European Tribune

European Salon de News, Discussion et Klatsch – 18. September

by Fran
Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:19:18 AM EST

On this date in history:

1812 - Fire of Moscow (1812) fades down after destroying more than three quarters of the city. Napoleon returns from Petrovsky Palace to Moscow Kremlin, spared from the fire.

More here and here


Welcome to the European Salon!

This Salon is open for discussions, exchange, and gossip and just plain socializing all day long. So please enter!

The Salon has different rooms or sections for your enjoyment. If you would like to join the discussion, then to add a link or comment to a topic or section, please click on "Reply to this" in one of the following sections:

EUROPE - is the place for anything to do with Europe.

WORLD - here you can add the links to topics concerning the rest of the World.

THIS, THAT, AND THE OTHER - is the place for everything from environment to health to curiosa.

KLATSCH - if you like gossip, this is the place. But you can also use this place as an Open Thread until the one in the Evening opens.

SPECIAL FOCUS - will be up only for special events and topics, like elections or other stuff.

I hope you will find this place inspiring – of course meaning the inspiration gained here to show up in interesting diaries. :-)

There is just one favor I would like to ask you – please do NOT click on “Post a Comment”, as this will put the link or your comment out of context at the bottom of the page.

Actually, there is another favor I would like to ask you – please, enjoy yourself and have fun at this place!

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
EUROPE
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:20:58 AM EST
From Spiegel Online, Sarko's Nuke Offer Bombs with Berlin:

Ever since Nicolas Sarkozy became French president, he has been bewildering the German government with one controversial idea after another. The latest shocker? The new man in Paris has offered German Chancellor Angela Merkel French nuclear weapons.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy didn't mention the bomb right away. Instead, he took a little detour by way of atomic energy: Whoever is serious about averting global warming should build more nuclear power plants, he told Chancellor Angela Merkel and Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier... Then came the surprise offer.

Seeing as they were discussing the benefits of all things atomic, the French president continued, he had another suggestion as well: Because the French nuclear umbrella protected France's neighbors as well as La Grande Nation itself, perhaps the Germans would consider taking a political stake in the French atomic arsenal?

Both the chancellor and her foreign minister were speechless. The idea of possessing nuclear weapons is taboo in Germany. Sarzoky's predecessor Jacques Chirac cautiously brought up the issue 12 years ago, but he quickly realized it was pointless to pursue it.

Steinmeier was the first to regain his composure, explaining that Germany did not seek to become a nuclear power, which is why the country had signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1975. Merkel offered a friendly smile and backed up her foreign minister.

Just what the world needs is more nuclear weapons proliferation.

by Magnifico on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:22:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
To be honest, I don't understand why they are shocked. One, this is not a new offer (Mitterrand hinted at it as well, IIRC) and two it is a perfectly logical one (not very different in scope to France offering its UN seat to the EU - I did not see the Germans reacting in shock to that!)

At some point, if Europeans are serious about having a common foreign policy, this HAS to be on the table.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:05:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
To be honest, I don't understand why they are shocked.

That's because you see nothing wrong with owning nuclear weapons, and don't seem to realise that rejection of those is held by an even wider majority in Germany than for nuclear power plants.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:23:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I know that, but German revulsion for nuclear weapons does not eliminate the fact that France has them just next door and that they will need to be discussed together at some point.

And maybe the German point of view can prevail, who knows? But sticking their heads in the sand is silly.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:35:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Who is sticking the head in the sand? Sarko made an offer he should have known has zero interest on the other side. That goes beyond just discussing Europe's nuclear power future.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:38:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
is that there is not the slightest basis for any kind of common foreign policy then.

Which will very soon mean that there is not the slightest bit for any common energy policy.

Why is it impossible for the Germans to answer "we welcome France's willingness to discuss energy weapons. As you know, our position is that we should not have nuclear weapons and we hope that this could be an opportunity to bring our French friends to our position?"

Saying that it should not even be debated is sticking heads in the sand. Just like Greenpeace antics to disrupt nuclear waste convoys do zero to deal with existing waste.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:24:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
it's the way how it is put on the table. I see zero tact in Sarkozy's approach. He could also have requested for a discussion on common foreign policy in which nuclear weapons played a part. He didn't. He basically went to say, "France has cool toys, and we are offering you to share them! Neat huh!"
by Nomad on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:49:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It is Sarkozy we are talking about. I am amazed by the level of his anti-German bias he lets through in public.

Still, the debate on foreign policy will need to get into tough issues at some point if it is to get anywhere.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:00:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why is it impossible for the Germans to answer "we welcome France's willingness to discuss energy weapons. As you know, our position is that we should not have nuclear weapons and we hope that this could be an opportunity to bring our French friends to our position?"

Saying that it should not even be debated is sticking heads in the sand.

Jérôme, this is hilarious. They answered, quote,

Germany did not seek to become a nuclear power, which is why the country had signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1975.

Do you have a lower opinion of the NNPT than George Bush, or why don't you take that for an answer?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:06:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the point is that Germany may have renounced nukes, but France has not, and thus Europe has not. So there is scope for improvement there from the pespective of the anti-nuke Germans.

And, from an European pov, there cannot be a common policy until this question is resolved - and, like pregnancy, there's no halfway position: either you have them, or you don't.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:09:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I also agree on this point: because french military is built around the existence of a nuclear deterrent (and it does impact all the doctrine), it is fundamentally not interoperable with the militaries of countries which have not deterrent (I mean, interoperable as in "fighting a really nasty war against a strong enemy without the yankees leading the pack").

So basically, german autism on the existence of the french deterrent kills any hope of a joint military program, and shoots a bullet in the foot of a joint foreign policy (because no soft power is as good as the one you back with the immanent threat of hard power).

In that respect, the british "deterrent", being a US trojan, is no more helpful. And of course, the US rejoice at this situation.

Pierre

by Pierre on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:32:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Whom does the French nuclear arsenal deter from what?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 11:00:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Nazis?    

Wait, no, Russians?  ...Iranians?  

Ah, got it:  The British.  From invading, of course.  Oh, the British would kill for a bit of land on the continent.  And better food.  

</running away now>

"This is nothing compared to how Putin rigged Eurovision."

by poemless on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 11:20:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well all of the Battle of Britain airfields in the south of England had been constructed because the Imperial General Staff had convinced the government that there was quite a good chance of War with France during the early 1930's, perhaps it's the same thing in reverse?

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 11:30:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The absence of an immediate threat does not make irrelevant a system that takes two or three decades to (re-)build. And the system was initially designed to deter both the Soviet Union and the United States. Of course, with Sarko at the helm we're pretty much a Bush colony.

Pierre
by Pierre on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 01:58:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree with DoDo on this. By broaching the matter in this way he is showing an enormous level of either ignorance or callousness.

It's not quite the same as offering an Arab minister a 3-martini lunch to celebrate the start of Ramadan, but it's close.

"Ideas or the lack of them can cause disease." - Kurt Vonnegut

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:16:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I thought they were being rather kind. Had it been me, I would have politely told Sarkozy to shove his nukes up his keister.

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde
by NordicStorm on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:35:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
...and I agree with you, DoDo and Nomad.

In these circles it is most important to bring this type of topic up in preliminary meetings so that no one forces a head of state into a position that is not easily gotten out of or where they lose face.

As NordicStorm says, the German response was very adroit. After having so many SarkMoments, they probably practice for them.

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:53:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
have a common foreign policy without nuclear weapons...

As long as the French governments promote a policy with nuclear weapons and the German governments have not changed their stance of one without, these attempts to get a discussion going appear utterly futile to me, and at worst, potentially damaging to the relationship between the two countries.

So I disagree Jerome. It's an appalling display of lack in diplomacy (there's probably no news in that). Sarkozy's is France
s figurehead and he knows all too well he's in the media's spotlight. I don't understand why Sarkozy has to step in and share around head-butts everywhere when he (or certainly his staffers) should be well aware of Germany's current position. Still character building? Brazen idiocy is how it looks to me.

by Nomad on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:49:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
have a common foreign policy without nuclear weapons...

My sentiments exactly. I'd love it if the UK were to join in but sadly that is extremely unlikely given the delusional nature of current British national mythologies.

There are too many nukes in the world and going on about how other countries shouldn't have them is hypocritical. The need of politicians to possess the capability to destroy the world several times over goes beyond any form of sense into a form of mania that should be certifiable.

We need a nominal deterrent force, preferably under UN control and the rest should be scrapped.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:45:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Nukes only make sense if other people have nukes.

If you don't have nukes and you're being threatened by someone who does, you have two choices - fireball, or surrender.

If you do, you can threaten a retaliatory strike, and balance is restored. (In a rather insane way.)

So it's hard to see what the UN would do with nukes if it had them and no one else did.

They're somewhat heavy-handed for peace keeping.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:08:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Microsoft case sets precedent, says Brussels - EUobserver.com
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - An EU court has upheld a European Commission decision to fine software giant Microsoft €497 million for abusing its dominant market position and to order the US-based company to share information on its programming systems.

The EU's second highest court - the Court of First Instance (CFI) - on Monday (17 September) went against Microsoft's appeal case to annul the EU executive's 2004 decision, with Brussels calling it an "important precedent" for other antitrust cases.

"The court...essentially upholds the commission's decision finding that Microsoft abused its dominant position," the CFI stated, adding that it had annulled certain parts of the decision relating to the appointment of a so-called "monitoring trustee", which it said had no legal basis in EU law.

The EU executive welcomed the ruling. Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso said that the judgment "confirms the objectivity and the credibility of the commission's competition policy."
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:23:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Microsoft ruling may bode ill for other companies - International Herald Tribune

LUXEMBOURG: Europe's second-highest court delivered a stinging rebuke to Microsoft Monday, but the impact of the decision upholding an earlier antitrust ruling may extend well beyond the world's largest software maker to other high-technology companies.

Software and legal experts said the European ruling might signal problems for companies like Apple, Intel and Qualcomm, whose market dominance in online music downloads, computer chips and mobile phone technology is also being scrutinized by the European Commission.

"The decision is a strong endorsement for what in the United States would be considered aggressive policy on dominant firms," said Andrew Gavil, a law professor at Howard University. "And that's going to continue to play out in other kinds of cases."

The 13-member European Court of First Instance, in a starkly worded 244-page summary, reaffirmed that Microsoft had abused its market power by adding a digital media player to Windows, undercutting the early leader, Real Networks.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:42:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is not "good for consumers", it "bodes ill for companies".

Why don't we give voting rights to companies, too?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:06:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Political Wrangling at Heart of German Terror Debate, Critics Say | Germany | Deutsche Welle | 17.09.2007
The German defense minister's comments about shooting down hijacked planes set off a burst of political squabbling. But the debate raises important issues, even if it's motivated by political maneuvering, observers say.

Politicians of all stripes have taken the opportunity to comment on German Defense Minster Franz Josef Jung's statement to Focus magazine on Sunday, Sept. 16, that he would give the command to shoot down a hijacked passenger plane, though such an order has been ruled illegal by Germany's highest court.

 

Leaders from the opposition Greens have called for his dismissal or at least for public chastisement while his colleagues in Christian Democratic Union (CDU) have tended to back him up by calling for a re-examination of constitutional questions in the face of a modern terrorist threat.

 

Also on Sunday, Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble said the risk of a terror attack remains high in Germany, and that the country is "in the sights of Islamist terrorism."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:24:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Fury Over Comments: German Minister Would Shoot Down Hijacked Plane - International - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News

Germany's Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung has sparked fury by saying he would order a hijacked passenger jet to be shot down if necessary -- even though the country's highest court ruled last year that such a move would be illegal.

 Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung is courting controversy with his latest comments. German Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung is under fire for declaring that he would order a hijacked passenger jet to be shot down if it were being used in a terror attack, despite last year's Constitutional Court ruling that it would be illegal.

Jung, a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives, told Focus magazine in an interview published on Monday: "If there is no other way I would give the order to fire to protect our citizens."

He admitted that the Federal Constitutional Court had ruled that a hijacked plane could only be shot down if only terrorists and no innocent people were on board.

But he added: "If it poses a general threat or the fundamental liberal democratic order is threatened, other rules apply."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:29:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They've got the whole western world tied up in knots. They just have to go boo once in a while and everyone starts flailing their arms and screaming "the terrorists are coming." At this rate the west will shortly strangle itself.

I told Bush; don't play chess with the freakin' Russians.
by LEP (rafifoon@yahoo.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 02:48:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
with one proviso:

the person giving that order would have to be shot as well, afterwards, i.e. it would include itself amongst those sacrificed for the greater good. How about it?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:08:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Isn't it horrible when a good idea sounds like snark?

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:57:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It is deadly serious.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:21:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This was discussed in dvx's diary.

Since then, the very outraged military pilots' association called on its pilots to ignore such orders from Jung. To which the reply came, such orders cannot be ignored in any case -- that's no more fantasizing in the press, that sounds like an order itself! Jung forgot that since Nuremburg, "I had my orders" is no excuse.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:19:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don;'t believe this - the spiegel is just reporting

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,506276,00.html

Jung rekrutiert befehlstreue Piloten für Alarmrotten

Jung is recruiting pilots that are 100% prepared to follow orders and shoot down planes.

However, he (the defense minister) would resign straight afterwards, if there is no law to justify his actions.

the argument against is also base on the soldiers law that puts under punishment to execute orders that lead to a crime.

and then the panic at the end:
"Wir können doch nicht zusehen, wie ein Flugzeug in ein Stadion mit 70.000 Menschen rast", sagte er (Unions-Verteidigungsexperte Jürgen Herrmann) dem Blatt.

We would not want to let it happen, that a plan flies into a football stadion with 70.000 people in it.

All quotes and stuff from the article linked.

by PeWi on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:01:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just a Praetorian Guard for the Commander-in-Chief. Nothing to see here, citizen.

"If you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles." Sun Tzu
by Turambar (sersguenda at hotmail com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 10:19:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Was Franz Josef Jung named for Strauß? He sure is becoming as insane as Strauß was in his time as Adenauer's defense minister (Spiegel Affair and such)... Also, for Koch's man in the government and a veritable member of the Andenpakt, a little inspiration from Pinochet wouldn't be surprising...

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 10:25:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
they could be related, but jung was born in 1949 - Strauss was 34 at that point, but I think he ony entered politics after that.

Franz Joseph is of course a hugely popular name in Bavaria.

by PeWi on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 11:01:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
D'oh! Strauß became CSU general secretary in 1949, so active but not yet legendary, but I would have thought Jung is younger by about a decade! (E.g. Koch's age.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 11:49:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If it poses a general threat or the fundamental liberal democratic order is threatened, other rules apply.

In other words, we must destroy ourselves before the terrorists get to us.

If A threatens to destroy B, destroy B.

I'm sure there's a fancy Latin phrase for that particular line of reasoning. But in plain English: fucking stupid.

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde

by NordicStorm on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:18:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Commission told to respond in senstive working time case - EUobserver.com
EUOBSERVER/BRUSSELS - The EU ombudsman has criticised the European commission for not dealing with a citizen's complaint concerning the implementation of working time rules for doctors, a sensitive issue in several member states.

The case is almost six years old and concerns a German doctor who complained to the commission that Germany was breaching an EU directive on working time, particularly regarding doctors and their time spent on call.

The complainant argued that Germany was not respecting EU jurisprudence under which the time spent on call should be counted as working time.

Consequently, German doctors were overloaded and their health as well as the health of their patients were at risk, said the complainant.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:26:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Dutch government struggling with EU referendum decision - EUobserver.com
The Dutch government is struggling to take a decision on whether to hold a referendum on the EU's Reform Treaty.

In a meeting on Friday (14 September), the Dutch cabinet decided to postpone the tricky decision by one week after discussing a key report by the Council of State, the Dutch government's highest advisory body.

The Council of State last week said in an opinion that there is no legal requirement for a referendum since the new EU treaty does not include "constitutional" elements.

Europe minister Frans Timmermans said after Friday's meeting that the government had had a "good discussion" on the Council of State report. "But good and very extensive advice also deserves a good and careful reaction," he stated according to ANP press agency.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:27:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
France considers dropping Turkey referendum - EUobserver.com
A senior French official has raised the question of scrapping a clause in the French constitution which says that future enlargement of European Union should first be voted on in a referendum.

"Should we maintain or erase this clause?", Jean-Pierre Jouyet, France's state secretary for European affairs, asked last week in front of the Balladur committee - a high-level committee on institutional reform set up by French president Nicolas Sarkozy.

"This could put France into difficulty as regards countries which have an indisputable and undisputed vocation to join the EU, such as Macedonia or the Balkans", he said, Le Figaro reports.

"France would risk blocking [their] membership process, while all the conditions would be present", he went on to say.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:28:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
yeah, let's go and change the Constitution as often as we change laws.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:09:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Surely it's better to correct mistakes quickly than slowly though?

I'm not saying that because the clause is a mistake, but if you view it as one, then just because it's in the constitution shouldn't mean it gets to stay for 10 years before it is corrected?

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:44:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
FT.com / In depth - London move to safeguard UK savings

The British government on Monday night stepped in to guarantee the savings of customers of the beleaguered Northern Rock bank as it moved to prevent panic from gripping the entire UK banking sector.

Alistair Darling, chancellor of the exchequer, pledged the government would fully guarantee people's savings and the Treasury said similar assurances would be available to customers of any other lender that ran into difficulty in the current turmoil.

Customers queued in their thousands to withdraw money from the mortgage lender for a third day and the stock market showed signs of fear spreading to other banks.

The government's move, which goes far beyond the current scheme for protecting depositors, came amid signs that the crisis of confidence in Northern Rock was spreading to other lenders. Shares in Alliance & Leicester, Britain's eighth-biggest bank, plunged more than 30 per cent after fears - denied by the bank - that it had been forced to follow Northern Rock in calling on the Bank of England for support.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:30:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Banking crisis: The fear spreads - Independent Online Edition > Business News

The Government made an unprecedented intervention in the Northern Rock crisis yesterday by publicly guaranteeing all the bank's deposits. The intervention, by the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, capped a dramatic day that had seen further mass queuing outside Northern Rock branches and billions wiped off banks' shares on fears of contagion.

The worst hit of the other banks was Alliance & Leicester, which tried to stem fears that it would be the next bank to seek emergency funding. Bradford & Bingley was another to feel the pain.

The slump in Alliance & Leicester's shares raised fears of its customers making mass withdrawals of their savings in a second run on a British bank, and the Leicester-based mortgage lender had to act quickly.

But it was the Northern Rock crisis that continued to cause the most concern. The bank's shares fell by 35.4 per cent, and mass withdrawals continued, bringing the total withdrawn in the past week to £2bn.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:32:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
after......

I told Bush; don't play chess with the freakin' Russians.
by LEP (rafifoon@yahoo.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 02:50:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The BoE could have spared everyone a tedious sermon about morals and done this on Friday.

Darling, Gordo and the BoE (and the FSA, for Chris) really didn't have a choice about doing this. If they hadn't, NR would have gone down. A&L and a number of others would have followed, and it's impossible to say where the carnage would have ended.

Rather than risk a run on the high street, they've shored up confidence.

The smart thing now would be to look at new solvency and trading regulations to make a repeat less likely. (But I'm not holding my breath.)

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 07:59:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There was a good letter in the Guardian yesterday on this

So, when an investment banker refuses to lend a tiny proportion of his bloated coffers to Northern Rock, that is financial wisdom. When a pensioner no longer wishes to lend them their life savings, that is panic.

Typical of the wunch of bankers that run our fianacial policies in this coutnry that they don't see that it exists to service the economy of the wider community and not just a creator of bonuses for City FatCats. Scum, total scum.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:01:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ther ARE the economy.
This is from the conclusion of the special report of the Economist this week on financial centers:


most cities would kill for a thriving financial sector that produced highly paid jobs and juicy tax revenues. Big financial firms have fanned out around the globe and are not shy about telling politicians exactly what they want. Many of the things they are looking for--from good infrastructure to low taxes--are helpful for businesses of all kinds, not just financial firms. Being able to attract the right talent is critical too.

It is the mix of all these factors that has kept New York and London so far ahead of the rest. They may be shockingly expensive places to live, but top financiers clearly think they are worth it. And there are plenty of lesser financial centres that aspire to become more like them.

And just above, we see a new version of trickle down...


As the financiers' money cascades across the cities where they live and work, it transforms everything from house prices to shopping patterns. Mr Hamnett draws an analogy with a multi-tiered water fountain, with water flowing first from the financial district to smart residential neighbourhoods, then to slightly less smart areas, and so on. On the other hand, if investment bankers' bonuses dry up, so will their lavish spending.

Because higher house prices  - of course - benefit everybody, not just established home owners, right?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:33:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Moral hazard Rules, OK?

Not that I am defending the UK's inadequate deposit insurance, but this is a very slippery slope indeed....

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:19:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC NEWS | Europe | France warning of war with Iran
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner says the world should prepare for war over Iran's nuclear programme.

"We have to prepare for the worst, and the worst is war," Mr Kouchner said in an interview on French TV and radio.

He was speaking ahead of a visit to Russia on Monday, during which Iran is likely to feature prominently.

Iran's nuclear programme will also be one of the main issues for the UN nuclear watchdog's annual conference, starting in Vienna on Monday.

Iran denies it is trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and says it only wants nuclear power to generate electricity for civilian purposes.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:34:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Khaleej Times Online - France slammed by Iran after minister warns of war

PARIS - A warning from French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner that the world has to prepare for a possible war with Iran over its nuclear programme triggered alarm in the Middle East and elsewhere on Monday.

Iran's official media launched a scathing response to the remarks, made in a broadcast interview Sunday evening, and accused Paris of pandering to the United States.

"The new occupants of the Elysee (presidential palace) want to copy the White House," the state-owned IRNA news agency said in an editorial.

Accusing French President Nicolas Sarkozy of taking on "an American skin", it said that "the French people will never forget the era when a non-European moved into the Elysee."

Kouchner, a former international charity chief and Socialist health minister, said that the world should negotiate with Iran "right to the end" over its nuclear programme.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:35:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Drift into war with Iran out of control, says UN | The Guardian | Guardian Unlimited
The UN's chief nuclear weapons inspector yesterday warned against the use of force against Iran, in what UN officials said was an attempt to halt an "out of control" drift to war.

His outspoken remarks, which drew a parallel between Iran and Iraq, appeared to take aim at the US and Britain. They followed comments on Sunday night by the French foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, who said: "We have to prepare for the worst," adding "the worst is war".

Article continues "I would not talk about any use of force," Mohamed ElBaradei told reporters at the International Atomic Energy Agency headquarters in Vienna. "There are rules on how to use force, and I would hope that everybody would have gotten the lesson after the Iraq situation, where 700,000 innocent civilians have lost their lives on the suspicion that a country has nuclear weapons."

There has been a string of reports out of Washington that the Bush administration is running out of patience with diplomacy and is intensifying its plans for air strikes as a means of halting Iran's disputed nuclear programme.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:37:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Europeans Tone Down War Rhetoric in Iran Nuclear Stand-Off | Europe | Deutsche Welle | 17.09.2007

In a bid to play down the controversy, French Prime Minister Francois Fillon said Monday, Sept. 17, that tensions with Iran were "extreme" but insisted there was still room for diplomacy in the nuclear stand-off.

 

"Everything must be done to avoid war," Fillon told reporters. "The Iranians must understand that tension has reached an extreme point."

 

While saying that Kouchner was right to call the situation with Iran dangerous, Fillon added that a confrontation was "the last option that any political leader would want."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:39:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Also see the discussion in bruno-ken's El-Baradei deal behind Kouchner's martial words on Iran?
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 01:26:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I can't understand the point of Kouchner's remarks.

I told Bush; don't play chess with the freakin' Russians.
by LEP (rafifoon@yahoo.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 02:54:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Part of Total's negotiations on South Pars, perhaps?

ie you lighten up on French investment in Iranian energy and we'll look again at the nuclear (non) issue.

If anyone here has easy access to International press archives I'd be interested in seeing when this Iranian nuclear "issue" first surfaced, and in what publications.

My (very) imperfect memory is that I can't recall reading about it before the US got embroiled in Fallujah in April 2004 or before I first went to Tehran in May 2004.

But I may well have missed it.

There's a serious Diary there for anyone inclined to do the research....

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:29:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC NEWS | Europe | Chernobyl to be covered in steel
The authorities in Ukraine have approved a giant steel cover for the radioactive site of the world's worst nuclear disaster - Chernobyl.

Ukraine has hired a French firm to build the structure to replace the crumbling concrete casing put over the reactor after the 1986 accident.

The casing project is expected to cost $1.4bn (£700m).

It will take five years to complete and the authorities say they will then be able to start dismantling the reactor.

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko hailed the project:

"Today is probably the first time that we can openly look into the eyes of the national and international community and say that a solution to the problem that has long been called the Chernobyl problem was formally found," he said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:36:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oooh, only 20 years too late. Still better late than never.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:02:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
thats one thing you'll never have to do to a windmill or solar array...

is this the modern equivalent of sweeping something under the rug, but scaled up?

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:30:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
European Commission seeks to beef up energy regulators - International Herald Tribune

BERLIN: In its latest bid to inject more competition into Europe's energy market, the European Commission plans to propose measures to make national regulators more independent so they can better resist an opposing push by companies for greater concentration.

The directive, scheduled to be introduced Wednesday by Andris Piebalgs, the European energy commissioner, would also include for the first time a "solidarity clause," which would strongly encourage - but not require - regional assistance for any EU member whose supplies were threatened.

Among other things, the directive also would require greater transparency about the share-holding structure of European energy companies and limit the term of a national energy regulator to five years.

The measures reflect a growing frustration on the commission's part that legislation it has introduced over the past five years has not yet led to a genuinely open and competitive market across the 27-country EU.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:43:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What are thy doing pushing a "solidarity clause" - a blatant interventionist move that goes aganst the rules of the market and the spirit of competition?

If supplies are "threatened" anywhere, it simply means that prices are not high enough. Or are they sayign that markets are not efficient? I am so confused.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:13:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Eurozone countries to call France to order: report

Key eurozone members are set to remind France it must cut its public deficit, a German press report said on Monday.

The eurozone countries, which were not identified, would send a written warning to French President Nicolas Sarkozy, pressing him to tighten the government's budget discipline, the Financial Times Deutschland said, without naming its sources.

The warning would take the form of a European Commission procedure, a so-called "political counsel," which the newspaper described as "declaration of war."

The recently adopted procedure is reportedly the most restrictive available to the commission with regard to countries that appear unable to meet fiscal rules laid down in the European Union's Stability and Growth Pact.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:50:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I can just see Sarkozy already "let me tell my European friends that France welcomes the debate but - do I tell them how to run their budget? Should I tell them how to run their budgets? No. and I think the reverse is true. With all my repsect for them, I would say they are less familiar with French politics and French domestic constraints than I am and that it is my job to take care of the French."

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:17:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Le Monde: Les Français pour les réformes, notamment sur les retraites

(Translation and errors mine)

More than a majority of French people (57%) believe that the government's economic policy is a good one, and 69% of them are favorable to France's special pension systems for retirees [régimes spéciaux de retraite], according to a BVA poll.

The proportion of individuals polls who were satisfied with the government's economic policy of François Fillon is the same as that recorded in the last survey conducted in June, noted a report for Les Echos and BFM Radio.

The proportion of those polled who were favorable to "a reform of the special pension systems for certain categories of civil servants in order to bring them into line with the general pension system" fell from 72% in April to 69%.

68% of those asked considered this reform "bold, for it shows well the government's desire to reform the country significantly ["deeply"]", though 69% think it "risky, for it could provoke strikes that risk paralyzing the country as in 1995."

This monthly* poll was conducted on September 14 and 15 over a sample of 1002 people, several hours before a speech that the president Nicolas Sarkozy was to deliver on social issues, in particular, on retirement.

*Not sure what baromètre mensuel meant.

Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read or write.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:20:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
English introduction to the French retirement system, including the régimes spéciaux:

The French Retirement System

This poll, and another poll I read about yesterday in Le Monde recalled some diaries from earlier this year that may have renewed relevance.

Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read or write.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Last weekend, as dvx reported too, the Green base revolted against the leadership, and replaced a proposal supporting the continued deployment of Tornado jets and troops in Afghanistan with one demanding withdrawal.

For those speaking German, read this op-ed and weep:

Grünen-Parteitag: Abschied von Fischers Außenpolitik - Politik - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Nachrichten

Abschied von Fischers Außenpolitik

Von Hubert Kleinert

Mangelnder Realismus, Großsprecherei, Antiamerikanismus: Das Afghanistan-Debakel der Grünen ist nicht nur eine Bauchlandung der "Regierungslinken", sondern schaltet die Partei auch als möglichen Bündnispartner jenseits von Rot-Grün aus. Die Blamage wird die Partei teuer zu stehen kommen.

Farewell to Fischer's foreign policy

Hubert Kleinert [Former Green representative for Hessen state, aide to Joschka Fischer]

Lacking realism, boastfulness, anti-Americanism: the Afghanistan debacle of the Greens is not only a belly landing of the "government Left", but also excludes the party as a potential coalition partner beyond Red-Green. The blamage will be expensive for the party.

No coalition with the CDU, what a tragedy. But Kleinert is right about the conservative reaction: the general secretary of the CDU's Bavarian  sister, the CSU, commented the event foaming at the mouth, declaring that the Greens "betrayed" Joschka Fischer!... He just can't think of a party not built as the feudal fiefdom of its leader (like his is).

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 04:34:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, fancy expecting politicians to deliver on their promises and principles. Whatever next ? Democrats doing something effective about ending the Iraq war. Oh the humanity !!

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:06:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
By ceasing their support for a mission which is not accomplishing anything the greens are showing that they are not 'serious' party anymore.

Serious people always support war. It is a difficult choice to support war, which provides ample ground to ponder on one's seriousness in doing so.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:13:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Serious people always support war.

As Gabor Steingart the born-again neocon says,

Irak-Abzug: Mein Berlin, ihr Bagdad - Politik - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Nachrichten

Wenn John F. Kennedy während der Berlin-Krise auf Meinungsumfragen gehört hätte, wären die USA rasch abgezogen. Diese alte amerikanische Standfestigkeit wünscht sich Gabor Steingart auch im Irak - und er fordert: durchhalten, gemeinsam geduldig sein.Had John F. Kennedy listened to opinion polls during the Berlin crisis [Sowiet blockade of West Berlin], the USA would have withdrawn quickly. Gabor Steingart wishes to see this old American steadfastness in Iraq, too - and he demands: keep it up, be patient together.


*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:23:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And to think that this was the generation that was going show the world how an egalitarian, antiauthoritarian party could work.

"Ideas or the lack of them can cause disease." - Kurt Vonnegut
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 09:04:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
WORLD
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:21:22 AM EST
Iraq orders expulsion of US security firm | Iraq | Guardian Unlimited
The US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, apologised to the Iraqi government yesterday in an attempt to prevent the expulsion of all employees of the security firm Blackwater USA.

The ministry of interior yesterday took the decision to expel Blackwater after eight Iraqi civilians were killed and 13 wounded in Baghdad when shots were fired from a US state department convoy on Sunday.

Diplomats, engineers and other westerners in Iraq rely heavily on protection by Blackwater. The Iraqi decision created confusion on the ground, with uncertainty over whether protection was still available and whether Blackwater staff should leave the country immediately.

Ms Rice called the prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, to apologise for the shooting. They agreed to run a "fair and transparent investigation", according to a statement from Mr Maliki's office.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:25:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Iraq tells US security company to leave after civilian deaths - Independent Online Edition > Middle East

The Iraqi government has ordered the American private security contractor Blackwater, which provides protection for US officials in the country, to shut down its operations after its guards were accused of killing 10 civilians and injuring 13 others in Baghdad.

Employees of the company are alleged to have opened fire indiscriminately after a bomb exploded on Sunday in the Mansour district of the city, packed with people shopping for Ramadan.

The Iraqi government's decision, personally endorsed by the Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, is the strongest measure taken yet against private security contractors, who have been repeatedly accused of carrying out unprovoked shootings of Iraqi civilians.

Yesterday, in an extraordinary telephone news conference, the US embassy spokeswoman could not answer whether the company was still working for the Americans inside the Green Zone, or what its legal position was along with similar foreign contractors within Iraq.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:40:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And how does the "government" of Iraq plan to enforce this order?

I told Bush; don't play chess with the freakin' Russians.
by LEP (rafifoon@yahoo.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 02:57:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hire bigger security companies?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:18:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Like I said yesterday. Blackwater will simply create another company called say...VeryDarkGreyWater and transfer the contracts and assets (ie mercenaries and weaponry) to them and carry on as before. Trebles and mass slaughter all round.

The only way this will end is if the Iraqis demand the removal of all militia from their soil, and that ain't gonna happen.  

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:11:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Other Blackwater details

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/09/blackwater-bann.html

http://www.ericumansky.com/2007/09/they-better-hop.html


Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. --Charu Saxena.

by metavision on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:37:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Japan turns to the older generation as ruling party stands at edge of abyss - Independent Online Edition > Asia

Thousands of people braved scorching sunshine in central Tokyo to hear speeches by the two men campaigning to become Japan's next prime minister in the oddest election in the country's recent history.

One of the candidates has already conceded defeat and the other says he is too old to be leader. But both say they are running because their party, which has governed Japan for half a century, is standing at the edge of the abyss.

Taro Aso, a former foreign minister, has admitted he has no chance of beating his rival, Yasuo Fukuda, and replacing Shinzo Abe, who is in hospital. "I have decided to run if only for the sake of holding an open election," Mr Aso told Japanese television.

For some conservatives, that admission was a huge disappointment. As Japan absorbed the shock of Mr Abe's abrupt resignation last week, Mr Aso was briefly the frontrunner to lead the Liberal Democrats (LDP) out of perhaps its worst crisis in 50 years. But the swashbuckling 66-year-old, as famous for his controversial bon mots as his obsession with manga comics, has been politically hobbled by his association with the deeply unpopular outgoing Prime Minister.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:44:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Dems and the New AG - Moon of Alabama

How Bush will get a very conservative man confirmed as new attorney general by a Democratic Senate:

  1. Secretly pick a very conservative candidate.
  2. Launch rumors of recommending other, more divisive and nutty candidates, Theodore B. Olson and Michael Chertoff, who have obviously no chance of being confirmed.
  3. Let the Dems prance against those.
  4. Pull out the 'compromise' candidate, retired federal judge Michael B. Mukasey
  5. Let Fred Hiatt rant against the candidate for not being conservative enough.
  6. Bribe a 'moderate' Democrat, Senator Schumer, to your side.
  7. Point to the candidates 'terrorism experience'.
  8. See the Democrats fold.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:51:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Who'd they expect, Noam Chomsky?

I told Bush; don't play chess with the freakin' Russians.
by LEP (rafifoon@yahoo.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 02:58:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
TUC press release www.tuc.org.uk

New report reveals 25% rise in murders of trade unionists

In 2006, 144 trade unionists were murdered for defending workers' rights, while more than 800 suffered beatings or torture, according to a worldwide survey released today by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC).

The `Survey of Violations of Trade Unions Rights' uncovers a shocking increase in anti-trade union violence, with the number of murders rising from 115 in 2005 to 144 in 2006. The increase is due in part to the brutal treatment of trade unionists in the Philippines, now the second most dangerous place in the world, after Colombia. A total of 33 murders and 130 instances of trade union and human rights violations were reported in the Philippines last year.

The ITUC survey reveals that anti-trade union repression is taking place in every continent across the globe, including Europe. Nearly 5,000 arrests were reported along with more than 8,000 dismissals of workers because of their trade union activities. Reported anti-trade union repression represents the tip of the iceberg as the vast majority of suffering goes unreported for fear of reprisals, say the report.

Colombia remains the most perilous place in the world to be in a trade union, with 78 killings reported in 2006. Just one per cent of murders over the last decade resulted in conviction, showing the impunity with which the Colombian paramilitary death squads are able to operate. Between 1994 and 2006, of the 1,165 murders documented, only 56 perpetrators have been brought to trial and only 14 have been sentenced.

The ITUC report also identifies worrying developments in Europe. Less than one in ten European companies fully respect the right of unions to organise and engage in bargaining. Many governments in Eastern Europe, including Russia, Georgia and Belarus have recently enacted labour legislation to restrict trade union rights.



Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 02:48:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Any chance you cna do a quick diary on this? This is worth front paging.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 03:19:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Done.

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:21:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Did you get my email? (on your yahoo account)

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 05:26:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
From RSF (media):

http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=20283


En 2006 :
  •  81 journalistes tués
  •  32 collaborateurs des médias tués
  •  au moins 871 interpellés
  •  au moins 1 472 agressés ou menacés
  •  au moins 912 médias censurés
  •  au moins 56 journalistes enlevés

A titre de comparaison, en 2005 :
  •  63 journalistes tués
  •  5 collaborateurs des médias tués
  •  au moins 807 interpellés
  •  au moins 1 308 agressés ou menacés
  •  au moins 1 006 médias censurés

I'm pretty sure no MSM will mention TUC press release.

by Laurent GUERBY on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 06:55:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
THIS, THAT, AND THE OTHER
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:21:50 AM EST
From Brooklyn to Berlin: New York Artists Escape to Germany - International - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News

Leonard Cohen famously sang "First we'll take Manhattan, then we'll take Berlin." Now many New York artists are doing just that, turning their backs on excessive rents and the stifling conservativism of the post-9/11 city to carve out a niche for themselves in the thriving Berlin art scene.

When David Krepfle left his small hometown in Iowa and moved to New York in 1989, he had $100 in his pocket and dreams of becoming an artist. He found a loft in the Brooklyn neighborhood known as DUMBO ("Down Under the Manhattan Bridge Overpass"). Back then, it was the kind of area where nobody cared if he used a chainsaw to make his art -- even if he did often get chased by thieves on the way home from the subway.

But over the years, as the neighborhood became the hippest place to live in New York, Krepfle's rent grew and it became a struggle to keep his home. Then he visited Berlin in 2001 -- and was so impressed that he joined the ranks of the New York artists making the exodus to the German capital.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:25:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
i continue to predict a 'culture' drain from the usa to yurp, like the 'braindrain' that gurgled deanander over to the usa in the 60's, but in reverse...

berlin could use some lefty energy, too, with the far right holding 25% of the seats...

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 08:21:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Venice says no to feeding pigeons | Special reports | Guardian Unlimited
Venice has decided to ignore its reputation for wedding romance by enforcing a ban on showering newly-weds with rice, in an effort to keep down the city's pigeon population.

Each year more than 1,000 civil marriages are registered at the historic Palazzo Cavalli. But, said the city's police chief Marco Agostini, "throwing rice at the bride and groom brings hordes of pigeons, who then wait around until the next ceremony. The situation has become unbearable."

Article continues There are caculated to be 40,000 pigeons in the historic centre. Besides the cost of cleaning up droppings, it has been discovered that pigeons are causing dangerous cracks in buildings. Offering them food spiked with contraceptives has produced scant results in cutting their numbers. A city spokeswoman said: "The rice ban was already on the books, but there will be no more turning a blind eye for weddings since it was calculated that every new-born Venetian is lumbered with an annual tax of €275 (£191) to clean up after pigeons."

The mayor, Massimo Cacciari, is also trying to ban the sale of grain to feed pigeons in St Mark's Square, despite opposition from animal rights groups and the sellers themselves, who have refused to move. "The square is not a hen-house and you can't have pigeon's droppings all over the place," Mr Agostini said. "The square is washed and cleaned up weekly, but it's not enough."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:40:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
KLATSCH
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 18th, 2007 at 12:22:14 AM EST