Shocking

by ceebs
Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 09:14:43 AM EST

Study finds median wealth for single black women at $5

Women of all races bring home less income and own fewer assets, on average, than men of the same race, but for single black women the disparities are so overwhelmingly great that even in their prime working years their median wealth amounts to only $5.

In a groundbreaking report released Monday by a leading economic research group, social scientists turned a spotlight on the grave financial challenges facing an often overlooked group of women, many of whom could not take an unpaid sick day or repair a major appliance without going into debt.

"It's rather shocking," said Meizhu Lui, director of the Closing the Gap Initiative based in Oakland, Calif., who contributed to the report "Lifting as We Climb: Women of Color, Wealth and America's Future."

Among the most startling revelations in the wealth data is that while single white women in the prime of their working years (ages 36 to 49) have a median wealth of $42,600 (still only 61 percent of their single white male counterparts), the median wealth for single black women is only $5.

"Even for those of us who have been looking at the wealth gap for a while, we were shocked and amazed at how little women of color have," Ms. Lui said.

Some days you see a story that you think you'll throw into the salon, then by the time you get there your outrage sends it to be a diary. this is one of those times.

How can anyone even begin to think this is even remotely acceptable?


Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
Shocking but unsurprising unfortunately.  Black women are horribly marginalised, and heavily discriminated against in employment.  Those in employment tend to be concentrated in very low paid and low skilled jobs.  Stereotyping of black women is very deep seated and the multiple discrimination faced as a result has this kind of impact.

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 09:54:26 AM EST
This is true, but I don't think the male/female disparity for blacks is anywhere near as big as for other groups. I found the following data for median personal income for 2005 in the U.S. in Wikipedia

This suggests other factors. Could it be that many more have negative equity? That they are more "responsible" than men, and are more likely to buy houses? Or is there some other reason?

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:05:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Which percentage of the general population has below 5$ in wealth ? It may be than 45% of single white women have below $5 in wealth, or it might be only 20%. The problem with medians is that you look at a single data point, that might, or might not be very significant.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:12:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
According to the histogram that goes with the article, 23% of single whites (no difference between men or women) have zero or  negative net worth. I don't know what happens in the $0 to $5 band...
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:20:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So I should have looked at the study. a pdf indicates that 23% of single white women have no net worth.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:22:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Negative equity is an interesting distortion, because in order to have that little net worth, you need to be wealthy enough to buy a house in the first place.

I'd guess a net worth of $5 probably equates to rented accommodation and hand-to-mouth existence: money in, money out, zero savings. Just coping.  Is it worth noting at this point that a single woman with children will have far greater expenses than a man who doesn't pay child support?

Below that, credit card debt (or worse), maybe run up for necessities or as a result of sickness or unemployment.

by Sassafras on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 11:54:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Check my post below. 46% of black women have zero or negative net worth. I've no idea how to interpret this: it may refer to negative equity which might not be that bad if you can afford the mortgage payments, but it might also refer to, for example, debts for medical bills for elderly relatives.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 12:09:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There are debts other than housing debt. Cars, even a TV can be bought on debt (I'm not sure if in the UK too, though).

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 03:12:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ah sorry, I see this is about the US not UK.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 03:14:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Equity" may or may not have anything to do with it. Revolving debt has been easy for everyone to get for several decades, and it hasn't exactly disappeared despite the credit crunch.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 07:47:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Student Loans.  Graduating from college already down $40,000 will put a lot of people into negative net worth.
by Zwackus on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 07:04:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How much of that effect is "black" and how much is "woman"? The story doesn't compare them to black men, you'll notice.

Mind you, when I read the headline I assumed it was a global study, so it included all the insanely poor women in Africa ...

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:10:11 AM EST
The PDF file that the article links to says that 46% of single black women vs. 33% of single black men have zero or negative net worth. So there is a significant difference.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:19:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I bet the difference is made up of single mothers.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 09:37:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And how much is, well, poverty ? Hispanics single women hardly have more net worth according to the study...

Race is often used as an explanation, hiding that, well, poor people are poor.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:21:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the data shows that black people are more likely to be poor.

So race is a significant factor.

by Sassafras on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 11:42:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It also hints at a difference in the reasons why the typical American woman stays single into their prime working age, depending on their race. The single whites whose median wealth is $46k are more likely to have stayed single and childless to get ahead in a professional career. The single blacks with a median wealth of $5 are caught in a cycle of poverty and probably are single mothers which has kept them from getting ahead economically.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 09:37:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the USA today, anyone who bought or re-financed a house after 2003 is likely to be underwater on their mortgage, which had been the major component of any  positive net worth. The $42,000 figure for white women is likely to be composed largely of widows with homes owned free and clear. Only the top 10% are likely to have much savings.

Layoffs hit women and minorities first and even those who have a job are not likely to have much savings unless they are married and their husbands are employed as well. Most single women with jobs rent and are hand to mouth and probably in debt--negative net worth.

Our current system is designed to extract wealth from those lower on the scale for those at the top. We should not be surprised to find that it accomplishes that goal. Outrage at the system is appropriate.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 02:04:07 PM EST
Lifting as We Climb: Women of Color, Wealth and America's Future pdf, 32pp

index of FAQs page

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 03:19:03 PM EST
The Insight Center analysis derives from numerous public and private sources, including the FRB. Note that typical US agency lag between completed data collection and released reports runs 12 - 18 months.

To measure the wealth gap, this paper relies on data from the 2007 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The SCG is a triennial national survey sponsored by the Federal Reserve Board and is considered to be one of the best sources of data on wealth inequality. This paper uses the same definition of wealth employed by the Federal Reserve Board....

Although the SCF is considered the best source of data on the extent of wealth inequality, Asians and Native Americans are combined into a single category in the public data due to their extremely small sample sizes in the survey. For this reason, when statistics on persons of color are disaggregated into constituent racial or ethnic categories in this paper, only data for blacks and Hispanics will be presented. However, when data for people of color are presented in an aggregated form, Asians and Native Americans are included in the statistcs. Where possible, data from other sources for Asians and Native Americans will be included.

The sample size for non-white and Hispanic unmarried males over age 65 is particularly small in the SCF and so the data for unmarried men and women of color are more representative of persons under age 65. [2010:3]



Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 06:48:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Table 1. "[W]idowhood is often more economically devastating for women of color than for white women because, due to factors such as the racial wealth gap and wage discrimination, many non-white couples have accumulated fewer assets. Upon widowhood, women of color no longer have their husband's income to rely on and have less wealth to support themselves.

Never-married women of color experience the largest wealth disadvantage, with median wealth of zero."

Table 2."While fathers are increasingly being granted custody, the financial burden of single parenthood falls disproportionately on women. The motherhood wealth penalty is particularly acute for women of color, who are not only facing the financial strain of single parenthood, but also the double wage disadvantage of being a woman and a person of color."

Table 3."Women of color ages 65 and older are least likely to receive retirement income from pensions or from assets. For instance, while 49% of white men and 30.5% of white women receive income from pensions, 26% of black women, 17% of Asian women and 12.7% of Hispanic women receive any income from pensions."

Table 4."Because different types of assets have historically had different rates of return and because they each have different characteristics in terms of liquidity, level of risk, and tax treatment, it is important to understand the types of assets owned by women of color."

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 07:07:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Affirmative action, though, has put a happy face on this racial reality.  Seeing black people graduate from Harvard and Yale and become CEOs or corporate lawyers -- not to mention president of the United States -- causes us all to marvel at what a long way we've come.  

Recent data shows, though, that much of black progress is a myth.  In many respects, African Americans are doing no better than they were when Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated and uprisings swept inner cities across America.  Nearly a quarter of African Americans live below the poverty line today, approximately the same percentage as in 1968.  The black child poverty rate is actually higher now than it was then.  Unemployment rates in black communities rival those in Third World countries.  And that's with affirmative action!

When we pull back the curtain and take a look at what our "colorblind" society creates without affirmative action, we see a familiar social, political, and economic structure -- the structure of racial caste.  The entrance into this new caste system can be found at the prison gate.

Read more...

DJP says:
March 11, 2010 at 4:28 pm

At the very least, framing the problem as "people of color" doing relatively poorly compared to whites is misleading. And it is conveniently misleading in the direction of the "blame whitey" theory.

In these sorts of discussions, you hear it framed that way constantly. You'll hear CNN talk about "minorities" struggling, etc. But some "minorities", such as the Chinese-American population, do better than whites on average.

If there really were an anti-white bias in society which is to explain why "people of color" do relatively worse, then that should also apply to Asians (including Indians, Chinese, Koreans, etc.).

Something like 40% of top California universities, such as UC Berkeley, are composed of Asians, even though they make up something like 10% of the California population.

"Model minority" is a derogatory term coined by the proponents of the "blame whitey" ideology.

Read more...



Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 08:02:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The issue surely is how this can be.
What are the milestones along the way that start some people accumulating wealth while other don't?
by bilejones on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 05:57:18 PM EST
a fascination with pulling wings off flies when young?

i think it comes from a childhood in which enough trauma has occurred to make the person, fundamentally, no matter how skillful the masks constructed to cover the horrible fact, end their natural tendency to trust other humans as a positive force.

this translates to a fear that one's survival is threatened, and therefore advantage over others is the best hedge against failure.

because money in this world is fetishised above all other symbols, the accumulation of it becomes a bulwark against annihilation.

this behaviour perpetuates until reality ruptures this membrane of paranoia, either positively through love or some other, less pleasurable port of entry.

i think what we're seeing now is a large number of people whose belief systems, conditioned by a few generations of fossil-fuelled grandiosity sufferers, are becoming ruptured, en masse.

to get this money to try and soothe the inner wound, others are seen as stepping stones, or gulls to exploit.

it's a mental illness, this attachment to a social construct that has been promoted as panacea, but in effect is revealed as a perversion.

this perversion has caused unbelievable amounts of pain and injustice through history, and continues to do so, though there is a growing number of people who cannot accept the consensus delusion, and are preparing to help create a different kind of social construct which would permit less exploitation, and thus be more compassionate.

2c

welcome to ET bilejones!

"Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do." Jim Hightower

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 06:39:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
An excellent perspective of our social alienation on a global scale with really sharp insights:  It IS a cerebral illness, considered 'normal' to avoid diagnosing the sheer majority of rat racers.

Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.
by metavision on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 05:11:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Rather a lot of the accumulation, for my generation, will still be house price inflation.  Any local house bought in 1997, even after the falls, carries on paper more than $42,600 alleged "profit". Not that one can spend it without going to live under a hedge, so is it real wealth?

It's trite to say it, but to accumulate wealth you need more coming in than going out.  Education helps. Free education definitely helps.  No student loans when I was at university. Delaying motherhood probably helps.  Not being single helps.  Steady, professional employment with a pension scheme helps.  Being in a position to inherit because your parents/grandparents had the same advantages helps.

by Sassafras on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 06:57:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure how anyone can find this remotely acceptable, but then again -- I mean...$5?!

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 07:19:47 PM EST
Is this true?
by michelle1982 on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 at 10:51:27 PM EST
Yes.

The US African-American population only achieved political equality with the Caucasian population in 1964.  (Legal protection is the sina qua non for wealth accumulation.)  Prior to 1964 lynchings, riots - the destruction of black owned property by whites, 'red lining' by banks, etc,. etc., etc., kept blacks from accumulating property - defined broadly - in one generation and, thus, providing a basis for the next generation to 'add their bit.'  Although there were exceptions, there always is, these exceptions were limited by overt or covert Jim Crow laws to the AA population, that didn't have a lot of spare cash to purchase, thus limited capital accumulation to/for black owned businesses.

On the macro-level, the Northern Migration from the South to northern cities during WW 2 and the two decades following occurred exactly at the time the US gutted the basis and economic value of cities -- white flight, suburbanization, & etc.  Thus black micro-economic activity in the north was located in an area that was in decline.  Blacks found themselves purchasing assets that were losing value.

Blacks that did 'make it' where heavily involved in 'scalable' industries where a small percentage of the people involved grabbed a majority of the money in that industry: entertainment, sports, & etc.  

To be sure some of the above were affecting poor and working class whites as well.  But the Post-WW 2 trends impacted blacks more and worse because they were starting from a lower economic position.

No one could have predicted

by ATinNM on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 04:13:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Goodman interviews Michelle Alexander (The New Jim Crow) here and Nicole Mason and Mariko Lin Chang ("Lifting as We Climb") here. VoD | trannie TK

Sorry, no Y. Smith or N. Wolf.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 10:02:07 AM EST
This is kind of non-information and hardly shocking news to most Americans.  Linca hits the nail on the head in his short comment above. When persons start off poor, with few assets and resources when compared to society in general, most will end up that way. The problems of and reasons for poverty in the US transcend race although they disproportionately affect certain ethnic and racial groupings because of the way they were disadvantaged historically.  IMHO what is needed to correct the disparities seen in racial and ethnic poverty figures (if this is in fact a valid goal- I would argue that it is not) is effective long-term assistance for the poor and affirmative action targeted towards the poor regardless of race.  It's no longer as much a matter of race as a matter of general poverty.  Disadvantaged how: Built-in cultural disadvantages resulting from long-term group poverty/disadvantage, lack of family assets at the start, no effective government/societal assistance to overcome limiting factors related to assets (poor home life, poor education opportunities), poor marriage/partnership outcomes leading to additional disadvantages for the mother and children. It just goes on and on. The fact that most Americans have done reasonable well, historically, tends to mask the real reasons for poverty in certain groups and prejudice calls for corrective actions.  That may all be changing.

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears
by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 01:03:19 PM EST


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]