|
by DoDo
This diary is a byproduct of my research for the Central European Time diary, having found some nice quotes. It is also relevant to discussion in The Wonders Of Capitalism, so I fast-tracked it.
Let's get back to the last third of the 19th century. This was the era of railway nationalisations in much of Europe. Pioneers were Prussia and the Hungary half of Austria-Hungary. The former pursued it for strategic militaristic reasons. The latter wanted to catch up with Western Europe in industrial development, and even the Manchester capitalist liberals saw railways as essential infrastructure to be developed with central planning. For a few brief decades, the latter policy propelled the Hungarian [Royal] State Railways (MÁV) into the forefront of railway development internationally. Another development it pioneered that is commonplace today was zone pricing of tickets.
From over there => - afew
To briefly recap what was already told in the timezone diary: Ending the era of stiff control in the wake of the 1848 revolutions, the so-called Compromise turned the Habsburg Empire into the dual empire of Austria-Hungary in 1867, whose parts had wide-reaching autonomy. The latter half used it to push industrialisation, above all construction of new railways:
The initial private railways were slowly bought up and merged into a national railway. I am no fan of the Great Men theory of history, but here one man with single-minded determination really had a central role.
Until then, most railways either calculated ticket price by multiplying travel distance with a fixed rate per unit distance, or set prices for every possible relation. Zone pricing, in contrast, means that ticket price is the same within certain distance ranges or within certain areas. For the traveller, zone pricing also brings the freedom to board or leave a train at different stations within the same zone. For policymakers, zones offer the possibility of non-linear pricing, to encourage (or discourage) certain kinds of travels. (And for cashiers, it reduces the variety of tickets.) Here are two present-day examples:
But back to the late 1880s, when Hungarian railways were in difficulties, and wanted to get back in black by raising ticket prices. But Baross wanted to do the opposite with his zone pricing. This first zone pricing had distance ranges (though also a regional element: to boost the then desired centralisation, travels via Budapest had to be priced as two successive travels), with the greatest reductions (up to 80%) for the shortest and longest distances. Baross argued that the loss from price cuts will be more than made up by the extra income from boosted traffic numbers. This revolutionary idea was a mirror image of one argument for tax cuts used by neolibs today, that economic growth will raise tax revenues back to the old level: instead of counting on the sustained success and goodwill of the richest, it was counting on the poorest to go trying their luck on now affordable trains. Baross's idea made both domestic and international furore. Some quotes, first strongly sceptical ones:
"...and here we see the theory of zone pricing in its full beauty, to open the railway for those, who were barred from it. This is the professed goal! But why stop half-way? The most ideal would be if everyone would travel at public expense..."
The State can commit every madness, because it does so at the expense of taxpayers. Do they dare to claim that traffic will grow so much that the giant income deficit will be made up for by that? Note the French sources -- a reason may have been that one of the last major private railways Baross would go on to nationalise was held by French investors. Other observers were fearful a different way:
"The country that is first to apply the cheap zone pricing will draw the flood of Europe's traffic closest to itself." But Baross won the policy battle at home, and his great gamble began on 1 August 1889. And it was an extreme success. In just 11 months, passenger numbers grew by 7 million, more than doubling from the year before, and the move brought a sizable overall profit. In two more years, traffic again doubled, and a similar pricing was introduced for freight. The Hungarian Royal State Railways would stay profitable until WWI. Zone pricing then quickly spread around the world, among the first was the city of Prague. Baross could see his success only for a short time, shortly after presenting another landmark proposal (draft of a law introducing workers' health insurance) he catched typhoid fever and died aged only 44.
More Occasional Train Blogging
23/01/2007 by richardk: High Speed Trains |
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . Search . Search (Google) . Archives (Wiki) Art, Economics, Energy, Environment, EU Politics, Mech & Tech, By Country Login
|
||||||||||
|
Occasional Train Blogging: Zone Pricing | 21 comments (21 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Occasional Train Blogging: Zone Pricing | 21 comments (21 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||