European Tribune

"Awahamba noma afe" - Report from Jozi

by Nomad
Tue May 20th, 2008 at 02:41:53 AM EST

Yesterday evening, I received a phone call from a worried family member who broke the story to me that downtown Johannesburg was experiencing violent rioting and xenophobic assaults. Apparently the story had been brought as breaking news in the Netherlands - which took me more by surprise than learning the dismaying news xenophobic violence was still escalating.

By now, the Gauteng province of South Africa, with Johannesburg at its epicentre, is caught up in a wave of xenophobic violence. This Monday was another day that saw violent attacks spread like wildfire and has resulted in a reported death count of at least 22 people. As ET readers may already know, I briefly reported last week Monday about xenophobic attacks in Alexandra township which have been ongoing throughout this week, slowly building to a new climax. Which came past Sunday.

I've put together a quick overview of press release for some insights that I've seen completely missing from the European news readings.

In-depth reporting on what is still flying under mainstream media's radar - afew


A quick timeline: Some of the violent incidences occurred as early as last week Sunday; BBC News has an article describing the first flares that erupted in Alexandra township on May 11. It took until Wednesday to quell the worst of violence in Alexandra: by that time most foreign immigrants were fleeing to other townships or were packed up at the central police station. From that point onwards, violent attacks have begun to spread to other townships. First in Diepsloot on Thursday. I lost track of the news reporting as I was kept busy on Friday and on Saturday I was back in Alexandra as part of my volunteering programme. Nothing appeared out of the ordinary - township life as usual.

With the onset of riots in downtown Johannesburg, South Africa has entered the escalation of the conflict. A report from downtown from the Mail and Guardian, past Sunday:

Mob violence turns Jo'burg CBD into war zone : Mail & Guardian Online

Marshall Street is criss-crossed with makeshift barricades of rusty barbed wire, tyres and chunks of concrete. In Main Street, shops have been literally disembowelled, their heavy-duty Jozi iron shutters wrenched off and their interiors cleaned out, stripped of every Pringle jumper and pair of Converse sneakers.

Police officers in bulletproof vests, with shotguns slung over their shoulders, stand guard at intersections, firing warning shots over the heads of would-be looters.

Helicopters clatter above us constantly and sirens and alarms wail all day.

We catch a ride in a police vehicle and, duly outfitted in bulletproof vests, tag along with Constable Meshack Sebiloane and Inspector Klaas Moloi as they escort a Zimbabwean man to his shop to remove his stock.

The pavements of Jules Street are thronged with knots of men, many of whom are drunk and carry sticks which they drop hurriedly when they see the cops approaching. The officers stand guard, rifles at the ready, as the family pack up their stock and household goods. Their landlady is disgusted: "If they are forced to move out, no one else must try to come in here. I refuse to rent it to anyone else -- let it stand empty."

Sylvia Khumalo (63) sits on a bench on the other side of the road, watching in disbelief. "This is just terrible, we don't understand what is going on," she says, and the other old women on the bench murmur their agreement. "I don't like it -- I am a human being, they are also like me."

Not everyone shares her compassion. A group of young women passes by and they laugh scornfully: "Abahambe. Manje sizohlala emarumini abo mahala. [Let them go. We will live in their rooms for free.]"

This actually underlines a first facet in this: I'm very much convinced this is also a generational divide between those who've lived through the apartheid days and the younger generation who have little emotional ties left with the past - except that a large majority of them still live in deplorable conditions and that economic apartheid remains a fact of life.

Monday has been worse than Sunday. Riots have now spread to townships all over Gauteng province: Germiston, Kya Sands, Reiger Park, Tembisa, it goes on and on. There has been fighting all day long and the incoming pictures are repulsing, shocking, horrific - and so is the one picture that has become an emblem - and I will show it:

Mob violence sweeps Gauteng : Mail & Guardian Online

On Sunday an immigrant died after being covered with his own blankets and set alight. The gruesome image of the human fireball was captured on the front-page of several South African papers on Monday.

Gauteng reels under xenophobic attacks : Mail & Guardian Online

Deadly day
Earlier, police recovered the hacked body parts of a Malawian national on a sandy road in Ramaphosa township and, near Primrose, one person with Mozambican identification papers in his pocket was found dead. Two other Mozambicans were seriously beaten.

In Zamimpilo, outside Riverlea on the West Rand, at least 50 shacks were burned. Foreign nationals in the area were taken to safety at a community centre.

In Kya Sands, an industrial area close to informal settlements, groups of people began throwing stones at each other after a community meeting, but the situation was brought under control, said police spokesperson Superintendent Lungelo Dlamini.

In the Jerusalem informal settlement, near Boksburg, police came under fire as they tried to stop a group of about 500 people from looting shops there.

Police in Cape Town were identifying possible flashpoints for xenophobic violence and would have units on standby, the city administration said on Monday.

The pattern I described for Alexandra township past week is now seen everywhere: police stations, community buildings, churches have become the safe-haven for thousands and thousands of people. Why do we see violence continue to spread? Because it's a strategy that is paying off for those who want the foreigners gone: people are leaving in droves, by the thousands. Park Station, a coach hub in Joburg is packed, one coach after another sets off, according to a witness I talked to today.

The Cape provinces and other areas remain apparently unaffected by all of this: it is no surprise that in Gauteng these tensions come to a head. Gauteng, and Johannesburg especially, have been the very nexus of economic migrants from other African countries since apartheid ended. It forms the economic heart of the country; it's the richest city on the continent and it draws people by the hundreds of thousands. It's also one reason why it harbours some of the world's worst squalor - the city can simply not keep up with immigrants, either from outside the country or coming from the rural areas.


There are a few points I'd like to underline which I have rarely seen mentioned in European press.

Firstly. A scary element in all of this is that also South Africans have been assaulted, raped, murdered. Why is that? Because the organisation and execution of all riots and plunder are dominantly run by Zulu. Anyone found who's not capable to speak proper IsiZulu becomes a target. Thus: there is a tribal element in all of this. People who speak SePedi or Venda (which are South African, officially recognised languages!!) have also been molested. And NB, the targeted Ndebele from Zimbabwe (who are already terrorised by Robert Mugabe) are the "cousins" of the Zulu - their languages are near identical!
Mob violence turns Jo'burg CBD into war zone : Mail & Guardian Online

"Since Zuma won the ANC presidency, they think they own South Africa. If they meet someone in the street and that person can't answer questions in isiZulu, they insult them and beat them," she says.

It's a story we are to hear over and over again -- and not just from foreigners. South Africans who speak Shangaan, Venda and Pedi report being attacked and told to go back to Limpopo.

And:

Gauteng reels under xenophobic attacks : Mail & Guardian Online

Though many foreigners were targeted in mob attacks, causing thousands to flee their homes for the safety of community centres and police stations, South African citizens were also reportedly victimised, with, for example, Pedi and Shangaan people being told by Zulu antagonists to "go back to Limpopo".

"We will burn the Shangaans if they don't go back," were the chilling words of a 25-year-old man arrested for public violence in Ramaphosa on the East Rand on Monday as police deployed specialists to stop the xenophobic attacks.

"We will fight for this country. We will keep on going, they can't stop us," said the unemployed man, speaking to reporters through the bars of a holding cell at the Reiger Park police station.

South Africa has seen most of this before: Zimbabwean refugees have been targeted frequently and there have been on and off flares of xenophobic attacks for the past year for as long as I've been reading papers here, most of them contained in only one township. The difference today is the scale at which these attacks are happening.

It is significant however that Jacob Zuma, the recently chosen ANC leader who had no qualms to let his admirers glorify Zulu-ness, has spoken out against the violence in strong terms:

Mob violence sweeps Gauteng : Mail & Guardian Online

n Pretoria, Zuma addressed a fully packed hall at the University of Pretoria's Vista campus in Mamelodi.

"We cannot allow South Africa to be famous for xenophobia. We cannot be a xenophobic country," he said, adding that he could not understand how people could attack foreigners when ANC members had sought refuge in neighbouring countries.

The address followed Zuma's meeting with local stakeholders -- including the Somali Association of South Africa -- to address issues facing the community, including xenophobia.

He said community leaders had informed him that residents had identified those behind xenophobic attacks but that when the information was taken to the police, they did not act on it. "We cannot have the police who are not active to deal with the issue because in no time this matter is going to take a different direction."

But Zuma is a respected ANC freedom fighter who is 66 years old; he also represents the older generation.

What does President Mbeki do?

Mob violence sweeps Gauteng : Mail & Guardian Online

President Thabo Mbeki announced on Sunday that a panel had been set up to look into the attacks.

snip


Speaking at San Lameer after a meeting of the International Investment Council, Mbeki said it is important for police to act firmly. "We hope that the panel and the police will work together and help us answer who is behind this."

A panel. A freaking panel. This is total madness at the scale at which this has been developing.

Here is another point that should be stressed continuously: the criminal elements active in the mobs should not be underestimated. The rioting mobs work hand in glove with criminal gangs who have seized each and every opportunity to plunder ruthlessly. Xenophobia has joined with unfettered hooliganism, full stop. Criminal gangs are profiting from fanning the flames.

In the meantime, Mbeki refuses to even open up the discussion to bring in the army. Perhaps Mbeki feels that bringing in the army to restore order would give South Africa a bad look, yet exactly because he does little to none, the riots continue, damaging the prestige of South Africa. Catch 22.


I will speculate very briefly on what has set this off. The Mail and Guardian brought a timeline in their edition of last Saturday which is partially on-line and it targets a group operating in Alexandra township, the ARA, which the M&G left undefined and I've no further information on them:

'They must leave or die ...' : Mail & Guardian Online

Tuesday May 6

During a meeting residents threatened to take matters into their own hands and remove foreigners from the area, according to Alexandra Community Police Forum (ACPF) chairperson Thomas Sithole. Sithole said police assured residents they would deal with the issue.

Saturday May 10

Then the renegade Alexandra Residents Association (ARA) held a meeting with taxi drivers to discuss concerns that foreigners were taking over the taxi industry.

Taxi drivers were unhappy about the growing number of foreigners working in the industry. They said foreigners were taking away their jobs and were willing to work for lower wages.

Chairperson of the Zimbabwe Diaspora Forum, Sox Chikowero, who attended the meeting, says people accused Zimbaweans of driving crime in the area and "taking away our jobs and our women". Chikowero said it was agreed that non-nationals would be driven from the township.

Sunday May 11

By nightfall mobs were rampaging through Alex.

There is another rumour doing the rounds, which is bone chilling in its scope, but cannot be relied on at all.  None of the succeeding has been confirmed in any way, but I no longer find it silly to keep it in the back of the mind: the Zimbabwe factor. A likely date for the presidential run-off in Zimbabwe has been set, perhaps lost in the turmoil of the earthquake in China and the catastrophe in Myanmar/Burma: June 27. Is it beneficial for Mugabe to undermine the relative security of its southern neighbour, to distract a pliable Mbeki even further? The role of the CIO, the dreaded secret police of Zimbabwe, in stirring up part of the troubles in Alexandra has been circulating for a few days now, but I once again want to stress it could likely be unfounded chatter.

Update [2008-5-20 6:1:0 by Nomad]:A brief Addendum: I want to come clean in all honesty that with yesterday's post in the Salon, speculating on the interference of Zimbabwe, I jumped the gun. I've scaled down the rhetoric in this diary when I had to conclude there was not one reliable verification of these rumours. Although possible, the riots have everything in them to have developed spontaneously. However, it goes without saying that the exodus of Zimbabweans under Mugabe's regime has massively contributed to the development of xenophobic tensions and are, ultimately, an expression of Zimbabwe as a failing state. (end of addendum)

That's it for now. A personal note: My university and the neighbourhood where I live are entirely unaffected by any this - as said, I wasn't even aware of what was happening in downtown Joburg yesterday. For now, I've suspended my activities in the townships and I'm taking care that I do not travel alone. I'm blessed to live with five people in one house; we're all looking after each other. Personally I do not have worries, but I have the more for this country and its northern brother, Zimbabwe. It's bitter and frustrating to watch from so close and yet so far what's unfolding.

I sincerely hope tomorrow will bring better news. I'm done being angry; weariness remains.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Means as much as "Leave or Die" in IsiZulu, and was one of the slogans was taken up by the mobs in Alexandra townships the previous week.
by Nomad on Mon May 19th, 2008 at 08:01:56 PM EST
Zuma was actually on that issue earlier:

S Africa 'must fight xenophobia' - BBC, Thursday, 1 May 2008 15:04 UK

South Africa's ruling party leader has urged people to work together to fight xenophobia and any ill-treatment of Zimbabweans and other foreigners.

During a Workers' Day rally, Jacob Zuma said the country had to find a way of dealing with the scores of Zimbabwean refugees in the country.

He said that said South Africans could not turn their backs on Zimbabwe's socio-economic crisis.

Some 3,000 Zimbabweans cross into South Africa daily looking for jobs.

He was also on the right side about the Chinese weapons, I believe. Leader/opportunist?

Thinking about it, it would indeed make a lot of sense for the Zanu goons to be behind that.  SA is the only power that can kick them out of power by force if (when) Zanu/Mugabe decide to cling to power at all costs. So, those riots in SA are goodness all around for them: 1) intimidate Mbeki, 2) create a split within the ANC and force Zuma into unpopular positions against the rioters and 3) extra bonus, the Zimbabweans in SA are Zanu opponents/refugees so good for Zanu if they are getting lynched. Someone else is nicely doing their dirty work abroad.

Facts, selfish little bastards. They don't even care about your feelings.

by Francois in Paris on Mon May 19th, 2008 at 09:50:27 PM EST
This may not be the first time it's happened, but the first I know of: French national radio broadcast a report about this, with correspondent, in fourth or fifth position in the 7 o'clock news this morning. No one seems to have had a drum to bang on this. And, if it isn't fed ready made to them, newsrooms find out about it a week or more later.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 01:36:18 AM EST
it was top story on all the major networks here in italy, the dominant image: swaggering young man with machete in hand. surrounded by smoke, chaos, mayhem.

photographers, like papperazzi, shooting their pix of these violent scenes, while the protagonists strut, pleased and flattered to have the attention.

my heart goes out to all these displaced people, it's appalling to see how humanity goes out the window, when overpopulation collides with rising food prices, and low, sketchy employment.

as in so many countries, there seems to be a reality disconnect between the ruling cadre and what's going on on the ground. your point about the generational issue seems quite valid. momentous as it was to end apartheid, they're hardly going to want to celebrate it as more than a symbol, when the reality is more apartheid, of an economic kind.

be safe nomad, ET's wonderful roving geo-reporter, and please keep sharing your insights into this nightmare, most of all so we know you're ok!

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 03:37:09 AM EST
You mention the strong Zulu angle. Could there be Inkatha involvement, as so many times over the past 25 years?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 05:41:16 AM EST
'They must leave or die ...' : Mail & Guardian Online
A loudspeaker announced a meeting in the KwaMadala area near Nobuhle hostel, in the heart of IFP territory. Led by a police van, party officials arrived in a light commercial vehicle, promising to listen to the grievances of the people. They had been stung by accusations that the IFP had orchestrated the violence.

A crowd gathered, carrying golf clubs, sticks and other weapons, and followed the IFP leaders singing: "Lelizwe elethu, aba hambe" (this country is ours -- they [foreigners] should leave). About 200 people gather in an open space between the hostel and informal settlement. IFP MP Bongikosi Dlamini told the crowd his party is not behind the orgy of violence. "As the IFP, we are here to make it clear that we condemn these attacks and are here to ask you not to go around attacking people in the IFP's name."

But Dlamini was quick to add that the IFP understood the frustrations of the people "as indeed the government has failed you, but you should not continue these attacks as opportunistic criminals will take advantage and you, as South Africans, would end up fighting against each other".

Bold mine. This occurred on May 12, the day after the first riots in Alexandra.

From today's edition:
Mbeki: Cops will root out Jo'burg 'anarchy' : Mail & Guardian Online

Meanwhile, the African National Congress (ANC) met with the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) to discuss the current wave of xenophobic attacks, the ANC's national working committee said on Monday.

ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe said the meeting had taken place because the flashpoints where the violence had occurred were places where there was an IFP presence.

"Your structure must talk to our structure ... so there is no mud-slinging," he said.

He said the situation was such that anyone could jump on to the bandwagon and trigger a reaction.

To which my initial reaction was: They're only talking to each other now? It may be presumptuous to assume that there wasn't any earlier contact between parties, but it is presented as such.

I don't have any idea what's playing underneath the IFP surface.

by Nomad on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 06:22:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not that I have any idea how to answer your question, but I will point out that the "ethnic divisions" between South Africa's political parties gets a bit overblown and the dynamics don't tend to be well understood by outsiders.  While the IFP is indeed a Zulu-dominated party, most Zulus are not necessarily members of the IFP, and that is especially true in Gauteng province, where Johannesburg is.  (The IFP won only two of 73 seats in the provincial legislature in the last general election. The IFP doesn't even control the provincial legislature in Kwazulu-Natal, its heartland -- it holds only 30 of the 80 seats, compared with 38 for the ANC.)

And the "Zulu test" of "South Africanness" is also not new -- there was a famous case when I lived there of a teacher of the Zulu language who was arrested by the police as an "illegal immigrant" simply because she refused to reply in Zulu when the police questioned her, even though she had valid South African identity documents on her.

When this kind of xenophobic violence has happened (albeit on a smaller scale) in the past, there has been a very strong element of criminal gang involvement -- the gangs scapegoat the Zimbabweans (or other foreigners) for their own crimes as a way of distracting the population and the authorities from their criminal activity.  Then it takes on a life of its own.

South Africa is a terribly xenophobic country, especially toward other Africans.  As Nomad indicated, there is nothing new about it.  I can't count the number of times I've heard people blame the country's entire crime problem on "foreigners," a convenient way to deny that responsibility for their own crime rate.

IMHO, this xenophobia goes hand-in-hand with nationalism, and the New South Africa is something that  most South Africans desperately want to be proud of, which can have the sad consequence of making it much harder for them to acknowledge (or even comprehend) the failings and shortcomings of the country in the post-apartheid era.

This may perhaps sound familiar to some of my own countryfolk, as well as to citizens of my current home, since both places are prone to a similar patriotism-induced wilful blindness....

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 09:32:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Always good to have another perspective on it. Before you mentioned it, I wasn't aware that "Zulu tests" had been part of previous xenophobic assaults - even when I had read about them when I was still in the Netherlands. I guess I'll chalk that up as an example how this aspect does not seem to get much attention outside the borders. Nor does it currently get a lot of attention here, while I'm rather fascinated by it...

At the end you touch another subject that also could grow into diary length, concerning my experiences with the confidence and self-image, or better the lack thereof, of many African people at the academic level.

by Nomad on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 04:18:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So...sadly...I am just learning of this now <sheesh - it has not been in the news I read>, but thanks to our intrepid reporter in SA, Nomad is giving us some breaking news, Thanks Nomad, and take care of yourself down there!

Half the population is under the age of 18. Tanzania's future is NOW...join the 50% campaign!
by whataboutbob on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 06:21:57 AM EST
I really don't know what frame to insert these events into.

Stay safe, and let's hope sanity prevails in the end.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 07:17:32 AM EST
I guess I'm just hesitant to ask Is ZA FUBAR?.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 03:00:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Simply put there are too many vested interests in this country. I'd like to see SA still in transition and although I sometimes feel it makes three steps forward and then sprints two back, it is still moving forward.

Economically, it is affected by the global financial crisis: it is suffering from a devaluating Rand, a slump in the gold price, people grumble here too about a steep rise in petrol and food prices, a worrying inflation of over 10% (4% above the maximum target of 6%), coupled to that high interest rates, which in effect forms a problem for many as total household debt is insanely huge and there is a crisis in energy supply (about which I will write one day soon). This will not stand a chance to tear SA apart as a country but it does turn up the survival pressure on the poor - as always.

by Nomad on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 05:07:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
These events are breaking my heart and frightening me on a whole new level.  Just last week, Lebanon erupts into gunfire, and now this.

I was on the phone this morning trying to track down some people who I'm afraid may have some trouble (their half-Zimbabwan half-Zulu kids live in Tembisa) and probably won't hear till tomorrow how things have gone for them.

Thanks for this diary, Nomad.  And stay well.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 09:42:12 AM EST
I recall driving on the south loop of I-10 around the southern side of downtown L.A. the morning after the "Rodney King" riots.  Plumes of smoke were rising all across South-Central L.A. On La Cienega south of the I-10, less than 7 miles from Santa Monica Bay, I saw newer cars driven by women pulling up beside big box stores while three or four men would get out and lope over to the stores to "get theirs." Much of the violence was directed at Korean shopkeepers.  In Koreatown Korean shop owners were shown on top of their stores armed with hunting rifles. Much of the violence was attributed to gangbangers.  However, there was no shortage of pure opportunism.  The black owner of one of the best barbicue shops in the area had recently died. His shop was torched. Insurance is the only context that made sense to me.

This seems terrifyingly worse due to the inter-ethnic communal violence.  It seems more comparable to Rwanda.  Yet, whatever its faults, the ANC and the government of South Africa do have more resources and control at their disposal and a greater understanding of the imperatives of a multi-ethnic society than we saw in Rwanda, do they not?  Can conditions have deteriorated that far this fast?

Take care, Nomad, and thanks for the good work.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.

by ARGeezer (argeezer a in a circle yahoo dot com) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 02:58:26 PM EST
To the outsider an economic analysis seems appropriate.  There are c. 3 Million Zimbabwean refugees in S.A. - which must put a lot of pressure on the unemployed or marginally employed people on the breadline in S.A. itself.  It's all very well for the comfortably off to tut- tut at the xenophobia, but if your livelihood was at stake?  S.A. is now paying the price for MBeki playing the comrade revolutionary with Mugabe.   The sooner Zimbabwe is re-democratised and some sort of economic rescue plan put in place, the sooner the S.A. situation can be re-stabilised as well.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 03:15:20 PM EST
You sound like you belive re-democratisation is something that can be imposed on Zimbabwe from outside?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 03:33:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
MBeki has been actively supporting Mugabe against his democratic opponents.  He needs to reverse that polarity - and yes - in the transition period it is hard not to see civil war leading to genocide without some external pressure or even peace keeping forces on the ground.  S. A. is best placed to provide it, and it is in its own self interest to do so -  the major determinant of action in international relations...

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 04:15:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is the narrative that has been fuelling this - the Zimbabweans, Mozambicans, etc are stealing our jobs, our wives, our homes, and they are all criminals. How much rooted are such accusations in actual facts? I'm sure there will be some economic pressure, but even strident worker's rights defender Vavi of the largest trade union Cosatu has come forth to say that it's nonsense to blame foreigners for a lack of job opportunities. Not that I've seen any numbers, and doubt if there are any reliable ones, as the grey/black markets would incorporate the biggest chunk of foreign migrants.

The Mbeki government must learn that ruling a country not only comes with privileges, but also with hassles that will not go away even if you choose to not admit them. The whole foreign policy regarding Mugabe, and I'm suspecting that also Mbeki's stance towards AIDS is driven by this, appears to me as mulish unwillingness to admit African people suffer from these problems under his government, unwillingness to make harsh resolutions against them. Under Mbeki some very real problems have been festering, left unattended, simply for too long.

by Nomad on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 04:40:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Here is another point that should be stressed continuously: the criminal elements active in the mobs should not be underestimated. The rioting mobs work hand in glove with criminal gangs who have seized each and every opportunity to plunder ruthlessly. Xenophobia has joined with unfettered hooliganism, full stop. Criminal gangs are profiting from fanning the flames.

As with all war-mongering, including the Bush Regime gang violence against Afghanistan and Iraq...  The xenophobia and racist rage are stirred up, a pretext is created for violence, and the looting goes on unremarked behind the smoke and body counts.  [No, I don't find it rhetorically excessive to call the Cheney/Halliburton/Blackwater/oil nexus a consortium of criminal gangs.  They are organisations which profit from vandalism, murder and calculated, planned lawbreaking -- prime RICO material, imho.]

One thing that really ticks me off about the whole situation is the use of photos from this and other 3w war zones to reinforce the Anglo nations' racist stereotypes of (a) Black males as inherently barbaric, violent, and dangerous, and (b) people of colour as inherently incapable of self-governance and civil order.  When a nation-state commits smash-n-grab raids under the aegis of a whipped-up fit of frothing xenophobia, it's called statecraft and geopolitics;  but when ethnic factions within a nation-state do the same it's called civil disorder, riot, and mayhem... and something that could only happen "over there" in "failed states" run by foreign, often darker-skinned people who (clearly) can't manage their affairs (and hence need us to invade them and teach them about Democracy(TM).)  [sound of hair tearing]

But it all comes down in the end to the same sorry refrain:  horrible inequity of resources, poverty, landlessness, insecurity, humiliation, fear, anger, panic, vengeance...  I am sure there is shit-stirring being done here -- by CIA, MI6, the Chinese, whoever -- but such troublemaking is harder to achieve when people have food and housing security, productive work, etc.  The poverty and inequity create the preconditions for successful shit-stirring.  (Another reason why 1w foreign policy is designed to perpetuate the poverty and inequity imho.)

It's hard for me not to see painful parallels between the "Zulu-ness" mantra of the "new South Africans" and the various faces of anti-Arab racism and imperial cant in the official (and even more in the unofficial) discourse of the Likudite faction in Israel.  Past experience of oppression seems to be so quickly converted -- especially by those for whom it is history/mythos rather than lived experience -- into tit-for-tat or fantasies of entitlement and exceptionalism.  If the Zulu-ueber-alles faction had its way unchecked (and a fat budget), how long would it be before they were building Bantustans for non-Zulus, and "separation walls"?  I am thinking here also of the BJP (Hindu supremacist party) in India, which apparently learned nothing from colonial British occupation other than a burning desire to see Hindus take the place of the "sahibs" at the top of the shitpile.  Sigh.  If I had to rewrite the list of seven deadly sins, I would put Exceptionalism very near the top...

As globalised finance capitalism continues to shred the climate and biosphere and concentrate resources in the hands of an ever-shrinking elite, I expect that these flashpoints of immiseration, deprivation, and rage (skilfully redirected into horizontal hostility by those who are creating and profiting from the deprivation) will only spread and intensify.  When resources are tight, people migrate in hope of bettering their condition;  and the people in the regions where the migrants arrive look nervously at the new neighbours and at their own dwindling resources.  Breaking out the machetes and the anti-furriner banners is very often the next step...  The "madness" in Rwanda, for example -- I am justabout convinced after a bit of reading -- had a lot to do with land ownership, population, soil productivity, and food.  Welcome to the big survivor show, for one big unhappy game of Prisoner's Dilemma manipulated by the wealthy bosses from their heavily-defended haciendas and enclaves...

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 04:22:06 PM EST
I would call all ET readers to this comment, because Huxley's "Brave New World" is alive an growing.

Skennah Kowa
by Crazy Horse on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 04:26:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
More like George Orwell's Animal Farm.

In Brave New World, at least everybody had enough food.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 04:36:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I share your general pessimism as to how elites will try to re-direct tensions arising from increasing scarcity onto even more under-privileged elements in society.  However for Zulus in S.A. this is a double edged sword, because they are quite a small minority within S.A. as a whole and even in KwaZulu Natal - where they are at there strongest - their attempts to take over the political apparatus through violence and intimidation have failed.  Having been ruled by a small white majority, South Africans in general are not going to accept mob rule led by a minority Zulu ehtnic/lingusitic minority group.

However in this case MBeki has presided over an increasingly indifferent regime - indifferent to the continuing privations of the black majority in S.A., not to mention the Ndebele in Zimbabwe.   The ANC have become the vehicle for the rising middle class with huge numbers in townships seeing few benefits post apartheid.  S.A./Zimbabwe now need a second revolution - the first generation revolutionary leaders have become too like the colonial oppressors they overthrew.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 05:02:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Uh, what?

The Zulus are not a small minority, they're the single largest ethnic group, and about 30 percent of the population speaks Zulu as a home language.

Second, "they" did not attempt to take over the political apparatus through violence -- you may be thinking of the IFP (which as I have noted elsewhere is a political party that is dominated by Zulus, but is not exclusively Zulu, nor is it the party that most Zulus belong to) but even if that's what you're thinking of, it's a vast oversimplification of the situation as it was 10 to 15 years ago.  At any rate, sweeping generalizations blaming "the Zulus" for this violence is not constructive.

Next, I'm not sure what your reference to the Ndebele in Zimbabwe is all about.  There is an ethnic dimension to Zimbabwe's political crisis, but it is not at its core and ethnic conflict.

While your point about the ANC and the middle class is well taken, the conflation of South Africa's situation and leadership with Zimbabwe's is just absurd.  Thabo Mbeki has his faults, and I am certainly no defender of him, but South Africa is not Zimbabwe, and trust me, Mbeki is no P.W. Botha.

Finally, just out of curiostiy, is there some particular reason why you keep capitalizing the second letter of Mbeki's surname?

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 06:35:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sorry, make that not at its core an ethnic conflict.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 06:37:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My recollection is that Zulus make up c. 10 out of 50 Million of the total population (including recent immigrants) = c. 20%.   Yes, I was thinking of Inkatha, which is almost exclusively Zulu - even if most Zulus support the ANC.  I'm not suggesting Mbeki (typo) is a P.W. Botha, but he is certainly representative of a new ruling class within SA which does not include the vast majority of township residents. He has formed a close alliance with Mugabe, and his inability to recognise the latter's megalomaniac and genocidal tendencies bode ill for SA as well even if things are unlikely to ever get remotely as bad in SA itself.  However his failure to address a situation which is now threatening the stability of SA itself will probably be remembered as his greatest failing - greater even than is ludicrous views on the Aids epidemic - where his aloof lack of concern was reminiscent of a P.W. Botha.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Tue May 20th, 2008 at 07:13:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
From Wikipedia, it appears Zulu-speakers are 30% of blacks, thus 23.8% of all (at the time of the 2001 census). Checking the actual census release [pdf, page 8/pdf page 15], indeed that is the case. (Based on the dynamics, the figure may be 25% today.)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 03:04:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Given that since 2001, over 3 Million Zimbabweans, plus large numbers of Mozambicans  and other southern Africans have fled/migrated into South Africa, the % of Zulu speakers is more likely to be going down that up. I don't dispute that they are the most significant black ethnic grouping 2ithin SA, merely that a policy of targeting ALL non Zulu speakers is a dangerous tactic to adopt as it risks alienating a majority of all other South African's against them.  

The ANC has gone to great lengths to accommodate Zulus at the highest levels of Government (partly to reduce the appeal of Inkatha) and because of a determination to seek to unite all South African's on a non-racial basis.  Rioting directed at all non-Zulu speakers thus strikes at the heart of ANC/Government and national policy and consensus.

Mbeki's failure to address the legitimate economic/social/health concerns of the poorest in SA society and his remoteness from the impact that massive immigration (and many other factors) has had on those communities has directly contributed to the current crisis.  

South Africa needs the Zimbabwean crises to be resolved very quickly and a massive regeneration program put in place to avoid the situation within South Africa getting even worse.  This isn't going to happen while Mugabe remains in power.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 05:45:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure what your reference to the Ndebele in Zimbabwe is all about.

I'm guessing an overemphasis of this from Nomad's diary:

And NB, the targeted Ndebele from Zimbabwe (who are already terrorised by Robert Mugabe)

As Nomad say in an earlier comment:

Ethnicity does play a minor part - Mugabe has targeted the Ndebele far more severely and has regularly dropped hints the country would be better off without them. Most likely there are connections to be made with the Gukurahundi campaign about which I know very little, but was worst in Matabeleland (Bulawayo is its pseudo capital, but is also a separate province in Zim). In any case, the opposition parties are more popular in those provinces.

But in short, ethnic divisions are not immediately visible in the opposition parties as far as I can see.

Regarding the IFP, I have a question. I have a recollection that not only was the IFP involved in a lot of bloodshed in the townships, but that in the eighties, it was actively helped in doing so by the secret service of the apartheid regime, as a way to split blacks and weaken the ANC. Is that correct?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 03:13:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, that is correct about the IFP.  It really has always been less of a party and more of an ego vehicle for its leader, Mangosuthu Buthelezi.  He is essentially a warlord.

Oddly, the party worked in coalition with the ANC for 10 years at both national and KZN provincial government level, between 1994 and 2004, when the alliance fell apart.  It was only in the 2004 campaign that KZN province had "normalized" enough that the ANC could campaign in IFP strongholds (including a Jacob Zuma-led rally in Mangosuthu Buthelezi's hometown) without violence erupting.

My understanding of the political alliance between Buthelezi and the ANC was that it was sort of a quid-pro-quo initially -- Buthelezi was made Minister of Home Affairs in exchange for buying into the ANC-led democratic process, keeping the bloodshed a lot lower than it might otherwise have been.  It took 10 years for the ANC to make the political inroads into KZN enough that they could afford to sideline Buthelezi and end the ANC-IFP coalition.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 04:16:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not my intention to give the impression that Mugabe's reign of terror intentionally selects one group above another. Mugabe's divide is simple: those who are against him and those who support him. The resistance against Mugabe in the Ndebele dominated western provinces is larger and hence the crackdown is.

Let's break it down how I understand it:

  1. All ethnic groups in Zim, whether Shona, Ndebele or other have refugees here in South Africa because of the overall dismal living conditions in Zim and the crackdown of the Mugabe regime.
  2. All Zimbabwean groups in South Africa have been targeted equally bad during the xenophobic attacks.
  3. Despite the fact that Ndebele and Zulu groups have historical ties and are also linguistically closely related, there has been shown (as far as I can see) zero clemency for this during the attacks.

I think that was the point I was, very opaquely, trying to make.
by Nomad on Thu May 22nd, 2008 at 08:03:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If I had to rewrite the list of seven deadly sins, I would put Exceptionalism very near the top...

seems to me that 'exceptionalism' is an upgraded definition of ''vainglory', aka 'silly human pride'.

didn't some xtian bigwig say spiritual pride was the worst sin, and charity the best virtue?

great comment, de

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Wed May 21st, 2008 at 07:59:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
ireland.com - The Irish Times - Fri, May 23, 2008 - Violence in South Africa
Violence in South Africa

HORRIFYING SCENES of violence against immigrants in South African townships have brought home how much the social crisis there is related to conditions in surrounding countries. Five million immigrants, from Zimbabwe and Mozambique especially, have swelled South Africa's population by about 10 per cent in recent years. Inevitably, they compete for jobs and housing, exposing the failure of the post-apartheid government to solve basic social infrastructure shortages.

A deep xenophobia has overtaken many of the poorest South Africans exposed to such pressures. Unfortunately it has been exacerbated by the government's failure to take political action capable of addressing the political crisis in Zimbabwe with the urgency required. President Thabo Mbeki is personally responsible for this because of his complete unwillingness to bring the issue into the open political arena much earlier. Yesterday's decision to deploy troops against rioters in the Alexandra township is directly related, bringing the issue home very uncomfortably. Many South Africans are irrationally scared their country could go the way of its neighbour, notwithstanding their much higher level of development and democratic culture.

The 12 days of rioting are a vivid reminder of the leadership vacuum created by Mr Mbeki's forthcoming departure as president. Other African National Congress leaders, including his likely successor, Jacob Zuma, have been much more critical of the Mugabe regime. It remains to be seen whether they can influence the expected rerun of Zimbabwe's presidential elections so that it will be conducted fairly, or whether the vote will be captured by Mugabe so that a further round of emigration may occur. That would deepen South Africa's problems. These riots show that a limit has been reached. Political action to stem the movement of people is imperative.

South Africa is a natural magnet for immigrants from its neighbours because of its economic strengths. But they cannot just be piled into existing shanty towns completely incapable of absorbing more people. The many successes of its government in consolidating democracy, multicultural society and a stable economy do not extend to reducing social inequalities and providing basic social infrastructure. Mr Zuma comes from the social democratic wing of the ANC and if he does become president, can be expected to give these tasks a higher priority. This outbreak of violence shows how necessary that will be.



"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri May 23rd, 2008 at 11:03:20 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]