Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.

LQD 12:45 - 18. dec. 2009 v.2

by Cat Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 12:55:42 PM EST

"Læs hele Barack Obamas tale her," Ekstra Badet, remarks as prepared in English and video of the speech delivered by the president of the United States to a plenary session of the UN Climate Change Conference, COP 15. It is but a click away, but I have reproduced it, the solomonic majesty of his um, here in its entirety for your convenience.

Exhale.

Incidentally, here's a candid snap of the indominatable US COP 15 representative and champion of leadership among nations, Turfin' Todd Stern. There ought to be a caption below it: "Den Begriff der Tugend würde kein Mensch haben, wenn er immer unter lauter Spitzbuben wäre."

Update [2009-12-18 12:55:42 by Cat]: Emended with DemocracyNow! transcript. There are significant differences in the texts.


Good morning. It's an honor to for me to join this distinguished group of leaders from nations around the world. We come together here in Copenhagen because climate change poses a grave and growing danger to our people. You would not be here unless you - like me - were convinced that this danger is real. This is not fiction, this is science. Unchecked, climate change will pose unacceptable risks to our security, our economies, and our planet. That much we know.

So the question before us is no longer the nature of the challenge - the question is our capacity to meet it. For while the reality of climate change is not in doubt, our ability to take collective action hangs in the balance.

I believe that we can act boldly, and decisively, in the face of this common threat. And that is why I have come here today.

As the world's largest economy and the world's second largest emitter, America bears our share of responsibility in addressing climate change, and we intend to meet that responsibility. That is why we have renewed our leadership within international climate negotiations, and worked with other nations to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. And that is why we have taken bold action at home - by making historic investments in renewable energy; by putting our people to work increasing efficiency in our homes and buildings; and by pursuing comprehensive legislation to transform to a clean energy economy.

These actions are ambitious, and we are taking them not simply to meet our global responsibilities. We are convinced that changing the way that we produce and use energy is essential to America's economic future - that it will create millions of new jobs, power new industry, keep us competitive, and spark new innovation. And we are convinced that changing the way we use energy is essential to America's national security, because it will reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and help us deal with some of the dangers posed by climate change.

So America is going to continue on this course of action no matter what happens in Copenhagen. But we will all be stronger and, all be safer and , all be more secure if we act together. That is why it is in our mutual interest to achieve a global accord in which we agree to take certain steps, and to hold each other accountable for our commitments.

After months of talk, and after two weeks of negotiations, after innumerable side meetings, bilateral meetings, endless hours of discussion among negotiators, I believe that the pieces of that accord are now should now be clear.

First, all major economies must put forward decisive national actions that will reduce their emissions, and begin to turn the corner on climate change. I'm pleased that many of us have already done so . Almost all the major economies have put forward legitimate targets, significant targets, ambitious targets. , and And I'm confident that America will fulfill the commitments that we have made: cutting our emissions in the range of 17 percent by 2020, and by more than 80 percent by 2050 in line with final legislation.

Second, we must have a mechanism to review whether we are keeping our commitments, and to exchange this information in a transparent manner. These measures need not be intrusive, or infringe upon sovereignty. They must, however, ensure that an accord is credible, and that we are living up to our obligations. For without Without such accountability, any agreement would be empty words on a page. I donít know how you have an international agreement where we all are not sharing information and ensuring that we are meeting our commitments. That doesnít make sense. It would be a hollow victory.

Third Number three, we must have financing that helps developing countries adapt, particularly the least-developed and most vulnerable to climate change. America will be a part of fast-start funding that will ramp up to $10 billion in 2012. And, yesterday, Secretary Clinton, my Secretary of State, made it clear that we will engage in a global effort to mobilize $100 billion in financing by 2020, if - and only if - it is part of the a broader accord that I have just described.

Mitigation. Transparency. And financing. It is a clear formula - one that embraces the principle of common but differentiated responses and respective capabilities. And it adds up to a significant accord - one that takes us farther than we have ever gone before as an international community.

I just want to say to this plenary session that we are running short on time. And at this point, the The question is whether we will move forward together, or split apart. whether we prefer posturing to action. Iím sure that many consider this an imperfect framework that I just described. This is not a perfect agreement, and no . No country would will get everything that it wants. There are those developing countries that want aid with no strings attached, and who think that the most advanced nations should pay a higher price. And there no obligations with respect to transparency. They think that the most advanced nations should pay a higher priceóI understand that. There are those advanced nations who think that developing countries either cannot absorb this assistance, or that will not be held accountable effectively, and the world's fastest-growing emitters should bear a greater share of the burden.

We know the fault lines because we've been imprisoned by them for years. These international discussions have essentially taken place now for almost two decades, and we have very little to show for it other than an increased acceleration of the climate change phenomenon. The time for talk is over.

This But here is the bottom line: we can embrace this accord, take a substantial step forward, and continue to refine it and build upon its foundation. We can do that, and everyone who is in this room will be a part of an historic endeavor - one that makes life better for our children and grandchildren.

Or we can again choose delay, falling back into the same divisions that have stood in the way of action for years. And we will be back having the same stale arguments month after month, year after year , perhaps decade after decade, - all while the danger of climate change grows until it is irreversible.

Ladies and gentlemen, there There is no time to waste. America has made our choice. We have charted our course, we have made our commitments, and we will do what we say. Now, I believe that it's time for the nations and people of the world to come together behind a common purpose.

We are ready to get this done today, but there has to be movement on all sides to recognize that it is better for us to act than to talk. Itís better for us to choose We must choose action over inaction; the future over the past . And with courage and faith, let us I believe that we can meet our responsibility to our people, and to the future of our planet.

Thank you very much.

For shaving.

Display:
DemocracyNow! video and transcript picks up remarks as prepared with ad libs at 'graph #6.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 11:53:22 AM EST
It was a lovely speech. I had tears in my eyes.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 04:39:31 PM EST
Financing... financing... financing... IMF forces are working around the clock even as I speak to determine the best rates for you, your children, your children's children's children... yes, we can _____ with no money down...

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 05:01:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So good of Obama, after trying until a month or so ago to ignore and diminish the importance of this conference as it did not fit well into his administration's domestic US legislative agenda, to deign to attend on the last day and put in a solid 13 hours of effort trying to get everyone to just get along and agree on something. He might as well have sent Rodney King.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 07:38:53 PM EST
You know what they say about war and foreign policy speeches...

Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio): "The president has painted a very nice picture, but as I have said time and time before, the devil is in the details. I am very concerned that developing countries like China, India and Brazil are simply giving the idea of international participation lip-service."

Hal Lewis, professor at UC Santa Barbara: "Since the word "workable" is in the question, the answer is no, but that word is in the eye of the beholder. I find it appalling that Obama, a supposedly intelligent man, allows himself to be suckered by his Science Advisor, and has apparently never heard that most of the so-called science behind the global warming frenzy is fraudulent. I'll bet that no one has told Obama of ClimateGate."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.): "The President delivered a firm statement of America's willingness to make commitments on policy and funding, and he correctly insisted that other nations must make commitments to ensure accountability."

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.): "The emissions reductions he has talked about are what you would find in Markey's bill, and that isn't going to happen. Of course that bill is dead, it will never even be brought up again."

David Ridenour, VP, National Center for Public Policy Research:"We are exposing the hypocrisy by offering them 'hypocrisy offsets' to alleviate their green guilt. As one who is skeptical of the necessity of draconian carbon cuts, I plan to do my part to ensure plenty of hypocrisy offsets are available.  I'll refrain from reducing my own personal carbon footprint."

in other news...

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 11:04:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Lula breaks ranks, Zenawi kicked to curb for Zuma in Chinese drive-by. 2℃, USD 100Bn annual fund ceiling to fry southern hemisphere.

The agreement was reached after President Barack Obama had last-minute talks with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and South African President, Jacob Zuma in Copenhagen today.

Not much more to this developing story...

'cept China's budgeting USD 3T for the homeland.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 09:06:43 PM EST
16 Dec 2009

AMY GOODMAN: Rio was 1992.

SUNITA NARAIN: Ninety-two. I was in Berlin when the Berlin Mandate was set. That was '95 when the Berlin Mandate was decided upon. I was in Kyoto when we talked about the Kyoto Protocol in end of 1997.

Think about it: Where was Mr Obama in 1997?

And every conference had definitely difficulties. Definitely we've had difficulties between the North and the South. But I think the kind of distrust that you have at this meeting, the kind of bad organization that you have, the lack of process, the lack of transparency, the enormous effort there seems to be to somehow fix the deal--and that's completely unacceptable. And I think, you know, if it's the Danish government or if it's the US government working with the Danish government, I think the only lesson to them is that they really cannot do this and get away.

AMY GOODMAN: What do you think is being lost right now? Explain, as hundred--more than a hundred heads of state come to Copenhagen.

SUNITA NARAIN: Time. I think what is really being lost today is time. We know that climate change is urgent. We need to do something about it. We need to reduce the emissions that we have. And this conference was to come after two years of negotiations.

And yet, what you have at this conference is a complete breakdown, and it's not because of the developing countries. It's not because of India and China. That's, you know, just hiding behind two countries. It's very clear: it's because the United States wants to dismantle the Kyoto Protocol. They want to dismantle the Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is based on the notion of equity. They want to bring to --in fact, they want to replace it with a completely different multilateral system. So there is a breakdown here, and there are countries responsible for it, but my suspicion is, on Friday, when President Obama does descend to the city, the world media is going to blame the poor nations and not the rich nations.

AMY GOODMAN: What does it mean--what kind of pressure is being brought to fix the deal?

SUNITA NARAIN: Well, I think there's both overt pressure and there is pressure from--you know, which is hidden pressure. When you look at--firstly, we need to understand what's the deal that the rich nations want. The rich nations want a deal in which, without Kyoto, they have an agreement, which is based on pledge and review, a system in which every country, including the United States, puts up a number and says this is what they will do domestically. So there is no multilateral framework which will make every country agree to a certain target for reduction. And we know that the US has put on the table a very small number, three percent below 1990 levels, when it needs to cut 40 percent. That's the deal they want.

Read more...



Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 09:59:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
3T yuan USD 440B

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Fri Dec 18th, 2009 at 11:13:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]