European Tribune

At Last Some Good News...

by afew
Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 08:51:49 AM EST

After the "Return" Directive, the French Offensive. French Minister for Immigration and National Identity, Brice Hortefeux, chaired a meeting of EU Interior Ministers in Cannes yesterday, that reached unanimous agreement on common measures against undocumented non-EU immigrants. Le Figaro today can hardly contain its glee:

Le Figaro - France : Immigration : feu vert des 27 au plan français Le Figaro - France: Immigration: green light from the 27 to French plan
Le ton se veut conciliant, mais le changement de cap est entériné : l'époque des régularisations massives est désormais révolue en Europe. Ce constat s'accompagne de l'affirmation selon laquelle «les étrangers en situation irrégulière sur le territoire des États membres doivent quitter ce territoire». Chaque capitale «s'engage à assurer l'applicationeffective de ce principe».The tone is meant to be conciliatory, but the change of direction is confirmed: the era of regularisation en masse is now over in Europe. With this affirmation goes the statement that "illegal aliens within the territory of Member States must leave this territory." Each capital "is committed to ensuring effective implementation of this principle."
Les États membres sont invités à «recourir à des dispositifs communs pour assurer l'éloignement des étrangers en situation irrégulière», tels que l'identification biométrique des clandestins ou l'utilisation de vols conjoints. Bien que condamné par les ONG, ce tour de vis est parfaitement assumé par l'UE. «On ne transforme pas l'Europe en blockhaus. Il y a sur ce territoire six millions d'illégaux. Il faut lutter contre l'immigration illégale et encadrer l'immigration légale», a insisté le ministre de l'Intérieur allemand, Wolfgang Schauble.Member States are invited to "resort to common procedures to ensure the removal of illegal aliens", such as biometric identification of illegal immigrants or use of joint flights. Although this turn of the screw is condemned by NGOs, the EU assumes full responsibility for it. "It does not transform Europe into a bunker. There are six million illegals in this territory. We must fight against illegal immigration and set a frame for legal immigration", insisted the German Interior Minister, Wolfgang Schäuble.

Hortefeux, Schäuble, UMP house newspaper Le Figaro, all are so pleased. Follow me below the fold for further good news.


  • Paula is from Angola. She has three children, Epifanio, 16, Jesse, 14, Débora 8. Her husband, opposition activist, is dead, and she had to flee from reprisals after a violent arrest. Her application for political asylum in France was turned down. She was served an OQTF (Obligation de Quitter le Territoire Français, summons to leave French territory) that she appealed against in vain before the Administrative Tribunal. Her request for discretionary regularisation was rejected by the Prefect. She is likely to be sent with her children to a retention centre any day now (school is over and the summer holidays are much more convenient for this kind of move).
  • Aïda, Armenian, has two daughters, Karine 12 and Nelly 10. Victim of interethnic conflicts between Azeris and Armenians, she was separated from her husband from whom she has had no further news and fears the worst. Her application for political asylum was turned down, as was her request for discretionary regularisation by the Prefect, who had her served an OQTF, appeal before the Administrative Tribunal rejected. She is likely to be sent with her children to a retention centre any day now (school is over etc...)
  • Georgette is from DRC and arrived in France, after a stay in French territory Mayotte, with her four children Aristote, 14, Naomi, 12, Innocent, 5, Esther, 1. Her application for political asylum was turned down. She expects to be served an OQTF any time now.
  • Joaquim, from Angola, is with his daughter Maveilha, 7. Threatened in his country because of his participation in opposition movements. His application for political asylum was turned down. He was served an OQTF, appeal rejected. He is likely to be sent with his daughter to a retention centre any day now.
  • (Note 1: The children of school age mentioned have all been at school in France for two or three years now.)

    (Note 2: "retention" is a euphemism for detention aka imprisonment. The Return Directive, which will no doubt be transposed into French and other MS law with no delay, provides for up to 18 months "retention".)

Have I cherry-picked these from a national list? I have not. These are just some cases from a very small town not far from where I live.

LATEST:

The joyful M Hortefeux can't wait for October, when he'll be chairing another Council meeting of Interior Ministers on integration policy ie language and culture tests (which didn't get through in the Cannes meeting yesterday).

He is organising it in the town of Vichy.

Where else?

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Good diary, and one that made me mutter rude things under my breath.

There's a book I need to diary on illegal migration to Europe.  Been meaning to do it for ages.

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 09:25:23 AM EST
What can be done to oppose this, since all our national parliaments, governments and also the European Parliament approve of this policy?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 09:30:03 AM EST
Not only that, this stuff has majority support in most European countries.

Local action groups backed by human rights orgs and lawyers can fight administrative rearguard actions and try to support the families concerned. One of the most fertile grounds for resistance is within schools, where teachers and pupils know the children who are threatened. This is why the summer, when schools are closed, is a time of risk.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 09:38:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sending children from school to 18-month detention is absolutely the worst part of this. How can a majority of the population support it?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 09:43:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think its the "They're not from round here/stealing my taxes/sponging off the state/ always at the top of the housing lists" argument rearing its ugly head once again.

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:18:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
that kids are sent there too. There is widespread indignation when stories on this are about kids. Thus policies focus on adults and try to hide the kids (cf the summer expulsions).

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:19:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If the kids are not sent there, then what? Do people favour detaining or deporting parents and putting immigrant children in foster care instead?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:24:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Because they don't think that deeply about it. They just want rid of the freeloading darkies who are taking their jobs, eating their food, stealing their potential mates, ruining western culture, bringing down house prices and generally making life more complicated for them.  Leaders either force them to think through those lazy, primitive thoughts or they exploit them. Guess what sort of leadership we're dealing with here?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:33:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Leadership? We're dealing with the tabloid press.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:40:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That appears to be our leadership these days.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:49:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That was quite precisely a crux under Vichy in 1942. Should the families be separated, or the children loaded into the trains with their parents?

Laval asked the Germans to please take the children, the French state didn't want them on its hands.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:42:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And the children got gassed on arrival as they couldn't do forced labour.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 11:36:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
One of the rare times I saw Pivot get really pissed off at a guest was when he had some guy explaining that Brasillach's infamous article 'N'oubliez pas les enfants' showed Brasillach's compassion and strong attachment to family values.
by MarekNYC on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 12:15:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There was such a horrifying sneer in that title. "Don't Forget the Children", not as in "Please Think Of The Children", but as in "Whatever You Do, Don't Leave Them Behind".

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 12:19:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If the kids are not sent there, then what? Do people favour detaining or deporting parents and putting immigrant children in foster care instead?

Think America where the kids of illegal immigrants, or some of them, are very often US citizens (automatic citizenship by birth). Whenever you hear of mass arrests of illegals you also read of child services agencies screaming about what this is doing to the suddenly orphaned kids.  

Then there are the folks who have basically spent there entire lives here, but came as small children and are 'illegal'. Our dear beloved Republicans decided to block an amnesty for those among them who are outstanding students (the so called 'Dream Act').

The sad thing is that there's actually a clear majority support for the legalization of all undocumented immigrants who have been in the US for more than a couple years. However, the large minority that hates this idea has made it clear that they will destroy any Republican politician who supports it. Add in a handful of Dems from red areas, and getting to sixty is very difficult. By the way, this also shows that business interests do not completely run the Republican party - they strongly support amnesty as well.

by MarekNYC on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 12:04:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
MarekNYC:
By the way, this also shows that business interests do not completely run the Republican party - they strongly support amnesty as well.

because they're such nice guys, or because the big southern ag plantations that depend on their cheap labour and strong backs for harvesting have such diligent, insistent, well-greased lobbyists?

maybe they'll have to pay u.s. minimum wage (maybe), but since americans don't want to physically work that hard in the fields, it's still a bargain they can't afford to lose. sending them home to mexico would leave them up the creek, and deprive mexico of a huge amount of money faithfully sent home by the migrant workers.

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 01:30:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Does it matter why if it's the right thing to do? Removing the fear of expulsion with the resulting opportunity for intimidation by employers, guaranteeing they get minimum wage, etc, is good for everyone. And once they're legally in the US they can leave the plantations if they have a better job opportunity elsewhere, which they can't really do as freely if they are illegal.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 01:38:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
totally...

i knew marek wasn't being naive. it is a big division in the repugs, as you know, and i couldn't resist rubbing their nose in it, lol!

Peace is not the absence of war -- peace is the absence of fear. Ursula Franklin

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 01:47:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Because they never mention that bit when they're talking about it. And anyway, they don't know those children.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:20:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's the part they don't like, when they hear about it, and particularly when they or their children know the children. This does not prevent the current French government from pressing forward. Hortefeux, regarded by Sarkozy as one of the "best" ministers, keeps up constant pressure on the prefects to obtain results and send in numbers: so many thousand "expelled illegals" is red meat to the xenophobes.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:21:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The tone is meant to be conciliatory, but the change of direction is confirmed: the era of regularisation en masse is now over in Europe.

Everyone is reading the agreement how itbest suits them. Le Figaro interprets is as full support for Sarkozy's position while El Pais quotes the Spanish Interior Minister's assurances that Spain's mass legalization of immigrants done in 2005 would still be legal under the new agreement. Apparently, they are splitting hairs over the difference between "universal" and "massive". Spain legalised those immigrants who could prove they had a job, as a way to bring those jobs out of the black economy, which qualifies as regularisation "on a case-by-case basis" as the agreement allows.

El Pais also says that the agreement has been hammered out by france, Germany and Spain, and that after being supported by the rest of the 27, the Commission will flech it out and the other member states will contribute to it before final ratification in October.

Spain opposes the "immigration contract" of Sarkozy, claims the legality of its own mass legalization is preserved, and also claims to have succeeded in shifting the burden regarding local language acquisition from the migrant to the host nation.

The following seems surreal:

To reactivate the EU after the Irish no to the Lisbon Treaty the ministers agreed various initiatives such as the creation of "European Police Stations" in touristic areas of where sports events are held. This initiative, introduced by Rubalcaba, was supported unanimously, as it "will allow citizens to be listened to in their own language to solve a problem". It was also agreed to create a sor of "Police Erasmus", like that for university students, to encourage exchanges among police officers.


When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:05:14 AM EST
Yes, Spain put up the most opposition at this conference. And the Figaro is of course crowing, it seemed to me it was doing it so obscenely I had to quote it. There will no doubt be leeway for countries that wish, to claim their regularisations were on a "case by case" basis. France will be free, also, to appeal for "case by case" volunteers to put in an application and then use the collected information to pin the applicants down and then expel or retain them (note that in my examples these are people who are not hiding but have exhausted all administrative recourse).

The "European Police Stations" is such a joke that it was left to the official French Interior Minister, Michèle Alliot-Marie, to announce this wonder of wonders. Brice Hortefeux, the real Interior Minister, wasn't going to get bogged down with that.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:33:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, you will notice the "Joke" was a Spanish proposal... El Pais was so proud it was unanimously adopted, to "revitalize the EU after Ireland".

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:39:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
French public radio this morning said it was part of bringing Europe closer to its citizens.

The LOL bit was when Alliot-Marie laboriously explained that it was going to be nice for tourists to find a copper from their own country when their papers or car were stolen.

Some slogan: "Visit (our country) and get ripped off!"

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:50:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I got a pointer to this from El Pais...

Trend News (Azerbaijan): Reports: Commission slams Sarkozy plans for immigration quotas (07.07.08)

A commission established by French President Nicolas Sarkozy to study his proposals to curb illegal immigration has concluded that his ideas for establishing quotas is useless, French media reported on Monday.

...

Media information about the report came at a delicate time for Sarkozy and his Immigration Minister, Brice Hortefeux. EU interior ministers began meeting Monday in Cannes to discuss an immigration pact for the Union in which Sarkozy and Hortefeux want to set up quotas for all of Europe.

...

The 13-member commission was headed by Pierre Mazeaud, a conservative former head of the Constitutional Council, the French equivalent of the US Supreme Court.

As the EU agreement is built around the idea of allowing a quota of legal migrants based on the labour market needs, and throwing out everyone else as "illegals", one would have to conclude the draft EU plan is also "useless".

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:09:43 AM EST
I fear Mazeaud's well-meaning and serious report is likely to receive as much attention as Lamassoure's on EU citizenship...

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:36:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sigh... I had not heard that particular bit. The sheer shamelessness of it is sickening.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:18:20 AM EST
It's brazen in-your-face, like Sarko's "when there's a strike in France these days, no one notices".

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 10:35:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the lack of reaction of US opposition to similar tactics by Bush has proven without doubt that it works; I'm sure Sarkozy is similarly emboldened by the choas in the socialist party right now (which he is happy to feed by discreetly supporting Besancenot's new Anticapitalist Party)

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 11:02:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The total lack of political opposition at the moment makes Besancenot sound good. Still, I don't see him becoming a "leftie Le Pen" that the right can exploit to divide the left.

OTOH, the current situation demonstrates, imo, the structural need for an opposition. Royal, after all, did get 47%. Those people are getting trashed at the moment because, without a strong voice in political opposition, they have difficulty organising and are prone to thinking there is nothing that can be done. Of course, the lack of really broad-based unions plays its part too.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jul 8th, 2008 at 12:00:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think reality lies somewhere between the ideas reported by Le figaro and El Pais. But it does seem to be merely a coming together of present policies rather than an EU wide new view about the needs of europe compared to the desperation of refugees.

There is no agreed definition of refugees, no definition of who should be encouraged to come, no concept of a green card as in the US. Just that member countries will support each other in their own policies. Which is such a "Duh ! Obvious" thing I'm surprised it needed saying.

I'm more interested in border controls and how that is to be managed centrally. Amongst the  reasons given by UK for not entering Schengen is that illegal immigrants seme to move freely through the EU and then arrive in the UK and declare themselves. Why the UK ? Why does France allow them to hang around near calais?

Yet, if there is an aspect of this it isn't mentioned in amongst the glee of vindictiveness against brown people.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Jul 9th, 2008 at 04:06:30 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]