Living In The Age Of The Exploit

by danps
Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 05:25:26 AM EST

Shameless leaders have created a culture of impunity.  Those who want accountability might need to adapt their expectations and keep an eye on the long run.

For more on pruning back executive power see Pruning Shears.


No Associated Press content was harmed in the writing of this post

One of my favorite blog posts is L33T Justice by Kung Fu Monkey.  Aside from being very funny and concisely getting at an important truth, it seems to represent a tipping point - one that mirrored my own.  Prior to that things had been bad; we were lied into a war of aggression that was being planned well before 9/11, intelligence agencies engaged in 4th Amendment-destroying activities that major journalists appeared committed to reporting incorrectly, and of course we had already set up our modern gulags.

It seemed to me the country was frightened enough to disregard Benjamin Franklin's warning for a while.  As a fallback explanation I was prepared to believe we were simply a more bellicose and primitive culture than I had previously thought.  By 2005 there was plenty of evidence that America had decided to make all its decisions with the lizard brain.  I hadn't made my peace with this prospect, mind you, but seeing your country willingly hand the reins to those committed to fearmongering and militarism has a way of blunting the sense of righteous indignation.

That is why when the Democrats took back Congress in 2006 relatively minor episodes like the Libby commutation and Gonzales' deliberately obtuse testimony were more infuriating than the horrors that came before.  There was finally  a sense that yes, as a country we went crazy for a while but we were finally getting our bearings.  It was happening too late for too many, but it was happening.  What the summer of Scooter and Fredo showed was: No, it is not and it will not.  Revelations began to trickle out, the first verdicts were finally coming in, and it became unmistakably clear that some of our leaders were criminals who were audacious enough to defiantly live publicly guilty lives.  Among the rest of our leadership, there was a critical mass that was too cowardly to do anything about it.

That has been the situation for several years now.  For the foreseeable future our government appears content to simply ignore the great crimes plainly in its midst.  There is no sense of urgency, significant new developments are not acknowledged, and the plan seems to be to resolutely ignore all of it lest some turbulence disturb the ruling class.  For those of us who care deeply about these issues it seems the best reaction now is not angry demands for real investigations and real consequences (outrage is difficult to sustain), but placid, ongoing documentation of the atrocities in order to have as complete a record as possible.

All of this is my somewhat awkward attempt to explain my reaction to Scott Horton's report on detainee deaths at Guantánamo.  It alleges war crimes that go all the way to the White House, it has been out for several weeks now, and continues to be developed.  Yet there are no investigations, no hearings, nothing.  We just postulate that our leaders did it, refuse to talk or do anything about it, and move on.

The problem is that such a corrosively cynical approach to governance causes foundational damage, and typically it is not recognized until the whole thing collapses.  No one thinks anything will come of it, but nobody thought the Soviet Union would collapse either.  In fact, a vignette from that period comes to mind; I recall seeing video of this as reported by the New York Times:

The next day [Romanian leader Nicolae] Ceausescu himself in effect brought the revolt to Bucharest, when a crowd of 100,000 he had summoned to denounce the Timisoara revolt suddenly took up a chant of ''Timisoara! Timisoara!'' The last televised image was Ceausescu's shocked face shouting ''Be quiet!'' That moment, all agree, finished him.
The investigations on Iraq in Britain and Guantánamo torture in Spain seem remote and of little interest right now.  The erosion of credibility and good will that they symbolize is easy to ignore as well.  In fact, the whole thing is.  If anything comes of all that, however, we will be oblivious to it - carrying on as if nothing will change until the moment we, like a clueless dictator, look on uncomprehendingly as our world turns upside down.

That probably will not come to pass, though.  The odds favor stagnation.  I used to think it was a matter of getting the word out, making enough noise, keeping the issues alive and waiting for our political and media elite to finally catch on.  Horton's reporting, and the radio silence greeting it, puts the lie to that.  We can - and must - continue to catalog these evils, but out of respect for the historical record and not any expectation that those responsible will be called to account.  It's L33T Justice, baby, and everyone gets a pass.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
by danps (dan at pruningshears (dot) us) on Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 05:25:41 AM EST
Dan, you know I personally appreciate your writing, but as a site editor I must say the following.

[ET Moderation Technology™]

This seems incongruous on a European blog:

The investigations on Iraq in Britain and Guantánamo torture in Spain seem remote and of little interest right now.

And on this particular European blog we have in fact blogged about the British Iraq inquiries, Spain's Guantanamo investigation, investigations in Germany and Italy, and so on.

But it could be easily fixed:

From the US, The investigations on Iraq in Britain and Guantánamo torture in Spain seem remote and of little interest right now.

or

To Americans, The investigations on Iraq in Britain and Guantánamo torture in Spain seem remote and of little interest right now.

US content is as welcome as any other on ET, but a little effort to adapt for an international audience what is essentially spill-over from the US blogosphere would be appreciated. Not everyone shares the same context and when we write about national European politics we don't assume our audience is familiar with the national context. It doesn't take long paragraphs to establish the context, the following kinds of substitutions would work:

  • the Senate -> the US Senate
  • the/our Nation -> the USA/the American people

and so on...

Wikipedia used to have an explicit policy to fight "US-centric" content. Now that focus has been diluted a bit by widening it to Systemic bias.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 05:49:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for the feedback, Migeru.  I don't have any problem with ET editors modifying any parts of my posts that they consider inappropriately US-centric.  I'd appreciate some notation to the parts that are changed, but don't insist on it since the originals will always be at Pruning Shears for comparison if needed.
by danps (dan at pruningshears (dot) us) on Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 08:51:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I am reminded of a comment in a swedish television program I saw recently.

But to understand this some background is needed: When the 2004 Tsunami hit Sweden had lots of tourists in Thailand. The first couple of days the Swedish governments response was uncoordinated and rather feeble. This was the subject of a series of hearings in 2005, detailing the doings of the highest officials on duty. Hopefully this resulted in better emergency routines (though I have my doubts).

Back to the television show where somebody said something like this:

"In the 2005 hearings it appeared to me that the real objective was to find someone responsible for the tsunami, even though it was a natural disaster. And politicians can not be held responsible for natural disasters. This appears to as very Swedish, I am from Italy where corruption and scandals are viewed as natural disasters which nobody can be held responsible for."

To tired right now to formulate why exactly I was reminded of this, so I leave it as an exercise for the reader.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 03:15:37 PM EST
Americans long time ago passed the shame.
It's a critical point when terrible crimes are done in your name. First there is outrage, then hope that we can do something , then shame and in the end hopelessness.
Do I believe in institutions as they can bring justice? No. But things , they have their own way to do it.
You don't have to be religious person to know that nothing good can come out of bad (evil). It takes time and many victims to see "natural" justice...No one can escape it all tho looking from outside sometimes it doesn't look so.Only time will tell.USA is on the wrong path...the cost will come.  
by vbo on Sun Feb 7th, 2010 at 08:42:12 AM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]