President-elect Obama Open Thread

by Jerome a Paris
Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:13:55 AM EST

For final results and first analyses...


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
  • a significant victory for Obama
  • movement in Congress towards larger D majorities, not enough to reach filibuster-proof Senate, but within range
  • the polls seem to have gotten it mostly right (I somehow always find it annoying when it is so - you want surprises on election night, dammit!)


In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:16:59 AM EST
Step one, get Obama elected.

Step two, smash the Anglo-disease, its apologists, and its theoreticians.

Step three, build a new future.

And if you thought step one was hard, you ain't seen nuthin yet!

by NBBooks on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:20:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Step One is great, good, fantastically well accomplished!

But compared to what follows, frankly, it's the easy bit.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:31:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes--not only is it the easier part, we have as yet no idea where Obama really wants to go. Perhaps he's wise enough to also remain flexible in this regard.

That said, I am today proud of my countrymen and women.

The kingmakers thought to crown queen Hillary this time, I believe, thinking they could triangulate their way into an extended stay in power, and have a Democratic scapegoat if the shit really hit the fan.

At first, I think McCain was a necessary theater-piece. I think Obama's primary victory caught them totally off guard, and they disintegrated into a dog pack and playing catch-up ever since- not sure if McCain was electable, not sure they wanted him to be elected. Governor Dingbat was an incredibly divisive choice for the real GOP.

At some point, the focus shifted away from McCain-Palin (!) to something ageeable and do-able: preventing a Democratic veto-proof majority in the senate. In this, they were successful, it seems.

I am one who has no faith in the integrity of the electoral process--Obama won because his margin of victory exceeded the GOP theft margin, and because of his superb strategy, particularly vis. the 50 state strategy. Thanks, Howard Dean.

Grabbing what you can, as John Ruskin said, isn't any less wicked when you grab it with the power of your brains than with the power of your fists.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:38:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Obama won because his margin of victory exceeded the GOP theft margin, and because of his superb strategy, particularly vis. the 50 state strategy. Thanks, Howard Dean.

Right. On the GOP theft margin, (excellent expression!), and on Howard Dean's paternity of the groundswell, 50-state, fighting Dems strategy.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:15:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You must be especially proud of Ohio :-)

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:50:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Proud--and amazed.

Grabbing what you can, as John Ruskin said, isn't any less wicked when you grab it with the power of your brains than with the power of your fists.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:48:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, I reckon that Georgia saw major disenfranchisement and probably even outright fraud.

All through the primaries, there were huge queues in the major cities (where the "other people" vote). And the polls became extremely close, even when their likely voters model had under 30% blacks (it was a lot more, at least in the proportion of people who wanted to vote -but I don't fault anyone for giving up on a longer than 8 hours queue, which happened in Georgia).

Then suddenly, a 9% gap when national results are on the high end of the expected values? When exit polls (remember, exit polls did not include the early voters, who were disproportionately black) were a lot closer?

Very suspicious. But then, people from Georgia on pollster.com had been warning about that all along so maybe we shouldn't be surprised.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:28:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Georgia is still very much in play, apparently, both for the presidency and for the Senate.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:09:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ok, the words have been spoken, now deliver the results and the change.  Then we judge.

Secondly, do not ever, ever, tell me America is a country of white racists again.  Do not ever waive your hand of white guilt and privilege.  97% of blacks voted for Obama.  Does that sound like votes for skin color or for policies...

by paulfl1 on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 09:50:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Jeez, Louise.  97% of blacks voted for Obama?  Read even the most charitable history of blacks in America and ask yourself: can you blame them?  I'm not surprised that 97% of blacks voted for Barack.  I am totally baffled that 3% did not.

Somewhere in cyberspace, the ghost of de Chardin is smiling.
by budr on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:17:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact, 3% of the GLOBAL vote for McCain would have been the normal outcome with a reasonably intelligent and decent electorate.

So maybe it's just a sign that blacks are more intelligent and decent.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:36:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Did this "Blacks are racist" line get some play on the hate stations recently? I have been hearing and reading it a lot in the last few days.

It is crap from several levels. First, by definition.

racism |ˈrāˌsizəm| noun
the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
* prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on such a belief : a program to combat racism.
DERIVATIVES
racist |ˈreɪs1st| noun & adjective
It would be racist to vote against someone just because of race. But to say that a 97% vote was only because of race is a logical void. There is a 85-95% likelihood that the segment known as 'The Black Vote" are going to vote for democrats regardless of race...in fact, the choice has been for only voting for white folk for hundreds of years...oops~! they couldn't vote for hundreds of years since their Terms of Sales forbid it...well, maybe since emancipations...nope, not that either...how about since de-segregation of the military in the 50s...wrong again...how about since the Civil Rights Act...getting closer, but we certainly have seen how this hasn't been true either what with fewer polling places that cause multi-hour long lines and other obstacles.

Secondly, stop with the generalizations - people would be wrong to say, and probably don't say, that "America is a country of white racists". What they should say is that "There are still a lot of Americans who are too lazy, or unable due to ignorance, or who prefer not to think out of their old sick and disgusting habits of racism and sexism and fear of anything different-ism, and who will do whatever is required to muddy the waters, including appearing sophomoric and foolish in public."

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:55:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I am glad it was Obama and not McCain that was elected and most off all I am glad that these elections are finally over, after 2 years - unbelievable.

As to being happy or excited, I just can not feel it, I am still not convinced that he will be change, especially in the direction most people seem to hope for, ending the wars, more progressive, more cooperation with other countries instead of demanding to be the leader, etc. But I really would be happy and delighted to be proven wrong, like never before in my life. If I am proven wrong I am willing to go out on the street and dance and sing.

What I am impressed with is not Obama, but the grassroot movement that was created by the US people, which started for me with Howard Dean and I think his work is largely forgotten and overlooked, without his 50 states strategy todays outcome might not have been possble. So congratulation for that to Americans. :-)

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:28:32 AM EST
I don't think he will be able to hugely turn things. But at least he won't set out to make things worse. At least he won't try to make Government incompetent. He won't try to disenfranchise minorities.

It has to be a major improvement, both over the incumbent and the alternative.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:31:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Cyrille:
But at least he won't set out to make things worse. At least he won't try to make Government incompetent. He won't try to disenfranchise minorities.

I agree with you, but doesn't necessarily speak for him but against his precedessor and it could have been said about any of the other canditates.

What I hope for is that this grassroot movement keeps active and holds his feets to the fire, so that he has to listen to the people.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:41:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
is for the standard no longer to be "no worse than ..." (Saddam, the French, the Russians, George Bush)

I was always annoyed that it was Bush that used the sentence about the "soft bigotry of low expectations" - a brilliant expression for a very much valid concept - and yet another case of projection.

So it's not so bad that expectations are high today. We need that if we want to have a chance for the big things that need to be done to actually be done.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:48:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, I didn't just mean that he'd merely no be worse than...

But the mess left behind by Bush is such that Obama will have to put out many a fire before he can actually improve things.

Fran, my candidate was John Edwards. I am sorry that Obama felt he had to campaign so far to the right. But his policies are still vastly better than a lot of what is considered mainstream.
You could argue that several other candidates were better than Bush, but any Republican would have been more destruction. We needed to get rid of Republicans. And it's not a done deal.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:19:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, we need higher expectations to become more realistic.

It's not as if wanting someone who isn't a crazy fuck should be such a big ask. But the homophobes in the US won most of their propositions, and there are still 54 million people in the US who would have been happy with McCain.

Realistically, Obama won a squeaker thanks to epic volunteer efforts. The difference is 6% and not 16% or 26% as it should have been.

So I'm not feeling cheered either. It feels like the start of a lot of hard work, and not the end of it.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:33:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
ThatBritGuy:
there are still 54 million people in the US who would have been happy with McCain.

and risk a Palin Presidency.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:48:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't really expect much more than a return to sanity by the US, but that is itself a hell of an improvement over the last while. I don't see any reason to expect he won't improve things: for instance the pressure of events and reality requires him to end the wars because they're not sustainable anyway.

He'll clearly be more progressive than McCain would be: if you're poor or middle class in the US, Obama and the Democrats are less awful than the Republicans  - that's not necessarily saying much, but it might be the difference between eating and not eating. One thing I noted with Obama was his references to how lucky he was to be well off.

As for his diplomacy, well he has a mandate to do things like talk to the Iranians without preconditions, which is already a huge improvement. "More cooperation with other countries" isn't a high hurdle either, given the Bush regime's skills.

The themes he hit in his acceptance speech - ending the wars, fixing the real economy, climate change and energy independence, fixing alliances - indicate that there is grounds for hope. Hell, having a US President that believes something needs to be done about global warming is a massive improvement.

Is he still a US politician embedded in the US system with all the baggage that implies? Of course. Is he still going to end up bombing a few thousand people? Probably. Is he still a centre right politician with a whole pile of personal failings? Naturally.

Are all or even most Eurotribbers going to be happy with his policies? Not a chance. But it'll most probably be an improvement. It might even be a great improvement. Wouldn't it be nice to be complaining that the US wasn't doing enough to address climate change rather than complaining that it was actively sabotaging any efforts to adapt?

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:32:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, I agree, I'm feeling relieved but little more. Godz, I feel like a party-pooper but I feel about him as I did when blair got elected when I said "at least he'll stop digging in the same hole the other guy did, I just worry about the holes he'll start"

Y'know I just wrote and then deleted a whole essay of stuff I want done different and don't expect to see change one iota and I've decided that maybe now ain't the time. Enjoy the party America, man you deserve at least that much.

But this was the easy bit. Really, compared with what's next this was a breeze. The hard work starts on Jan 28th.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:39:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I echo those sentiments, but I think it's easy to underestimate the importance of having a black Emperor. Also, that his father was born in Africa, not in the US. This has the potential to change how people look at the US after Bush more than any other candidate would have. Of course, the potential for disappointment is greater.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:39:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How the world looks at the US is changing right now. Obama's a huge image-maker. But what you say about the potential for disappointment, etc...
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:49:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
He could be attuned enough - and smart enough - to seize on it and avoid disappointment. But as we know he's been toning down his rhetoric and asking people not to expect much from his first 100 days.

The problem with that attitude is that the first 100 days set the tone and also set a maximum level of energy and ambition. You don't get to step up in the middle of your term: 9/11 was very unusual. Less than 8  months into his term, Bush was headed for 4 years of lame duck presidency.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:01:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
True. But that was a handicapped president-intellectually, politically and psychologically. Could this be a new game? I think it could.

Obama's knowledge about the world is yet woefully limited. Nothing in his two books or his public life suggest an as-yet wider view. But it's clear he's a quick study. Our best hope.

Grabbing what you can, as John Ruskin said, isn't any less wicked when you grab it with the power of your brains than with the power of your fists.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:47:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Le Canard prints words apparently said by Obama to a French delegation at a big meeting a fewdays ago:

"I don't understand you French - you have all these problems with your black people and yet the white would vote 80% for me."

"You guys know about socialism. Is it a curable disease?"

With no context, it's hard to know if the latter was meant in jest or otherwise. But the whole thing suggests that the usual narratives about France are well and alive in Obama's mind.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:20:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
With regard to the former, first I don't think we have "all these problems with our black people", but his surprise seems to indicate that he reckons colour of skin really is a very relevant factor.

He of all people should not push that narrative.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:56:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Both of those quotes have the stench of poor translation.  Sarcasm and American dry humor don't seem to translate into French.  The word choices, etc, don't sound much like Obama.  

I'd like to see the actual Obama quotes and some context from the conversation.  Without that these quotes are wide open for interpretation.

The first bit seems to be calling out the French for hypocrisy.  He is suggesting that even though a huge majority would vote for him, a black American, they probably wouldn't do the same for a black Frenchman.

The second quote is probably an attempt at sarcasm or at least clever wordplay.  Based on the extremely socialist rhetoric Obama has used in the past month I would be hard pressed to read the latter as being "the usual narrative."  I think you'll find that Obama's domestic policy ends up borrowing greatly from France and Europe in general.  This much seems clear.

by paving on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:09:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What's really needed globally though is simply to stop looking toward the US, rather than looking toward it with new eyes. A unipolar world is much too limiting, regardless of who currently heads the White House.

--
$E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$
by martingale on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:04:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The US is likely to leave its hegemonic position. The question is whether there will be a "hegemonic succession war" as Bruce once put it. McCain would have accelerated the process even more than Bush, and probably ensured that the US went out with a big bang. Obama will slow down the process, but not reverse it. Of course, the white supremacists will say that the election of a black President is a sign of America's decadence.


Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:19:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the US right now, things have gotten to such a state that anything less than excellence on Obama's part is a guarantee of failure.

Paradoxically, this is why I'm allowing myself to hope. Obama certainly has the intelligence and vision to see what needs to be done; what has disturbed me to date has been his tendency to choose the safe policy option over the bold and risky one.

Now that the bold and risky options are the only ones left, I'm hopeful that he will step up.

Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:09:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
He also has nothing to gain by playing it safe: he's already Emperor.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:21:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm getting emails about massive street celebrations in Washington, Boston, NY, Chicago. Any pictures anywhere?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:42:59 AM EST
http://www.philly.com/philly/gallery/Crowds_flood_Philly_streets_after_Obama_win.html

hard to find other good pics on Google.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:51:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
there's a couple of party picture threads on kos.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:40:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I just came back from a HUGE spontaneous rally outside the White House.  Thousands of people walked down there from all over town: chanting, dancing, singing, banging drums, hi-fiving everyone in sight, walking up to total strangers and hugging them.....

Amazing. Uplifting. Not something I could have imagined.

I have some pictures and video, but it's almost 3 in the morning here, I have to work tomorrow and I can't find my cable or card reader to download them from my camera.  But I hope to post a White House party diary Wednesday....

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:51:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
How will people react to Bush's last 3 months of executive orders?

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:57:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Will anyone on the receiving end of those orders act on them?

Grabbing what you can, as John Ruskin said, isn't any less wicked when you grab it with the power of your brains than with the power of your fists.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:52:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hopefully not. We'll see.

When does the Senate meet again? Does Obama get the chance to do anything in the 75 days before he takes office?


Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:52:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The greatest damage he can do is administrative: by issuing executive orders changing regulations - or even how they are implemented - ha can cause damage that would take years to correct.

Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:29:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I have said before if I were president I would start by issuing executive orders reversing Bush's.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:50:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And so he should.

The fear is that Bush might promulgate rules, say, easing restrictions on logging in sensitive areas and then grant permits under the new rules. Even if the respective order is reversed, the permits would remain valid.

Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:12:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
there's always ways around that if you mean it. You can log, but you can't make access roads, you can't use machinery etc etc.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:27:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the meantime, the Washington Post has video here, which looks like it was taken really early on, before the crowd got huge.

I mean, there were literally people dancing in the streets. Thousands and thousands. A river of them, walking down 16th Street.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:58:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Where have you been lately? We haven't seen you since the Pzris meetup!?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:59:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hi! Been slammed with work and life and everything, not online much at all. Working on that...
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:01:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good god! having a life? that will never do.

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:15:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Flickr's got photos from all over:

Seattle: http://flickr.com/photos/allswede/3005025410/
Philly: http://flickr.com/photos/dis-section/3004991298/
Atlanta: http://flickr.com/photos/sanasaurus/3004120857/
etc.

see http://flickr.com/search/?s=rec&q=obama+atlanta

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:48:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is to be contrasted with Bush's inauguration in January 2001, which was gloomy and acrimonious.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:52:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What I hope for is that this new mood will strengthen the grassroot movement even more and that they start to holf their politicians more accountable. Something we still could use more of, here in Europe too.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:59:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a really poor quality video, but with my cruddy camera, I captured the moment that California's votes came in and it dawned on everyone that Holy crap, Obama won!!!

I wanted very badly to watch the election results with other people, but was disappointed to learn that the only option anyone knew of was the 400 RMB per head event sponsored by the American Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. Consulate in Shanghai.  (400 RMB [45 euros] is very expensive in China: outside of rent, I could live on that for two weeks easily, and up to a month if I just eat simple Chinese food.)  At the price, this morning I was like, "Forge it.  I'll just follow it on the Web."  Power up the computer:  Web is down.  Turns out, the the internet is down for the whole neighborhood for some reason.  Tinfoil alert starts ringing:  Does the PRC not want us ex-pats, much less their citizens, to follow this historically momentous election?  Try the TV.  All the news is about yesterday's agreement between Taiwan and China to allow planes and ships to travel directly across the Taiwan Strait.  And when they finally got to the election, they had some economist on blabbing about how the U.S. economy was coupled to China and how the new president shouldn't endanger economic ties between the two countries, etc.

That's it:  suck it up, get to the Hilton, and fork up the cash.

I was worried that the event would be mostly high-powered professionals and diplomat types.  The keynote speaker was to be Ian Johnson, a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist from the Wall Street Journal.  Sure enough, when I walked in, it looked like a goddamn GOP convention except that all the staff were Chinese.

But over time, more and more people showed up dressed casually, and by the time Obama's victory was announced, I did not feel so out of place (although the suits still outnumbered everyone by a large margin).

The big and pleasant surprise was that although there were a few McCain supporters, most people seemed in favor of Obama, based on the cheering and clapping whenever a state was announced for Obama.

This was confirmed when the results of a mock vote that was taken among the attendees was announced:  19 for McCain, 122 for Obama.  This among the U.S. business and diplomatic elite in Shanghai.

A minor highlight was meeting two fellow dual/naturalized U.S. citizens like myself -- who were equally overjoyed (and almost in disbelief) about Obama's victory.

There were few tears: I got the feeling that as moving as the moment was, people were leery of letting their feelings out among so many Serious People.  But I saw plenty of beaming smiles and hugs, and caught several people wiping away tears.

Of course, it's likely that most McCain supporters in the Shanghai U.S. business/diplomatic community didn't even bother to come.  Who knows, if McCain was favored, or even if it were close, there might have been far more of them than Obama supporters.  The president of the Shanghai American Chamber of Commerce seemed to give away his own preference when he prefaced his speech by saying something along the lines of, "Well, this is all very nice and  all, but we need to talk about some serious matters," before going into his concerns about the future of U.S. commerce, trade and industry with/in China.  Right.  Because his talk was more serious than Obama's election.

Today reminded me a lot of watching another event when a group of people were experiencing incredibly intense emotions that under the circumstances they felt compelled to keep pent up:  watching France beat Brazil in the 1998 World Cup in a bar in Austin, Texas where Brazilian fans outnumbered French fans about 30 to 1.  When we (the French) won, we could not believe it, and we could no longer contain our jubilation.  To the Brazilians' credit, they were good sports about it and let us enjoy our moment of celebration.

Similarly, my conservative friends back in the U.S. wrote emails to our mail list congratulating Obama and those of us who supported him, and wished the new president-elect and the country the best of luck.

And more than one of them also expressed pride and satisfaction that the "racism as an influential presence in our country" was continuing to be transcended.

Sorry for the long post!

Gotta go party now!!!!

Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:22:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's all I'm going to say.

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:41:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No pics here in DC.  I'm hoping those loud bangs from across the Potomac last night were fireworks rather than celebratory gun shots though.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:29:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC correspondents' heads exploding.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:31:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In a good way or what?  I can imagine Drew's brain is fried around now, assuming it still functions.

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:34:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
My brain is semi-functional on only the best of days, so yep: fried now.  I'm exhausted.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 09:17:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good job.  Take a break.  More work comin'.

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 09:24:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hey, how's the head?

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:36:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They were massive.  Downtown Washington was shut down.  People celebrated in front of the White House (suck on it, Junior!).  I wish I'd gone to the party and taken the day off today, because the video footage is really amazing.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 10:40:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC NEWS | World | Americas | US Elections 2008 | Obama makes victory speech
President elect Barack Obama has addressed supporters in Chicago after beating John McCain to become the next US president


Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:47:57 AM EST
Does anyone have the voter numbers, how many Usians did vote for Obama? I can only find the electoral numbers and most news sites are down anyway - probably overload.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:48:12 AM EST
the WSJ has Obama at 56.1M (52%) and McCain at 51.1M (47%)

this looks like Obama could get 65M votes.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:52:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Can these numbers be considered a landslide or just a very good outcome?
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:02:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Many are using the term. It is a much larger margin than recent elections, including Bush's which were proclaimed as a mandate for the neocon policies, the will of the people, etc.

What is noteworthy is Obama's success in far flung parts of the country. Large margins in New Mexico, Colorado and Arizona, a possible win in Montana as well as a sweep of the west coast with high margins. So this is not about the mythical northeastern elites and cannot be painted as such.

by melvin on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:40:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Correction: Nevada not Arizona
by melvin on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:48:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Obama: 58.7M
McCain: 53.0M

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:58:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The three west coast states are nowhere near counted yet. Obama's numbers will grow more than McCains.
by melvin on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:11:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Obama 52
McCain 46

96% in.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:55:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Don't think anyone will be home in the USA today. Have a good party

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:04:05 AM EST
Obama's Acceptance Speech - AMERICAblog News| A great nation deserves the truth
Remarks of President-Elect Barack Obama--as prepared for delivery
Election Night
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008
Chicago, Illinois

If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.

It's the answer told by lines that stretched around schools and churches in numbers this nation has never seen; by people who waited three hours and four hours, many for the very first time in their lives, because they believed that this time must be different; that their voice could be that difference.

It's the answer spoken by young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Latino, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled - Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been a collection of Red States and Blue States: we are, and always will be, the United States of America.

It's the answer that led those who have been told for so long by so many to be cynical, and fearful, and doubtful of what we can achieve to put their hands on the arc of history and bend it once more toward the hope of a better day.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:14:22 AM EST
Obama Elected President as Racial Barrier Falls - NYTimes.com
"It's been a long time coming," the president-elect added, "but tonight, because of what we did on this date in this election at this defining moment, change has come to America."

Echos of:



Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:18:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
any news on prop 8 ?

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:15:19 AM EST
Less than half the vote counted, that abomination is passing with 53%. Unclear what is still out. With luck it is some of the larger municipalities.
by melvin on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:46:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Prop 8 has a 53-47 in in LA County with 44% of the vote counted. That is very bad, since we needed a goodly sized No vote there to counter some of the more backward parts of the state.

Statewide it's 52.5% Yes 47.5% No with 48% reporting. Many metropolitan counties are incomplete, but it's split: Alameda, Santa Clara, and Contra Costa Counties (SF suburbs) are expected to have a large No vote, but Southern California counties such as Orange, San Bernardino and San Diego, expected to have a large Yes vote, have also not reported much results yet.

SF County is 98% complete, and delivered a big No vote, but it's up to the less reliable parts of the state.

We will not know anything for certain until the morning (here in California), but it does not look good at the moment.

And the world will live as one

by Montereyan (robert at calitics dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:57:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

A sad nugget:


Prop 8 Exit Polls

They show a narrow victory for marriage equality: 52 to 48. Every ethnic group supported marriage equality, except African-Americans, who voted overwhelmingly against extending to gay people the civil rights once denied them: a staggering 69 - 31 percent African-American margin against marriage equality.  (...)

Oh, and there was no gender gap. And a massive generation gap: the under-30s voted for marriage equality by 67 to 31 percent. The over 65s voted for discrimination by 57 - 43 percent.



In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:56:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Great, on the day AA people finally get to feel like full citizens of their own country, their Californian brothers and sisters vote to create a new second class citizenship in the H8 ST8.

I will not be celebrating the possibility of a new america while the old bigotries come right out and smack us on the nose.

I gotta deal with that here on Thursday. Bad news.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:24:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
African Americans are very socially conservative, as are Hispanics.

All that heartfelt Christianity, you know.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:33:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't care about their superstitious manias, I don't care about their social conservatisim, I care that a group of people who seemingly feel they have just been finally truly emancipated taking the time to remove civil rights from another minority group.

Don't they understand what civil rights are ? Or h8in' on teh gay take precedence over the idea ? Maye gay groups should propse restoring miscegeny legislation and see how they feel ?

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:57:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You may not care, but the fact is superstitious manias, cnservatism or hypocrisy don't disqualify people from voting, and sometimes people vote on those.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:35:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
it's running 52.5% yes with 49.4% reporting

Link

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:06:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by das monde on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:25:09 AM EST
One very bright spot. In what claims to be the inside scoop on Obama's planned staff and cabinet appointments one name stands out in a field of mediocrity and overly familiar faces: Jay Inslee is rumored to be the favorite for Secretary of the Interior. There could be no better news for the environment. Inslee is passionate about a green economy, a proponent of tidal power, biodiversity's best friend in Congress. I can guarantee you the oil companies and extractive industry in general hate this man with good reason.

He was once my congressman and he is also just a really cool guy.

by melvin on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:54:20 AM EST
Many tears from the old lions of the civil rights movement tonight.

Jesse Jackson in Grant Park

by melvin on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:03:35 AM EST
Old warrior, brave man. Finally the victory--
No wonder he weeps-for joy.

Grabbing what you can, as John Ruskin said, isn't any less wicked when you grab it with the power of your brains than with the power of your fists.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:58:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Anyone want to make a list of countries that have had elected leaders from ethnic minorities representing less than 13% of the population? The "only in America" meme is going to start hurting my head soon.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:05:14 AM EST
I already got emails telling me that the street celebrations were unprecedented not just in America, but worldwide.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:07:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
France, Leon Blum, 1936. And that's not even looking for the protestant (or atheist) PMs...

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:02:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm trying to work out if ethnic non-executive heads of state work  here: we've had two Protestants, back when that really meant something ...
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:06:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Are Irish Protestants an ethnic minority?

Vote McCain for war without gain
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:08:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, then she can also count:

Ruth Dreifuss - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ruth Dreifuss (born January 9, 1940 in St. Gallen) is a Swiss politician affiliated to the Social Democratic Party. She was a member of the Swiss Federal Council from 1993 to 2002, representing the Canton of Geneva).

She was elected to the Swiss Federal Council on March 10, 1993, as the 100th member elected since the foundation of the federal state, as the second woman ever, and as the only Jew so far,[1] and was President of the Confederation in 1999, the first woman to hold this position.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:08:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
1851.

Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.
by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:26:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
1868 in the UK
Benjamin Disraeli - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Disraeli's biographers believe he was descended from Italian Sephardic Jews. He claimed Spanish ancestry, possibly referring to the ultimate origin of his family heritage in Spain prior to the expulsion of Jews in 1492, after which many Jews emigrated temporarily to northern Italy before returning to the Netherlands and then England.[5]


If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:10:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Kreisky, Disraeli, Blum  etc.

If you restrict your question to non-Jewish minorities (and ignore the white leaders of South Africa, for obvious reasons), the only ones I can think of are Fumijori in Peru and Sarkozy in France.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:16:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, it's not just about minorities but about disenfranchised groups. I still think the election of Evo Morales in Bolivia was momentous, too.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:22:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Would you please not fall for the recent UMP propaganda that Sarkozy is from an ethnic minority?

If he is, then EVERYONE is and it has no meaning whatsoever

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:29:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure about the latter point - if you go back far enough, everybody is, but in Sarkozy's case you only have to go back one generation.

I think the main problem is the way the question was phrased. The interesting question is whether somebody from a minority which has suffered severe discrimination can become the leader of the country, not whether somebody from a small minority can. Then Morales would be relevant, even if he represents more than 13%, and Sarkozy would not - nobody can seriously claim that there has been severe discrimination in France against Hungarians.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:37:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hungarians are not an ethnic minority in France, or then you need to count Bretons, Parisians...

Ethnically, we are absolutely the same.

With regard to having gone through discrimination, it's even clearer indeed, especially if you take into account that it was Hungarian aristocracy -Italian low grade workers had it a lot tougher.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:48:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact, by excluding Jews, you already excluded Sarko. (Sarko's father was a Hungarian aristocrat, but his mother was from a rich Jewish Greek family.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:05:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He is not Jewish himself, and put catholicism left, right and centre of his campaing (yes, it was disingenuous, but he did).

There is no way he can honestly be considered alongside Blum as an elected Jew.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 02:34:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think gk meant "Jewish" as religious minority. Bruno Kreisky was an agnostic (and a mender of fences between his Social Democrats and the Austrian Catholic church). Disraeli, too, became Anglican.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:25:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
With regard to having gone through discrimination, it's even clearer indeed, especially if you take into account that it was Hungarian aristocracy

Actually, Sarko's father left when he was very small, he became a momma's boy then.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:55:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
EVERYONE is and it has no meaning whatsoever

That's the problem with identity politics.

The question is whether the minority status was an issue in the (s)election process.

Clearly Obama's race was a major issue in this election. Sarkozy being Hungarian wasn't.

What is significant about Sarko is that he's not an Enarque.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:47:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Mitterrand wasn't one (Enarque) either. So even that is not exactly breathtaking.

"Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. - Galbraith"
by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:50:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What is also - if not much, much more - significant about Sarko is that he is from Neuilly. And that his main real rival, de Villepin, was from the 16th. The French aristocracy is alive and well, and feels it doesn't need the pretense of meritocracy to mask its rule.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:50:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
what's wrong from being from the 16th?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:21:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Aristo!

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:33:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There's nothing wrong with being from the 16th ; the problem is the overrepresentation of the 16th in the formation of French elites.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:35:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
UK, Disraeli? And should we count 13% or just non-whites - it would have been equally big if Asian American, or Native American, were elected?
by Sargon on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 09:34:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not elected, but from a small minority: Stalin.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 01:07:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
At that rate we can include the Norse and Norman-speaking England rulers of the middle ages...

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:52:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/11/5/12649/6674/253/653696


The AP and local Georgia press have called neither the president or senate races. The media seems to have blown it - by a little and there's no harm no foul, but by a lot and we could see some fall out

The numbers aren't adding up. Looking at turnout trends, exit polls, and early voting there seem to have to be far more unaccounted for votes than the reporting makes it appear. No concrete reason why right now.



In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:06:30 AM EST


Jesus died for somebody's sins but not mine - Patti Smith
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 03:21:42 AM EST
Twank, I'm drinking one to you tonight.  In fact, I'll drink five.  I've never been so happy to be wrong in my life.

poemless, all I can say is, THANK YOU!

Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 04:13:42 AM EST
OK, step 1. Obama in office.  DONE!

Now, step 2.  No offense peoples but I still have my engineering/get it done mentality AND I'm stone cold sober (I have tutoring today) so it's time for me to email contact Amy Goodman/Democracy Now and see if I can do a hook-up between them and yous.  Any suggestions, let me know.

Time for me to stop watching and actually help build a better future.  

In the words of Stan (the Man) Lee,  'Nuf Said!

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 06:51:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We've talked a lot about what "change" might mean. Here's a compilation of Obama's campaign positions and proposals. If even half come to pass, it will surely be real change.
Thanks to After Downing Street, Bob Fertik and Ben Brandzel:

From Bob Fertik:

And here are 42 outstanding reasons to work your heart out, courtesy of Ben Brandzel:

  1. Health care: High quality health care guaranteed to every American regardless of medical history or income, lower insurance premiums for everyone, and the freedom to chose our own doctor and our own plan.
  2. Iraq: Bringing all combat troops home from Iraq within 16 months and no permanent bases.
  3. Climate: Reduce America's carbon emissions 80% by 2050 and lead the world in negotiating a binding global treaty to replace the expiring Kyoto Protocol.
  4. Taxes: Shifting the tax burden to reward work and cut taxes for 95% of American families while rolling back Bush's tax giveaways to the rich
  5. Eliminate all income taxes for seniors making under $50,000 a year
  6. Triple the Earned Income Tax credit, one of the most powerful anti-poverty programs ever
  7. Raise the minimum wage to $9.50 an hour by 2011 and index it to inflation (finally!)
  8. Pass the Employee Free Choice Act, eliminating unfair barriers to organizing and rejuvenating the labor movement overnight
  9. Establish a "Credit Card Bill of Rights" to protect consumers
  10. Help every student afford college by provide a $4,000 tax credit and boosting Pell grants
  11. Ensure workers can care for elderly parents and even attend children's' activities by expanding the Family and Medical Leave Act
  12. Eliminate no-bid contracts for any government expenditure over $2500. Sorry Halliburton!
  13. End the loophole that allows major corporations to incorporate off-shore and evade billions in taxes
  14. Get 1 million plug-in electric cars on the road by 2015
  15. Double fuel economy standards
  16. Invest $150 billion over ten years to support renewable energy and create 5 million new green jobs
  17. Allow individuals to generate electrify at home with solar or wind and then sell the excess power back to the utilities by creating a "Digital Smart Grid"
  18. Offer voluntary, universal pre-school to all children
  19. Send 30,000 highly qualified teachers to high-need areas
  20. Double federal funding for after school programs
  21. Bring broadband internet access to every community in America
  22. Significantly increase federal support of stem cell research
  23. Invest in public transit and high-speed national rail
  24. Encourage growth from the bottom up by eliminating the capital gains tax on start-up small businesses
  25. Only negotiate new trade agreements that contain vigorous labor and environmental protections
  26. Focus diplomatic and military efforts on addressing real threats, like Al Qaeda
  27. Revise the Patriot Act to protect Americans' rights
  28. Close the Guantanamo Bay detention center
  29. De-politicize military intelligence to avoid ever repeating the kind of mistakes that led us into Iraq
  30. Fully fund veterans' health care and adopt a zero-tolerance policy for letting veterans fall into homelessness
  31. Establish a clear goal of eliminating all nuclear weapons across the globe
  32. Lead the world in stopping the genocide in Darfur
  33. Save millions of lives and win allies around the world by doubling foreign assistance to cut extreme poverty in half by 2015 and accelerate the fight against HIV/AIDS, tuberculoses and Malaria (This one is definately my favorite)
  34. No more "signing statements" that undermine legislative intent and subvert the constitution
  35. Shine light into Washington with a searchable online database that easily connects the dots between all federal lobbying, tax earmarks, campaign finance filings, and Congressional ethics records
  36. Triple AmeriCorps, double the Peace Corps
  37. Cut corruption by prevent any political appointees from working on any regulations or contracts related to their former employer for two years (Sorry again, Haliburton!)
  38. Ban all gifts from lobbyists to any executive branch employee
  39. Work towards ending the pay gap for women by passing the Fair Pay Restoration Act
  40. Ensure Americans are never again denied their right to vote by pass the Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Act and fully funding the Help America Vote Act to guarantee that every vote is counted
  41. Support equal rights and privileges for all same-sex couples and end discrimination against gays and lesbians in the military
  42. Require polluters to pay for cleaning up their messes under the superfund program

After 8 years of fighting bad stuff, it kinda makes your head spin to think of all this change actually happening, huh? But it really could. And it's just the beginning. Cause this is the stuff Obama has already committed to. And America's progressives are just getting warmed up.


Grabbing what you can, as John Ruskin said, isn't any less wicked when you grab it with the power of your brains than with the power of your fists.
by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:18:36 AM EST
Stevens is ahead of Begich in Alaska and Young is ahead of Berkowitz. Stupid Alaskans.

Oregon is extremely close, but I think Merkley will eventually pull ahead, 74% in now and the difference is 12,000 votes.

Minnesota will probably go to a recount as Franken now trails by less than 800 votes. Might even get closer from the one or two districts that still have to report.

The Democrats could end up with only 56 in the Senate. I think it's going to be 57, but we'll see. Then the matter will be to expel Stevens and see who will replace him after a runoff.

The results in the House are in line with expectations, which is good. The Democrats should end up with a majority of around 75-80 seats.

I guess that since there is no filibuster-proof Senate in sight, Obama will really have to show that he can reach across the aisle to the moderate Republicans (still more than 2 of those left!).

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:05:24 AM EST
Back to history class of amurkan politix.  Tammany Hall?  Teapot Dome?1st Mayor Daley?  "They may be corrupt, but at least they're OUR corrupt."

Skennah Kowa
by Crazy Horse on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:25:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Alaska is one big corrupt family.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:30:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Speaking of corruption, how did Stevens do?

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, that sucks.  Oh, well, screw Alaska.  Or at least most of it.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 10:42:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
100% in for Minnesota now and Franken is 570 votes behind. Will go down to the provisional ballots, I guess, and a recount.

36% in Alaska voted Obama, 44% Berkowitz, 47% Begich. So I guess about 40% of it isn't completely hopeless. Alaska is a small state and the weather should get warmer in the future. Maybe in four cycles it'll become normal.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 10:51:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Franken's only down 345 now, apparently.  No idea where the votes are coming from.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 10:55:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Provisional ballots?

In worse news, Michelle Bachmann hung on to her seat in MN-06, 46/44.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 11:36:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I say drill it.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 10:57:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's great that Obama has won this resounding victory, and it's very good that in his speech, he made it clear to his supporters that this was just the start of the struggle, that they had elected him to bring about the opportunity for change, but that the work had only begun. That was impressive.

It's not false modesty in my reading. He's thinking about the next steps, and trying to explain them to his base, and the nation. It´s a great way of doing politics.

Now in terms of the whole 'first 100 days' nonsense, I think Obama should try getting a climate bill through first. This is going to be a cap and trade programme, that much is already locked in. In terms of design, it´ll have to start in 2010 and have a preliminary period of 2 years, after which the period will be extended to 2020, but the cap will depend upon the outcome of global negotiations.

I think Obama will get enough Republican senators on board for this effort. Otherwise, I think he could threaten to simply have the EPA regulate greenhouse gases as pollution, in which case the senate would have to overturn him. If I´m not missing anything?

It would be nice if Obama would attend the Conference of the Parties in Poznan in December, to prepare for Copenhagen.

Otherwise, he needs to prepare the ground for an orderly withdrawal from Iraq and for his healthcare bill.

The healthcare bill will be a difficult task, as he´ll have to get Republican support, ideally, of at least 6 Senators.

Otherwise, the financial crisis will probably continue and Obama may have to nationalise the banking system and take action to safeguard the creditworthiness of the US.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 08:57:58 AM EST
A random observation - the last thing I tuned into last night was the wait for the McCain concession speech.

I flipped over from watching the Chicago crowd to see the McCain camp. C-Span's roving camera coverage was excellent - the kind of stray visuals you'd concentrate on yourself if you were there, without any intrusive steaming and inane punditry.

The Chicago crowd looked numerous, but entirely normal. These were ordinary people looking ordinary but excited on an extraordinary day.

The Phoenix crowd looked like extras from a David Lynch movie. Really - they were Just Plain Odd, in a creepy, disturbing and very concentrated kind of a way.

Both McCain and Palin have been displaying that oddness throughout, so this shouldn't have been a surprise. And yet - not normal. Disturbingly not normal.

I'm not sure last night counts as lucky, exactly, when so many people put so much work into it.

But we certainly dodged a bullet, and avoided four years of weird which would have been far beyond even the Bush term.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:46:07 PM EST
The Phoenix crowd looked like extras from a David Lynch movie. Really - they were Just Plain Odd, in a creepy, disturbing and very concentrated kind of a way.

Both McCain and Palin have been displaying that oddness throughout, so this shouldn't have been a surprise. And yet - not normal. Disturbingly not normal.

I'll start.  Remember the aliens in the Rowdy Roddy Piper movie decades ago "They Live"?  Huh?  Huh?   Next!

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:51:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Got any gum?
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 05:56:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Don't recognize the reference ... either a true blank or my brain is totally fried from a 3 hr. Chem tutoring session.  Dinner and then bed.

PS.  Laptop "going into the shop for a lube,oil, and filter"; out of the mix until Sunday.  Don't weep too loudly.  :)

I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Wed Nov 5th, 2008 at 09:26:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My computer guy Tyler showing up today at 11 CA time.  Got some sleep ... my brain works again.  And I remember the reference you made!  Yaaaaa for brains!  I should have posted this above.



I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Thu Nov 6th, 2008 at 07:55:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
was; way ahead of its time.  If the Anglo-disease theme needs a video clip to be associated with, try this.



I love the smell of roast chicken in the morning!

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Thu Nov 6th, 2008 at 08:03:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]