European Salon de News, Discussion et Klatsch - 17 July

by Fran
Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 02:00:40 PM EST

 A Daily Review Of International Online Media 


Europeans on this date in history:

1821 – Pauline Viardot, a nineteenth century French mezzo-soprano and composer of Spanish descent, was born. (d. 1910)

More here and video

 The European Salon is a daily selection of news items to which you are invited to contribute. Post links to news stories that interest you, or just your comments. Come in and join us!


The Salon has different rooms or sections for your enjoyment. If you would like to join the discussion, then to add a link or comment to a topic or section, please click on "Reply to this" in one of the following sections:

I hope you will find this place inspiring - of course meaning the inspiration gained here to show up in interesting diaries on ET. :-)

There is just one favor I would like to ask you - please do NOT click on "Post a Comment", as this will put the link or your comment out of context at the bottom of the page.

Actually, there is another favor I would like to ask you - please, enjoy yourself and have fun at this place!

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
 EUROPE 

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:38:09 PM EST
Central Europe's leaders ask Barack Obama to take strong line with Russia - Telegraph
A group of Central and Eastern Europe's most influential political figures have written an open letter to US President Barack Obama warning him of 'Russia's increasing intimidation' in their region and calling for the US to take a strong line.

The letter, signed by 22 former leaders, including Lech Walesa and Vaclav Havel, expressed deep concern over what it alleged as America's declining interest in a part of the world exhibiting "growing signs of nervousness" owing to Russian foreign policy.

"Russia uses overt and covert means of economic warfare, ranging from energy blockades and politically motivated investments to bribery and media manipulation in order to advance its interests and to challenge the trans-Atlantic orientation of Central and Eastern Europe," the letter claimed.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:50:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Guys, guys, it's over. The soviet Union is no more. Stop beating up on it.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:57:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Russia is still there, and the same people still live in it.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:26:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
[Starvid's Rysskräck Technology™]

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:47:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Iceland's parliament approves EU membership bid | Europe | Deutsche Welle | 16.07.2009
After a lengthy debate parliamentarians in Iceland have paved the way for accession talks with the European Union. Iceland's government plans to launch its EU membership bid in Brussels before the end of this month.  

The Icelandic parliament, the Althingi, gave the green light for the government to bid for membership in the European Union, with 33 of the nation's 63 parliamentarians voting in favor of the proposal. 

A total of 32 votes were required to pass the proposal, but opposition to the move was limited to 28 lawmakers, while another two abstained.

Thursday's narrow victory came as a relief to crisis-stricken Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir, who hopes to stabilize Iceland's economy by joining the 27-member bloc.

In the end, however, it will be the citizens of Iceland who will have the final word on whether the government pursues membership. If and when Iceland completes successful accession negotiations with the European Union, the question will then be put to the people in a referendum.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:50:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Fish first. Then we talk :-))

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:57:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
EUobserver / New committee chairs set to create bruising encounters

EUOBSERVER / STRASBOURG - The election of two sectoral champions to the European parliament's industry and environment committees on Thursday (16 July) has set the stage for five years or bruising encounters between the two bodies.

Controversial German MEP Herbert Reul from the centre-right European Peoples Party was elected chairman of the powerful industry, research and energy committee while former environmentalist Jo Leinen, an MEP from the Socialists and Democrats group, takes over the helm of the legislature's environment committee.

Over half of the committee chairpersons were decided on Thursday, with the rest to follow on Monday

Before the vote, a number of industry committee members expressed concern that the proposed chairman held overly close links with the business world, with the Liberal delegation saying "transparency must be the watchword."

In previous parliament negotiations on the car emissions law and on opening up the energy market in the EU, Mr Reul was accused of handing in amendments that came directly from industry.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:51:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
France 24 | France to spend 1 billion Euros on A H1N1 vaccine | France 24
France's health minister Roselyne Bachelot has anounced that the Government will spend one billion euros on ninety-four million doses of the vaccine to combat the influenza A H1N1 virus.

The H1N1 virus has caused the deaths of more than 400 people worldwide and the number of cases is nearing one hundred thousand.


In France, the government has announced a mass programme of vaccinations - 94 million doses of the vaccine to the tune of one billion euros. It also has an option on 44 million doses more.


France's Health Minister, Roselyne Bachelot, says it is money well spent: "You've got to look at the loss to the economy in terms of time off work and sick leave. There are statistics showing that a flu epidemic could cost billions in lost earnnig.
Investing in health is always a good investment."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:51:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
France has a population of 65 million.  The quantity they've ordered is fascinating to me.  
by paving on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:03:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the whole French speaking world ? Do the Quebecois not get covered by canada ?

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:59:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not just France
The presentation says existing government orders for H1N1 vaccines total 850 million to 900 million doses. On average, governments have ordered one dose per person, but most have options for, or are considering ordering, two doses per person, which would increase total orders to about 1.8 billion doses.
Anybody know why?
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:18:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suspect they're being very cunning and will trade vaccine to buy influence. It's good politics.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 04:40:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Bachelot was a pharmacist before going into politics.

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 11:58:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Opinion: Europe Has No Exit Strategy in the Balkans - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International

The Balkan states of Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina are artificial constructs that are dependent on international organizations to function. Unlike in Iraq, there is no end in sight for this foreign rule and Europe seems to have little in the way of an exit strategy.

There is probably no one who knows his way around the Balkans , that unloved stepchild of Europe, better than Valentin Inzko. He has family roots in Slovenia, and he speaks Russian, Serbo-Croatian and Czech. Even for an Austrian career diplomat, this is unusual. Inzko, 60, is a walking encyclopedia on the history and contemporary affairs of these countries, all of which are now clamoring to be accepted into the European Union.

 Spanish soldiers, members of the EU peacekeeping mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina. The international community has sent Inzko to Bosnia-Herzegovina, armed with two grand titles: High Representative of the United Nations and EU Special Envoy. This sounds impressive and, in fact, Inzko has considerable standing in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo, where he is a proconsul of sorts, with the power to unseat ministers and other members of the local elite.

FROM THE MAGAZINE Find out how you can reprint this DER SPIEGEL article in your publication. Today, Bosnia-Herzegovina is a country that resembles what Iraq was until recently. A horrible war claimed about 100,000 lives and left behind deep wounds, in a country that is now occupied and that is weighed down by deep ethnic and religious conflicts. While regulating Bosnia-Herzegovina's affairs, Inzko and his six predecessors have dismissed an astonishing 600 officials, including two presidents -- presumably a world record.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:54:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Interview with Abkhazian President Sergei Bagapsh: 'We Won't Beg for Diplomatic Recognition' - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International

Once a popular holiday getaway for the communist elite, tiny Abkhazia is now a de-facto republic at odds with most of the world. President Sergei Bagapsh spoke with SPIEGEL ONLINE about his nation's plans, friends and foes -- and prime real estate.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Other than Russia, your neighboring Black Sea states do not recognize Abkhazia as a nation. Are you isolated?

 Dreams of Independence: Abkhazian President Sergei Bagapsh. Sergei Bagapsch: We are a small country with around 242,000 inhabitants. At the moment, our connections with Russia suffice to allow us to develop our economy. Of course, we would be happy if Europe was more open toward us. But I think that's just a question of time. At the moment, we are trying to develop economic relationships with Iran, Jordan, Turkey and Belarus. We won't beg for diplomatic recognition.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Up until now, only Russia and Nicaragua have recognized your republic. Did that change anything for the Abkhazian people?

Bagapsch: The most important thing is that our people now know they can have normal lives. We know that it takes time to build an independent state. And we want a state based on a constitution and founded on the norms of international law. That requires new laws and a new way of thinking.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:58:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
France 24 | Chechen president behind activist's murder, rights group claims | France 24
Russian human rights watchdog Memorial has accused Chechnya's Moscow-backed President Ramzam Kadyrov of being responsible for the death of a leading human rights activist investigating abuses in the former Soviet republic.

A leading Russian human rights group has accused Chechnya's strongman president of being responsible for the killing of a prominent human rights activist.  

Memorial's Natalia Estemirova was abducted in Chechnya's capital Grozny on Wednesday. Her bullet-riddled body was found in neighbouring Ingushetia hours later.
 

Estemirova had been gathering evidence of an alleged campaign of house burnings as collective punishment by government-backed Chechen militias.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:59:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There is actually some thoughtful commentary over at Sean's Russia Blog.

Some snippets:

There is currently a power struggle going on in Ingushetia triggered by the attempted murder of the republic's president last month and the murders of several of the republic's officials. (Actually, the murders may be part of the power struggle.) Many people are agitating for the return of the previous president, which has been blocked by UR and Kadyrov.

Simultaneously, there is a power struggle going on between forces in Chechnya and forces in Ingushetia. The Chechen government wants to reunite with Ingushetia. Presumably, given the demographics of the region, this would make Chechens (specifically, Kadyrov) the dominant force in the reconstituted republic. The Ingush do not want to reunite, for obvious reasons. This amid accusations that people are attempting to set the vainnakh against each other.

This is the background against which the murder takes place. A murder which, oddly, involved a suspicious Chechnya-Ingushetia border crossing.

The assumption is that, because Kadyrov didn't want her snooping around, he must have decided to murder her rather than let her escape with whatever evidence of human rights abuses she found or might have found. But what could be worse PR than having a Memorial activist murdered in your backyard? This has attracted far more negative press coverage that any `new' revelations about the already well publicized detention and interrogation camps in Chechnya.

In lieu of any real evidence, I'm inclined to think that "they kill whomever speaks the truth" remains a bit of an exaggeration, even in an age when государственны&# 1081; террор is knocking on the door..

I don't buy into the Kadyrov as culprit for Estemirova for many of the reasons Chris has stated. Key among them is Russia's weak central government, and if you follow what is going on in Chechnya-Ingushetia, there are all sorts of nefarious individuals who would have an interest in taking out a human rights activist. I'm not saying that I agree with the provocation theory (that is just to make Kadyrov look bad), but at the same time, I wouldn't discount the murder being part of a larger power struggle. Kadyrov is merely a symptom of a larger disease in the region.

Even though all signs point to Kadyrov, I can't be sure that I buy the theory that it was his direct order. He was running a healthy little theifdom with few problems from Moscow, and now I am sure he isn't too happy with some new pressures that are coming.

It seems like the stories about Putin getting edged out of influence may have some merit. There is nobody of significance running policy in the Caucasus right now, and in this vacuum, parties likely related to Kadyrov took advantage.

Without going into a "who's who" of the Russia-watcher-sphere, I think it's worth pointing out that these comments are from quite different political corners.

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.

by poemless on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:07:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Italy - The wrong way round
The sale of pardons is a fine old tradition in Italy, but Finance Minister Tremonti is on record as having said he will not countenance any further condoni, as they are known, since they undermine respect for the law. This is a worthy stand to take, and it is a pity that he has been over-ruled. The government is now proposing a pardon on a larger scale than anything yet. Hidden inside a draft law whose ostensible purpose is to raise money to help earthquake victims is a proposal that essentially puts the Italian state into the money-laundering business, and at a very competitive price. It allows any business or individual to bring into Italy funds previously held outside, with no questions asked and guaranteed impunity, whatever the crime - drug-smuggling, arms-dealing, people-trafficking, whatever - that may have given rise to those hidden funds. What is more, although the law specifies funds brought in from outside, there can be no proof that the money being declared is not simply funds that accrued within Italy, but was never declared to the tax authorities. So it is in effect a pardon for all tax avoiders, and at a cut-price rate. Normally one would expect to pay a money-launderer something like 40% for the service of exchanging "dirty" money for "clean" money. But the proposed law seems likely to charge a much smaller percentage - a previous such law passed by Mr Tremonti in 2002 charged only 2.5% of the funds declared. Coming so soon after the disclosure of the negotiations between the Mafia and Berlusconi in 1994, in which they pledged their support and asked for his (see post on July 10th), it seems a little rash to bring in a law that so clearly serves the interests of the less law-abiding sections of Italian society.


If'Madness is the absence of work'(Foucault), then Sanity is the presence of play..
by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:20:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
 SPECIAL FOCUS 
 Stop Blair! 

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:38:46 PM EST
European Tribune - Keep On Stopping Blair!
The "Blair for EU President" drum is being banged again. Whether this is part of some jockeying strategy designed to increase the UK's bargaining power on other matters or not, it seems that it's time to speak out again:
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:43:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
European Tribune - Press Contact List: Your Help Needed
In the relaunch of the Stop Blair! campaign, ThatBritGuy suggests putting out a press release.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:43:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hat tip to Melanchton who posted the cartoon in the OT. But it is to good as not to post it here again. :-)
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:44:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
EUobserver / London publicly supports Blair for EU president post

Tony Blair would have London's full backing for the new post of EU president, UK's Europe minister confirmed, suggesting the well-known British ex-leader would be respected and "generally welcomed."

The British Labour leader has been mentioned as a possible candidate for the title since it first appeared in the European Constitution, which was later transformed into the Lisbon treaty.

Is he heading back from the Middle East to Europe?

But this is the first time that London's position has been publicly announced by a government minister.

"The UK government is supporting Tony Blair's candidature for president of the Council [of EU governments]," Lady Kinnock, Britain's Europe minister, told journalists in Strasbourg on Wednesday (15 July).

She argued that Mr Blair had the "strength of character" and "status" to take on the job, adding: "People know who he is, and he could step into this new role with a lot of respect and he would be generally welcomed."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:47:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Blair Faces a Battle for the E.U. Presidency - NYTimes.com

STRASBOURG -- His interest in the job was one of the worst-kept secrets in British politics. But on Wednesday Britain's former prime minister, Tony Blair, was finally named as a candidate for a new presidential post in the European Union.

In apparently unscripted comments, the European Minister for Britain, Glenys Kinnock, made it clear that Mr. Blair wanted the position and had the blessing of the British government.

"The U.K. government is supporting Tony Blair's candidature," Ms. Kinnock said. "I am sure they would not do it without asking him."

Designed to raise the E.U.'s profile globally, the presidential post is seen by some as the answer the Henry Kissinger's question: "Who do I call if I want to talk to Europe?"

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:52:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, well, as a mass murderer, Henry would feel very comfortable talking to Tony.

However, just like the palestinians at the moment when they want to talk to their "peace" envoy, he'd probably find his call diverted to some obscure Mid West neocon outpost where tony would be on his permanent money-grubbing lecture tour.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:27:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Brown formally backs Blair as candidate for 'President of Europe' - Europe, World - The Independent
Post will be created as early as January once the Treaty of Lisbon is ratified

Tony Blair won the formal backing of Gordon Brown yesterday as Britain's candidate to become the first "President of Europe".

Downing Street endorsed Baroness (Glenys) Kinnock, the Europe minister, who said in Strasbourg: "The UK Government is supporting Tony Blair's candidature for President of the [European] Council." Asked if the prospect had been discussed with Mr Blair, she said: "It is the Government's position. I am sure they would not do that without asking him." Mr Brown's spokesman said: "What the Prime Minister supports is Tony Blair's candidature for the President of the European Council if Tony Blair decides that that is what he would like to do and as and when such a position exists."

The post would be created, possibly as early as next January, if the Lisbon Treaty is ratified. The biggest remaining hurdle is a second referendum in Ireland in October, but opinion polls suggest people will vote Yes this time.

Allies of Mr Blair said he was not campaigning actively for the job but would be interested if it involved being a figurehead representing the European Union on the world stage. "He doesn't want to spend his time chairing meetings of EU leaders," one said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:54:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why President Blair is perfect for the EU | Mail Online

Now we've heard it all. The lying warmonger who has done more than anyone to corrupt our public life is the Government's official choice to be the first president of the European Union.

Never mind that the post won't exist unless all 27 member states ratify the Lisbon treaty - and that remains in doubt while the Czech president hesitates and Ireland awaits its second referendum.

Such procedural and democratic niceties don't matter to the panjandrums of New Labour, to whom looking after a crony has always come first.

No. First they deny us our own referendum on Lisbon's EU constitution, in flagrant breach of an unequivocal election pledge. Now they decide in their bunker, consulting only each other, that the nation's official candidate is to be none other than Tony Blair.

Curious, I left a comment this afternoon with a link to the Petition, but so far there is not one comment.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:57:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Any president of Europe is an affront to Britain as a sovereign, self governing nation | Mail Online

Getting into the stride of her new job as Europe Minister, Baroness Kinnock has declared her support for Tony Blair to become President of the European Union.

The Blairs and the Kinnocks seem to regard the EU as a mechanism for awarding each other highly paid jobs at the taxpayer's expense.

As Labour leader in 1995 Blair nominated Glenys's husband Neil to be an EU Commissioner - tet as young politicians Blair and Kinnock advocated Britain's withdrawal from the EU. No wonder they have changed their minds with first class seats on the gravy train.

Representing the people: Tony Blair outside Jerusalem in his role as International Mideast envoy. He could become the first president of Europe

Lord Mandelson was a courtier to Kinnock and then Blair. Mandy still seems to have enough clout with the Blairites to avert coup attempts against Gordon Brown (although a dismal defeat for Labour in next week's Norwich North by-election might revive that question.)

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:57:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 ECONOMY & FINANCE 

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:39:34 PM EST
EUobserver / EIB loans flow through tax havens, say NGOs

Despite harsh words and threats of tough sanctions against tax dodgers, EU-funded development projects in the third world are run by companies registered in tax havens. This costs developing countries millions in much needed tax revenues and leads to capital flight and lack of transparency, a study by bank-monitoring NGOs says.

The EU wants to clamp down on tax dodgers, but the union's development monies end up in the pockets of dodgiest ones, say NGOs

The study, "Flying in the face of development- How European Investment Bank loans enable tax havens", released on Wednesday (15 July), says projects and beneficiaries funded by the European Investment Bank (EIB), the EU's house bank, involve tax havens, and multinational companies that use them for tax purposes.

According to the group "Counter Balance", composed of seven European NGOs that track the EIB's activities, the bank is particularly unconvincing when handing out so-called global loans - loans provided on trust to Europe's biggest banks, the largest users of tax havens.

"The EIB does not have much overview of what they [the banks] then do with the money, and several of the banks have earlier been in the spotlight for conducting business through tax havens," Marta Ruiz, a policy officer from the European Network for Debt and Development (EURODAD) and author of the study, told this website.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:48:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Bank should publish pay and bonuses of all top earners, Walker Report recommends - Telegraph
Sir David Walker's recommendations that British banks should publish the pay and bonuses of all their top earners, not just board members, has been welcomed by the Gordon Brown.

His far-reaching review on corporate governance in the British financial sector, which was commissioned by the Prime Minister in February, recommends a public and regulatory scrutiny of pay practices across financial institutions in order to curb the excesses that brought the financial system to close to collapse.

The Prime Minister told MPs on the House of Commons Liaison Committe that he welcomed Sir David's call for tougher non-executive directors to crack down on boardroom excesses.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:50:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
France 24 | Official data shows French consumer prices fell in June | France 24
French consumer prices fell by 0.5 percent in June, according to official data released Thursday. This marks a deflationary step for the second month running, but shows a monthly rise of 0.1 percent for the past year.

AFP - French consumer prices over 12 months fell by 0.5 percent in June, official data showed on Thursday, marking a deflationary step for the second month running but showing a monthly rise of 0.1 percent.
  
In May, prices over 12 months had shown a fall, of 0.3 percent, for the first time since 1957, owing mainy to a fall in the price of oil from a high point in the middle of 2008.
  
An extended period of falling prices amounts to deflation, a serious threat to an economy since it can set in hand a vicious spiral of falling demand, falling investment and employment, and a further fall in prices.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 02:00:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Wall Street Journal Goes After Goldman and the Bank Bailout

Arianna is happy to pound her favorite "beyond left and right" drum here, somewhat unconvincingly contrasting the GS coverage of Murdoch's WSJ with that of AP's business writer Stephen Bernard, who gushed about GS's "stunning" profit report and called the company "the king of post-meltdown Wall Street."  Kinda hard to see AP as out of the MSM consensus, but it is good to see the WSJ lambasting GS, though I doubt they would be taking so critical a line were Paulson now doing the same under a McCain administration.

Yesterday's opinion section of the Wall Street Journal offered convincing proof that those who want a progressive financial policy and those who simply want to save capitalism are in agreement about the madness of the administration's Wall Street policies.

There, on the editorial page of the capitalist Bible, was a piece taking repeated shots at Wall Street darling Goldman Sachs. And, over on the opposite page, a two-fisted op-ed by former hedge-fund manager Andy Kessler in which he labels the government bailout of Wall Street "a dumb move" and "a bust."

-Skip-

Let's start with the editorial, "A Tale of Two Bailouts," which decries the fact that, thanks to the policies of Tim Geithner and Larry Summers, Goldman "enjoys the best of both worlds: outsize profits for its traders and shareholders and a taxpayer backstop should anything go wrong."

The piece is spiked with disdainful references to "the Goldmans of the world" and "the likes of Goldman, which apparently needs no help printing money," and takes issue with the way "we changed when we stepped in to save certain banks in the name of saving the system." It also dubs Goldman "Goldie Mac," saying: "Goldman will surely deny that its risk taking is subsidized by the taxpayer -- but then so did Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, right up to the bitter end."

But then an effective response would take a lot more than "agreement" between "those who want a progressive financial policy and those who simply want to save capitalism."  It would take more like a broad but resolute coalition of everyone but GS to break the grip GS seems to have on US regulatory policy towards Wall Street, and even that would be a very long shot, absent dramatic new developments.  

Arianna may be grasping at straws, but then, at this point, aren't all who want to see real change?

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:38:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
following Taibbi:

Op-Ed Columnist - The Joy of Sachs - NYTimes.com

... Goldman's role in the financialization of America was similar to that of other players, except for one thing: Goldman didn't believe its own hype. Other banks invested heavily in the same toxic waste they were selling to the public at large. Goldman, famously, made a lot of money selling securities backed by subprime mortgages -- then made a lot more money by selling mortgage-backed securities short, just before their value crashed. All of this was perfectly legal, but the net effect was that Goldman made profits by playing the rest of us for suckers.

And Wall Streeters have every incentive to keep playing that kind of game. <...>

This time, new regulations are still in the drawing-board stage -- and the finance lobby is already fighting against even the most basic protections for consumers.

If these lobbying efforts succeed, we'll have set the stage for an even bigger financial disaster a few years down the road. The next crisis could look something like the savings-and-loan mess of the 1980s, in which deregulated banks gambled with, or in some cases stole, taxpayers' money -- except that it would involve the financial industry as a whole.

The bottom line is that Goldman's blowout quarter is good news for Goldman and the people who work there. It's good news for financial superstars in general, whose paychecks are rapidly climbing back to precrisis levels. But it's bad news for almost everyone else.



Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.
by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 02:04:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But they now have the wherwithal to buy all of the legislators they need to ensure regulation never happens. And Paulson gave them the means to do it.

And Obama is too right wing to believe anything radical needs to be done unless he's dragged kicking and screaming to that point.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 04:44:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 02:07:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd be amazed if it is not a spoof.  It is like a movie confession that the villain is tricked into.  But very "truthy".

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:28:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Scapegoating is an obstacle to meaningful reform.

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 02:27:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If Goldman could be taken down it would be like removing the stopper.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:29:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
San Francisco Bay Area home sales up 20% in June

Median sales price is down year-over-year but has more than doubled since bottoming out in March.

San Francisco Bay Area home sales were up 20% in June over the same month last year, while the median sales price was down 27%, MDA DataQuick reported Thursday.

The median price for the Bay Area was $352,000, down from $485,000 in June 2008 and 47% below the peak median of $665,000, reached in June 2007. Last month's median was up 3% from May's, however. The Bay Area's median appears to have hit its floor in March at $290,000.

As in Southern California, the rising Bay Area median reflects the changing mix of homes sold. The market is being driven less by low-priced foreclosures, and higher-end sellers are coming down in price, which is attracting buyers. So the median rises due to sales of more expensive homes, but those homes are moving because they are dropping in price.

Foreclosed homes accounted for 37% of Bay Area sales, down from a peak of 52% in February.



If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 12:02:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Almost certainly driven by foreclosure sales, individual's buying income properties and a back-log of first-time buyers (taking advantage of good programs to assist them).  My mortgage lender friend says that she's busy but they are all of this type, eg unsustainable.
by paving on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 02:45:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Washington's Dilemma: This Isn't a Recession, It's a Collapse   Gregor Macdonald,  Seeking Alpha

Washington is bluffing that it will not bail out California, and every other state suffering from collapsed revenues and massive job losses. If cuts in police and schools don't force DC off from its current position, then the math will. Because in many states the aggregate revenue losses and looming cuts to state payrolls will largely render the intended effects of federal stimulus as moot. Frankly, unless Washington prints money and bails out every state that needs capital, including California, federal power will decline amidst this severe economic recession, and the process of a soft American devolution will begin. If you think this idea is outrageous, then you've still not come to terms with a core reality of our current situation: the structure of this financial crisis is wholly different than any in our post-war era. This isn't a recession. This is collapse.

-Skip-

The internal composition of the US economic and financial system when it hit 2007/8 was very different than in previous recessions, even the severe recession of 1980/82. It's this internal composition that's now determinative, to the outcome. The sawdust of debt, and the monetization of assets rather than the production of goods, continually came to define the internal composition of the system. The economy cannot, therefore, express the same kind of resilience it has done so often, since WW2.

This is the core problem of this collapse and why the prospect for recovery is dim. Americans can't actually rebuild the savings that the banking system needs to escape from the current mess. Individually, Americans are trapped by debt and cannot spend. In The Seigniorage Curse, I explain that one of the primary mechanisms for the hollowing out of the American economy over many years was the dollar advantage, which at first was earned. And then, came to be un-earned. By the time the US reached the 21st century, our primary manufactured product was debt, and dollars. Is it any wonder that once that system collapsed, that we quickly gave up 100% of the phantom job growth that had been sitting on top of the debt bubble? The current level of employment in the United States has now returned to the levels of June 2000. Enough said.

-Skip-

In Washington today the annual budget deficit crossed the one trillion mark. In Sacramento, there is a 26 billion dollar shotgun hole in their budget. (One hopes that CALPERS is marking to market, because if they're not, that would be a new liability for Sacramento to deal with). Meanwhile, Autumn approaches and whole range of rather nasty choices looms over the school system. Imagine living in a prime area of California and watching your house decline by 40%, your household income knocked for an initial 30%, and the after-school programs and town services get cut. Now throw some fees and tax hikes on top of that mess. For the coup de grace, imagine California voters sitting down each night to another wave of bailouts from Washington to financial corporations. Under those circumstances it seems quite unlikely Washington can say no, to the States.



If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 12:21:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Central govt has to start making states behave rationally in their taxation policies. And let's be honest, thanks to prop 13, California ain't rational. But that would impinge on "State's rights".

So now we are at the point where the Govt is supposed to be bailing out States that refuse to help themselves.  I know in my mind what should be happening, but I'm liberal left european and I know that such ideas as I have are meaningless that side of the pond. So it's gonna be "interesting" to see where this goes, but I bet an awful lot of people will suffer who really don't deserve it.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 04:51:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You are unarguably correct on all points, and without making any of them secondary, there are the two over-riding criminal issues of negligence and treason while purporting to govern; the first being akin to the idea of negligent bankicide and the second being pure and simple execution of the scam of fleecing the public and Our Commons for the benefit of the rich.

As well, let's not forget also that from Reagan on, in order to keep from bankrupting the national government with their war budgets, the republican presidents kept passing more and more expenses and mandates onto the states. Then the republican governors piled on with prison expenses and their own interstate graft. That there was a problem with getting tax money for their scams was just a subtle twist of the knife.

Corporate Socialism is the problem. That there is graft, and aggravating minor players pretending to be Congress-critters who cater around the edges to their thumb-sucking constituents, is just an inconsequential cost of doing business...but it is not what pushes the cycle of cultural bust and more cultural bust.

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 09:56:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, there is this:

From direct democracy to direct federal financial rule in California

The obvious penalty to discourage recidivism is to impose direct financial rule by Washington over the state of California in exchange for fiscal financial support for the state of California from the federal government.  That is what happens with municipalities and counties that go or are about to go belly up financially and that turn to the state government for financial support.  It is what happens in other federal systems when a state government knocks, cap-in-hand on the back door of the federal Treasury, begging to be rescued.

Direct financial rule would mean that neither California's state executive nor the its state legislature would have any financial decision making powers until financial normalcy is restored.  California's `proposition mechanism' would also be suspended for any proposition that would have financial implications for the state.  A federally appointed Board of Overseers would have full powers to cut public spending, raise existing taxes or introduce new taxes or charges until the budget deficit has been eliminated in a sustainable manner.

Such direct financial rule reduces the state of California to a legally and financially incompetent minor.  Because that is exactly the way the state has acted and continues to act, this is both efficient and fair.  The only irony is that this direct financial rule rule would be excised by an entity appointed by a federal government that itself is structurally incapable of putting its fiscal house in order.  But that is an irony Californians will have to learn to live with.  Beggars can't be choosers.


Would that it would be so.  Just edit out Prop 13 and all of its evil spawn from the constitution, adjust tax rates, etc. and sit on it until CA residents clearly saw the benefits of rationality.  A dream.

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 11:37:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I linked to that blog recently in relation with two others...
ChrisCook:
Frankly, unless Washington prints money and bails out every state that needs capital, including California, federal power will decline amidst this severe economic recession, and the process of a soft American devolution will begin. If you think this idea is outrageous, then you've still not come to terms with a core reality of our current situation: the structure of this financial crisis is wholly different than any in our post-war era. This isn't a recession. This is collapse.
FT.com: From direct democracy to direct federal financial rule in California (Willem Buiter's Maverecon, July 13, 2009)
The state still services its outstanding stock of official debt with cash, which is why no formal event of default has been called yet, but de-facto California has already defaulted on its financial obligations and commitments by paying suppliers and employees with funny money rather than with cash.  When the banks stop accepting the IOUs except possibly at massive discounts, which will happen soon unless an early resolution of the budgetary stalemate is achieved, the state of California will close down for business.  Municipalities and counties dependent on state funds will follow suit.  Before long the teachers won't teach, the fire fighters won't fight fires, the police won't maintain law and order and neither garbage nor taxes will get collected.  It will be a grand Hobbesian experiment.
Energy Bulletin: Closing the 'Collapse Gap': the USSR was better prepared for collapse than the US (Dmitry Orlov, December 4 2006)
My talk tonight is about the lack of collapse-preparedness here in the United States. I will compare it with the situation in the Soviet Union, prior to its collapse. The rhetorical device I am going to use is the "Collapse Gap" - to go along with the Nuclear Gap, and the Space Gap, and various other superpower gaps that were fashionable during the Cold War.

...

The subject of economic collapse is generally a sad one. But I am an optimistic, cheerful sort of person, and I believe that, with a bit of preparation, such events can be taken in stride. As you can probably surmise, I am actually rather keen on observing economic collapses. Perhaps when I am really old, all collapses will start looking the same to me, but I am not at that point yet.

And this next one certainly has me intrigued. From what I've seen and read, it seems that there is a fair chance that the U.S. economy will collapse sometime within the foreseeable future. It also would seem that we won't be particularly well-prepared for it. As things stand, the U.S. economy is poised to perform something like a disappearing act. And so I am eager to put my observations of the Soviet collapse to good use.



The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 11:52:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But the state of California's only problem is that they can't increase the tax rate, isn't it?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 11:55:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not only.

A lot of its revenue has been earmarked for particular purposes (as a sweetener to get taxes approved by a referendum) so that the general fund available for discretionary expenditures is very small. There is hardly any leeway to shuffle money among budget categories.

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 11:57:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But basically the solution is simple: the people of California grow the fuck up, let the executive run the state and pay the taxes they need to do in order to do so. Collapse has fuck all to do with it, as far as I can see.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 12:00:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Very funny rant.

There are very way too many very way too rich people in the state to allow that to happen.

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 01:26:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is actually a good thing, it was done as a protective measure against the kind of people who passed prop 13, prop 187 and kept trying to get "school vouchers" aka "kill the public schools."

Anything essential is earmarked to prevent the insane political ideologues in Southern California from using the state budget as a social experiment any more than they already have.

This is why it is typically best to ignore the state when they whine yearly about "going broke" and "catastrophic cuts" because they're really only talking about a very small $% of the budget.

The real issue that is coming to head this year is of course the lack of revenue due to not collecting nearly enough taxes on property.  This is just the kind of catastrophe necessary to bring "prop 13" back into the discussion.

by paving on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:13:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Right on.

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jul 18th, 2009 at 04:39:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Mig
I linked to that blog recently...

It was apropos the discussion.  Third time is the charm?  (I had missed your comments by failing to re-read the entire Salon the morning after I had posted my own comments.)  

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 01:03:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Are GLD and SLV Legitimate Investment Vehicles?

Ever since the launch of the US gold ETF, GLD, in November, 2004 and the launch of the US silver ETF, SLV, April 2006, a debate has raged in analyst circles regarding the legitimacy of these two investment vehicles as a proxy for physical gold and physical silver. Though all evidence against investing in these two trusts has been entirely circumstantial, plenty of red flags exist in both the GLD and SLV prospectuses that should steer any logical, rational human being that wishes to own gold and silver away from these two investment vehicles.

Conflicts of Interest

Let's begin with the obvious. Is it not a huge conflict of interest that JP Morgan (JPM), a bank that perpetually ranks among the largest short positions against silver on the COMEX, is the custodian for the iShares Silver Trust (SLV)? According to silver analyst Ted Butler, JP Morgan is consistently among the one or two U.S. banks that hold more than 80% to 90% of the entire commercial net short position in COMEX silver futures. If you have positioned yourself to make huge profits from drops in the price of silver, is it reasonable for you to simultaneously desire investors to buy more physical silver (if indeed the SLV holds the amount of physical silver it claims)?

Is it also not a conflict of interest that HSBC (HBC) bank, a bank that allegedly holds some of the largest short positions against gold on the COMEX, is the custodian for the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD)? If these banks profit when gold and silver drop, and they manage the largest ETFs in the US regarding these respective metals, is it unreasonable to state that these two banks should be barred from acting as custodians of the GLD and SLV? In fact, how is this situation any different than Goldman Sachs's (GS) actions in the past when they originated CDOs and then made a fortune by shorting them, actions that back then, were apparently unknown even to the firm's own traders? On the surface, it certainly appears to be another classic case of the fox guarding the hen house.

-Skip-

Multiple Claims on the Physical Gold and Physical Silver Held on Behalf of GLD and SLV Shareholders?

The appointed custodians of the SLV and the GLD, responsible for safekeeping the silver and gold bars owned by the trusts, respectively are JP Morgan and HSBC Bank USA. The GLD prospectus states, "Gold held in the Trust's unallocated gold account and any Authorized Participant's unallocated gold account will not be segregated from the Custodian's assets." Only Authorized Participants, and no shareholders, have the right to redeem shares for actual gold.

In my opinion, there are several potential huge problems with this arrangement. Physical gold held by the GLD should be held in allocated accounts specifically for the trust. The fact that physical gold held for the GLD may be held in unallocated gold accounts where gold is not segregated from the Custodian's assets may mean that multiple entities have claims on the same gold bars. In theory, the gold held in the Custodian's vaults may be used for delivery against shorts they hold in the futures markets if necessary even though GLD shareholders have a claim on this gold.



If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 12:36:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
One possibility:  Let us say there is a security scare. (Highly improbable, but just assume.)  Wealthy individuals rush to buy gold and silver.  The price spikes.  There is short covering.  Custodians surely wouldn't sell gold or silver to cover their shorts, would they?  Surely not at the time "investors" in GLD and SLV want to cash in their shares for their profits?

If sanity be culturally normative, then by the norms of this culture I claim insanity.
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 12:50:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Italy - The wrong way round
A persistent message from the government has been the need to promote optimism about the economy, and to persuade people to start consuming once more in the way they did before the economic crisis. Berlusconi has frequently suggested that businesses should not advertise in journals or TV channels that disseminate economic gloom. Yet one could hardly get gloomier than the figures in the government's own recent economic forecasts, which envisage the economy contracting by 5.2% in the course of this year, and essentially stagnating next year (with 2010 growth forecast at just 0.5%, well within the margin of error of economic statistics). Although asserting that "the Italian economy is one of the least exposed to the factors that are specific to the current financial crisis" its own figures make clear that the Italian economy will in fact suffer about the worst of any in Western Europe. With Italian government debt accounting for over a quarter of total Euroland government debt (while Italy accounts for only 17% of Euroland GDP), there is little scope for stimulus. Yields on Italian government bonds indicate the extent to which the Italian government's creditworthiness is at risk: 30-year Italian bonds yield 5 1/4%, while German 30-year bonds yield only just over 4%. Finance Minister Tremonti has said that there are some "non-negative signals" about the economic future - a cautious term, which falls short of claiming that there are any positive ones. Behind the smile on the government's face there is clearly a very worried frown. That is supposed to be the way with clowns.

As anticipated, the "fiscal shield", discussed immediately below, forms part of the government's economic package. The money-laundering fee will be a very modest 5%. The government has put only a nominal amount in as its estimate of the revenue yield from providing these services to organised crime and to white-collar criminals (among whom, of course, the prime minister must be numbered). As Di Pietro says, the government is offering to "restore the virginity, and fatten the wallets" of rich criminals.


If'Madness is the absence of work'(Foucault), then Sanity is the presence of play..
by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:17:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
FT.com / Columnists / GillianTett - How Markit turned from a camera into an engine

But the days of innocent obscurity are over. The Department of Justice this week confirmed that it had started an investigation into pricing practices in the credit derivatives markets. It has demanded extensive data from Markit and the dozen-odd banks that own it, a request with which Markit is complying - out of swanky offices in London and New York.

What triggered the DoJ probe is - like the credit markets - a touch murky. Some bankers think the DoJ is flexing its muscles in the new political landscape by demonstrating a tough interpretation of the so-called "Sherman" anti-competitive doctrine. Others fear that the exchanges and some hedge funds are leaning on the DoJ as part of a campaign to move credit default swap activity on to exchanges.

There may be a simpler explanation. In recent months the DoJ has had reason to look at the credit derivatives world because of a flurry of corporate activity. Most notably, efforts are under way to create clearing platforms and Markit is creating a joint venture. As the DoJ peers into this once-geeky world, it is not surprising if it thinks some of those practices look a touch odd - at least given the mood of the times.



The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 05:58:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
 WORLD 

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:39:56 PM EST
BBC NEWS | Africa | Islamists 'share French hostages'

Two French security advisers seized in Somalia this week have been split up and are now being held by two different hardline groups, reports say.

The pair were snatched by gunmen from a Mogadishu hotel on Tuesday and were being held by the Hizbul-Islam group.

But officials say the al-Shabab group wanted them and after a row, Hizbul-Islam handed one of the men over.

Al-Shabab has recently carried out several beheadings, amputations and stonings in areas it controls.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:45:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Administration Objects to Bar on Using Contractors to Conduct Interrogations - washingtonpost.com

The Obama administration has objected to a provision in the 2010 defense funding bill currently before the Senate that would bar the military's use of contractors to interrogate detainees.

The provision, strongly backed by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.), describes interrogations as an "inherently governmental function" that "cannot be transferred to contractor personnel." It would give the Defense Department one year from the bill's enactment to ensure that the military had the resources to comply with it.

A White House policy statement yesterday signaled "many areas of agreement" with the bill that emerged from Levin's committee late last month but said the administration has "serious concerns" about some provisions. The statement repeated Obama's threat to veto the $680 billion bill unless $1.75 billion to fund an additional seven F-22 fighter aircraft is removed.

Obama and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates "are as serious as a heart attack on this," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:59:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh dear. Obama wants wiggle room where none should be available.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:32:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Things seem to be heating up rapidly. After the riots over the opening of a parking lot on Satuday have become routine, the Orthodox now have something else to riot about.
Riots in Jerusalem over the recent arrest of an ultra-Orthodox woman suspected of starving her 3-year-old son escalated as demonstrators concluded their third consecutive day of violent protests with no indication that they were planning to ease up.

The riots erupted Tuesday when the news of the arrest became public. The ultra-Orthodox community was outraged that the woman, who belongs to one of the most extreme ultra-Orthodox sects, was in custody, rejecting suspicions that she had systematically starved her son over the course of the last two years. The boy is currently hospitalized in serious condition and weighing only 7 kilograms. Hundreds of ultra-Orthodox protesters hurled rocks at police late Thursday night on Highway 1 near the Haredi neighborhood of Beit Yisrael. Police arrested dozens of people and used water cannons to disperse the crowds. Seven police officers were lightly wounded by rock thrower.


by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:29:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If the Orthodox carry on like this, they're gonna force the mainstream authorities to recognise that they represent a genuine threat to civil society

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:35:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Helen: If the Orthodox carry on like this...

Maybe we should stop calling them "Islamic extremists" or "Islamic militants" and start calling them "orthodox (ultra-orthodox?) Muslims".

Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 02:13:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Heh !!!

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 04:52:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Done, from herein on.

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 12:38:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 LIVING OFF THE PLANET 
 Environment, Energy, Agriculture, Food 

     

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:40:29 PM EST
Customers choosing green energy after nuclear reactor shutdown | Germany | Deutsche Welle | 15.07.2009
The recent troubles at the Vattenfall Kruemmel nuclear plant near Hamburg may prove a boon to green energy companies. One such company, Lichtblick, has seen 200 new customers per day since the power outage. 

The Kruemmel nuclear plant near Hamburg had been back up and running for less than two weeks after a two year shutdown when one of its transformers short circuited on July 4. There was a sudden drop in voltage then shopping centers and traffic lights in Germany's second largest city went dark.

Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Failed transformers led to an automatic shutdown at the Kruemmel nuclear plant

Vattenfall, the Swedish company running the Kreemmel plant said the short circuit and the hour-long blackout were simply an isolated incident. But energy users may see it otherwise, much to the delight of green energy companies, who say they've seen a dramatic jump in customers.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:47:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Obama Administration Approves First Roadless Logging Contract In Alaska's Tongass National Forest
This week, the Obama administration approved the sale of timber in a roadless national forest in Alaska. The Tongass National Forest is a 17 million acre temperate rain forest in southeast Alaska, which is home to both endangered species and native Alaskan tribes. It is the largest temperate rain forest in the United States.
by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:49:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So Sad, Obama.

Skennah Kowa
by Crazy Horse on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:17:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
People in the countryside told to accept 'many thousands' of new wind turbines - Telegraph
Country residents have been told that they must accept the building of "many thousands" of wind turbines as part of a new green energy strategy.

Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, announced yesterday that planning rules would be changed to make it easier for 6,000 onshore wind turbines to be built. Britain's "default position" would be to accept new onshore turbines, he said.

The expansion in wind farms was included in the Government's Renewable Energy Strategy, which aims to cut energy use and carbon dioxide emissions, and reduce Britain's dependence on fossil fuels.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:55:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ugh.

Launching large industrial projects never works well without the support of the locals. The way Miliband (or the Telegraph?) frames it makes me think of Yucca Mountain. That is NOT the way to run things.

If you just explain the pros of accepting wind power parks or nuclear waste facilites, communities are bound to fight over who gets them. If you try to impose them on people in a top-down process people will fight them no matter the pros, as they should.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:26:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The UK is, to be professional, kinda fucked up. Contrast with Germany, where a new law gives local entities a greater share of the pie. (Not certain it's passed yet, but it's agreed.)

Though windparks hardly qualify as national sacrifice areas.

Skennah Kowa

by Crazy Horse on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:33:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Though windparks hardly qualify as national sacrifice areas.

That depends on local opinion. Some people would certainly consider nuclear waste facilities national sacrifce areas. But not for example in Sweden or South Korea where communties are fighting tooth and nail for them and they generally have a 70-80 % popular support , while at the same time they might fight against wind parks just as vehemently. It's up to the locals, always, when you have large infrastructure projects.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:53:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
for the umpteenth time, the worst conceivable accident at a windpark is miniscule compared to potential leakage of radioactivity.

Would that your world of ceramic bubbles without risk for 10,000 years was as miniscule. (In other words, i don't want to hear about Sweden's unbelievably safe storage methods, unless you're willing to write a book about the entire supply chain)

Just because Burrough's insects masquerading as citizens clamor for something doesn't corelate to value.

Skennah Kowa

by Crazy Horse on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:16:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There are more things to take into account than infinitely small risks of leakage. And while I didn't write a book, I did write an article.

Personally I'd much rather live next to the spent fuel storage than a wind farm (which is exactly what's going to happen as they're building that site in my backyard but won't build any windfarms) but I understand perfectly well if other people feel the opposite way. The important thing is listening to the locals so no community have unwanted things imposed upon them.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:32:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Alright Crazy Horse. Time to come clean. Tell us about how much recycling the paint on those blades cost after decommissioning. I bet a lot of that needs some pretty strong chemicals that you would prefer to hide.

And, I suppose that you will try to tell us that 100% of the copper in the windings will be recycled. Ha! 100%???? As if anything is ever 100%.

While you have us swimming in solvents and copper dust, I'll have you know that nuclear materials are natural products, some even on the periodic table fer chissake. Radiation is everywhere. The sun's energy is radiation. You don't want to put that down in some tunnel for 10 billion years, do you?

Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.

Frank Delaney ~ Ireland

by siegestate (siegestate or beyondwarispeace.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 01:21:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, but the way the system works in the UK, unless something is forced, nothing will happen.

somebody will always object, one way or another. Anything the Govt wants done has to be bulldozed through. So this story in the Telegraph reflects exactly how any project happens while describing the paper's attitude towards it.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:40:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why is your system working that way?

Can't you just bring all the local communities, companies, politicians, labour unions and NGO's together, sit down and sing kumbayah? Consensus, my friends, consensus. ;)

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:44:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's the UK.

If we wanted consensus, we'd be in Europe.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 08:38:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course the release of Miliband's energy vision is causing quite a ruckus in Britain, which deserves it. Why don't we take a gander at how it's played in The "Economist" to see how it works.


SO MUCH for Labour's fearsome media machine. On the morning of July 15th Ed Miliband, the secretary of state for energy and climate change, was giving press interviews in London trumpeting his government's plans to cut Britain's greenhouse-gas emissions and rebuild its economy around clean energy. The very next day the Vestas wind-turbine plant on the Isle of Wight, the biggest in Britain, completed its final batch of turbine blades and shut up shop, with the loss of over 600 jobs.

The fact that this blade shop's inferior blades caused no end of warranty costs for Vestas seems to have escaped the Economist's normally top shelf auditors. I won't go into the details, suffice to say that one of Vestas' turbine models which they acquired by buying Micon is now being phased out. hence, inferior factory closes.  Would that England realized that onshore windpower is task no. 1 could have changed the situation.


Mr Miliband had the guts to admit that building nuclear reactors and wind turbines would mean energy bills rising, an unpopular consequence that other politicians have avoided mentioning. Officials guess that Britain will have to spend £324 billion-404 billion ($532 billion-663 billion) by 2050 to scrub out carbon.

I haven't been able yet to identify who or what "officials" make the estimate, but i have been able to identify that Thee Economyst's normally excellent auditors have once again neglected to mention the entire range of externalites not accounted for in the UK system. Despite these externalities being what's known as "hard costs."

and then Thee Eek onomist turns about face and says the support isn't enough.


Yet the money looks inadequate to the ambition. The biggest new dollop of cash is £405m for developing eco-industries, including £120m for offshore wind turbines, £60m for wave and tidal energy, and £15m for nuclear research. That pales next to the hundreds of billions the government mustered to bail out the finance industry it now hopes to trim. Gordon Edge, chief economist at the British Wind Energy Association, argues that raw financial firepower is less important than directing it wisely, but he concedes that Britain's government has been less pushy than some. In fact, say analysts at HSBC, a bank, its Keynesian splurge is one of the world's least green. Britain has allocated 7% of total spending to environmental causes, compared with 12% in America and 83% in South Korea.

I can assure you, i'm not schizophrenic, and neither am i. Both of us are wondering however, how every nation, country, city-state, principality, city and village is going to be No.1 in renewables, as they are all claiming.

Wouldn't it be simpler to just get on with the work of building renewables into a transparent part of our civilization?

Skennah Kowa

by Crazy Horse on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:53:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Wouldn't it be simpler to just get on with the work of building renewables into a transparent part of our civilization?

Don't be silly. Building things cost money, billions, while claiming that you're no.1 will just set you back a few millions for PR campaigns and press conferences with generous buffets.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:57:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Heh.

Skennah Kowa
by Crazy Horse on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 05:01:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You'll notice how that only includes £15 million for "research" into nuclear but over a hundred million for building windfarms.

All of the costings dumped on the public about how much more green enrgy will be than staying with coal and gas have nuclear builds and CCS research and installation rolled into them, when windfarms and more hydro are much much cheaper. You never hear about how much nuclear and CCS will cost.

So the govt is just being plainly dishonest in order to destroy the idea of green energy to enable CCS and nuclear to become the default. In the UK green vs nuclear is a zero sum game where nuclear holds all the aces and lobbying advantages.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 04:32:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Daily Kos: The Black Swan Myth

what's been happening is people proudly proclaiming that they won't "kick the can down the road" for someone else to deal with, and then doing exactly that. when we hear about 'green jobs that can't be outsourced', what images come to mind? people across the country building, installing, maintaining windmills. whole new industries. industrial parks being built or re-tooled to support all of this manufacturing and maintenance. retro-fitting for environmental soundness, and the like.

this is what people thought they were voting to achieve. instead what we've been given is a silly line that feeding astronomical sums of $$ directly to corrupt banks will 'fix everything eventually', and a bald-faced lie that 'no one could have seen this coming'.

where are our windmills? where are the new factories? where is there even any kind of talk about creating these things within our government? why are 500,000 people losing their jobs per month, and people are trying to sit around and talk about what god-damn good news it is??? this is nuts! why isn't the government hiring people in large numbers to put into practice this new, more sustainable lifestyle?

why indeed...

If'Madness is the absence of work'(Foucault), then Sanity is the presence of play..

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 04:52:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
 LIVING ON THE PLANET 
 Society, Culture, History, Information 

     

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:40:51 PM EST
Exchange students live American nightmare - CNN.com

SCRANTON, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- They came from around the world hoping to spend a high school year immersed in the culture and joys of America.

Exchange student Carlos Villareal of Colombia says he was underfed and kept in "an unsafe environment."

Instead, five young foreign exchange students found themselves caught in a nightmare of neglect, malnourishment and abandonment by those supposed to protect them.

Now those five -- natives of countries stretching from Norway to Tanzania to Colombia -- are back home telling friends of a different America than they expected. And their brief visit reverberates in America as a United States senator demands accountability and reform, a Pennsylvania district attorney seeks criminal charges and the U.S. State Department concedes it failed to protect kids coming to America.

"We at the Department of State recognize [because we] are responsible for this program we have to make sure we are aggressively overseeing this program and make sure children are well-suited," said State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley.

"This is a program that is very important to the Department of State," Crowley said. "We are talking 15- to 18-year-old children. We are introducing them to the United States. We are trying to put our best foot forward. We recognize in this incident in Scranton and also elsewhere around the country we have failed to do so."

What happened in Scranton, according to Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, District Attorney Andrew Jarbola, is a crime. He has convened a grand jury to look into the families where some of the 12 students who came to Scranton were placed, as well as the company who placed them there and its officials.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:46:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
To be fair those cases are extremely unusual.  Whomever was placement manager for those people blew it big time.  More often than not exchange students are placed in very "wholesome" do-gooder type homes in my experience.  Often they were bored with these people very quickly!
by paving on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:10:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Fiji freemasons held for sorcery

A group of freemasons have had to spend a night in jail in Fiji, after local villagers complained they were practising witchcraft.

The 14 men, including eight Australians and a New Zealander, had been holding a night-time meeting on Denerau island.

The New Zealand man told reporters he had spent a "wretched" time in jail, and blamed the mix-up on the actions of "dopey village people".

Police also seized wands, compasses and a skull from the freemasons' lodge.

Freemasonry is a centuries-old club that practises secret rituals and has more than five million members worldwide.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:52:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Financial Times editor says most news websites will charge within a year | Media | guardian.co.uk

The Financial Times editor, Lionel Barber, has predicted that "almost all" news organisations will be charging for online content within a year.

Barber said building online platforms that could charge readers on an article-by-article or subscription basis was one of the key challenges facing news organisations.

"How these online payment models work and how much revenue they can generate is still up in the air," Barber said in a speech at at a Media Standards Trust event at the British Academy last night.

"But I confidently predict that within the next 12 months, almost all news organisations will be charging for content."



I'm tired of this backslapping, aint humanity great BS, we're a virus with shoes Bill Hicks
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 03:53:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oops.
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 08:43:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Does this mean we should be expecting paychecks from the ET within the year? ;)

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 01:24:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why We Must Ration Health Care - NYTimes.com
You have advanced kidney cancer. It will kill you, probably in the next year or two. A drug called Sutent slows the spread of the cancer and may give you an extra six months, but at a cost of $54,000. Is a few more months worth that much?

If you can afford it, you probably would pay that much, or more, to live longer, even if your quality of life wasn't going to be good. But suppose it's not you with the cancer but a stranger covered by your health-insurance fund. If the insurer provides this man -- and everyone else like him -- with Sutent, your premiums will increase. Do you still think the drug is a good value? Suppose the treatment cost a million dollars. Would it be worth it then? Ten million? Is there any limit to how much you would want your insurer to pay for a drug that adds six months to someone's life? If there is any point at which you say, "No, an extra six months isn't worth that much," then you think that health care should be rationed. <...>

Remember the joke about the man who asks a woman if she would have sex with him for a million dollars? She reflects for a few moments and then answers that she would. "So," he says, "would you have sex with me for $50?" Indignantly, she exclaims, "What kind of a woman do you think I am?" He replies: "We've already established that. Now we're just haggling about the price." The man's response implies that if a woman will sell herself at any price, she is a prostitute. The way we regard rationing in health care seems to rest on a similar assumption, that it's immoral to apply monetary considerations to saving lives -- but is that stance tenable? <...>

Rationing health care means getting value for the billions we are spending by setting limits on which treatments should be paid for from the public purse. If we ration we won't be writing blank checks to pharmaceutical companies for their patented drugs, nor paying for whatever procedures doctors choose to recommend. When public funds subsidize health care or provide it directly, it is crazy not to try to get value for money. The debate over health care reform in the United States should start from the premise that some form of health care rationing is both inescapable and desirable. Then we can ask, What is the best way to do it?  ...



Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.
by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 05:24:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Editorial - A Strong Health Reform Bill - NYTimes.com
While the Senate continues to struggle over its approach to health care reform, House Democratic leaders have unveiled a bill that would go a long way toward solving the nation's health insurance problems without driving up the deficit. It is already drawing fierce opposition from business groups and many Republicans. This is a bill worth fighting for.

The bill would require virtually all Americans to carry health insurance or pay a penalty. And it would require all but the smallest businesses to provide health insurance for their workers or pay a substantial fee. It would also expand Medicaid to cover many more poor people, and it would create new exchanges through which millions of middle-class Americans could buy health insurance with the help of government subsidies. The result would be near-universal coverage at a surprisingly manageable cost to the federal government.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that by 2015, 97 percent of all residents, excluding illegal immigrants, would have health insurance. <...>

The bill makes a mockery of Republican claims that the Democrats are pushing a hugely costly government takeover of medicine.

This bill is clearly not hugely costly. It would expand the government's role in financing and regulating coverage but would also bolster private coverage. It would increase employer-based coverage, mostly by requiring employers to participate. And it would send more clients to the private insurance industry. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that perhaps 10 million people might enroll in a new public plan, while twice that number might enroll in competing private policies. ...



Truth unfolds in time through a communal process.
by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 05:29:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Tis debate is just as lively here. At an individual level you might want to take a drug to extend your life by 6 months or so. But should the nation pay ?

It's s different thing if it's a cure. But simply delaying the inevitable for a couple of months or so is less justifiable.

It's difficult. None of us get out of here alive. I thik we should accept that there must be a level of reasonableness about efforts to sustain us.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 05:05:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
 PEOPLE AND KLATSCH 

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:41:28 PM EST
Operation Sarah: How the Prime Minister's wife is rebranding herself - UK Politics, UK - The Independent
Editing the News of the World's magazine, marching at Gay Pride, tweeting at G8 - Sarah Brown is running a public relations campaign. So who is she targeting? And what is she hoping to achieve? Ian Burrell studies her strategy

When Gordon Brown sat down at a press conference at the G8 summit in Italy last week and solemnly pronounced that allegations of phone-hacking by The News of the World constituted a "very serious" matter, he may not have given much thought as to who exactly will be editing that newspaper's magazine, Fabulous, this weekend.

But as his cabinet colleagues still seek to make political capital out of the row, and as angry MPs summon executives from the paper's parent company to come before them and answer questions, Mr Brown's wife, Sarah, is eagerly anticipating the publication of her own journalistic efforts in that very same title.

Last Sunday, with Labour hoping that the claims could yet undermine David Cameron by shaming his Tory communications chief Andy Coulson, The News of the World did not pass up the opportunity to celebrate its connections with Number 10. The paper's editor, Colin Myler, said he felt "proud and privileged" to have Brown edit the newpsaper's magazine. "She devoted a great deal of time to editing this unique issue, interviewing cover star Jools Oliver, wife of TV chef Jamie, about her fertility experiences," he said. "She came into the office and co-ordinated features, including one about five inspiring women who had babies... as well as Dr Hilary Jones's guide to tackling a host of women's health problems."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 01:48:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
{g a g}

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 04:42:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sussex teacher 'abducted by aliens in UFO' (From The Argus)

Pupils were terrified after a school staged an alien crash landing which ended with a teacher being 'abducted'.

Children aged between seven and 11 at Southway Junior School in Southway, Burgess Hill, watched in horror as a 'spaceship' crashed near their school and aliens grabbed a member of staff.

The 'alien invasion' show, which was supported by Sussex police, took place without parents being informed, leaving some angry that they had to comfort their children.

The event, held on Friday, was designed to 'develop youngsters' writing skills' and fire their imagination - but some children were left traumatised by the show.

Southway School has admitted that a number of parents complained after their children returned home in a 'state of shock'.

Youngsters had to be reassured that the abducted member of staff was safe and well after he was carted off by the 'aliens'.

Police contributed to the invasion by providing sirens and flashing blue lights to signify the landing of the craft just before morning classes.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jul 16th, 2009 at 08:43:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
WTF?

And then they're not allowed to do normal child things because of health and safety regulations.

Only in Britain.

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 02:20:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What's the problem? I presume that the aliens were screened to make sure they had no criminal records and so on.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 03:22:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
My CRB check has been ongoing for 4months now with no end in sight. So those aliens must have been orbiting a looooong time getting their records from Betelguese

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 04:29:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I thought it was Sirius B?

The peak-to-trough part of the business cycle is an outlier. Carnot would have died laughing.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 05:48:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, Sirius people do mind control on CNN

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 08:23:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
An interesting collection of stories about novel-naming by Gary Dexter.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Fri Jul 17th, 2009 at 05:27:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]