|
by Migeru
FT.com: Letters - We should reject this extremism of Greenspan's (March 19 2008)
The rest is behind a subscription firewall, but you can read it after the fold...
After denying for years that there was any asset bubble, Mr Greenspan now describes it in excruciating detail, and concludes that it was inevitable, because it is the very nature of financial markets to be occasionally irrational, and to engage in booms and busts. Such a (correct) assessment would seem to be a call for much stricter regulation of how the financial world can be allowed to play with other people's money to limit such cycles. Instead, his insistence that nothing of the kind should be done is an extraordinarily explicit call to privatise financial profits (during the boom) and socialise losses (in the aftermath). As such, it should be treated with all the respect that political extremism deserves; ie, none. |
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . Advertise . New User Guide . FAQ . Search . Search (Google) . Archives (Wiki) Art, Economics, Energy, Environment, EU Politics, Mech & Tech, By Country Login
|
|
|
ET in FT: Greenspan's 'extremism' | 25 comments (25 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
ET in FT: Greenspan's 'extremism' | 25 comments (25 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||
| ||