European Tribune

It's the Stupidity, Stupid

by Maryscott OConnor
Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 03:24:14 PM EST




Crossposted from MY LEFT WING

My dear friend Paul in San Francisco made the following comment in a recent discussion, and the response I composed became far too unwieldy to post as a comment, so...


Republican memes

When the Republicans talk about liberal "elitism," it's certainly shorthand for New York intellectuals, and often codespeak for Jews.

While I respect Paul greatly and believe him one of the more good-natured participants in a seemingly endless series of liberal blogs' I/P Wars, I'll have to disagree on this point (though the titular "Stupid" is not aimed at him).








First, a clarification: By definition, "elitist" is not a synonym of "elite." "Elitism" is a charge far more accurate in describing the Republican or "conservative" mindset than its opposite Democratic or "liberal" mindset.

(I hereby stipulate that the labels "conservative," "liberal," Republican" and "Democratic" are virtually worthless nowadays, since no consensus can be achieved in defining ANY of them. But for our purposes here, let us assume that Republicans are "conservative" and Democrats are "liberal" and that we all have at least a desultory idea of what those words mean -- or should mean, at any rate.)


elite:

-- (often used with a plural verb) the choice or best of anything considered collectively, as of a group or class of persons.

-- (used with a plural verb) persons of the highest class: "Only the elite were there."

-- a group of persons exercising the major share of authority or influence within a larger group: the power elite of a major political party.


elitist:
-- practice of or belief in rule by an elite.

-- consciousness of or pride in belonging to a select or favored group.


elitism:

-- The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.

-- The sense of entitlement enjoyed by such a group or class.

-- Control, rule, or domination by such a group or class.

When Republicans talk about "liberal elitists" they're talking about EDUCATED PEOPLE, though they would never acknowledge it, for fear of undermining their propaganda with truth. The Republican propaganda machine actively and consciously attempts (with a disappointing albeit unsurprisingly high degree of success) to conflate the definitions of "educated," "liberal" and "elitist" -- the latter's actual definition being that which they, ironically, are far more guilty of embodying than those they wish to smear with it.

Republican propagandists conflate "Elitism" with the kind of people who intimidate and infuriate the shit out of STUPID people -- educated, most often liberal people. The kind of Republican propaganda that confirms their stupid fears and stupid ideas all too easily persuades stupid people.

One of stupid people's stupidest ideas: the notion that educated people think they're better than uneducated people.

One of stupid people's stupidest fears: the notion that educated people ARE better than uneducated people -- namely, themselves.

(There does exist a subset of Stupid People who are "educated," but manage to remain stupid despite it. They mostly work for Fox News or in conservative think tanks -- but never mind them now.)

The massive irony is that stupid people BUY this propaganda... from ACTUAL elitists who DO believe they're better than them.

STUPID people have a huge emotional revulsion toward "elitists." Merely ignorant or uneducated people may find educated people intimidating, but many of them aren't stupid and therefore aren't as likely to reflexively respond with revulsion to propaganda equating "elitists" with "educated people." STUPID people do that. And STUPID is what you have to be to despise someone solely because she is educated, rich or both.

And, as I continue to declare, with ever increasing empirical evidence to support me, MOST PEOPLE ARE STUPID.

But, returning to the original topic... believe it or not, MOST people (Americans, that is) don't think one way or the other about Jews, let alone Jews as the Intellectual Elitists Who Run the World.

If they do think about Jews, it's almost a sure bet that the first thing that comes to most people's minds is the Holocaust and how horrified they are by it. Why? Because the Intellectual Elite (comprised, contrary to some asserions, by mostly non-Jews) -- that is to say, EDUCATED people -- systematically, judiciously, wisely and properly made SURE that the Holocaust would become a historical touchstone; not only because of its roots in anti-Semitism, but because the virulent roots in political and cultural ignorance made it possible.

But you know WHY most people don't even think about Jews? Because MOST people don't KNOW any Jews. And MOST people live in present day America, where anti-Semitism is universally recognised as a Bad Thing -- thanks in great part to how the "Intellectual Elites made damned certain to control the manner in which the Holocaust was accurately and irrevocably enshrined in our modern culture.

Those same "Intellectual Elites" are the ones who have also tried, often unsuccessfulyy (more's the pity) to educate our culture about OTHER horrors brought about by (or allowed to occur because of) cultural ignorance.

Said horrors include everything from the environmental problems created or enabled by corporations unfettered by regulations; to ludicrously unfair wage practices by the real Elitists who fought so hard against the creation of workers' unions in the past and continue today to fight to dissolve them or render them ineffectual; to maintaining the elements of America's political system that ensure the Real Elite's continued stranglehold on it and on the vast majority of America's citizens who exist, in the Elite's mindset, merely to serve them.

Which is why the Republicans use "Elitism" as a bludgeon over the heads of the masses: when your entire ideological existence hinges on keeping the mass of men in ignorant desperation, Education is your fucking ENEMY.



Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:


... come off as too elitist for stupid people, here.

If I can't rant, I don't want to be part of your revolution
by Maryscott OConnor (myleftwing@gmail.com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 03:25:11 PM EST


"Stupid people, here."

Crucial comma.

If I can't rant, I don't want to be part of your revolution

by Maryscott OConnor (myleftwing@gmail.com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 03:26:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What's nice about educated people is they know how to do punctuation. :-)

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 02:51:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Half of all people have an IQ below 100 (by definition).

However it's not their quickness to absorb new information (what IQ tests measure) that counts, but their willingness to do so. The US has long had a strong strain of anti-intellectualism.

One can see this in the public schools where programs for the "gifted" are regarded as elitist while the filtering that takes place when choosing sports team members is seen as perfectly acceptable. Selection by brains is bad, by brawn good.

As for the Jewish issue, there is one. Whether you wish to notice or not the NY Times is owned by Jews and they are also more representative than should be the case in many other prominent media outlets. Oddly enough there are now representatives on both sides with the Kristols, etc. now being ultra-rightists where the previous generation started out as leftists.

So, yes, elitist is still a code word, although some using it may not consciously think that way. Remember the furor when Obama was said to be "well spoken". This was immediately seen as a racist code attack, but was it, or did it simply reflect an unconscious set of expectations?

Racism, antisemitism, sexism and a whole bunch of other nasty thoughts are alive and well in the US. Too bad people are so insecure that they have to find someone "beneath" them to feel superior to.

Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 05:24:09 PM EST
Remember the furor when Obama was said to be "well spoken". This was immediately seen as a racist code attack, but was it, or did it simply reflect an unconscious set of expectations?

A more accurate explanation for many would be a reflection of unconscious hope, considering the embarrassing level of elocution that accompanied the White House these past eight years.

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears

by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 05:50:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the use of the word 'elitist' has become a shameless populist vote-getting tool, reaching out to those millions who flunked high school and are thus doomed to flipping burgers for life.

vote your rage!, here's a target! you want your kids to go to college and get rich, but it's the educated that are the enemy!

cog-diss rules!

the ironic fact that it's used by financial and political elitists is apparently lost on said populus, (can you have irony without education?).

:)

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 05:40:48 PM EST
elitist:

-- consciousness of or pride in belonging to a select or favored group.

But if e.g. somebody says poor people voting for the GOP are voting against their own interests does not speak of the consciousness to belong to a group of people who know what is best for others?
Paternalism (that is what my dictionary says for 'Bevormundung', despite in the case of left paternalism it has nothing to do with father or man or parents at all) is the main left form of elitism. And it can be pretty pronounced, too.


Lich King/Caribou Barbie 08
Pain brings Katharsis

by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 09:09:00 PM EST
As the saying goes: imagine how stupid is a person with the median intellect... Now, half of the people are even more stupid than that!

That is the motto of the rich and powerful elites in this world.  

by das monde on Tue Jul 15th, 2008 at 10:31:25 PM EST
As Jared Diamond pointed out, elites can be incredibly stupid.  The difference between a stupid elite class and a stupid individual is that a stupid elite class can lead a whole culture/nation off the Maladaptive Precipice...

OTOH there seems to be a hard-to-beat law of hierarchical societies, that membership in an elite -- at least by the 2nd generation -- seems to make people stupid.  Elites have tons of privilege and hence live somewhat insulated from reality, i.e. insulated from any need for common sense and practical, realistic thinking (not to mention any ability to understand the conditions and needs of ordinary people).  Hence... G W Bush, or the Hapsburg princes, or any one of a number of other manifestly odd (to put it politely) personages who got to sit in the big chair and order other people around.  This phenomenon of "rot at the top" or the gradually increasing divide between an elite ruling class and physical realities, seems to be almost as important a feature of imperial decline as resource overshoot and attenuated supply lines...

The difference between theory and practise in practise ...

by DeAnander (de_at_daclarke_dot_org) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 01:24:43 AM EST
And compounding this is the fact that if the elites are realistic and wise, they leave a system to their heirs with much greater capacity to absorb stupid decisions and not break down - so the overshot can be much, much worse.

The first generation fights. The second generation builds. The third generation squanders. Lather, rinse, repeat.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 09:24:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
i've heard something similar, if a little happier:

'i am a warrior, so my son can be a farmer and his son an artist...'

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 10:02:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by Maryscott OConnor (myleftwing@gmail.com) on Sat Jul 19th, 2008 at 11:18:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Kinda.  The quote is:

"I am a warrior, that my son may be a Merchant, that his son may be a Poet."

Och nu den svenska kocken bakar en Alaskan älg jägare. Bonk! Bonk! Bonk!

by ATinNM on Sat Jul 19th, 2008 at 11:32:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Elitism has ntohing to do with any particular definition, elitism is a narrative.. it is interesting because it has some metaphors linked with .. but the precise definition that it could have is irrelevant.

YOu can always change the definition or the narrative to suit your purposes.. this particular kind of narrative (the name association to a set of metaphors which are negative) has some relations with branding  and purely naming but it has a little bit more sophistication....

But it is not paritucalrly complex (as the mythical economic structures that the right-wing has in the US) or particualrly difficult to fight...you just need a simple counter-narrative, some cognitive dissonance examples and a lot a lot a lot of media..

As brit says here... buy media.

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 06:17:55 AM EST
I knew this diary had to be about the US.

The title gives it away.

"C'est un scandale !"

by redstar on Wed Jul 16th, 2008 at 12:13:32 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]