Closer To Stopping Barroso

by afew
Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 08:40:26 AM EST

Euractiv tells us (caveat, on the strength of undisclosed "sources") that a "large majority of MEPs" is against holding a July vote on the candidature of José Manuel Barroso for a new mandate as European Commission president. In other words, they want to wait till the new parliament is sworn in in the autumn. This is not yet a declaration of majority intent to oppose Barroso, but it looks as if the EPP (conservative) that backs Barroso, and Council (the governments of the member states) that unanimously proposed his candidature, are going to have a hard time pushing through a quick vote in July.

EurActiv.com - No majority in Parliament for Barroso vote | EU - European Information on EU Elections 09

On 9 July, the European Parliament's conference of presidents will vote on whether to hold the secret vote on Barroso in mid-July, as the centre-right has been insisting for several months now (EurActiv 20/03/09), the group's chair Joseph Daul told journalists on Wednesday (24 June). The decision in the conference of presidents is taken by simple vote, representing the number of MEPs within each group: the EPP can count on 264 votes, as well as on the support of the newly formed anti-federalist group (EurActiv 23/06/09), which has 56 MEPs, Daul indicated. 

But this total of 320 MEPS falls short of the simple majority of 368 votes required to back Barroso. Therefore the EPP will invite, in separate moves, the centre-left Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in Europe (PASDE) and ALDE to join. In exchange, it would offer its support for the European Parliament presidency for a two-and-a half year period...


Euractiv quotes ALDE leader Graham Watson:

EurActiv.com - No majority in Parliament for Barroso vote | EU - European Information on EU Elections 09

Outgoing ALDE group Leader Graham Watson issued a written statement after his group had met on 24 June in Watson's constituency in Bristol, South West England. 

"Unlike the Socialists and the Greens, ALDE is not resolutely opposed to a vote in July. While Liberal Democrat prime ministers have pronounced themselves in favour of a vote for Mr. Barroso in July, opinion among leading ALDE MEPs is varied. ALDE would wish to see a number of conditions fulfilled before such a vote could be taken. Nonetheless, a consensus exists that we should engage in discussions with other Groups to secure the best outcome for the European Union," Watson stated. 

But, according to EUractiv:

EurActiv.com - No majority in Parliament for Barroso vote | EU - European Information on EU Elections 09

At an internal meeting held in Bristol on 23 and 24 June, the European Liberals decided to vote against holding the Barroso vote on 15 July, party sources said. It appeared that this was the minimal level of agreement that the group could reach, as in fact the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) is seriously divided between supporters and opponents of having the outgoing Commission president reappointed for another five years. 

The sources added that the French ALDE-affiliated MoDem, led by François Bayrou (six MEPs), and more importantly the German FDP, with its 12 MEPs, as well as some of the 11 British Liberal Democrats strongly oppose Barroso and do not want a vote on 15 July. 

Barroso's automatic re-appointment is looking less and less automatic.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
In the new EP, ALDE has 83 MEPs.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 08:43:39 AM EST
ALDE, the kingmaker or breaker.

In the Dutch press there are suggestions that the "European Parliament" is purposefully blocking Barroso to get some leverage, like last time with Butiglioni. However, your analysis shows it ain't that simple - it's all parceled up and divided over national political groups. Ain't that simple.

But it doesn't look too good for Barroso - as long as he's not comfirmed and left in the lurch, he won't be able to put together a reliable groundwork for the next period. Are people still happy with gridlock in the EU?

by Nomad on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 09:50:59 AM EST
the EP getting more power is not gridlock, but achance at getting more accountability and transparency from the EU processes, and in particular, to ensure that the Councils can't take any decision they want.

As to exercising their power with respect to the nomination of the European executive, I think there is no topic which is more legitimate.

So it's a good thing.

And note that ALDE is not a pivot on their own: there are coalitions that can happen without them, and any coalition iwht them will need at least 2 other groups, so they can't run the show that easily. And ALDE-Greens coalition might play that role, but that would be a slightly different animal...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 10:23:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The PM of Hungary, when 'explaining' his part in the unanimous European Council vote for Barroso, said that 'Europe needs decisiveness and action from the Commission in time of crisis'. Which was ridiculous, given Baroso's indecisiveness and habit of changing views back and forth after saying yes to everyone.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri Jun 26th, 2009 at 01:40:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Simply eliminating the aura of inevitability could do wonders to ensure that it becomes a serious contest.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 10:05:35 AM EST
That's a good point. Now would be a good time to ramp up the internet Stop Barroso campaign.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 10:06:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Do we have an alternative to rally around (and who could conceivably get a majority of the votes)? Dunno about the best strategy here, but if some other, more appealing, candidate were to start gaining momentum, at least Barroso's appointment wouldn't be a foregone conclusion...

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde
by NordicStorm (michael<-at->sturmbaum.net) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 10:48:47 AM EST
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jun 25th, 2009 at 11:24:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
EurActiv.com - Parliament set to delay Barroso vote | EU - European Information on EU Treaty & Institutions
The European Parliament will not hold a vote on José Manuel Barroso's re-appointment as Commission president at its July plenary, it emerged yesterday (1 July) after the liberals and socialists agreed to wait until the second Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty this autumn.

Guy Verhofstadt, the new leader of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), said his group will oppose holding a vote on Barroso's re-appointment during the Parliament's opening plenary session on 15 July (EurActiv 25/06/09).

The former Belgian prime minister, who was elected unopposed as ALDE leader on Tuesday, said he and his group will "not accept timetables imposed on Parliament," dealing a blow to the centre-right EPP group and the Swedish EU Presidency who were pushing for a quick decision on the new Commission President.

Earlier, the Greens group had announced that they would oppose a July vote on Barroso, joining calls made on 18 June by the socialists.

Unless positions change, it therefore appears that there will be no majority for putting a vote on the Parliament's agenda when the Assembly's political group leaders meet on 9 July to discuss the issue.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 at 10:42:40 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]