Old Age in Europe

by In Wales
Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 09:25:49 AM EST

Some documents landed on my desk from FERPA - the English translation of which is the European Federation of Retired and Elderly People.  It is a union of older people across Europe:

Some 70 million people are aged over 60 in Europe today, amounting to between 3 and 4 in every 10 voters. Their labour, and their political, social and trade union commitment have helped to build the European Union. They therefore demand the right to play an active part in European policy-making at all levels.

Specifically the documents are from their Women's Committee, looking at the evidence of the feminization of poverty and the impact this has on older women.


FERPA Women's Committee held an extraordinary meeting to respond to the economic crisis with a resolution on the impact of the crisis on elderly women.  It sets out the impact the economic crisis is already having on older people in repsect of job losses, pensions being frozen, public services cuts, lack of access to adequate health and social care.

The invisible threat of poverty, misery and segregation is becoming visible and taking as almost normal. On the other side the World Bank is trying to press governments, especially in new Member States, to continue to reduce social rights.

If the EU leaves the more vulnerable Member States outside the euro area exposed to the vagaries of the financial markets, then those Member States will have no choice but to turn to international financial institutions, particularly the IMF. However, the IMF's track record is well known : in exchange for foreign currency loans, countries are forced to cut anything social : wages, social spending, workers' rights and public services.

The weakest and most vulnerable group is retired elderly women, especially those with the lowest pension benefits. The at-risk-of-poverty rate in the European Union is higher for older women (20%) than for older men (15%). In the future, the proportion of people aged over 75 living at risk of poverty could be 30% or more in many EU Member States, with women exposed more than men.

The resolution calls for 'EU institutions to strengthen the EU's role in decreasing the impact of the economic crisis on older people and pensioners'.

Within this it outlines the importance of keeping the European Social Model which they argue is under attack by the World Bank and IMF; the increasing concerns around continuing gender inequality, pay gaps and poor career prospects; the need for a living wage and pensions for all; need for universal access to health and social care; and access to the labour market.

A presentation given at this meeting contains some interesting stats, taken from a 2009 OECD study.

  • Women's wages are 18% lower and pensions are on average 15-30% lower than men's across Europe

  • 52% of Europeans fear that people in employment will be increasingly reluctant to pay taxes and social contributions to support older people

  • OECD report gives policy makers a 10 year window to implement reforms to health, education and pensions systems (before the next baby boom generation starts to retire)

Two key factors drawn from various research studies show that the pension system and women's labour participation play a key role in poverty later in life.

For women in particular the risk factors are associated with less education, those in poor health, those divorced, living alone and the oldest of the old.  Those living in Portugal, UK and Belgium are most at risk of poverty.

The presentation also discusses the services and voluntary activities that pensioners already contribute to society and the economy, such as childcare or community volunteering, as well as those who do still make an economic contribution through paid work. The need to ensure a living pension as well as dignity and access to care when one becomes dependent should recognise both the past contribution but also the potential contributions that people can make in a variety of ways past retirement age.

2010 is the European Year of combating poverty, so especially given the impact of the financial crisis it will be interesting to see how the EU and the member states respond to this challenge.  

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
For those of you already near/past retirement age or supporting parents in old age what do your countries do well/badly when it comes to making provision for older people?

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 06:12:25 AM EST
Sort-of-reply.

  • Last year, in attempting a more in-depth critique of the local nominal centre-left's economic policies over the past eight years, the main opposition party concluded that Hungary's economy is in a bad shape because the Socialists improved the situation of inactives -- which they shall correct byx boosting the actives.

  • The transport minister in the current neolib fake expert' government has the idée fixe (originating in neolib PR) that the state railway transports only pensioners and railway employees for free 'and this can't continue' (whatever happened to public services). To prove it, now pensioners have to validate for-free tickets or else.

Meanwhile, we have elections in two months. And how do the paries start the campaign? By appealing to pensioners! Credible? Incredible...

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 10:52:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Women's wages are 18% lower and pensions are on average 15-30% lower than men's across Europe

How much of this is a legacy of the past? That is, when the rate of pension depends on one's wage level in his or her active life, then the differences of men and women retiring in the last few decades are generations in which the gender wage difference was higher and many women did not have a wage at all (being housewifes).

Which leads to the question: are there any proposals by FERPA or unions to compensate this effect specifically?

Those living in Portugal, UK and Belgium are most at risk of poverty.

Belgium?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 09:08:53 AM EST
All good points.  I haven't got the documents in e-version but they draw partly from the OECD 2009 report and from some other research papers that they referenced.

A lot of the gap is due to legacy of the past, certainly very much the case for the UK where women who worked were paid less than men as a matter of course, were heavily segregated in the labour market,  and those who married had no income or pension of their own, since their husbands were expected to provide.  In the UK, a large enough gap in employment and National Insurance contributions had a very heavy impact on eligibility for a full state pension.

The resolutions include proposals to ensure that pensions are at a level that people can live on without being in poverty (in the UK, means testing is used to provide benefits to top up income, they may as well provide a state pension that people can live on - except many who are eligible for benefits don't claim due to stigma and complexity).

They call for universality of pension rights, decent access to health care and social care services and for active labour market policies for women, facilitating access to the labour market (and appropriate education and training) and to stem the rise of casual hire-and-fire approaches to employment, and provision of better childcare and care services.

Not sure what Belgium is doing so badly wrong, I don't know anything about their employment policies.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 09:22:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I realise this from the declaration you linked to might be relevant to the legacy of the past:

6. WE DEMAND that the poverty risk for older women be specifically targeted by providing better survivors' benefits for all partners and by improving indexation of state pensions and minimum pensions linked to increases in non-indexed wages and salaries.

...where I have to ask what the second means (non-indexed wages and salaries).

Re Belgium, the linked release contains nothing about it; does your paper version say more, f.e. stats?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 09:32:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Belgium bit comes from a paper copy of presentation slides but doesn't expand on the headline stats at all.

Indexation is the linking of state pensions with earnings (rather than with inflation for example) so it ensures that the state pension will gradually increase over time in line with earnings.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 10:19:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think it means more than that.

By linking with non-indexed wages, isn't it making a demand for the link with average earnings to be restored?

The UK state pension used to be linked to average earnings, but that was stopped by the Thatcher government, who tied it to inflation (usually lower) instead.  Hence the erosion in real terms of the amount of the basic pension.

by Sassafras on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 02:16:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Pensions Act 2007 (?) restored that link.  I don't know if that aspect is in force just yet.  I do have a very handy booklet on how the British pensions system works, which I used to deliver a policy workshop a few months ago.  I could diary that at some point although my notes are at work at the moment.

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 03:47:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The survivor's benefits is definitely an issue.

My mother gave up work when she had me.  It was the done thing, even though she was quite successful in her career (and caused much resentment by getting promotions some male colleagues thought should  be theirs by right).

My parents have a comfortable civil service pension.  However, if I remember correctly, the standard survivor's benefit was one third.  My father paid a large sum in extra contributions (and, caught between rule changes, I think also had to accept a lower pension) in order to increase that to one half.  Given that most of her expenses would be unchanged, half of comfortable isn't enough, and if he dies first, she will be reliant on their investment income.  If they weren't lucky/thrifty enough to have that cushion, I would be far more worried than I am.

by Sassafras on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 02:09:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
this is very important issue for Europeans but I would like to draw your attention that main thing governments across the subcontinent should do - is to avoid financial and subsequent economic crises. In any critical situations it's pensioners who bear the brunt, it's them who are always left out, it's on their pensions freezes (or even reductions if you count inflation in) that governments tend to use to cut budget deficits to satisfy monetarist wonks from IMF and WB.

We know this happened in Russia where the state under Yeltsin squeezed pensioners dry, reduced them to rags if they did not have jobs or close relatives who would care for them. It's only recently when Putin's popularity started to wane that he turned good samaritan and significantly increased pensions and benefits. these benefits were always there (like free airtickets for pensioners every two years) but in 1990s they could not use them, they needed money also for hotels, taxis, food, etc.

I believe that in modern state there should be sound and just safety net system to increase demand for goods. If such system is not in place (like in Africa, India or to big extent in China) or being eroded (under prescriptions from Washington) than the whole society suffers and may be locked forever in vicious poverty trap.

by FarEasterner (avdavydov@yandex.ru) on Sun Feb 7th, 2010 at 11:54:52 AM EST
I visited Russia towards the end of 1992, iirc.

It was heartbreaking to see proud old men and women, the survivors of the siege of Leningrad, reduced to begging outside churches.  Someone I know gave 50 roubles (about 10p at the black market exchange rate) to an old soldier outside the Maly, and he tried to give her one of his medals in exchange.

But amongst the Russians, almost everybody gave.  A rouble at a time, but everybody gave.  It was pretty humbling, coming from a land where everyone had more than they needed, and the needy got stepped over in the streets.

I don't know what it's like there now, of course.  Could it really be almost 20 years ago?

by Sassafras on Sun Feb 7th, 2010 at 06:40:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]