Burning the Midnight Oil for Progressive Populism

by BruceMcF
Tue Jan 29th, 2008 at 09:43:57 PM EST

NB: This is a candidate diary with the references to the candidate removed. The candidate diary itself will go live on the Big Orange, sometime a little after midnight, Ohio Time (6am, Paris time).

One serious confusion in some progressive populist thinking online has been a misunderstanding of the role of the progressive blogosphere as a tool for building a progressive movement.

However, as a progressive populist looking at the passive-voice descriptions that "populist messaging fails because there is not a populist movement" ... I feel like jumping up and down and yelling, "read your history books you idiots!"

A populist movement is not created in coffee house discussions, whether live or online ... it is created in the process of fighting for things, and in the process learning how to engage in a political fight and transform ourselves from political consumers to citizens of a Republic.

And without populist messaging leading the way, there will be nothing to take to our fellows when we get out amongst them.

Picture Credit: David Leeson (#8)


As we scramble around trying to get messaging out, much of the effort would seem to be pointless and wasted effort ... but there are so many different efforts that some of them work, and those are the ones that are propagated. And as in many cases of early innovation, we have to make many efforts, all of which have a low chance of succeeding, in order to actually have a strong chance that some of them shall succeed.

And, no, its not enough to provide "oxygen" for a bonfire ... not at this point in time. But its enough to keep the fire burning, which is something that would not have been technologically feasible just four short years ago.

And the tools and the political environment have come together in a particular "pre-change" moment ... because, in part, a growing number of people are realizing that the Climate Crisis is really, truly serious.

As we look at the magnitude of the gap between the politically possible and the urgently needed ...

... then it is clear that any vote that does not change the boundaries of the politically possibly is a wasted vote. It is, of course, up to each of us to decide for ourself what vote can have that impact ... and while I would strongly argue on the issue, I don't think this is the place to do so.

Still, how can we doze through another marketing exercise posing as a political campaign?

How can we sleep ... when our beds are burning?


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
... so y'all got it waiting for you in the morning.


Utsukushikereba sore de ii
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Tue Jan 29th, 2008 at 09:46:47 PM EST
Well, Edwards is gone, which leaves a choice of two corporate candidates. Frankly I prefer Obama, not because of his policies, but he's more likely to win in November.

But america will not change in 2009, not in the way it needs to or even wants to, because Obama isn't about that. Never was. His idea of change...well the things he thinks important I can't understand.

This was America's chance to change in time, to fend off the worst of the storm that's gonna rage around the world by 2020. By the time you wake up it will be too late for all of us.

ps are you BruceF on Sideshow ?

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jan 31st, 2008 at 11:06:33 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]