More on Middle Britain

by In Wales
Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 05:46:08 AM EST

From a TUC press release:

A growing pay gap - particularly between middle income Britain and the super-rich - was a crucial but overlooked ingredient in the financial crash, according to TUC research published today.

The share of national wealth going to wages has been in sharp decline, peaking at 65 per cent in 1975 but now down to 53 per cent, with a greater proportion going to the prosperous middle classes and super-rich. In contrast the profits share has been rising.

The wages of middle income earners of £22,000 median, have fallen behind productivity as well as being hit by growing inequality as the better off have taken a much larger share of the wages.


TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said: 'Many have tracked the role of finance and speculators in causing the crash, but few have asked where they got the money and why so many needed to borrow so much.

Consumer culture is one thing but how did the situation arise where people routinely began living well beyond their means?

Stewart Lansley, author of the two reports, said: 'For the last 30 years Britain's low and middle earners have seen their pay and living conditions stall while the incomes of the affluent, the rich and super-rich have vastly outpaced them.

'We now have an increasingly unequal society with growing income, wealth and opportunity gaps.

' As the profits squeeze of the 1970s gave way to today's enduring and equally damaging wage squeeze, the British economy has became as much out of balance as it was in that decade.

'To build a sustainable economy, far less susceptible to asset bubbles and credit crunches, the trend of an ever shrinking wage pool needs to be reversed.'

Our increasingly unequal society is no surprise and the irony of the recession is that it provides the excuse for an even bigger squeeze on wages, when it is the long term wage squeeze that contributed heavily to the situation we find ourselves in now.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:

Middle income earners - the real middle Britain earning median incomes around £22,000 a year - have been doubly squeezed as:

  • Their wages have fallen behind productivity. Since 1980 their wages have risen by 1.6 per cent a year, while productivity has been growing by 1.9 per cent a year.
  • They have also been hit by growing inequality as the better off have grabbed a growing share of wages. From 1978-2008, real earnings at the 90th percentile doubled while real median earnings grew by 56 per cent and those at the 10th percentile by only 27 per cent. The report shows that some groups of workers, from fork-lift truck and bus drivers to bakers and low skilled factory workers, have enjoyed little rise in real earnings at all.

But the rising tide lifts all ships... sigh.

When TUC releases such studies, are they routinely thematised by Labour backbenchers or someone from the opposition? Or is there just big silwence in Westminster?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 06:18:23 AM EST


*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 06:19:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know what happens actually. I think part of the aim of the TUC press releases is to get information out in the public domain and to aid policy makers in other organisations.  Sometimes the media may even pick up on it.

This kind of information is used in Wales but the Westminster lot live on another planet. TUC does use this type of research when invited to give evidence to Westminster committees but it is only taken on board if it fits with the direction the Government wants to go in anyway.

I've been involved for the last 18 months in compiling huge amounts of evidence and case studies that demonstrate the benefit of workplace equality reps and making the case for them to have statutory rights to training and time off to do the job.  On the back of that the TUC have tried to get Govt support to take forward an amendment to the Equality Bill to give reps those rights and have been told that they won't take the amendment forward.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 06:31:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In Wales:
TUC does use this type of research when invited to give evidence to Westminster committees but it is only taken on board if it fits with the direction the Government wants to go in anyway.
Are you saying the intelligence and facts are being fixed around the policy?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 06:59:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm saying the TUC produces research and stats analysis.  The TUC may be invited to present evidence on various topics at various committees and will try to influence policy development and make recommendations based on the TUC's evidence base/interpretation of the issues.  The committee in question may or may not wish to agree with the TUC's presentation and conclusions.

If a committee or Government leads are already focused on moving policy in a particular direction they will give emphasis to evidence and conclusions that support their view.  That isn't breaking news.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 09:10:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In a normal democracy, any study putting government policy in a bad light would be seized upon by at least one opposition party or engaged single MP, and someone would force the government to defend itself, be in parliament or media. Yet, over the past year or so, I can recall the media echo of only one or two damning TUC studies entering public discourse this way. This is very sobering. (IOW, you and people like you should really try to run for MP candidate again...)

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 12:27:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Name "a normal democracy".

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Nov 13th, 2009 at 08:45:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm doing 'God's work'. Meet Mr Goldman Sachs

I ask him the question that, in these troubled times, you'd think anyone -- from the guy outside 85 Broad selling 99-cent chilli dogs to the gazillionaire King of Wall Street sitting 30 storeys above -- would pause before answering. And then, perhaps, offer an equivocal, on-the-one-hand, on-the-other-hand answer, whether he means it or not. Is it possible to make too much money?

"Is it possible to have too much ambition? Is it possible to be too successful?" Blankfein shoots back. "I don't want people in this firm to think that they have accomplished as much for themselves as they can and go on vacation. As the guardian of the interests of the shareholders and, by the way, for the purposes of society, I'd like them to continue to do what they are doing. I don't want to put a cap on their ambition. It's hard for me to argue for a cap on their compensation."

So, it's business as usual, then, regardless of whether it makes most people howl at the moon with rage? Goldman Sachs, this pillar of the free market, breeder of super-citizens, object of envy and awe will go on raking it in, getting richer than God? An impish grin spreads across Blankfein's face. Call him a fat cat who mocks the public. Call him wicked. Call him what you will. He is, he says, just a banker "doing God's work"


Goldman chief defends employees' pay

Goldman Sachs pays its employees more than other financial groups because its employees are more productive, declared Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman chief executive, at an industry conference on Tuesday.

(...)

"I often hear references to higher compensation at Goldman," said Mr Blankfein. "What people fail to mention is that net income generated per head is a multiple of our peer average. The people of Goldman Sachs are among the most productive in the world."



In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (jeromeguillet@yahoo.fr) on Thu Nov 12th, 2009 at 08:21:00 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]