European Tribune

Climaticide Chronicles: The Imminent Collapse of The Wilkins Ice Shelf

by JohnnyRook
Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 05:40:53 PM EST

[editor's note, by Migeru] originally posted on March 26

Some of you may remember that scene at the beginning of The Day After Tomorrow, when an Antarctic ice shelf breaks up under a group of scientists? Well, they didn't just make it up.

The Day After Tomorrow

The inspiration for that scene came from a real event. Beginning on January 31, 2002 and continuing over a 35 day period, the Antarctic Peninsula's Larsen B ice shelf broke up and collapsed, sending thousands of icebergs churning into the Weddell Sea. The area affected covered 3250 km2. According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center:

...the area lost in this [then] most recent event dwarfs Rhode Island (2717 km2) in size. In terms of volume, the amount of ice released in this short time is 720 billion tons, enough ice for about 12 trillion 10 kg bags.

However, as the consequences of our Climaticide continue to manifest themselves in ever more extreme forms, no record is safe. Today Rhode Island, tomorrow Connecticut...

Diary rescue by Migeru


Larsen B Collapse

A scientist at the British Antarctic Survey announced today that an Antarctic ice shelf the size of Connecticut is "hanging by a thread" and may soon break up. The collapse of the Wilkins Ice Shelf will be the largest event of this type ever observed by scientists.

Satellite images processed at the US National Snow and Ice Data Center revealed that the retreat began on February 28 when a large (41 by 2.5 km) iceberg calved away from the ice shelf's south-western front. In a series of images, the edge of the shelf proceeded to crumble and disintegrate in a pattern that has become characteristic of climate-caused ice shelf retreats throughout the northern Peninsula, leaving a sky-blue patch spreading across the ocean surface compose [sic] of hundreds of large blocks of exposed old glacier ice. By 8 March, the ice shelf had lost just over 570 km2, and the patch of disintegrated Antarctic ice had spread over 1400km2. As of mid-March, only a narrow strip of shelf ice was protecting several thousand kilometres of potential further break-up.

Wilkins ice sheet collapse

The area behind the "hanging thread" comprises 13,680 km2, five times greater than the Larsen B breakup.

When the initial iceberg separated from the ice shelf's southwestern front on February 28, it triggered "a runaway disintegration of 405 square kilometers (160 square miles) of the shelf interior..."

[See image to right]

For video of the breakup, click here.

Professor [David] Vaughan, who in 1993 predicted that the northern part of Wilkins Ice Shelf was likely to be lost within 30 years if climate warming on the Peninsula were to continue at the same rate, says,

"Wilkins is the largest ice shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula yet to be threatened. I didn't expect to see things happen this quickly. The ice shelf is hanging by a thread - we'll know in the next few days or weeks what its fate will be."

The professional climate denialists, the propaganda producing minions of global warming's true villains the climaticidal coal and oil corporations, love to claim that climate models are wrong.  As the data rolls in it is becoming increasingly obvious that the models are wrong, but not in the way the climaticides claim, for far from overestimating the rate of climate change, the models actually underestimate it.  

James Hansen, probably the world's preeminent climate scientist now believes that climate sensitivity for a doubling of CO2 from pre-industrial levels (that is 550 ppm) is 6 degrees Celsius twice the estimate of the IPCC.  For this reason Hansen is now calling for a rollback to 350 ppm (currently we are at 385 ppm). Read the draft version of his latest paper on the subject here (PDF).

Joseph Romm summarizes Hansen's position in this way:

... if we stabilize at 450 ppm (or higher) we risk returning the planet to conditions when it was largely ice free, when sea levels were higher by 70 meters -- more than 200 feet!

We are now living through the first stage of rapid climate change. What climate scientists 20 years ago predicted might happen in 50 years is happening today: more intense droughts, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, sea ice and glacial melt, species extinction and the spread of disease. When the rest of the Wilkins ice sheet falls into the sea in the next few weeks or months it will simply be the latest and most spectacular example to date of our blind march to disaster.

[Thanks to Deadicated Marxist whose diary today on Daily Kos provided the inspiration for this one].

[Crossposted at Daily Kos]

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
On the positive side, 350 ppm is very manageable and would likely involve little reduction in actual quality of life, provided we approach the problem correctly.
by Egarwaen on Wed Mar 26th, 2008 at 06:13:44 PM EST
European Tribune - Climaticide Chronicles: The Imminent Collapse of The Wilkins Ice Shelf
The professional climate denialists, the propaganda producing minions of global warming's true villains the climaticidal coal and oil corporations, love to claim that climate models are wrong.  As the data rolls in it is becoming increasingly obvious that the models are wrong, but not in the way the climaticides claim, for far from overestimating the rate of climate change, the models actually underestimate it.  
I think maybe the models are not wrong in "the rate of climate change", but definitely it seems as though they have been modelling polar ice as a big ice cube when it is nothing but. This would explain why the ice is breaking up faster than expected.

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 05:43:21 PM EST
The models have been wrong for precisely the sort of reason that you point out. Modelers have frequently left feedbacks out of the models, particularly non-fast-acting feedbacks. See Are Scientists Overestimating -- or Underestimating -- Climate Change, Part II. By conceiving ice sheets as ice cubes you miss all sorts of feedbacks such as the existence of moulins and lubrication of the ice sheet at bedrock.  This omission of feedbacks isn't limited to ice caps.  It affects storm phenomena, rates of desertification, and most importantly, the rate of temperature rise itself.  The models keep getting better because the scientists are getting a better understanding of the myriad of feedbacks at work.

"My True Religion Is Kindness" -- The Dalai Lama
by JohnnyRook (johnnyrook1@gmail.com) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 02:34:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The specific failure I point out is not really about ignoring feedback loops but about getting the structural properties of ice all wrong. It would appear that climatologists know a lot more about atmospheric physics than about glaciology: glaciologists know that the ice in a glacier behaves like a fluid, not a solid.

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 02:57:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Isn't one of the global-warming-disaster-scenarios based on the concept that, because of global warming and/or a volcano eruption, antarctic glaciers start flowing much more quickly. It was used in Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy, I think.

Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 03:46:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Possibly, but it appears the standard climate models didn't allow for that.

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 04:53:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, the Big One in the Mars Trilogy is a volcanic eruption leading to a large land based Antarctic glacier sliding into the sea. I think there's something along the same lines without the volcano in the back-story to Ben Bova's Asteroid Wars trilogies.

Of course, when writing a SF story, major introduction of ice or water from land-based Antarctic glaciers gives more dramatic effect than the mundane, inexorable, process of the seal level rising as a given volume of Ocean expands with increasing average sea water temperatures.

Utsukushikereba sore de ii

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Apr 7th, 2008 at 12:04:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think that even if we grant your specific point about the way glaciers melt, the fact remains that the planet is heating up faster than the models predict because of the failure to take into account these slower feedbacks in the models.

"My True Religion Is Kindness" -- The Dalai Lama
by JohnnyRook (johnnyrook1@gmail.com) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 04:44:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, yes. Probably the single biggest ice-related feedback loop is the reduction in albedo due to the reduction in the size of Arctic summer ice.

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 04:50:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sadly, nothing will happen till London or New York flood. Our politicians believe there are always two sides of equal merit to each argument and at the moment the economic advantage of listening to the denialists is winning hands-down.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 06:29:31 AM EST
Even then, London and New York probably can afford to spend helicopterloads of money on building flood defences.

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 07:36:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm sure they could, but there would come a point where even the most stubborn politican might notice that sea level rises due to climate change were a reality.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Apr 3rd, 2008 at 07:59:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Even cheaper if you only protect Wall Street and the City. Who cares for Harlem or the East End ?

Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Mon Apr 7th, 2008 at 06:53:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... draw more attention to the need for turfing out the majority of the current batch of politicians.


Utsukushikereba sore de ii
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Apr 7th, 2008 at 12:07:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]