Cyclone Gonu Shuts Strait of Hormuz - Fill Your Tanks

by LondonYank
Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:24:16 AM EST

We've spent most of the past four years wondering what would happen if the warmongering idiots holding office in Iran or the USA shut the Strait of Hormuz.  That narrow body of water - only 70m deep in the shipping channel - is the artery for 40 percent of the world's exported oil supply.  

Wonder no more.  God is in the game, and he's showing us how it's done with a storm more destructive than any in the historical record for the region.

The map above is from stratfor.com (subscription required). As of this morning Oman is taking a pounding from Gonu.  Although Gonu has weakened in intensity overnight, the Category 1 storm has also shifted direction so that it looks like running along the coast of Oman, headed for the Strait of Hormuz.  Oil and natural gas shipments will be severely disrupted, according to The Oil Drum.

From the diaries - whataboutbob


Hat tip to osnick who alerted me to the storm yesterday.

Anyone who has visited the Gulf states knows that they build to the coastline on sandy land that is mere inches above sea level.  The mountain ranges behind the flat plains are marked with wadis - dry river beds - that are ideal conduits for flash floods.  The picture below is the Qalhat LNG terminal, with cities being just bigger spreads of such construction.

Now imagine massive rain, 100 mph winds and tidal surges of 1-2m inundating and pounding those plains simultaneously.  As of yesterday the official line being spun from the Gulf was not to worry, that the oil would keep flowing.  As of this morning, I find that line impossible to believe.  

Whether it is the flooding, the winds, the sandstorms or the tidal surge, the damage to an area never before hit by a storm like this will be massive.  Construction in the Gulf is not designed for severe weather. There hasn't been a storm like this in Oman since 1977 and the last cyclone to hit Iran was in 1945.  It is doubtful that oil infrastructure has sufficient flood defenses or structural protection either.

As with Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the loss of electrical power and damage to homes and roads will prevent rapid recovery.  In the Gulf there are the added problems of little drinking water if desalination plants are offline and the need to ship in absolutely every resource and building material except stone.

The humanitarian damage could be huge, impacting Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Iran and Pakistan.  Karachi may be hit by tidal swells, flooding over a mile inland.

The implications for the price of oil are not pretty.  Discussion on The Oil Drum is pointing toward a sharp spike in oil prices, even if Gonu only shuts shipments from the Gulf for a few days.  Any damage to oil platforms, rigs, shipping terminals or tankers which requires more prolonged repair will sharply impact oil prices over the summer and into the fall, particularly in Asia but also worldwide.  The latest on the storm from Arabian Business indicates that oil and natural gas shipments from Oman will be shut down for at least three days.

As an interesting sidelight, the US ability to stage a wider war may be hit by the cyclone.  Our airbase in Oman was on an island directly in the path of the cyclone which was evacuated of its 7,000 inhabitants yesterday.  It isn't clear whether the planes remained or were moved in advance of the storm.  Our fleet will be bottled up in the Persian Gulf, riding the storm out.  

The best site for monitoring the progress of Gonu is weatherunderground.com, where Margie Kieper and Steve Gregory are blogging the storm.  The Oil Drum has a new thread up on the implications for the oil industry which projects severe disruption:

KAC/UCF and Chuck Watson are forecasting, based on their damage models, that the Qalhat (Sur) LNG terminal will be out for 25-30 days and the Mina al Fahal oil terminal will be down for 15-20 days--all of this assuming they are built to US standards. (NB: These damage estimates have increased with each successive model run...and assume US construction standards.)

The latest news from the Gulf is very sketchy as the storm is hitting.  The following is from the Khaleej Times:

The wind speed has gone down from 260 kilometres (160 miles) an hour to between 120 and 176 kilometres (71 and 105 miles) an hour, Omani weather officials said.

The impact of the cyclone on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, where at least a quarter of world oil supplies passes, is not clear.

It is worth remembering that Oman provided $15 million in aid to the people of New Orleans, and that people throughout the region will be entirely unprepared for what is coming at them.

One of the fondest memories I have of my time in the Gulf in 2005 is snorkling in the Gulf of Oman with my children.  They had never been in open water, struggling against waves and current.  They were a half-mile from shore and panicking when a sea turtle popped up between us, rolling over in the gleaming sunshine to show us his agility in the water.  Two seconds later those boys were heads down, bums up, enthralled with the turtle, fish, coral and plants a few meters below the surface.  The beaches where the turtles nest are likely being swept away today.

This morning I am praying for the peoples of the Gulf of Oman as they confront Cyclone Gonu.  I hope those that suffer will be supported by compassion and practical relief.  And I hope that Americans will bear the higher cost of gasoline over the summer driving season with good grace.

In the meanwhile, I urge you to fill your gas tanks today.  Prices will be rising quickly with those tankers bottled up and supplies disrupted.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Look, I don't mean to pick at nits, and your diary is sort of going to bear the brunt of an accumulation of frustration with a pattern of hysterical and wildly exaggerated rhetoric I've seen over the past two days.   So please don't take what I'm about to say personally...

Honestly, this situation is serious enough without histrionics.

There hasn't been a storm like this in Oman since 1977

That is just simply not true.  Oman has been hit by cyclones, on average, every five years since the 1940s, when modern recordkeeping began (although there are records going back to the 19th century).  There was a large storm in 2002 that resulted in extensive flooding in the southern region of Dhofar.

I linked to this document (.pdf) in yesterday's Open Thread.

Most of the storms have hit the southern part of the country, not the northeast, where this storm hit, and that does change the equation.  But all this hysterical talk about this being "unprecedented" is really just unnecessary.  Something doesn't have to be "unprecedented" in order to be very bad.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 09:12:02 AM EST
But something has to be "unprecedented" in order to get the attention of the media.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 09:18:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm just going off of what I've read which is that Muskat hasn't been hit since 1977 on this scale and that there's never been a cyclone that moved up the Gulf in the way this one is moving.  Maybe the storm is being hyped overmuch, but somehow I doubt it.  

Having lived briefly in that part of the world, I can't imagine the construction they have there if they get hit by these storms regularly.  They build on sand almost level with the sea right up to the shoreline.

As of this afternoon some neighbourhoods of Muskat are reported to be 2 meters under water from the surge.  I'm guessing that's unusual.

Little information is now coming out because power and phone are knocked out.  We're getting sporadic information from folks with cellphones via contacts in Europe and elsewhere reported on blogs.

I'll be glad to post something absolutely accurate once the facts become known.

by LondonYank (LondonYank (at) aol.com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 09:36:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The people at Weather Underground sound rather worried about the potential damage, and have some interesting satellite pictures showing town built on dry river beds.

And disruptions in oil operations are already being reported.

Reuters via Khaleej Times: Cyclone Gonu sweeps Oman, disrupts oil, shipping (6 June 2007)

Cyclone Gonu pummelled Oman on Wednesday, halting oil and gas exports for a second day and forcing thousands to flee the coast, but weakened as it moved through the Arabian Sea, a major route for Gulf oil shipments.

The storm, which peaked to a maximum-force Category Five hurricane on Tuesday, has been downgraded to a Category One hurricane, with a maximum sustained wind speed of about 92 mph, the US military's Joint Typhoon Warning Center said.

Oman's meteorology department said the centre of the storm made landfall in Oman around midnight and was heading northwest to Muscat, bringing torrential rains, strong winds and high waves but the cyclone was expected to dissipate on Thursday.



Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 09:56:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I get the sense that towns built in river beds are pretty universal around the world. Seems to me the human time span does us in every time. We might just remember heavy storms that come in at a pattern of 25 years. But the really big events on a 100 years or more frequency are generally forgotten or dismissed as a singularity in the ordinary bureaucratic mill of today. And that's within a system that has a bureaucratic mill and one properly(?) functioning at that.

Which is why Tokyo probably will be ruined one day. Same goes for LA. Same goes for Napels. And so on...

There were people in the Netherlands that had built their houses in the storm beds of the big rivers and who were then all scorned the river flooded them in the early ninenties. And those houses were built inside the storm bed for the 25 years range.

by Nomad on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:45:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
River beds are good: flat and rich in sediments.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:49:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Volcanic slopes are good: rich in sediments and receive lots of sunshine.

I guess it was just damnable misfortune they put LA on the San Andreas fault and Tokyo on a triple junction.
 

by Nomad on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:57:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Muscat is Muscat, not all of Oman.

I'm not arguing that this is not very serious, or that it is in any way "usual."  I think the fact that it's so serious is all the more reason why there's no need to exaggerate.

And I did ask you not to take it personally.  It's just that I'm reading all these statements everywhere about how "no cyclone has EVER entered the Gulf of Oman before" (except that at least one has), etc.

FYI, there are recent photos here.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 09:58:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Jeff Masters has a somewhat cryptic but very strong qualifier to this:
In the tropical cyclone best tracks and the modern era of weather satellites, there is no record of such an occurrence.


Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:02:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's actually Margie Kieper, posting from Jeff's account while he's on vacation.  She also described it like this:

the first tropical cyclone with hurricane-force winds, and major hurricane-force winds at that, is approaching the Gulf of Oman, to strike the eastern coast of Oman, curve northward, and make landfall on the coast of Iran.

In other words, it's the first recorded cyclone to follow the precise path that it appears to be following.

Some very good stuff in that post and the comments, btw.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:11:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I must disagree with you. On one hand, Oman is big, big enough for the Eastern and Northern shore to differ significantly in traditions of what they are prepared for, so it is of little consequence to them that the other half of the country has been hit regularly. On the other hand, even if the cyclone weaked down by the time it hit the shore, its storm surge is still of the unprecedented size corresponding to an unprecedented Category Five.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 11:44:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well hey, if it's unprecedented then it must be really bad.  Because if anything like this had ever happened before since the beginning of time, then it would obviously be much less troubling for the people of Oman and Iran.

??

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 02:45:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A Category 5 being the metric of the Saffir-Simpson scale which apparently developed in 1969 and since then implemented.

Hurricane/Cyclone satellite tracking only went up in the sixties, but the Dvorak technique to establish intensities was not underway until the seventies. And according to those who worked with the technique have reported it was immensely tricky and subjective when it was done without additional information from buoys or air reconnaissance. One wonders how many of those were done in the Indian Ocean. (If you'd believe this PDF from the NMFC there were none in the North Indian ocean in 1983).

So yes, clearly it may be unprecedented. Since the 1970s. It is abundantly reasonable then that the media labels it Death Storm.

by Nomad on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 03:33:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank you London yank for cross posting over here (at my request)!

I know this may drive up the wall a bit stormy, but hyperbole aside, it is a big storm...

"Once in awhile we get shown the light, in the strangest of places, if we look at it right" - Hunter/Garcia

by whataboutbob on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:27:29 AM EST
I'm crossposting this from your Dkos entry.

Just got this in my email from a listserv I'm on.

There's a major strike underway by Iraqi oil workers in Basra.  They've cut off the flow of oil from two pipelines, and the Iraqi military has surrounded the strikers.

Due to the Iraqi military surrounding striking Basra oil pipeline workers, the 20-million-member ICEM today called on the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to conclude peaceful negotiations with the Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions (IFOU) in order to resolve their legitimate trade union demands.

In a letter to the Prime Minister from ICEM General Secretary Manfred Warda, the global union federation of oil, gas, and energy unions throughout the world, stated, "On Tuesday evening, we learnt from the union that the Iraqi army had surrounded the strikers yesterday (5 June). The situation was, we understand, extremely tense. Urgent negotiations with your representatives have led to a temporary return to work to allow further negotiations, but the army remains in position and the situation remains very tense."

Pipeline workers of the 26,000-member IFOU, first struck pipe number 42 in the early hours of Monday, 4 June, following a company communication that a normal payment made to workers would not be forthcoming. Prior to the strike there had been weeks of negotiation, over a range of demands including terms and conditions of work, health and safety, and the future of the oil industry in Iraq. The following morning, 5 June, the strike strengthened when oil workers cut off the flow of oil from another pipeline. That was followed by Iraqi military troops surrounding the strikers.

"I assure you that military intervention in the dispute is not the way to resolve matters," stated the ICEM letter to Prime Minister al-Maliki. "In particular, we urge you to ensure that there are no arrests or detentions of any strikers or strike leaders, and no one involved is physically harmed. Genuine negotiations over the workers' legitimate grievances must take place."



And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 10:53:29 AM EST
A Cat-1 will cause disruption, but it shouldn't cause too much damage.  We're talking about 80mph winds, according to Weather Underground.  What we should be concerned about are, as always, coastal cities and the potential for flooding -- that is depending, obviously, on how the cities are mapped out with regard to elevation.  Typically, it's the flooding that causes huge problems with storms on this level of strength.

But, again, the winds are quite weak, in my opinion, as someone who's dealt with 80mph storms on a fairly regular basis in Florida.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 11:09:39 AM EST
God is in the game

Or maybe humanity? Maybe it's an effect of human-induced climate change.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 11:47:59 AM EST
I don't know about storm surges, but according to this image from The Oil Drum, Gonu missed the tip of Oman and so will make landfall in Iran if at all, East of the straits of Hormuz.


Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 11:59:40 AM EST
Permalink to the thread.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 12:00:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"God" as you say has thrown us all a wild card.  God is really the best screenwriter of all.  

alohapolitics.com
by Keone Michaels on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 12:35:14 PM EST
Good look at old predictions on econbrowser:

http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/06/post_mortem_on.html


In the summer of 2005, Cambridge Energy Research Associates received a lot of publicity for their optimistic assessments of near-term oil supplies. Two years later, it's interesting to see how the details of those predictions have been borne out so far.

The foundation for CERA's optimism seemed to be quite concrete. Daniel Yergin stated the case this way in July of 2005:

    There will be a large, unprecedented buildup of oil supply in the next few years. Between 2004 and 2010, capacity to produce oil (not actual production) could grow by 16 million barrels a day -- from 85 million barrels per day to 101 million barrels a day -- a 20 percent increase. Such growth over the next few years would relieve the current pressure on supply and demand.
[...]

Always an interesting exercise.

by Laurent GUERBY on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 03:44:38 PM EST
Please don't encourage people to try to hoard gasoline or any other petroleum product.

First, one tankful isn't going to significantly delay a personal run out anyway.

Secondly, people rushing to top up really does suck down inventories making shortages possible where none need be.

It's just bad advice.

by HiD on Wed Jun 6th, 2007 at 05:34:35 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]