"Not a reliable operator"

by DoDo
Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 03:06:28 AM EST

This past week, Swedish energy giant Vattenfall and junior partner E.on was admonished by authorities in two EU countries for chronically bad safety management of nuclear plants.

First, two days ago, it was Swedish authorities, for the 70% Vattenfall, 30% E.ON Ringhals Nuclear Power Plant. After the failure of the operators to overcome deficiencies and a number of (relatively minor) incidents, the plant was placed under special supervision.

Yesterday, German politicians were shooting strong criticism at the same two companies, after the full extent of problems leading to the shutdown of the Krümmel nuclear plant became known. That plant was just re-started, after two years of retrofitting after the last major problems (the scandal of which I diaried).


On Ringhals, which supplies the area of Göteborg (Gothenburg), Deutsche Welle reports (via Fran in the Salon):

The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) has placed the Ringhals nuclear plant, in the southwest of the country, under special supervision after a series of incidents.

"The agency has on several occasions pointed out deficiencies that have been followed by measures from Ringhals, but the problems still remain," said Swedish Radiation Safety Authority official Leif Karlsson.

According to reports, the first incident occurred late in 2008 and involved the failure of an automatic safety system to switch on. The second, at the start of 2009, involved faulty control rods that are designed to regulate nuclear activity.

The nuclear watchdog also cited weaknesses in how officials at the nuclear plant carried out routines and how instructions were adhered to.

As for the Krümmel plant, near Hamburg, Die Zeit reports:

Der Krümmel-Reaktor war vergangenes Wochenende nur zwei Wochen nach Inbetriebnahme nach zweijähriger Pause durch einen Kurzschluss erneut lahmgelegt worden. Bei der Schnellabschaltung kam zudem heraus, dass ein Brennelement defekt war. Zudem war das Kühlsystem des Reaktorwasser-Reinigungssystems ausgefallen.Last weekend, only two weeks after [re]commissioning following a two year break, the Krümmel reactor was again paralyzed, by a short circuit. Additionally, during the rapid shutdown, it transspired that one fuel element was defective. Furthermore, the cooling system of the reactor water purification system failed.

Vattenfall fired a manager on Tuesday. Note again that all this happened after retrofitting following the severe troubles two years ago. In fact, the damaged fuel rod or rods (detected via increased radioactivity in the water) must have been there all this time, while the short circuit hit a transformer just like two years ago (and they fired a manager back then, too, one previously working on the Gorleben final storage project). To boot, information management was again less than perfect.

Vattenfall steht am Pranger, weil nicht das Unternehmen, sondern die Polizei die Kieler Aufsichtsbehörde zuerst über den Vorfall informiert hatte. Warum der verantwortliche Bereitschaftsleiter zu Hause war und erst nach einer halben Stunde auf der Kraftwerkswarte eintraf, blieb unklar. Die Vorschriften sehen vor, dass der Bereitschaftsleiter die Behörden über einen Vorfall informieren muss. Er wollte sich aber offenbar erst selbst ein Bild von der Lage machen, bevor er das für die Atomaufsicht zuständige Sozialministerium in Kiel informierte.Vattenfall is on the pillory because it wasn't the company, but the police who first informed the supervisory authority in Kiel about the incident. It remained unclear why the responsible readiness leader was at home and arrived at the power plant checkpoint only half an hour later. The rules stipulate that the readiness leader must inform authorities about an incident. However, apparently, he first wanted to get himself a picture of the situation before informing the Social Ministry in Kiel which is responsible for nuclear oversight.

As can be expected, criticism rained from leftist politicians (quotes from the Zeit article):

"Das Unternehmen ist offensichtlich nicht dazu in der Lage, diese Technologie zu beherrschen", sagte SPD- Fraktionsvize Ulrich Kelber dem Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger."The company is obviously not able to master this technology," SPD deputy faction leader Ulrich Kelber told the Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger.
..."Es gibt starke Indizien, dass Vattenfall und E.on keine zuverlässigen Betreiber von Atomkraftwerken sind", sagte [Grünen-Fraktionsvize Bärbel] Höhn der Passauer Neuen Presse. Einem Gastwirt wäre bei entsprechendem Fehlverhalten schon längst die Betriebslizenz entzogen worden.... "There are strong indicators that Vattenfall and E.on aren't reliable operators of nuclear power plants," [Greens deputy faction leader Bärbel] Höhn told the Passauer Neue Presse. An innkeeper would already had his operating license revoked for similar misconduct.
Auch Bundesumweltminister Sigmar Gabriel (SPD) hatte sich – am Rande eines Besuchs des Unglücksreaktors von Tschernobyl in der Ukraine am Donnerstag – besorgt gezeigt und gedroht, das Atomgesetz zu verschärfen. Die jüngsten Vorfälle in Krümmel zeigten, dass der Betreiber offensichtlich größere Probleme hat, sagte er. Es wäre angemessen, den Reaktor endgültig vom Netz zu nehmen.Federal Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel (SPD) - speaking during a visit to the disaster reactor at Chernobyl in the Ukraine on Thursday - showed concern, too, and threantened to strengthen the Atomic Energy Act. The newest incidents in Krümmel showed that the operator is apparentlsy having bigger problems, he said. It would be appropriate to disconnect the reactor from the network finally.
SPD-Kanzlerkandidat Frank-Walter Steinmeier ... Nach den früheren Pannen in dem Atommeiler sei die Bewährungsprobe offensichtlich nicht bestanden. "Es ist an der Zeit, dass das Atomkraftwerk Krümmel jetzt abgeschaltet wird." SPD Chancellor candidate Frank-Walter Steinmeier ... After the earlier failures in the nuclear reactor, the endurance test obviously failed. "It is now time to shut down the Krümmel nuclear plant."

(Language note: there was an untranslateable double meaning in Steinmeier's original. Bewährung also means 'probation'.)

This time, criticism also came from the CDU:

Hamburgs Bürgermeister Ole von Beust sagte der Hamburger Morgenpost, sein Vertrauen in die Stromversorgung durch Atomkraftwerke sei durch den Krümmel-Störfall "stark erschüttert".Hamburg mayor Ole von Beust told Hamburger Morgenpost that his confidence in power supply by nuclear power was "strongly shaken" by the Krümmel failure.

(Then again, he supported coal as alternative...)

...and one more criticism came from an illustrious person inside Vattenfall (quoted from the second link):

Selbst der konzerneigene Sicherheitsberater Hans Blix, ehemaliger Chef der Internationalen Atomenergiebehörde, rüffelt am Donnerstag Vattenfall wegen der Pannen in Krümmel. "Natürlich ist es nicht akzeptabel, dass die Behörden nicht sofort unterrichtet wurden."Even the company's own security adviser, Hans Blix, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, snubbed Vattenfall on Thursday on the issue of failures in Krümmel. "It is of course unacceptable that authorities weren't informed immediately."

:: :: :: :: ::

I don't know about Ringhals, but for fairness, Krümmel is definitely a bad apple in Germany. The local nuclear industry could have spared a lot of bad press by shutting it down two years ago...

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Could someone (or any other Swedish speaker...) translate the essence of the original Swedish press release (in the first link above fold)?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 04:57:55 AM EST
This is imperfect, but maybe helps:

Press Release: SRSA decides on special conditions for operation at Ringhals

The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority  (SRSA) has decided to submit Ringhals AB to specific diverse investigative measures and conditions for the operation of the reactors at Ringhals 1-4. The Authority and its predecessors have since 2005 raised deficiencies that can be linked to the safety culture at the nuclear power. But, problems remain despite actions implemented by Ringhals.

 SRSA and its predecessor the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate highlighted a series of failures of supervision at the nuclear plant since 2005. These are weaknesses in terms of command and control, traceability of internal decisions and compliance with procedures and instructions.

- The Authority has repeatedly pointed out deficiencies followed by efforts from Ringhals. Yet they have not come to grips with their problems, "says Leif Karlsson, Acting Head of Department for Nuclear Safety at SRSA.

Under the authority's decision should Ringhals investigate and report why the practice is not complied with, and why past and current actions not intended results. Ringhals is also preparing a new action to correct these identified recurring deficiencies.

Moreover, the decision on the specific conditions that Ringhals must recognize internal decision on the restart before any of the reactors become operational after withdrawals.

compiling and presenting the conclusions and actions following internal audits.

compiling and presenting the conclusions and actions resulting from investigations of the relationships in human-technology-organization.(??)

preparation and presentation of the management of temporary instructions.

SRSA do not believe that the identified shortcomings prevent continued operation of the reactors. However the Authority considers that safety is not given the weight which is necessary in all parts of the organization. This could ultimately jeopardize the reactor safety.

In another decision the SRSA gives approval to take Ringhals reactor Ringhals 1 into trial after a completed modernization program. The biggest changes are the modernization of the reactor protection system and strengthening the function of the residual effect of cooling.

In addition, SRSA examined the application for the restarting of the Ringhals 1 in the light of revealed deficiencies which parts of the reactor's automatic safety feature were not activated during operation. The Authority decides in this case to accept a restart because Ringhals done the investigation and taken the measures necessary for the reactor to be operational in a safe manner.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 06:16:44 AM EST
It is a good enough translation.

It should be noted that this critcism of the safety culture comes directly after the special supervision at Forsmark has been lifted. That supervision was in turn started after the 2006 incident at Forsmark which was connected to (at least according to whistle-blowers) a lax security culture.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 08:58:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Pardon my ignorance, but I am unclear whether the issue is that two reactors of the same design have gotten into trouble, or that the two companies managing both are proving to be incompetent/not up to the job.  Are these reactors similar in design to others managed by other companies without problems?

notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 07:17:58 AM EST
It's not the design but the management of the plants that is in discussion -- though, in case of sustained management failure, the question of manageability does come up. However, there is indeed type similarity, too: one of the four blocks of Ringhals is, just like the single block of Krümmel, a boiling water reactor (BWR) -- not the oldest, but not the newest design either (the Ringhals BWR is from 1976, Krümmel is from 1984).

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 08:27:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Related news from the shining spot of nuclear power in our misguided world, EdF to raise prices.


He said that "electricity in France is 30-40 percent cheaper than in other European countries," and that in the last 25 years the rise of electricity prices in France had never been greater than inflation.

EDF needed to catch up, therefore. "We cannot increase directly investment in France as we are doing if we don't also increase sales revenues."

EDF had to catch up on prices so that "EDF's success can be secured" otherwise "in ten years' time all of the success of the nuclear industry will be behind us."

And scrolling down the same page we find there may be serious problems with some fuel rods at Kruemmel.


All 80,000 fuel rods at the plant near Hamburg will be examined from Friday because "it looks as if one or several of the rods in the reactor is defective," said Ernst Michael Zuefle, head of operator Vattenfall's nuclear arm.

Kruemmel, one of the oldest of Germany's 17 nuclear power stations, suffered an emergency shutdown on Saturday after a short circuit in one of its transformers and Vattenfall expects it to be offline for at least nine months. It was the second such incident in several days at the plant, which had only re-opened around a week earlier after two years of repairs following a failure in a transformer that had caused a fire and a shutdown.

Tuomo Hatakka, head of Vattenfall Europe, said the problems at Kruemmel, which has been operating for over 25 years, "posed no risk to the population."

"The safety systems worked at Kruemmel and there is no reason to question them," he told a news conference in Berlin.



Skennah Kowa
by Crazy Horse on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 08:19:26 AM EST
too dangerous to fail...

i'm shocked they tried to keep in hushed up, (SOP).

dishonest and inefficient, stupid, stupid, stupid.

hubris incarnate

If'Madness is the absence of work'(Foucault), then Sanity is the presence of play..

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 09:03:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
He said that "electricity in France is 30-40 percent cheaper than in other European countries," and that in the last 25 years the rise of electricity prices in France had never been greater than inflation.

And this is a bad thing? LOL.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 06:26:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
EDF needed to catch up, therefore. "We cannot increase directly investment in France as we are doing if we don't also increase sales revenues."

Q1: How come EdF became such a succesful company with such terminally low prices?
A: Got loans at soveriegn rates.

Q2: Why does EdF need to raise prices?
A: Need cash to increase investment.

Q3: Why not just loan money at sovereign rates instead of raising prices, given that last time that was done EdF became the biggest company in Europe with prices 30-40 % lower than their competitors?
A: <head explodes>

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 06:30:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But sovereign credit distorts competition! Don't you realise that by cutting out the City of London failing to pursue a competitive, market-based strategy for energy security, you'd jeopardise the jobs of certain well-connected hedge fund managers Europe's prospects for economic growth in the long term?

- Jake

Tory Bliar for president prison!

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 07:11:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is getting entirely too easy and obvious, isn't it?
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 07:40:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank Jerome and Migeru for opening our eyes...

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 11:45:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As the FysikRevyTM says: Cheap points are also points.

- Jake

Tory Bliar for president prison!

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 02:14:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The control rod issue mentioned should not be blamed on Vattenfall, but on the manufacturer, Westinghouse. They have delivered faulty control rods to other Swedish nuclear power stations.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri Jul 10th, 2009 at 06:25:56 PM EST
May well be the case that the original fault is born by Westinghouse, but the responsibility for managing that over the decades lies with Vattenfall.  Particularly known faults.

replacement parts are part of the normal operating budget, unless you're bound by, say, maximizing profit.  in this instance failure endangers the entire society.  we see the same story with older plants over and over, and there's always a management failure attached.

Skennah Kowa

by Crazy Horse on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 10:45:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Control rods do not last for decades but for 5 years IIRC. These showed cracks after a much shorter time, and hence they were replaced. I don't see any shadow fall on Vattenfall.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 11:47:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
SHould the operator not check what it installs?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 11:51:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's what it did! Control rods are regularly checked. Mostly they work just as they're supposed to. But it seems Westinghouse made a faulty batch some years ago and hence these stories have been popping up during the last year.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 11:53:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I did some searching. It seems DW messed up the dates of the two incidents, the automatic shutdown system failure was this year. Even so, I couldn't track down any details on the control rod issue. I only found that there was a check on the control rods in three nuclear plants, including Ringhals, from October 2008, when the first one with cracks was discovered in Oskarshamn. But articles I found mentioned further faulty rod findings only in the other two, Forsmark and Oskarshamn.

So, if the admonishing of Ringhals has something to do with this, they must have been worse in something compared to the other two plants.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 02:45:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now we know that the oversight authority demanded the installation of a monitoring sensor in the transformer that caused both failures (the one last week and the one two years ago), but Vattenfall failed to install them. They couldn't yet tell why.

:: :: :: :: ::

Germany will have elections this autumn.

In Germany's federal governing Grand Coalition, the mainstream within the center-right CDU/CSU parties (who lead polls) was and is friendly to both developing and operating companies in the nuclear industry, and wants to bring back a future for nuclear through the back door - and not the election campaign.

Within the Social Democrats (SPD, which is rather down in the polls), there is great unison between the Coal, Gas and Renewables party wings (</snark>) against nuclear. After Krümmel, it seems they think clubbing the CDU with the nuclear issue with a popular demand (72% want the immediate closure of the oldest plants) can be a suitable last-ditch effort.

So, in the last two days, the talk of closing Krümmel became a concrete demand on the SPD's part, and they are blasting the CDU for resisiting. Including party boss Franz Müntefering ("Shut that thing down at last!") and chancellor candidate Steinmeier ("I really don't get why the CDU/CSU ... make themselves the mouthpiece of the nuclear lobby to this extent").

Meanwhile, the local leaders of the CDU are following the Merkel Tactic (from when Merkel was Kohl's federal environment minister and had to manage the scandal of contaminated nuclear waste containers): they are scolding the operator (Vattenfall) publicly, threantening consequences (taking away Vattenfall's operating license).

Hessen PM Roland Koch, strongly pro-nuclear, said that "the stupidity of the companies in communication is barely describable anymore". Then he followed it up with a really interesting variation on the default CDU position (demanding extended running times for existing plants): he demanded unlimited running times for safe plants [ = drop Krümmel to save the rest], and said that this has to be done until renewables can take over fully "by the middle of this century".

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 12:28:56 PM EST
Brilliant summary of the situation and issues regarding nuclear power in Germany.  Also nice to know Roland Koch is so well versed in the state of renewables as to predict they'll be ready in 40 years.

Skennah Kowa
by Crazy Horse on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 02:58:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Are you alluding to Baden-Württenberg PM Oettinger's criticism of Steinmeier for opining on stuff he lacks expertise in? :-)

But, Koch's change of rhetoric is not to be underestimated: it's the first time I hear a CDU figure talk of 100% renewables! It's as if he said, "OK, Ypsilanti and Scheer were right in saying 100% renewables is possible, but not in 10-15 but 40 years".

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 03:06:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hadn't realized your take on Koch.  Hard to say whether it's a positive step or not, as the effect over the next few years to a decade would be the same.  The job has to be done now, with no competing distractions.

Skennah Kowa
by Crazy Horse on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 03:11:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hard to say whether it's a positive step or not

Well, it's a change of rhetoric - it signals a weakened position, and could be used against him in the future. Sadly, if CDU+FDP will reign come October, the job won't be done now...

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Sat Jul 11th, 2009 at 04:06:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Within the Social Democrats (SPD, which is rather down in the polls), there is great unison between the Coal, Gas and Renewables party wings (</snark>) against nuclear. After Krümmel, it seems they think clubbing the CDU with the nuclear issue with a popular demand (72% want the immediate closure of the oldest plants) can be a suitable last-ditch effort.

It's fascinating how different the popular opinions about nuclear are in nations like Sweden and Germany which otherwise have so much in common.

In Germany it's still a very hot potato, while in Sweden it's a wedege issue for the right, which repeatedly bashes the left with it, as the leftist elite (and for a long time also the bourgeoise elite) are strong opponents, while the general population is the most pro-nuclear in the entire world!

If I speculate this might have something to do with us not having any coal/gas special interests, and renewables means either biomass heat or hydro, the latter which is dominated by big players with massive nuclear assets (Vattenfall, E.On and Fortum).

I also think it's related to our extremely exhaustive 40 year debate on nuclear. This huge exposure means the public has had to learn the basic technical issues and with that the fear of the "unknown" and spooky "radiation" has receded.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sun Jul 12th, 2009 at 12:46:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I doubt that the swedish population is the most pro-nuclear in the world. And if it is it is interesting that the most pro-nuclear population in the world has (iirc) ~40% "keep current plants" / ~30% "build more plants" / ~20% "close down current plants". That is there is no majority for building more or closing any down.

I would say that also reflects the reason the question is looked at "keep current plants", in addition to the question in the 80ies breaking up the swedish bloc system and making majority governments impossible for a while.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 07:19:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]