International Day for Decent Work

by In Wales
Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 07:44:17 AM EST

How we are meant to keep track of all of these National and International Days of... I don't know but today is International Day for Decent Work, pulled together by trade unions and NGOs, with a number of events taking place in different countries.

In Belgium, a 2 year campaign on decent work is being launched with the slogan, 'Workers are no tools'.

The campaign aims at promoting solidarity, at raising awareness on the situation of workers over the whole world and at promoting debate on decent work with working people, union members and general public The campaign also wants to press Belgian and European poiticians and policy makers to make of ‘decent work’ a central lead in future policies.

The weblink above leads to other sites in different languages.


See ETUC events taking place,a great example of pan-Europe working on those issues that cut across all borders.

This unprecedented event, organised by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and including the participation of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), gives trade unions worldwide an opportunity to join a broad global mobilisation.

In the context of this World day for decent work, John Monks, General Secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation, will take part in the activities organised by ETUC’s Belgian members on the morning of 7 October.

A European trade union delegation will also be in Paris that afternoon to participate in the event organised by ETUC’s French member unions.

In the UK, the TUC is calling for:

• trade justice: a boost to world trade by opening global markets to goods from the global south, and pro-development agreements between developed and developing countries;

• an emphasis in environmental policies on creating new, green jobs, with help to protect the livelihoods of workers in other industries;

• more teachers, nurses and other workers to provide decent public services, funded by more aid and debt relief; and

• building equal treatment for people at work – based on core labour standards such as no forced or child labour, no discrimination, and rights to join unions and bargain collectively – into the work of international trade and financial institutions and migration systems.

The point being made by the TUC is that unless Governments NGOs and Unions place a strong emphasis on work, then effectively we are doing nothing more than providing charity, which doesn't bring any sustainable solutions to the issue of poverty.

“Earlier this summer, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) recognised the importance of work, including job creation and employment rights, with its ‘decent work agenda’. We want more organisations to make this call a central plank of the campaign to make poverty history.”

The decent work agenda elaborated by the UN’s ILO has four pillars – job creation, social security, social dialogue and rights at work. The UN has recognised the role of decent work in delivering the first of its eight Millennium Development Goals. At its international conference this June, the ILO adopted a declaration on ‘social justice for a fair globalisation’.

Trying to find press coverage so far doesn't give much but perhaps it will grow. It is a large scale event but as with Saturday's Child Poverty rally in London, people won't look if they don't care and don't see how it could affect them.

Organised by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), more than 170 conferences and protests are being held during the day that begins in Fiji and ends in Alaska.

"On this day we are raising our voice together to deliver a single, strong and united message," said Guy Ryder, general secretary of ITUC.

"We know that in each of our countries, working families are bearing the brunt of the financial, food and energy crisis, the deepest crisis that this globalised economy has ever known."

The day aims to promote decent work conditions, while drawing attention to international labour laws, such as the ban on forced labour and child labour and the respect for union freedoms, and the fight against poverty.

Here we have a Global Unions website which provides more information on why decent work is so important.

Any news from your countires?

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Every person on earth should be able to have a job that enables them to live a good life in which their basic needs are met. Employment is a crucial factor for achieving this. This is why all governments should be urged to work more on job creation. Not just any jobs, of course, but decent jobs for everybody.

It is often argued that countries cannot afford to have fair wages and better conditions, however the short-term costs will quickly be outstripped by the long-term benefits. That is why Decent Work is the best way to fight global poverty. To most people around the world, lack of decent work means poverty.

Achievable, or not?

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 07:45:23 AM EST
Why would we want that ? Do we want bag fillers in supermarkets ? Maybe there isn't enough work to do to keep everybody employed. And the "work for welfare" ideology works very well with the neoliberal dream of a workforce too numerous, and thus with bad bargaining conditions.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 08:13:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd love to see a debate between you and redstar on full employment...

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 08:17:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Do we want bag fillers in supermarkets ?

Is that decent work?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 08:18:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It might be all some people want to do.

But the question of whether there are enough decent jobs is one that popped into my head.  

Perhaps thinking of areas where poverty is rife, there must be some forms of employment that can be generated that can target poverty and social issues through the jobs created and also through people being able to earn money. Local people actively involved with the regeneration and development of some areas could be one such source.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 08:30:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In Wales:
a job that enables them to live a good life in which their basic needs are met

By this definition, so long as the bag fillers are paid enough - yes.

Which is rather the problem, philosophically.

DeAnander and I have sort of discussed in comments and diaries the notion of the return of "feudalism." I think that's what this "decent work" concept doesn't really address.

We're developing an unequal economy. The "decent work" notion addresses the first problem that those on the bottom are often starving and lacking basics.

But however you provide these things (and this is largely a concept of a minimum wage) there remains the issue of power inequality. And dignity.

In parts this is very complicated. After all, why shouldn't my elderly aunt be able to go to the supermarket and wander round, choose the things she wants, put them in the trolley and then be aided at the checkout by someone more physically agile? Could it not be humanly and socially rewarding to be a "bag filler" in this scenario?

Of course at the same time, it's easy to conceive of situations where being a bag filler has less dignity to it.

And none of these problems about "service work" - (being a servant?) broach on the issue about fulfilment...

(To be clear I think solving poverty is a positive step, I just worry that you can do it and still leave power inequalities buried in the structure of the economy when people are classified as "not in short supply.")

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 08:30:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Power inequality is a really important issue to raise and a very difficult one to address, since it requires a culture change that certainly in the UK doesn't look likely to happen. Could it work in other societies this is a global campaign after all?

eg with the view being that no matter what the work is, everyone is making a positive contribution and are able to earn a living from that.

There are so many jobs that I can't see a way of making them fulfilling in themselves, but if working in decent conditions at the very, least some fulfilment can be gained from working in a good environment, and interacting with other people.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 08:44:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Leaving the argument of full employment aside for the moment, there are people capable of working, who want work but can't access it.  There are jobs that could be generated, or training that could be provided to allow people to access employment locally instead of bringing in only outsiders (not talking about migrant workers but any non-local workforces) instead of trying to support local people with gaining employment. It's more sustainable if done properly.

But also even 'crap' jobs could be worth doing if the conditions people work in and the pay they receive was decent enough.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 08:34:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Is the point of a job to provide social status to the employee or to actually accomplish something useful for society ?

What's the point of the former definition - which seems to be the one used here ?

The probleme with unemployment isn't the jobless wanting jobs, it's the jobless wanting money.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 09:32:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The need to have enough money is an issue but even to have a job in itself is an important thing in terms of people 'feeling useful' and having something to do.

Unemployment increases the likelihood of depression and that isn't just a money related issue but stems from having nothing to do.  Being a bag filler isn't necessarily an alternative nor is any random pointless 'job' but nor does that mean that the aim of job creation should be written off.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 09:43:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What about teaching people to occupy themselves so that they can fill their days with something else than work and TV ? (which is also easier with a bit more money than given on many unemployment benefits)

There are many ways to "feel useful" that don't require the exchanges of power and time required by employment. There are -used to be- many channels of social contact available, beyond employment.

We're building a society where "holding a job" becomes the only avenue of social interaction and fulfillment. The problem is that "holding a job" is a lousy way of social interaction and fulfillment - work can become an tension filled environment where friendships are hard to form ; fulfillment is not so easy to come by when doing someone else's bidding.

And our capitalist societies aren't shaped to provide "good jobs for everybody" ; the producticity requirement in much of private employment, the fact employers want full time employees, and that our automatising societies don't require as much human labour as it used to, converge towards more and more unemployment.

We can decide to force our societies into the full employment paradigm of the twentieth century, or try to change them towards a different paradigm - did you see Martin's diary about Basic Income ?

The rentier of the 19th century didn't seem so depressed about not being productive...


Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 10:14:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Haven't seen Martin's diary, I'll try and take a look soon.

I agree that there are other ways of being engaged and useful but the challenge is changing societies where it is a badge of honour to appear on daytime tv shows like Jeremy Kyle - think Jerry Springer...

It's a problem that is so deeply ingrained in the UK that I can't work out where it begins or ends or where it isn't.  It ties in with everything, the education system, the principles of 'welfare', inequalities, employment...

The scenario you wish to present - how do you shift the paradigm to begin to move towards that?

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 10:33:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
See Martin's diary...

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Oct 7th, 2008 at 10:34:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]