There's a whole sub-field in Social Psychology investigating how icky¹ individuals feel when they are, or perceive they are, isolated from the local group.  

Co-operation is built-in to humans.  

********************
¹  Apologies for the technical jargon.  ;-)

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.

by ATinNM on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 10:54:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Co-operation is built into lefties.

I see no evidence at all that it's built into righties, who are happy not only to rape the poor but also to feed off each other if they believe there's an advantage in it for them.

Not everyone does empathy. It's a mistake to assume they do.

If they did, they'd already be like us, and they wouldn't be running around doing ultra-violent batshit insane things, and then lying brazenly about them.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 04:23:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
[WAH! Scoop ate my post.  It was a good comment, full of wit, charm, and insightful insights.  But now 'twill ne'er see the light of day.  :-( ]

Oops, Quantification error.  I should have said co-operation is built-in to most people.  

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.

by ATinNM on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 11:28:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The myth of the "self-made man" is indeed a lie.  Here's a link to a report going into that subject much further, just in case anyone is interested or wants a reference: I Didn't Do It Alone: Society's Contribution to Individual Wealth and Success.  This is also a point frequently mentioned by my number one hero, George Lakoff.
by leftymathprof (leftymathprof at yahoo dot com) on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 09:10:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Try reposting on Green and Orange and see what happens.  
by Gaianne on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 02:12:49 PM EST
I keep praying there is NOT another level.  Like ultraviolet, or something . . .  
by Gaianne on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 02:23:19 PM EST
Thermonuclear?

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 03:21:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Do you know about the role playing game Paranoia? In that game, ultraviolets ruled the world and infrareds were essentially slaves.
The security clearance system in Alpha Complex is based on colors of the visible spectrum, plus an extra two beyond it. Every citizen starts off with Security Clearance Infrared (represented by the color black). A lucky and trusted few rise to the lofty heights of Ultraviolet (or white) Clearance. Those with Ultraviolet clearance are also sometimes known as "High Programmers" for they have the closest access to the Computer. Generally, higher clearance characters look down on lower clearance characters while seeking to raise their own clearance. Higher level citizens, especially those of Blue and above, can demote and in some cases execute lower level citizens.

Security clearance is not necessarily related to competence, job prestige or even authority, though there is often a correlation; clearance is a measure of the Computer's trust in a citizen.

...

The full order of clearances from lowest to highest is Infrared, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, Violet, and Ultraviolet. Most of the population, about 80%, is Infrared. Infrared characters are kept artificially happy with drugs. Infrared characters are fed unappetizing food based on processed algae.



"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 06:42:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm never quite paranoid enough to think that that was prediction in action.

Interviewer: What do you believe is behind this recent increase in terrorist bombings? Helpmann: Bad sportsmanship
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 08:35:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This looks fun. Maybe we should try it at an ET meet sometime.

It would make a change from trying to work out which of us is the CIA plant. :)

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 05:58:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
trying to work out which of us is the CIA plant.

or which of us isn't...

"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char

by Melanchthon on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 07:57:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There's one more level, and there's even a film about it.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 09:21:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, I liked that movie.  But unfortunately, our situation is much more difficult.  It's not just a simple matter of "take the red pill and all truth will suddenly become clear."  And ultimately I don't think we will be liberated by a lone extraordinary Neo.  I think the only thing that can free us is if we can spread the word and increase our numbers greatly.
by leftymathprof (leftymathprof at yahoo dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 10:49:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know how long you have been reading ET before first posting, but if you missed this you might want to give it a look:

The Authoritarians

It's an online book which attempts to explain the "authoritarian" personality, which actually means someone who follows authoritarian leaders.

The inability to change these people's world view is one of the points of the research.


Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 03:17:49 PM EST
This is indeed an excellent book.

Anyone who hasn't read it yet (and still believes that everyone is nice at heart) really should read it.

In my ideal world I'd like to see this bundle of personality traits named formally as a syndrome and added to the next DSM.

You can't tackle authoritarians by arguing with them. But if the syndrome is seen as a form of mental illness - which it surely is, considering how incredibly destructive it can be - it puts it into a frame which makes it easier to deal with.

I'm sure some people will disagree with this, but I think authoritarians don't just have different opinions. Their cognitive disabilities seem to be much more serious than that.

They reliably appear to have a very disturbed relationship with reality, they're unable to effectively model the consequences of their beliefs and actions, and they're also just plain violent and abusive.

Just because there's no proximate cause, as with alcoholism, doesn't mean this shouldn't be considered a medical condition.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 05:55:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think authoritarians don't just have different opinions. Their cognitive disabilities seem to be much more serious than that.

In my experience authoritarians - of the left and right - have difficulty dealing with uncertainty.  They require a nice warm 'All' to wrap up in.  It is this that sparks their well known tendency to ignore or suppress information which does not fit their opinions.  

Have epistemological model of Complex Information environments. Will Travel.

by ATinNM on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 11:07:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Aren't all math profs dangerous leftists ?
by balbuz on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 03:37:10 PM EST
Who isn't

Interviewer: What do you believe is behind this recent increase in terrorist bombings? Helpmann: Bad sportsmanship
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 05:15:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, unfortunately not.  I've been very disappointed to see how indifferent the other profs in my department have been.  They've completely ignored all the stuff I've been posting on my office door about the war, global warming, economics, etc.  And they've ignored the big peace symbol that I now wear everywhere I go.





Here in academia in the USA, the pressure to publish is very high.  (From what I've heard, it's not quite so high in Europe.)  So the attitude most of my colleagues take is that they don't have time for anything that doesn't lead to a publishable article; the scholar's only duty is to further his own career and his subject.  I recently realized that that attitude sucks -- sure, mathematics can be beautiful, but who is it FOR?  Because my colleages have achieved great expertise in some narrow little subject, they think that that exempts them from any responsibility for thinking about anything else; they think that everything in each subject should be left to the experts of that subject.  But look at what a mess the world is in as a result.  I posted some of these ideas on a web page called Mathematicians for Peace, and posted a copy of it on my office door, but they've ignored that too.


I wish I could figure out how to wake them up.  It's bad enough walking down the street and seeing people sleepwalking around me.  But having to work with the zombies too -- that's even harder.
by leftymathprof (leftymathprof at yahoo dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 10:44:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How about giving them a copy of Rep. Henry Waxman's report?
About Politics & Science (August 2003)

The State of Science Under the Bush Administration

The American people depend upon federal agencies to promote scientific research and to develop science-based policies that protect the nation's health and welfare. Historically, these agencies -- such as the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Environmental Protection Agency -- have had global reputations for scientific excellence.

However, leading scientific journals have questioned whether scientific integrity at federal agencies has been sacrificed to further a political and ideological agenda. As the editor of Science wrote in early 2003, there is growing evidence that the Bush Administration "invades areas once immune to this kind of manipulation."

I mean, this was visible enough for anyone who was awake four years ago, and it should interest them if they have a commitment to science beyond their narrow sub-sub-discipline.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 10:52:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't really feel I can give them anything, or start a conversation with them; the intellectual climate just doesn't support it.  The best I can do is post stuff on my office door, which they walk past fairly often.  I choose stuff that I think is fairly interesting looking.  For instance, Waxman doesn't look exciting, but the Union of Concerned Scientists' really cool web page about the periodic table of political interference in science does.  I posted a copy of it, but still no reaction.
by leftymathprof (leftymathprof at yahoo dot com) on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 09:50:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Take heart.  If the eye can see it, eventually it sinks in, so keep hanging it on the door and know that you are doing your part.

After all, it took you a few years to really wake up and you are in the forefront of science.

_Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. --Charu Saxena._

by metavision on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 12:43:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not everyone is a zombie, take for instance this other mathematician's "Nasty Stuff" page.

Over Halloween weekend 2004 I went to a mathematical physics conference near Toronto. There was one person there who was going to vote republican and everyone else that I talked to was at least at paranoia level blue. But, then again, this was a conference of dissidents so they had other reasons to have their eyes open. So it's not all hopeless, but maybe mainstream scientists are.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 10:58:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for this "nasty stuff" link. I hadn't heard about the Bogdanov affair, it's fascinating reading.
by balbuz on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 12:06:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Something is not quite right, when a teacher's career is judged by publishing accomplishments, not by teaching accomplishments.

There is one maths prof, Fields medal laureate, Laurent LAFFORGUE, who endlessly denounces entrenched experts at the "Education Nationale". His view is that - I simplify a lot - the school system itself (not the teachers) creates a sub-standard education, which undermines the noble aim of a school of the Republic. So he had to resign from the "Haut Conseil de l'Education".

This guy certainly projected himself at the core of today's problems.

by balbuz on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 09:26:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Something is not quite right, when a teacher's career is judged by publishing accomplishments, not by teaching accomplishments.

Some mandatory reading...

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 12:18:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Although (0) I don't like the educational establishment in the way it presently works, I have been in it long enough that I have thought up (1) some feeble but plausible reasons about why it should be running the way it is, or, disagreeing with those, also (2) some plausible reasons about how it went astray with good intentions.

(0) I don't like the way that it puts all emphasis on "research."  Kline's book "Why the Professor Can't Teach" was an excellent exposition on that subject.  But the pressure to publish leads very intelligent people to focus their attention on rather specialized matters, and often on rather trivial matters.  And in mathematics (I don't know whether this is true in other subjects), only new truths count as "research"; improved expositions of old truths do not count.  I have spent the last 17 years of my discretionary time writing two excellent expository works on grand and important themes of mathematics, but neither of my books counts as much toward promotion as a little 3-page  piece of research fluff that I wrote quickly on a nearly pointless topic.

I have resigned myself to the fact that I will never be promoted to full professor; but fortunately I've started getting used to that idea.  I have tenure, so at least my job is fairly safe.  I don't have the full respect and admiration of my mathematical colleagues, but lately I am not particularly concerned about that.  In fact, what is more to the point is that my mathematical colleagues have lost my respect and admiration.  When I walk down the hallway, I see some office doors blank and some doors holding posters that announce math conferences, but my door is the only one that says anything about peace, or global warming, or the economics of our university, or anything like that.  They may be "better" than me at doing mathematics, but who are they doing the mathematics for?  I guess we all (some of us more than others) depend on peer approval for our emotional existence, but lately I realize that you folks and others like you are my peers too.

I don't really understand how they evaluate "research," anyway.  Einstein said "reseach is what I am doing when I do not know what I am doing."  I think most so-called researchers in academia today do know exactly what they're doing.  They choose projects that they know will result in a publication.

(1) Feeble excuses.  Well, let's see.  Research is easier to measure (in a rudimentary and inaccurate way) than teaching.  To measure research, they just count the number of publications; some universities also pay some attention to the prestige level of the journals.  (They don't bother to divide by the number of coauthors, though.  Sometimes I've been tempted to team up with someone and trade nominal coauthorships on papers that were not really coauthored.  But so far, my own feeling of personal integrity has won out over desire for promotion.)

(2) Feeble how-it-got-that-way's.  Well, some people labor under the assumption that quality of writing and clarity of understanding don't really matter.  They believe that a fact is a fact.  All a teacher needs to do is present the facts.  And once a discoverer has discovered a fact, there is no further work required in explaining it; the original explanation is as good as it can get.  I think that viewpoint is a mistake, but since it is a viewpoint I shared when I was younger, I can see how some people might believe it.

by leftymathprof (leftymathprof at yahoo dot com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 01:28:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't really understand how they evaluate "research," anyway.

...

Research is easier to measure (in a rudimentary and inaccurate way) than teaching.  To measure research, they just count the number of publications; some universities also pay some attention to the prestige level of the journals.  (They don't bother to divide by the number of coauthors, though.  Sometimes I've been tempted to team up with someone and trade nominal coauthorships on papers that were not really coauthored.  But so far, my own feeling of personal integrity has won out over desire for promotion.)

People also sometimes write very, very long papers in several installments, which multiplies the number of papers. Dividing by the number of coauthors would be good. I doubt a majority of the people on a department's hiring committee actually read the publications of their candidates, because they would not understand them. Let's face it, most mathematicians in the same department talk about the weather when they meet in the staff room, because they can't understand each other's research. People's collaborators are across the world, not in the same department.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 03:39:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
doubt a majority of the people on a department's hiring committee actually read the publications of their candidates, because they would not understand them.  

This and the post above remind me of my nadir of disillusionment.  (Not that I got re-illusioned, I just moved on . . . )  

It came when hearing about how one of my professors published in order NOT to be read.  That's right:  A paper is like a stone in a game of go--it is placed to control territory and keep other people from going there.  The whole point is to chase people OUT of a line of inquiry (so that one can publish more papers in it oneself and enhance one's promotion).  If they read and understood what you are writing, that could be dangerous (or at least slow down advancement).  

And yes, those committees are literally just counting up the publications, under the blissful assumption that somebody else has read them, assessed them, and found them worthy.  

A shell game.  

Let's face it, most mathematicians in the same department talk about the weather when they meet in the staff room, because they can't understand each other's

Too true.  Not only can't.  Don't want to either.  Drove me nuts.  

The whole thing began to feel not just narcissistic, but solipsistic.

(Yeah, at this point my days were numbered . . . )

by Gaianne on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 05:52:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Within Morris Kline's trichotomy, Researcher - Scholar - Teacher, I consider myself a scholar. Not being a researcher, I did not see myself carving a niche in high-prestige universities; not being a teacher, I would have been unhappy in the teaching-only Community Colleges. At least in the US there is a multi-tiered university system:
  • research university [awards Ph.Ds, faculty promotion is by research only]
  • 4-year college [may award Masters' degrees, faculty promotion involves both teaching and research]
  • 2-year college [faculty evaluated mainly on teaching]
In Europe there is only one tier organised along research-university lines. Then even if (as you suggested in another comment) the US research universities are more competitive than European universities as a whole, the European job market is more competitive than the US market as a whole, because it is narrower and because of the national fragmentation.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 03:50:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hello and welcome, leftymothproof! Er, leftyprombath! Er... (And I'm far from Sven's age, but we don't need to go into that...)

Yes, I should think orange with a reddish tinge is a fairly broadly-shared level here. With a codicil to the effect that a chunk of the Democratic leadership believes, sincerely or insincerely, that it is not its business to stand up and get in the way.

Sincerely welcome, leftymapfroth!

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 03:44:56 PM EST
Welcome here!!!

Actually here you are not presenting levels of paranoia but dfferent narratives of the world... reality is much more complex than any single one of this paranoia items...

World is a complex stuff....

But I could have not sum up better the different narratives that we can adopt.... because all of them are in the air... it jsut depends onm your background, vision, etc...although I may add that paranoia level White is basically contrary to facts.. but as you amy not know.. I think reality and facts are mostly irrelevant.

My preferred narrative is not in there.. I would like to change Paranoia Level Orange quite a bit... well a lot... but it would certioanly be my starting point.

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 03:49:37 PM EST
Here is my current state of mind:



"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char

by Melanchthon on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 04:22:51 PM EST
Another of ny favourites - especially the jazz influenced ones, which really started to live, as opposed to the more formal Russian/Bauhaus infliuenced earlier ones which I find cold.

There in also a coldness in Ellsworth Kelly and the colour field painters which does not exist in, for instance, Adolph Gottlieb.



You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 05:11:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is one piece to explain why.
http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20011212.htm
You may of course stop at any veil you wish most of the world does.
by Lasthorseman (Lasthorseman@comcast.net) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 05:01:15 PM EST
Lasthorseman, have you read this?

http://www.plebe.com.br/repositorio/filosofia/prometeus.pdf

Very much worth the effort.

Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.

by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 06:53:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
(Let me know if the link doesn't work.)

Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 06:53:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank You!  I just scanned the contents but I like it.
by Lasthorseman (Lasthorseman@comcast.net) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 08:18:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
now we need to add colour to the ET political distribution plot...  since oddly enough there are both righty and lefty versions of each of the paranoia levels.

I've been pegged somewhere between red and black for decades, as if anyone didn't know that already...

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 08:12:55 PM EST
Sub-poll: How much did everyone edit out of their comments before posting because we thought "someone" might be watching Eurotrib....

I took a whole paragraph out of mine....

(By the way, welcome leftymathprof!)

"You can't be a successful crook with a dishonest face, now, can you?" -The Fourth Doctor

by lychee (lychee9393 A yahoo D com) on Thu Mar 15th, 2007 at 10:54:56 PM EST
Cat: Forget red - let's go all the way up to brown alert!
Kryten: There's no such thing as a brown alert sir.
Cat: You won't be saying that in a minute! And don't say I didn't alert you!


by oldfrog on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 06:33:37 AM EST
Paranoia Level Black:

1.a. Black hole:  Severe greed, severe arrogance, criminal negligence.  In politics, in communications/media, in economics, in business, in health care, in education, in science?....  What area is left, of a milder color of corruption, that we can build on?

1.b. Hell on earth:  continued public apathy about the above.


_Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. --Charu Saxena._

by metavision on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 07:51:55 AM EST
I like the original post a lot.  Welcome to the madhouse, math man, and thank you for a thoughtful diary. I will employ, right now, your suggested tactic of speaking one level above the level of acceptance in order to not be dismissed out of hand.

Migeru, If you read my posts here and on Kos, you will find a lot of overlap with these ideas, and thanks for the tip on the Overton window . Really interesting. I know Mackinac Island well--my home turf for summer jobs in college.

When I try to place myself on the list, I discover that we are trying to describe a "system"--an ecology-- by a linear metaphor that is essentially short some dimensions. Too bipolar, as is most Western European thinking. (There. THAT ought to get me in trouble properly!)
For example, I think that in the game of power such things as described in paranoia level black result from an insanely complex level of events, processes and targets of opportunity. The great "talent" of people like Cheney and Rumsfeld is to sense, to intuit if you like, the way the current flows, and craft a strategy that achieves their desired result based on this "sense" of flow, by swimming WITH the current, instead of against it.

That said, I'm Black. But with many caveats. To go that way is an admission of failure for the players I see.

The beginning questions we need to ask are:
Who are the players?
What is their desired end state?
Of the pieces of the puzzle that we can sort out and verify, there will be many ways we can assemble them that are plausible- that make sense. One selects among this galaxy of assemblages based on for example historic lessons and definitions of reality, for a crude beginning description. (NOW who's short some dimensions?)
Having done that, I think, to select one of the more stark elements, the detention facilities exist and are a real option, but represent an almost failed end state for the Dick and Don show, a less failed but still undesirable result for the Straussian Theocons, since they think they can pull your strings without recourse to Stalinesque options) and a regrettable but relatively acceptable option for the corporate oligarchs, given continued media control. Since I see these three elements as the real major players, (and for MANY other reasons,), I am quite glad to be several thousand miles away.
And though I think Cheney would regret a martial law scenario with selective detentions, I think he would do it.
I would like to pose a couple questions to the group:

  1. Remember how confident Bush was during the last part of what should have been a cliff-hanger election?

  2. How many think they will just quietly fade from stage right?

  3. Under what circumstances, or set of conditions would the  above players pull the trigger on martial law? ---for our own protection, of course.

If your answer is, "oh, for God's sake, Geezer, get off it. " ----I picked the wrong level of discourse. oops. ----Or, perhaps you are in for a nasty shock down the road.  

Useful talking follows experience, the more experience the better. Talking that precedes experience is known as bullshit.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 04:47:06 PM EST
  1. Yes. My interpretation was that he had expanded the power of the Presidency (te "unitary Executive" they—who?&mdahs;call it) to the point that Democratic control of both houses of congress was not a threat to his agenda. The Democrats, much to my dismay, had decided impeachment wasn't politically expedient (and, I fear, that the unitary executive will come in really handy when one of their number wins in 2008) and seem to have accepted that Bush has the authority to expand the current wars to Iran without asking Congress. So he was right to be insouciant.
  2. I don't. I'll be surprised if he does. Alternatively, I have often commented that seeing who is the Republican nominee for 2008 will give us an important hint as to who the puppet master is.
  3. If it looks like a Democrat will win in 2008, they will pull a cigar aficionado in october 2008. Any credible threat of impeachment would trigger it, too.


"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 05:32:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Agreed. Pretty good summary. What fascinates me is this:
I see this as the endgame, and I see the likelihood of a "black" outcome as related to the fact that most of the players I can identify would find that outcome acceptable, either right off or given, as you say, another grand opportunity (WMD disaster or attack with casualties). Their desired endstates may differ, but each of them follows a path that crosses the "Black" square on the board, given either of the two conditions you describe. I will post next to Melo, but suffice it to say that I do not think a lot of people will even notice.

Useful talking follows experience, the more experience the better. Talking that precedes experience is known as bullshit.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 03:38:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
  1. Remember how many people on this very site were convinced that the republicans would not hand over control of congress to the democrats after the 06 election. They did without issue. Without recounts. Without much controversy at all. A police state would be radically less profitable for wall street due to the the financial costs and the potential for disruptive unrest, and for that reason, we will have no dictator in 08. As geezer pointed out the elites already have a passive population doing their bidding, removing the minimal level of democracy we have would cause absolute chaos. No way the elites risk waking up the public to the man behind the curtain when they already have what they want.

  2. That said, a new terror attack would result in what you say, but again it won't result in a dictator for the reasons I just gave. I think most first world countries will resemble something like China after such event(s) occur (a measure of economic freedom and political freedom that is symbolic only). The forces leading us down this path have nothing to do with American politics though - it is the result of three things:

  • Advancing technology functions to lower both the material and labor costs of causing a specific level of destruction.

  • Advancing technology has also allows increasing complexity, and we have used that complexity on our economic structures and physical infrastructure to maximize profitability and utility at the expense of robustness, leaving both increasingly vulnerable to attack.

  • The efficiency of bureaucratic structures have decayed due in part to their incredible size which was possible to begin with because of the cheap energy bonanza of the past century. They can't change in a qualitative fashion due to their own inertia, so to counter the threats present in my first two items they continue down the path of their "local minimum" doing the only thing they know how to do - increase levels of public harassment.

I expect the world to enter into a new dark age regardless of American politics and society. I don't see a conspiracy here - at least of the sort involving a few old white guys smoking cigars in a small room somewhere in suburban DC.

The big unknown is peak oil (and its twin peak food) - a qualitative change of such magnitude that all bets are complete conjecture as far as I'm concerned. Do the elites try to hold their complex, energy intensive global networks together through the means of a police state or do they cut and run and allow the world to fragment without resistance? What fills that void if they do? I can think of hundreds of questions along these lines that I have no answer to.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 12:39:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
i hope to god you're wrong, but here's how i see it re internment/martial law:

it would politicise the mass of people who are fence-sitting right now, tear families into shreds as much or more than vietnam did, set off a multiple firestorm of ammy-caching waco-type nutjobs/survivalists that would suck up a lot of pain before going out in flames.

travel to and from the states would be obviously altered beyond recognition; since the us is a country of immigrants, this would provoke a huge swell of resentment worldwide, and leave america isolated like never before.

the logistics of running a police state are a nightmare, and the levels of brutality needed to keep the public in a state of sheepish acquiescence would be impossible to explain away or dress up with words....all pretence of democracy, a fair society where all are equal, etc, would become so cognitively dissonant to teach in such a visible contradiction...america would have to unhook from every other country fumbling for a sane world, and remain in its dystopia  until some counter-wave would occur.

the problem is that cheneycorps is just lunatic (and saturnine) enough to paint themselves into a corner where this would be the only choice left to them, short of ending up lynched like mussolini, or doing the 'gentlemanly' thing, like adolf and family.

like every other option on their deranged agenda, this would fail spectacularly, but i foresee an america divided in ways by this nightmare, if it degressed to this sinister a level, that would make the civil war look like earl grey and cucumber sandwiches on the lawn.

the sheer number of guns, missile launchers, diy armories around now that weren't around then would ensure that.

the odds are low, imo, because a. they already have so many peeps in jail already, building enough camps to fit everyone who doesn't want to  roll up their sleeves and get with the program would make the land of the free the laughing stock of the rest of the world...through tears.

b: the teched up world of global interconnectedness will survive and just like the partisans sabotaged and helped undo the nazi evil in ww2, there would be a huge support from outside the us to help relatives  and friends who were trapped in the maw of the matrix.

in my worst paranoia days i suspect europe is in on it too, and the same day as the us goes, all of a sudden the city streets here will be being patrolled by blackwater mercenaries who don't speak any euro language.

then i shake my head, because not even clancy would storyboard that!

There are no blank spots on the map any more, anywhere on earth. You want a blank spot on the map, you gotta leave the map behind. Jon Krakauer

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 09:28:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
b: the teched up world of global interconnectedness will survive and just like the partisans sabotaged and helped undo the nazi evil in ww2, there would be a huge support from outside the us to help relatives  and friends who were trapped in the maw of the matrix.

in my worst paranoia days i suspect europe is in on it too, and the same day as the us goes, all of a sudden the city streets here will be being patrolled by blackwater mercenaries who don't speak any euro language.

Then add the EU data rentention directive and they can roll up the logs to find who wrote what at what page, who phoned whom, and who meet whom where (at least if they were carrying cell phones) and so on. Should make for an easy passage of unwanted elements to the nearest holding facility.

by A swedish kind of death on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 09:43:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
i see we are watching the same sci-fi channel...

'render' unto the lord....

the question is: straight into biodiesel for the warmachine - sorta like feeding human chopped liver to warhorses - or rendered over to some country where they never heard of geneva, let alone conventions...

when i saw the planes fly into the wtc, i knew reality and fiction were finally fusing.

was this the beginning of the end of his story, and maybe the end of the beginning  for hers?

time will toll or tell...

There are no blank spots on the map any more, anywhere on earth. You want a blank spot on the map, you gotta leave the map behind. Jon Krakauer

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Mar 16th, 2007 at 09:55:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My paranoia level for the EU is at yellow because of the neoliberal consensus [even Zapatero's government is part of it] which is two levels below my US paranoia level. However, the CIA prison/flight non-scandal makes level black as you describe it at least plausible. It's been thinkable since the repression of protesters against the G8 meeting in Genoa.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 03:16:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's a 4 for joining the dots and for the implicit suggestion that the violence at Genoa and the violence in Iraq have the same roots in the US establishment.

The aftermath of 9/11 changed nothing. It was more like a spore carrying body breaking through the surface from the rot and decay underneath it.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 06:02:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think it was in the summer of 2001, after the EU Göteborg summit in June, that I realised something was not quite right with the European political establishment. If I remember correctly, that was the first time there was a major anti-globalisation protest at an EU summit, and the politicians barricaded themselves and dismissed the protesters. I thought to myself "those are your people trying to tell you something, you should be listening, not barricading yourselves". Since 1999 when anti-globalisation protesters were famously able to disrupt the WTO meeting in Seattle, major international summits have been increasingly isolated or held in an unbearably repressive atmosphere. What was the US Air force doing taking over the Czech airspace a few years back (was it for a Bush state visit, or a NATO summit, or what?)

Since that eye-opening experience in 2001 (before 9-11) I've been convinced that "official politics" was going to quickly become irrelevant to the life of ordinary people. That is, I think, the case today, 6 years later. The real power centres are not in our national governments.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 18th, 2007 at 12:28:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Melo,
I live outside the US, and have done so mostly for 30 years, in ten countries. I see it very differently than I did as a resident of the US.

it would politicise the mass of people who are fence-sitting right now, tear families into shreds as much or more than Vietnam did, set off a multiple firestorm of ammy-caching waco-type nutjobs/survivalists that would suck up a lot of pain before going out in flames.

Too late.  The number of major media outlets of all types in existence (as corporate structures) that have the potential to influence public opinion is about a fiftieth of the Viet Nam days, and their corporate ownership is solidly republican and corporate-oligarchic in character. There would be an effect, but an integral part of any sociological model of collective behavior is communication, and the growth of a generalized belief as to the problem and as to the  location of responsibility. That's over now. Except for us blog weirdos, and the blog world does not yet even approach the functionality needed as a communication channel for collective behavior.

travel to and from the states would be obviously altered beyond recognition; since the us is a country of immigrants, this would provoke a huge swell of resentment worldwide, and leave america isolated like never before.

Again, too late. Travel to and from the US is already a process from hell, often- Canadians must have passports, get photographs and fingerprints on all ten. Canadians? Melo, the swell has already come, and washed away our reputation, --and we did not really notice. And isolation is not an option, because we buy their crap, and we have the nukes. They GOTTA deal with us.

the logistics of running a police state are a nightmare, and the levels of brutality needed to keep the public in a state of sheepish acquiescence would be impossible to explain away or dress up with words....all pretence of democracy, a fair society where all are equal, etc, would become so cognitively dissonant to teach in such a visible contradiction...america would have to unhook from every other country fumbling for a sane world, and remain in its dystopia  until some counter-wave would occur.

Leftymathprof's point about the sleepwalkers is that none of that was necessary to put us in an utterly aquiescent state. What did it, without a shot fired or a bit of barbed wire was a vast amount of stuff demanding our attention and labor, eating up our lifetimes, media that focuses on Britney Spear's ass pimples and the cherry-picking of reality to soothe us, and education in parroting instead of thinking.
I did my battle with the sleepwalkers during Viet Nam, and it was touch and go even then-- you have no idea how many people at Ohio State University could not have cared less about a half million dead Cambodians, as long as the OSU-Michigan game went off on schedule.

the odds are low, imo, because a. they already have so many peeps in jail already, building enough camps to fit everyone who doesn't want to  roll up their sleeves and get with the program would make the land of the free the laughing stock of the rest of the world...through tears.

b: the teched up world of global interconnectedness will survive and just like the partisans sabotaged and helped undo the nazi evil in ww2, there would be a huge support from outside the us to help relatives  and friends who were trapped in the maw of the matrix.

There are many types of prison. The sleepwalkers are already in a prison assembled from injection moulded plastic crap, and cell phones and ipods that they cannot live without. Ever tried to walk through a crowd of shoppers with 20% of them on their cell phones? That crowd has been effectively rendered harmless. Without a trial or a sentence, they got life. And they don't even know it. And Europe can't help, because they are doing their own battle with an economic/social construct that lives or dies on it's ability to make stuff, and get people to devote their lives to stuff. It eats their lives too. Tragically, our most powerful effect on Europe has been to export to them our golden arches, our stuff addiction, and all the machinery that must be populated to support it.

in my worst paranoia days i suspect europe is in on it too, and the same day as the us goes, all of a sudden the city streets here will be being patrolled by blackwater mercenaries who don't speak any euro language.

See above.
The real art is to achieve the desired end state without any of the grisly drama, to fabricate a narrative, a story that is convincing and compelling, ---and that we can live in, and not meddle with the affairs of our betters.

Done, dude.

And MUCH cheaper than prisons and Blackwater goons. But there will be/are weirdoes-- and a prudent move would be to provide for them.

 

Useful talking follows experience, the more experience the better. Talking that precedes experience is known as bullshit.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Sat Mar 17th, 2007 at 04:58:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A few random comments --

Yes, the linear scale is an oversimplification.  But any attempt at a realistic and accurate description of the multidimensional arrangement viewpoints would be way too complicated to have much expository value.  Still, maybe someone can suggest some refinements or adjustments or minor corrections of my linear scale.

Wha