|
by Jerome a Paris
1) We are going through an unprecedented economic crisis;
2) Everybody, even neoliberal economists, tag-along pundits and politicians, agree that it was caused by the irresponsible risk-taking of the financial sector, itself driven by a ruthless focus on short term profits (including personal ones); 3) there is also a general consensus that finance needs to be tamed, made boring and more strictly regulated, given its proven ability to privatize profits and blackmail governments into socializing losses; and a general agreement that this would make banking less profitable; 4) Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan have just announced record quarterly profits (and the accompayning "bonus pools"), thereby suggesting that investment banking has not quite yet been tamed; 5) in the face of such evidence that the causes of the recent crisis have not been eliminated ... markets rose massively. So... either markets think that the current crisis is a good thing for investors, or they are not quite as efficient at processing information as they claim to be. In both cases, one might want to question why the health of financial markets is seen as a good proxy for the overall health of the economy. Will the pundits even notice this little paradox right in front of their nose?
|
Menu
. Home
. About . Contact . New User Guide . FAQ . ET Editorial Guidelines . Search . Search (Google) Login
|
||
|
Logic | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Logic | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
| ||||
| ||||