European Tribune

LQD: Buying Dirt

by ChrisCook
Fri Aug 22nd, 2008 at 05:50:21 AM EST

I found this Blog Post interesting.

Habitat for Humanity Homes

I've followed Habitat for Humanity for a while. Their "direct action" approach to building affordable homes with volunteer assistance certainly has its heart in the right place.

But what interested me in the blog post was this quote...

 

"We are currently investigating ways for Habitat to acquire foreclosed properties, rehab them and sell them to families. The challenge is that at the moment, it is still more expensive to buy existing homes for rehab than it is to buy dirt and build new, high quality homes."

The statement raises several issues of which three in particular struck me.

Firstly: the difference between the UK property market - where the lack of availability of "Dirt" to build on, and therefore its price, is key - and much of the US property market.

Secondly: the scale of the staggering waste of resources implicit in the wave of US foreclosures and effective abandonment of property.

Thirdly: what the statement implies in relation to realisations by Banks who foreclose, and therefore the true value of their property "assets"....


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
what the statement implies in relation to realisations by Banks who foreclose, and therefore the true value of their property "assets"....

In a word DENIAL.  No one is going to acknowledge reality until they at least think they can find a profitable path forward by so doing.  No agency head wants to be seen as the one who popped the bubble, even if all acknowledge the bubble.  Now California investors are blaming Sen. Schumer's letter for the FDIC take-over of Indy-Mac.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (argeezer a in a circle yahoo dot com) on Fri Aug 22nd, 2008 at 01:53:15 PM EST
two comments:
  1. Much of the U.S. housing market is still inflated to the extent that their remark is true, but that is partly due to a 'stillness before the storm'. Many home"owners" are holding their breath, finding ways to 'get by', in hopes of a return to the 'normal' market that they have come to know and love. Ain't going to happen. The market has already contracted severely, and prices will follow.
  2. Abandonment will be rare. Either financial institutions, including Sovereign Wealth Funds, will step in and buy housing for the rental market - which will grow substantially - or governments will intervene.

Interestingly, state and local governments in many regions have become way more involved lately - as in the 1930s - in endeavors that they had abandoned to the federal government and to businesses in the last 40 years: for instances, more intervention in renewable-source energy generation and expansion of public transportation (at least here in the Pacific NW).

As to your third point, your implication is exactly correct. More 'ballast' for a sinking ship.

paul spencer

by paul spencer (spencerinthegorge AT yahoo DOT com) on Fri Aug 22nd, 2008 at 02:08:51 PM EST
Land with planning permission, or even likely to get planning permission in Britain is insanely expensive. And the more the demand, ie closer to london, the more insane it becomes.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Aug 24th, 2008 at 05:24:24 AM EST
That is a title I noticed on internets this week. The subject is different, but important and interesting to us, peak lovers.
by das monde on Wed Aug 27th, 2008 at 05:32:00 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]