Solar Minimum : Temperatures drop

by Luis de Sousa
Fri Jul 4th, 2008 at 10:44:09 AM EST

With six months into the year an interesting picture is emerging from the surface temperature data collected by space borne sensors. As the Sun slowly marches towards its activity minimum the radiation and geomagnetic flux the Earth receives from the star ease down, and with it seem to be going surface temperatures.


Satellite temperature datasets are published monthly by the University of Alabama at Huntsville and the Remote Sensing Systems at Santa Rosa, California. They are known simply by the acronyms UAH MSU and RSS MSU and are the publicly available temperature datasets with the highest spatial resolution. Both go back to 1979, now comprising almost thirty years of data.

The data published shows for each month the temperature anomaly - the difference from the temperature measured to the average of a reference period, in this case 1979 - 1998. The following graphs were obtained by averaging the twelve temperature anomalies collected for each year, plus the average of the first semester of 2008.

Global Temperatures
Average Global temperature anomalies for each year since 1979 plus the average of the first 2008 semester with RSS data.
Average Global temperature anomalies for each year since 1979 plus the average of the first 2008 semester with UAH data.

According to the RSS dataset 2008 is being the coldest year since 1993 with an anomaly close to zero (+0.01 ºC). The data from UAH is also presenting 2008 so far as the coldest year since 1993, but with a slightly negative anomaly (-0.03 ºC). According to both datasets there are only eight years on record with average anomalies below 2008: 1979, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1989, 1992 and 1993. Less than one third of the data is colder than 2008.

Northern Hemisphere
Average Northern Hemisphere temperature anomalies for each year since 1979 plus the average of the first 2008 semester with RSS data.
Average Northern Hemisphere temperature anomalies for each year since 1979 plus the average of the first 2008 semester with UAH data.

Things are not as drastic in the Northern Hemisphere, here 2008 is being the coldest year since 2000 according to RSS and since 1997 according to UAH. On both datasets 2008 is staying in the warmest half of the available years. There are ten years warmer in the Northern Hemisphere than in 2008 according to UAH and thirteen according to RSS. Is is also clear from this graphs the warm seven year period between 2001 and 2007 when the average anomalies stayed above +0.20 ºC, that 2008 is promising to put an end to.

Southern Hemisphere
Average Southern Hemisphere temperature anomalies for each year since 1979 plus the average of the first 2008 semester with RSS data.
Average Southern Hemisphere temperature anomalies for each year since 1979 plus the average of the first 2008 semester with UAH data.

Here can be found the root of the current low temperatures; according to RSS there were only two years colder than 2008 in the Southern Hemisphere, 1984 and 1985. In the UAH dataset 2008 is so far the coldest year on record.

Of note is also the irregular difference between the Northern and Southern anomalies in 2008, by far the highest in the RSS dataset (0.41 ºC) and only surpassed by 1999 in UAH's. This awkward difference should decrease during the following times, to what side remains to be seen, although looking at the raw monthly data the Northern Hemisphere seems to be starting a cooling trend initiated an year earlier in the Southern Hemisphere.

Looking ahead

Will temperatures continue to go down? It remains an open possibility; if the current period of solar inactivity is in fact the major driver behind these recent changes, at least the continuation in time of these negative anomalies should be expected.

The present period of solar inactivity is bound to last, with the minimum twelve months or more away. The smoothed Wolf number is still going down, as so the solar flux. In six months there were just three sunspots belonging to solar cycle 24, the last appearing in April. Before the Sun returns to a visible level of activity, above 10 monthly wolfs, one or two full months without sunspots should be expected.
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
It's a good thing that the data on temperature anomaly spans 30 years, because then one can use it to argue that the last 11-year solar activity cycle has indeed been significantly warmer than the preceding two cycles.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 4th, 2008 at 11:02:43 AM EST
I recall it was thought that
Global temperatures will drop slightly this year as a result of the cooling effects of the La Niña current in the Pacific


When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 4th, 2008 at 02:51:57 PM EST
And this
The data published shows for each month the temperature anomaly - the difference from the temperature measured to the average of a reference period, in this case 1979 - 1998. The following graphs were obtained by averaging the twelve temperature anomalies collected for each year, plus the average of the first semester of 2008.
reminds me of the Hadley Centre "mistake".

Nomad:

Any thoughts on the correction the Hadley Centre had recently done on the presentation of their monthly temperature data because 2008 was turning out to be too cold to be true?
The Hadley Centre were using just the average of the first two months for their March 2008 report. A 12-month moving average, would be better in any case.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 4th, 2008 at 03:10:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Here is your moving average. I was lazy; I did it only for one set of data.



(Since datasets start in January 1979, moving averages start with December 1979.)

Solar minima in is period: September 1986, May 1996, now.

Recent El Niños: 1986-1987, 1991-1992, 1993, 1994, 1997-1998, 2002-2003, 2004-2005 and 2006-2007.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Fri Jul 11th, 2008 at 07:05:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now for some commentary. I don't think the effect of solar minima is all that obvious in these graphs. The ENSO effect is obvious, however. (Tho' maybe I should have shifted the averages backwards by six months for a more sensible display.) Then again, unlike solar cycles, the ENSO is problematic (from the viewpoint of a global warming sceptic) because forcing between the ENSO and global warming could go both ways.

Also, I don't understand what Luís's argument about a low likelihood of a jump back to +0.6 is about. There are a lot of similarly rapid and large-amplitude movements in this graph as the present one - usually followed by a swing in the other direction. As JakeS says, it's the long-term trend that is of interest, at least on the ENSO period scale, so we may see in two years at the earliest whether the present downswing has a longer-term downward component.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Sat Jul 12th, 2008 at 07:24:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Tho' maybe I should have shifted the averages backwards by six months for a more sensible display.

Now done. A stupid mistake in the hemisphere diagrams corrected too. For good measure, here is the first graph for a 36-month moving average:



*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Sat Jul 12th, 2008 at 07:51:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
  1. Apples and oranges. You're comparing 12-month averages to a 6-month average, despite the fact that the Earth undergoes a 12-month climatic cycle.

  2. Outlier. The trend in the dataset is upwards. You can't just decide to input some arbitrary splitting point in your data and compare trends before and after. That's not how you do serious time-series analysis. Nor can you pick out single points and compare them.

There are proper ways to detect turning points in a time series. But what you do is not one of them.

- Jake

Your representatives may not listen to you. But they do read your e-mail.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Jul 4th, 2008 at 04:56:49 PM EST
Some notes on the issues raised by the commentators:
  • ENSO - While the index divided to -2 in February it has recovered in the meantime now staying at 0. The temperature anomalies have been stronger in May and June.

  • Six months of data - While six months of data can not be used to fully characterize the year's anomaly they are enough to perceive where it will be relatively to past years. For 2008 to reach an anomaly similar to past years around +0.3 ºC the following six months would need to average around +0.6 ºC. There are just three months equal or above +0.6 ºC in UAH's dataset and six in RSS', all occurring in 1997 - 1998. The probability of having just one month at +0.6 ºC is thus below 2%, the probability of having six straight of such months is infinitesimal.

  • Trends - There's no trend fitted on any of the graphs. Many are the curves that can be fitted to each of these datasets, depending of the period considered and the fitting method used. To know what's ahead a good understanding of meteorologic phenomena and the mechanisms behind them is better than any trend.

  • Outlier - For an year with a null anomaly so far that's an hilarious characterization.


Vencit omnia veritas.
by Luis de Sousa (luis[dot]a[dot]de[dot]sousa[at]gmail[dot]com) on Mon Jul 7th, 2008 at 03:18:37 AM EST
  1. Comparing six-month to twelve-month averages is still sloppy. If you want to make a point, you could compare the relevant six months of all the past years to the six months you have data for this year. I don't know what that would yield; I haven't run the numbers. But then again, I'm not the one trying to prove a point using those data.

  2. You don't have to fit to see a trend in those data. Chi-by-eye more than suffices. As an aside, we know that there is an effect of solar activity, and we know that it is cyclic on the scales presented here. But it doesn't explain the underlying upwards trend (as another aside, it is - among other things - to smooth out this cyclic behaviour that one normally looks at global mean temperatures over a 30-year running average).

- Jake

Your representatives may not listen to you. But they do read your e-mail.
by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Jul 7th, 2008 at 03:47:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
six months of data Isn't it better to just do a moving average with a 12-month trailing window?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 11th, 2008 at 04:12:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not clear what moral you want us to draw from this story?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Jul 7th, 2008 at 10:21:50 AM EST
2008 is experiencing both a solar minimum and a La Niña event, and still it manages to score in the 30th percentile in a 30-year sample. I say that's pretty hot.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 11th, 2008 at 05:57:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
From Real Climate:

"It's long been known that El Niño variability affects the global mean temperature anomalies. 1998 was so warm in part because of the big El Niño event over the winter of 1997-1998 which directly warmed a large part of the Pacific, and indirectly warmed (via the large increase in water vapour) an even larger region. The opposite effect was seen with the La Niña event this last winter. Since the variability associated with these events is large compared to expected global warming trends over a short number of years, the underlying trends might be more clearly seen if the El Niño events (more generally, the El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)) were taken out of the way. There is no perfect way to do this - but there are a couple of reasonable approaches"...


The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake
by talos (mihalis at gmail dot com) on Mon Jul 7th, 2008 at 10:35:19 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]