|
by Jerome a Paris
30 years of a victorious ideological drive captured in a couple of sentences in an article from the Guardian this morning:
"It's all very well to support solidarity and national cohesion, it's quite another to damage yourself or endanger your own growth," says Mr Guardans of Catalonia. "We only want to receive back what we pay in."
he subscribes to their views on how national wealth should be shared. "The south just takes us for granted, they truly believe in the one-way flow of our money to the south. It's not right. Of course, we need to do something to support the weaker parts of the country. But I don't want to do it personally. It would be better to split up." We're happy that the poor don't actually subsidize us, and we're happy if they show solidarity for one another (we're not heartless, we don't need others to be selfish, just us), as long as it costs us no money. Not now, not later. This is the world we live in, and it is quite striking to see that the Guardian has bought the narrative in full, accepting uncritically that richer areas are "centers of excellence" that generate all their wealth with no public intervention whatsoever, and not even noting that if you don't contribute, it's hard to call it 'solidarity' in any meaningful way.
|
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . ET Editorial Guidelines . Search . Search (Google) Login
|
||
|
Neo-solidarity | 9 comments (9 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Neo-solidarity | 9 comments (9 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||
| ||||