|
by Magnifico
Tony Blair plans to push through "new anti-terrorism laws" before he leaves office that would give the police "wartime"-like powers "to stop and question people." The "draconian" powers will give the police the ability "to interrogate individuals about who they are, where they have been and where they are going."
Under the new laws, police will not need to suspect that a crime has taken place and can use the power to gain information about "matters relevant" to terror investigations. If suspects fail to stop or refuse to answer questions, they could be charged with a criminal offence and fined up to £5,000.In an opinion piece for The Sunday Times, Blair attacked the belief that civil liberties come before security: Their right to traditional civil liberties comes first. I believe this is a dangerous misjudgment.
In context, this is Blair's argument:
Your papers please. Blair wants the police to be able to stop anyone, at anytime, ask the person anything they want, and if they fail to comply with police wishes, they will be charged and fined. Blair and his ministers seek to make the police practically unfettered and unaccountable. Blair laments the "time-consuming" paperwork the police must now do when the stop a person. Such bureaucracy is inconvient when a government is implementing a police state. Ministers will seek to justify the new powers on the grounds that they will be "useful" for the police and "less intrusive" than the current measure to stop and search, which they will not need to use so often. Officers often have to spend hours filling out paperwork after making stops and searches. How many years did Britain live with terrorism before the Good Friday Peace Agreement? Was IRA bombings in London any less threatening than today's Islamic extermists? I think no. But Tony Blair would have us believe otherwise. The Times makes it clearly obvious that this is a power grab by Blair. No general police power to stop and question has ever been introduced in mainland Britain except during wartime. Civil liberties campaigners last night branded the proposed measures "one of the most significant moves on civil liberties since the second world war". What poses a greater danger to Britain? Islamic extremists or a prime minister who does not recognize that civil liberties are the foundation of a democratic society? Effectively, Blair and John Reid, his home secretary that is also leaving, are trying to put into place the same law the British government had in Northern Ireland over all of Britain. This comes at the same time "the stop and question power" is to be repealed there as part of the peace agreement. So, the big question is will the British parliament show more spine standing up to their lame duck prime minister than the American Congress did standing up to their lame duck president in stopping the Iraq occupation? I can see no more fitting epitaph for Tony Blair's years as prime minister than The father of Britain's endless war and police state. |
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . ET Editorial Guidelines . Search . Search (Google) Login
|
||
|
Tony Blair To Push Through Police State Before Leaving As PM | 86 comments (86 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Tony Blair To Push Through Police State Before Leaving As PM | 86 comments (86 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||
| ||||