Slovakia: Lisbon Treaty vote and domestic turmoil

by DoDo
Sat Apr 26th, 2008 at 05:34:07 AM EST

A quick diary on the further development of a story briefly discussed in the 11 April Salon.

On 10 April, the parliament of Slovakia voted to ratify the Lisbon Treaty, defeating a boycott by the right-wing and liberal opposition. The latter had nothing to do with Europe, the opposition being more Europhile than the government: the opposition wanted to use the occasion to protest a grossly restrictive new media law.

The opposition party breaking lines was the ethnic Hungarian minority party SMK/MKP. In the weeks since, claims of backroom deals caused turmoil.


The media law
  • gives persons and public institutions the right to get rebuttals published to anything, and that at the place and in the size of the article rebutted;
  • there is no requirement to prove in court that the original report was false or misleading or libelous, it's enough if the rebutters themselves deem it so;
  • the media are forbidden from reacting to the 'rebuttals';
  • the media keep responsiblity for the 'rebuttals', too -- e.g. if they violate laws and ethics!

Slovakian papers protested durling debate in parliament on 27 March by appearing with front pages empty, except for a statement listing the above problems.

After some minor changes (they dropped the element on fines), the government majority adopted the media law on 9 April. The boycott of the Lisbon Treaty vote, which required a three-fifths majority to pass, worked the same day, but SMK/MKP changed sides in the repeat vote the next day.

One day later, the newspapers again appeared with empty front pages. A week later, they got a supporting action from the main Czech dailies.

In the EP, the Socialists, who earlier this year restored the membership of PM Robert Fico's Smer party that was discontinued for coalitioning with a far-right partner, decided to do nothing for the time being. The EPP however saw the complaints of their Slovakian members as good occasion to blast the Socialists.

At home, far-right leader Ján Slota (Le Pen's personal friend in Slovakia) "thanked" MKP by calling its leader "a guy with balls" (he earlier called him "a heap of cow dung"). While the MKP's former coalition partners and fellow opposition parties (SDKÚ and KDH, the liberal resp. conservative Christian Democrats) were furious.

The leaders of SDKÚ and KDH publicly claimed, Slovakian papers widely reported (but the alleged participants denied) that the government won the MKP over with a backroom deal: a promise to leave the status quo and not limit education in minority languages in the upcoming education law.

A week after the Lisbon Treaty vote, the claim of another backroom deal surfaced: that Fico "bought" the MKP with public money to save a publisher which had connections to MKP's current chairman Pál Csáky. The former minister ousted prior longtime chairman and former Speaker of Parliament Béla Bugár a year ago, which was a victory of the nationalist wing over the moderate wing. But the internal conflict continued, and Bugár is said to be the "leaker".

What followed was a string of public accusations and motions to remove/expel people of the other camp. The government used the turmoil to renege on the first alleged deal, and put back restrictions on minority language education into the draft education law.

:: :: :: :: ::

I note that with both of the other two opposition parties in parliament also had internal conflict earlier this year, and that the government didn't commit big mistakes affecting the common people so far, and survived the tossing out of a corrupt agriculture minister from former left-populist (and criminal) PM Mečiar's party, Fico and his Smer party are even more popular than when elected.

Some further reading: The Lisbon Treaty, in hindsight in the e-zine The Slovak Spectator.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
You'll find an intore to Slovakian politics in Ahead of the Slovakian Elections... I note that while the big issue then was (the undoing of) the healthcare privatisation and flat-tax reforms, in government Fico's attempts on both fronts stalled after minor changes. But nationalism didn't stall. Tossing out Mečiar's party was a textbook example of Machiavellian politics, however.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Sat Apr 26th, 2008 at 05:39:24 AM EST
Tossing out Mečiar's party

Correction: tossing out the minister of agriculture from Mečiar's party (and the Machiavellian move was to pretend the entire party will be tossed out & bring up the investigation of mafia connections of Mečiar's past government).

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Mon Apr 28th, 2008 at 11:16:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Are there any plans for a legal challenge?  because its hard to see how this could possibly comply with the ECHR's affirmation of freedom of speech...
by IdiotSavant on Sat Apr 26th, 2008 at 08:34:32 PM EST
And while we're on the topic of the ECHR, the Council of Europe has another convention on Regional and Minority Languages which should make
a backroom deal [...] to leave the status quo and not limit education in minority languages in the upcoming education law
unnecessary.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Apr 26th, 2008 at 08:43:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That treaty defines a minimum level and voluntary extra measures above it, so restrictions as opposed to elimination aren't opposed to it.

To be specific, the main change is for first graders to go from 7 hours/week for Hungarian and 4 for Slovakian to 5-5 (reduction by two - increase by one), because "ethnic Hungarian pupils don't speak Slovakian well but they should" (said the education minister).

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 01:08:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suppose before we get to the European level, there are still challenges in the domestic courts, especially constitutional. However, Ihaven't been able to find any concrete steps taken in news reports, only vague sentences that this isn't the end of the road.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 12:40:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
hard to see how this could possibly comply with the ECHR's affirmation of freedom of speech...

There is a tortured argument at least for the bulk of the law, it runs like this: "The publishing of rebuttals doesn't constrain freedom of speech, in fact ensures the freedom of speech of those whom the media mis-reported and libeled before without any outlet for those to give their version uncorrupted!" The one part that definitely breaches freedom of speech is the prohibition to react to the corrections/responses (as the rebuttals are officially called).

But there are other, equally bothersome aspects which aren't directly against freedom of speech:

  • the practical breach of editorial freedom: wih equal space ensured for the rebuttals, the rebutters in effect become co-editors of the papers (and TV news?);
  • the lack of a truth check, which allows a he-said-she-said avalanche;
  • the exclusive responsibility of the media for what's printed, even if it's a rebuttal...


*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 12:47:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Requiring the publication of rebuttals is a good idea, but all the other terms and conditions are a disaster waiting to happen.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Apr 28th, 2008 at 02:41:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
for your regular posts on central/eastern European affairs. In the conventional media these things get not the space that they should get.

by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Mon Apr 28th, 2008 at 10:33:07 AM EST
Thanks. Here is a new development for you.

From the institute overseeing the files of the former Czechoslovak secret service, a sensational revelation came out about Ján Slota, the far-right leader.

Slota's father became a secret service informant in the seventies. He offered up his services for something in return: the deletion of Ján Slota's criminal files! For young Ján Slota was part of a gang of robbers. They started by robbing shops and fuel stations. Then they fled to Austria, and continued with car-jacking. Young Ján Slota fled Austrian police back home only days later, but his former accomplices continued with even a train robbery, and one of them ended up with his head cut in some underworld war.

And now comes the true Central European element: Slota has now submitted a motion in parliament for the dissolution of the institute managing the secret service files!!!

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Mon Apr 28th, 2008 at 11:02:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Seconded, it sounds so corrupt it could be the Republican party

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Apr 28th, 2008 at 02:10:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]