|
by Turambar
[Long time no see. Drifted away to strange places like 4chan, because the US election was just too damn funny and interesting. Don't know if you ever really come back from this abyss, especially after being involved in the Palin incident (thanks, rubico).]
I spent Monday in Brussels, talking to different people directly involved in the budget review process. Won't name names, so I can say more.
First, there was the German representation in the Council. It's even worse than I imagined. They don't care what any MEP hast to say or whether some program might be useful or not, they are controlled by the finance ministry and some numbers (say, 2 billion) have to be cut from every yearly budget somehow. Their most used argument seems to be "we're getting back some of the money at the end of the year, this clearly proves how you don't need any to begin with". Regarding the financial perspective, all they care about is the overall accounting balance ("operatives Haushaltssaldo") of Germany and (in true "juste retour" logic) ways to make it more transparent.
Then, there are MEPs. They're elected, so they think they're the most important people in the process, but they freely admit they can't influence 85% of the budget at all. The rest, however, they can sometimes shift a little from one line to another. Seems like they're content with actually having a vote based on their own position and not on the one of their national governments'. They're only bound by the positions of lobbyists, interest groups, NROs, "market forces", companies in their districts, party affiliations (European and national), committee interests and 475.6 other things. When they're done making remarks (May - October), the Council goes back to its first proposal.
And there's the commission. Privately, they all think the current budget structure to be silly historical baggage, but the only thing that could really change the way Brussels works, in their opinion, is a way to make sure that no country can trace back its accounting balance (funding the budget by direct EU taxes etc.). To make matters worse, they won't put forward the final report on the midterm budget review process in fear of provoking another Irish "No" (and, some might add, Barroso's second term after the June elections). They'll rather have you vote before you know everything that might affect your choice. In the light of recent events, I want to end on a positive note. Brussels has understood what has to change and is working on it. It's just that it'll take an awful lot of time. |
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . ET Editorial Guidelines . Search . Search (Google) Login
|
||||||
My personal impression of how Brussels actually works | 26 comments (26 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
My personal impression of how Brussels actually works | 26 comments (26 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||||||
| ||||||||