Conflicts, ratings, trolls - a service announcement

by DoDo
Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 10:27:14 AM EST

Fights and troll ratings over 9-11, prisons and the word "clamoring", and 9-11 again, negative comments based on suspicion of political motivation, Bite me and Girls, girls -- another conflict meltdown week on ET... So, with my official powers as frontpager, especially for the benefit of our newer readers, a few words on behaviour on ET.

First of all, this is not a free-for-all place. ET achieved a unique signal-to-noise ratio on the Blogosphere, and you are expected to behave in a way that that remains so.

Second, if you were looking for a place of like-minded people, this isn't it. Here, everyone disagrees with everyone else (on something), often passionately so. You have to bear dismissal, and you have to offer a minimum of lack of self-confidence.

Promoted by whataboutbob


On rules of behaviour

As the FAQ states, there are no fixed rules of behaviour, other than try to behave in a civil way. There are however some guidelines which I won't restate in full, but you are advised to read. First, the ETiquette, which is more distilled guidelines than rules, and more about attitude than actions.

What Sven Triloquist wrote is a rather good shorter version of the ETiquette on how easy it is to get into misunderstandings, and how to avoid getting upset. Except for the "kiss my ass" part, which may cool you down but not your adversary. To keep a place together where everyone disagrees with everyone else, the motto is not "bite me" but "I bite my teeth". It is good to keep enough emotional distance to avoid being offended, and to be able to 'climb back' if there has been a misunderstanding.

Trolls and banning

For the case a user misbehaves consistently and grossly, especially if s/he keeps getting troll-rated, I repeat that this is not a free-for-all place: we frontpagers do have a banning policy, a three-step process with public warnings, though a frontpager may elect to first try to get the offender to behave via private communication. For now, this is our exclusive right, not subject to discussion, or appeal to fellow posters. On the other hand, note that the number of times someone got banned is exactly zero.

(Oh, and in case you wonder, the current frontpagers are: Jerome a Paris, Colman, Fran, whataboutbob, me [DoDo], Izzy, afew, the stormy present; commenters DeAnander and poemless used to be frontpagers too, just like inactive members soj and Sirocco, as well as some frontpagers of Booman Tribune.)

On ratings and ratings abuse

There is a New User Guide section on ratings, though it may be due for a rewording/update (suggestions welcome), but I say this:

On group blogs, ratings usually serve three objectives: to rank comments by usefulness/resonance, to signal approval to the writer, and to filter out trollish comments. On ET, the first doesn't play much of a role (3 is almost never used, only the number of 4s indicates level of approval), while the last is followed in a very restricted way.

The reason is that, again, everyone disagrees with everyone else. Ratings can further heat a heated dispute, and we don't want that here, even if other group blogs allow it.

On ET, it is de-facto agreed that if someone's behaviour bugs you, you first give a warning, then if that behaviour persists, a 2 rating (which also means "Warning") and explain why you gave it, and only if that fails, a 1 or 0 troll-rating. However, since someone in the heat of a debate is not the best situated to objectively say his/her opponent is trollish (as I said, some lack of self-confidence is a good thing), it is best if you refrain from rating your opponent, even in seemingly clear cases, and let other readers do the police job.

However, in the case a commenter persists in issuing troll ratings loose and just in spite, we frontpagers have a policy on that, too. This has been applied twice so far, but I will state it full officially in a diary here for the first time:

If we frontpagers see someone repeatedly abusing the ratings system, by giving retaliatory troll ratings without explanation or apparent gross insult/provocation, then, if two or more frontpagers agree and none disagrees,

  1. all ratings of the user too loose with troll-ratings will be wiped,
  2. the user's capacity to rate comments will be removed for one week,
  3. these will be announced in a comment on ET and possibly also in private email,
  4. if after the one-week ban, the behaviour persists, the user's capacity to rate comments will be removed again, this time permanently.
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Er... I warn myself!...

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 08:42:54 AM EST
I have no 2 cents to add, you said it all and well. And I also agree with Bob's comment.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:18:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Here, everyone disagrees with everyone else

I beg to differ...

"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char
by Melanchthon on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:28:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The big Jihad is ourselves, and the little Jihad is the rest of the world.

We spend so much time on the little Jihad.

We are for Justice and Mercy, and Truth and Peace, and true Freedom. Edward Burroughs 1659

by edwin on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:32:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
(where kids who get in trouble with the law come to court)  One of the possible outcomes is to be taken from the home and sent to a "Camp" where they go to school and get some vocational skills training and some reeducating.  One of the skills is in rough carpentry, and the kids make quite nice picnic tables.  They put one for display out in the front of the building and on it placed a sign which read

"ORDER WITHIN"  it had been up a few weeks when someone came along and wrote  "CHAOS WITHOUT" underneath the sign.

"I said, 'Wait a minute, Chester, You know I'm a peaceful man...'" Robbie Robertson

by NearlyNormal on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 02:25:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think you are missing a couple of points..

for example in Africa there is a little hut with two inahbitants who...

ok I quit

great post Dodo.

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 11:00:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks DoDo...here's my two cents worth too:

Unfortunately, we periodically need to re-visit the issue of the European Tribune community ethics, because new community members join in who don't seem to understand that the preferred communication style here is about RESPECT and civility. This is not to say that we don't have different points of view, have disagreements, or don't get emotional about certain topics...and in fact, that's not only fine, but makes for a richer environment when we can offer different points of view.

But...what is not cool here is to make personal attacks, to call people names, to tell them they are stupid, etc. We only ask for one basic thing from everybody: that we all treat each other with the respect that we would want to be treated with.

Have fun, express your opinions, but stay cool!

Peace & cheers!!

Half the population is under the age of 18. Tanzania's future is NOW...join the 50% campaign!

by whataboutbob on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:05:38 AM EST
How you keep so 110% cool, I don't know. You must have been born with your opioidergic system in a state of permanent stimulation ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:15:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]


"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char
by Melanchthon on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:22:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
60's brother...started in the 60's !!!  It just progressed in the 70's!!

Cheers!

Half the population is under the age of 18. Tanzania's future is NOW...join the 50% campaign!

by whataboutbob on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 10:24:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"But...what is not cool here is to make personal attacks, to call people names, to tell them they are stupid, etc."

Indeed, and there's a further (but similar) policy that I recommend: In an exchange, state what you think, know, or feel about a subject, but avoid asserting that the other person wrongly thinks X, or is ignorant of Y, or has bad motive Z. Statements like these can be a form of personal attack. Alternatives include stating a contrasting view, asking whether a particular concern has been considered, and stating the conclusions that you see following from good motives.

(In other words, more or less: You're wrong about genuine civility. You either don't understand the real issues, or you're trying to excuse front pagers for their veiled but uncivil attacks on the rest of us. So there! Nyah!)


Words and ideas I offer here may be used freely and without attribution.

by technopolitical on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 06:01:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Is there any way that acceptance as a member is in some way made conditional upon reading the guidelines.

I'm thinking of the <agree> v <not agree> acceptance of downloaded software - but without all the legalese. It might give pause for thought.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:12:38 AM EST
How about a big blinking "READ THE BLOODY FAQ YOU DOLT" covering the screen the first five times you visit the site? (joke)

Though, it seems to me people tend to merely skim through the ToS, if they read it at all, before clicking accept, so I dunno how one would enforce reading the guidelines. Random pop quizzes while logged in?

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde

by NordicStorm on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:20:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
'Please read the FAQ' is certainly a good comeback in response to an unwarranted rating.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:23:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Only if the FAQ is clear enough, which I'm not sure it is at the moment.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:34:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good grief - I'd better go and read it ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:50:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How about "Read the FAQing manual"?

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:43:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You've been reading Kant again...

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:55:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What, on Whirled Peas?

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:58:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, it was his Critique of Puréed Treason

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 05:11:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suppose the site could be tweaked to display the new user guide at the top of the recommended diary list if the user hasn't read it. Tweaking the rec diary list is easy, but adding the "has read new user guide" toggle would require some more intense PERL coding server-side. Front-pagers should have to ability to "reset" everyone's toggle to "unread" after a major revision of the new user guide.

Just a thought. I know it's more work that I could do right now, but I also know it's not exactly difficult to do this (just annoying: this is SCOOP after all).

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:47:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
An option requiring no coding is to make the new user guide the body of a diary, and make the new user guide link point to the diary instead of the current location. That diary could then be bumped regularly [or simply after any major edit] to appear at the top of the recent diary list. If a major revision is needed and the existing comments are stale, a new diary could be created and the new user guide link pointed to the new diary.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 05:06:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suggest to add What Sven Triloquist wrote to the New User Guide section on ratings as well as part of what  The Stormy Present wrote

"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char
by Melanchthon on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 09:35:19 AM EST
I did a quick edit of the first part of the FAQ. I'll hav t continue with the rest later. Sadly the formatting has gone and I don't have time now to fix it.

How do I post a comment?

You have to register with the site to post comments. You do this by clicking "make a new account" in the Login box in the upper right-hand section of the page.

How to post a comment: to reply to a diary, click on "Post a comment". To reply to a comment, click on "Post a reply"

This will open a new comment box. If you  "post a comment" to a diary, add a title for your comment in the title box. If you "post a reply", the title of the previous comment will be placed in the title box. You can change it.

Put the body of your comment in the large box. Use any html formatting you want to (see below for examples).

 ---

What are comments' ratings and how do I use them?

 At the end of the title of each comment, there are brackets that look like this: (none/0), (none/1), (4.00/3), (2.33/6) or some other variation.

 This is the rating of the comment by other users. It is the average of the ratings that have been given and reflects what they think of the comment, with the following table of available ratings:

 4: Excellent
 3: Good
 2: Warning!
 1: Troll
 0: Super Troll

0 is only available to Trusted Users (see [here] to know what that is); the other four are available to all users.

1 is used to rate a comment "trollish", i.e. disruptive of dialogue, insulting, or really inappropriate. Such ratings should never be used to indicate that you disagree with the comment. If in doubt, wait until another member uses this thankfully seldom used warning. If several members give this warning, the comment will be removed (see below "Community Policing")
)

2 is a warning that is occasionally used for comments that are unnecessarily aggressive or disruptive in their tone. Again, if in doubt, wait and see what other members do. There are usually experienced members around to quickly spot such comments. Remember that you or the commenter might be having a bad day. Count to 10 and think before using. Or ignore.

3 is almost never used. It was originally included for interesting, but imperfect comments.

4 is used to reward informative, smart or otherwise useful comments. It also encourages commenters by showing that they have been read. It is a social device for the community.

Community Policing
There is a very practical use of the ratings, which is to get rid of trolls. Comments with an average below a certain value will be hidden and only visible thereafter to Trusted Users. This is a very effective way for the community to self-police and avoid disruptions and thread hijackings caused by trolls.

 There are also "Tip Jars", which are another way for diarists to be rewarded. A number of diarist traditionally write the first comment to their own diary, either with some additional content, or a small comment, or simply with a "Tip Jar" title, and it is traditional to give "4" to that comment to show your appreciation of the diary or the diarist, or to show him/her that you read the diary. This can be done in addition to the recommendation of the diary.

 In order to rate a comment, use the small menu at the bottom of each comment. There is a drop down menu with "none" as a default value, and a Rate All button next to it. Choose the rating, and click on the "Rate All" button. You will be sent back to the top of the diary.

 You can rate many comments in one go and then only press "Rate All" once. All your ratings will be saved in one go. But if you post a comment in between, your ratings may not be saved.

 You can go modify a rating (but currently not delete) at any time simply by going to the relevant drop down menu, changing the rating and pressing on the "Rate All" button.

 ---

What are recommended diaries?

 Diaries that you find deserving of more attention, because of their quality, the quality of the debate it has sparked, or because it is a topic that you think is important to spread as widely as possible, can be "recommended". (see below How do I recommend a diary?)

 The most recommended diaries appear in the right sidebar, in the "Recommended diaries" box, and they are thus more visible to site visitors than regular diaries.

 All users have the exact same voting power as regards recommendations (no user has extra voting weight), but the timing of recommendations matter, as they "decay" after a certain period of time so that there can be a reasonable rotation of recommended diaries.


You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 10:26:19 AM EST
If several members give this warning, the comment will be removed (see below "Community Policing")

I believe at least one 0 rating needs to be given because the rule is that if the average rating is below 1 the comment gets hidden.

This means it is possible for a hidden comment to be unhidden by receiving more 2 ratings than 0 ratings.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:42:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I should therefore add (not previously knowing of the possible rule you reveal):

"If several members give this warning, causing the average rating to drop below 1, the comment will be hidden from public view."

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:50:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But you should move that line to the explanation of "0".

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:58:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
wait... maybe that argument WAS about the use of the word 'clamoring'...

Still, I demand that it be entered into evidence that I had previously been compared to Ann Coulter.  Surely that counts as an extenuating circumstance.

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes

by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 01:03:02 PM EST
well it's a word that I can only hear in a Scottish accent so I probably see it in an entirely different light to everyone else here.

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 01:39:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, that's how I hear it, too.  Wait, does that admission help or hurt my case?

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 02:00:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suggest to the almighty front pagers to add some rules:
  • Thou shalt not compare Izzy to Ann Coulter or other filthy animal
  • Thou shalt not mention pancakes nor peanut butter
  • Thou shalt not pronounce the name of Jehovah (OMG, I said it!)



"Ne te courbe que pour aimer..." René Char
by Melanchthon on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 01:48:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yod-he-Vau-he is allowed, I presume?

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 04:52:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
One of the most interesting aspects of this blog is that it is a disparate international community.

Most human communication is non-verbal; so in an entirely verbal medium such as this, the capacity even for people who share the same first language and culture to misunderstand each other and react inappropriately over unintended slights is huge. A lot of blog spats I've seen are little more that slight differences between intention and perception magnified out of all proportion. Add in cultural differences, and then square the whole problem by factoring in that for many contributors, english is not the first language and you have a recipe for pretty regular mayhem.

That we manage to have them only occasionally is actually quite incredible. I'm not the most temperate of writers and I'm sure I've hurt more than a few people here. I've taken quite a few slaps as well (some deserved, some I imagined), but by and large this is a very tolerant place.

Hope it stays that way.


keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 01:09:50 PM EST
another conflict meltdown week on ET...

Must be the Spring. Or maybe it's Global Warming.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 05:07:29 PM EST
Hell,

I've been rated one so much here, that I've gotten used to it.

I think I've done something wrong if I get a four.

Not around here much anymore.

Trying to do some serious writing elsewhere.

Things are hopping elsewhere.

I see only one person here that abuses the ratings , repeatedly, and it is not a front pager.

And I am not a troll, BTW.

Take Care.

"When the abyss stares at me, it wets its pants." Brian Hopkins

by EricC on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 06:43:54 PM EST
I've been rated one so much here, that I've gotten used to it.
No you haven't!!! ;)
Your history:
You have written 684 comments on the eurotrib
of these:
452 were not rated
159 were rated by one person
47 by two persons
16 by three persons
6 by four persons
2 by five persons
2 by seven persons
only one comment has been rated with anything less than a '4'... (you got a 2)

A rating of 'none/1' means that one person has rated your comment. The rating is not indicated in that score, but if you click on it, you will see who rated you, and which rate they gave. In all but one case they gave you a '4'.

Datamining is da bomb!

by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 06:15:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Agreed, after review.

I apologize.

Will respond more tonight.

"When the abyss stares at me, it wets its pants." Brian Hopkins

by EricC on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 07:06:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I just gave you a 4, not a 1. We need to explain that better in the Guide.

People may sometimes be puzzled by your brief comments, but I don't think anyone thinks you're a troll...

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 07:24:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
someone, you know more about what goes on here than we do! ;)

Thanks for mining this, because I was a bit puzzled by EricC's troll-rating claim. It must be a misunderstanding.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 07:19:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Damn!

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears
by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 09:10:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Someone, you're uniquely placed to carry out a project I suggested last year.

Basically, on each day, post a diary with links to all diaries or stories posted on the same date on previous years.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 14th, 2007 at 10:57:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What would be the purpose of this exercise? General curiosity? A kind of "This day in eurotrib history"? The numbering of the stories/diaries give the number of ones posted since. Let's have a peak at what happened here a year ago:

Stories:

1185. Open Thread - Wednesday Evening  (News, ET Community)
posted by whataboutbob on 06/14/2006 04:59:59 PM MEST
27 comments ( new)

1186. YK - Energize America presentation (part 3 - main goals)  (News, Energy)
posted by Jerome a Paris on 06/14/2006 03:20:58 PM MEST
7 comments ( new)

1187. Vote early and often.  (News, Europe)
posted by Colman on 06/14/2006 09:53:37 AM MEST
6 comments ( new)

1188. European Breakfast - June 14  (News, International)
posted by Fran on 06/14/2006 06:19:51 AM MEST
73 comments ( new)

Diaries:

2026. Iraq War Grief Daily Witness (photo) Day 292  (Diaries, Diary)
posted by RubDMC on 06/14/2006 06:28:47 PM MEST
3 comments ( new)

2027. Of Death, Taxes and Substitutes  (Diaries, Diary)
posted by joelado on 06/14/2006 03:50:55 PM MEST
4 comments ( new)

2028. Little children shame us...  (Diaries, Europe)
posted by proximity1 on 06/14/2006 03:14:38 PM MEST
16 comments ( new)

2029. World Cup Diary : Day Five Results, Day Six Previews  (Diaries, International)
posted by whataboutbob on 06/14/2006 01:10:40 PM MEST
53 comments ( new)

2030. Ahead of the Slovakian Elections...***  (Diaries, Europe)
posted by DoDo on 06/14/2006 12:37:01 PM MEST
29 comments ( new)

2031. Summit of SCO and Eurasian Geopolitics  (Diaries, Diary)
posted by FarEasterner on 06/14/2006 12:05:24 PM MEST
9 comments ( new)

2032. This United Kingdom  (Diaries, Europe)
posted by RogueTrooper on 06/14/2006 11:59:41 AM MEST
40 comments ( new)

2033. Mates, how your investments are going ?  (Diaries, Diary)
posted by fredouil on 06/14/2006 07:08:58 AM MEST
2 comments ( new)

by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Thu Jun 14th, 2007 at 11:38:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, there's general curiosity and "this day in Eurotrib history", but it's also an opportunity to look back and rescue diaries that we may have forgotten about and may be still current, and motivate people to write follow-ups.

It's not like the volume is that large: that's 12 entries with a couple hundred comments altogether from a year ago. I suppose it would be half that size again if you added the previous year.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 14th, 2007 at 11:55:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Happens everytime I eat mangos.

"Beware of the man who does not talk, and the dog that does not bark." Cheyenne
by maracatu on Tue Jun 12th, 2007 at 07:36:31 PM EST
First, there is absolutely a remarkable signal-to-noise ratio here -- I've been duly impressed ever since I stumbled on your site.

Second, is there a way you can update your frontpagers list in the sidebar?  It seems to be outdated.

ProgressiveHistorians: History For Our Future

by Nonpartisan on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 01:09:36 AM EST
Actually, I see Fran is missing from the front-pagers list, which is an egregious omission - otherwise it's correct.

There's an Alumni subtitle heading a list of past front-pagers, that may not show up enough.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 02:37:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I was just going to try to fix that and put Fran in the list, but I can't find the right box to edit.  It must be named something strange.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 03:55:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Done. Turns out to be a block, not a box...

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 04:47:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Dastardly blocks, trying to confuse me...
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 04:57:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Okay, things may be heated here from time to time, but that's nothing compared to what goes on in Malta.

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde
by NordicStorm on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 05:03:16 AM EST
Understand Alvin Karpis studied computer science after doing 30 standing on his head in Alcatraz.

Blogs down there now.

He's your lad.

"When the abyss stares at me, it wets its pants." Brian Hopkins

by EricC on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 05:29:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
all of the ratings abuse and troll rating happened on a diary about a controversial subject, where most of the contributors were newcomers.

I think ET is fine as it is. People who join in mostly get it and mostly fit in just fine. On the very rare occasions where people are being deliberately offensive, they're usually troll rated into oblivion fairly quickly.

Controversial subjects will always be controversial, but so far hardly any of the contributors to that thread seem to have had much to say elsewhere on the site. Which suggest they're more interested in the subject than the site, and once the interest dies down they may well find that somewhere else is more amenable to discussing that particular issue.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 09:03:40 AM EST
I linked to four different diaries, with more than one link only from the first.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Jun 13th, 2007 at 09:36:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]