Last word on the Biden slap-down in Israel

by shergald
Sat Mar 13th, 2010 at 10:32:30 AM EST

...belongs to Phil Weiss of Mondoweiss with help from Max Blumenthal, who has followed  Reverend Hagee and his pro-Israel group, Christians United for Israel (CUFI), or simply the Christian Zionists, for years. Hagee and CUFI were conferencing in Jerusalem just before the arrival of Vice President Biden, where Netanyahu addressed them.

Israel's insult to Biden should have been no surprise.

Max Blumenthal puts the lie to the claim that the interior minister surprised Netanyahu with his announcement of further settlements with this report on a hoedown with John Hagee and Netanyahu on the eve of Biden's visit, in which there was endless talk of further settlements:


Quoting Max Blumenthal:

Vice President Joe Biden was greeted in Jerusalem with the announcement that the Israeli Interior Ministry approved the construction of 1600 new homes in Occupied East Jerusalem contrary to U.S. wishes and complicating Biden's mission to help jump start the peace process. But Biden should have known that Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu intended to upset his plans by Netanyahu's appearance with John Hagee.

The day after a series of talks between US Special Envoy for the Middle East George Mitchell and Netanyahu, and a day before Biden's arrival, Netanyahu appeared onstage with Pastor John Hagee in Jerusalem. The occasion was Hagee's Night To Honor Israel, an event the far-right Texas-based preacher arranged to tout his ministry's millions in donations to Israeli organizations and to level bellicose rhetoric against Israel's perceived enemies...

Hagee's ceremony featured a 15-minute film highlighting the recipients of donations from John Hagee Ministries that totaled $58 million since 2001. The recipients included Jewish settlements from the West Bank like Gush Etzion and Shomron, which was involved in promoting an "Obama Hilltop project" that promoted more settlement building and compared Obama to Pharoah.

The Obama Hilltop Project?

Jewish settlers launch 'Obama Hilltop project'

Tel Aviv - Radical Jewish settlers overnight vowed to respond to US President Barack Obama's stance against Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian areas, by rebuilding one in the northern West Bank, evacuated in 2005. Homesh was one of four West Bank settlements uprooted by former Israeli premier Ariel Sharon as part of his unilateral pullout from the Gaza Strip and a small area in the northern West Bank.

Settler leaders published a message to Obama, slamming him for his pressure against Israel on the issue of settlement construction.

"Mr. President, your policy that aims to destroy the Jewish communities of Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem will no longer go unchallenged," said the message, using the Jewish Biblical names for the southern and northern West Bank.

It called Obama's objection to Israeli construction in these areas "an affront" to history and the Jewish religion.

Imagine a perspective that puts Ariel Sharon too far left in the minds of the religious settlers, Netanyahu's constituency.

As a side note, it should be mentioned that romancing of the Religious Right in America was part of A Clean Break, the policy document created by a group right wing American Neocons for the Likud party in 1996. Netanyahu has never veered from those policies.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
A few more last words from Amy Kaufman, writing in Huffington Post: By George, I Think the Palestinians Have Got It!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ami-kaufman/by-george-i-think-the-pal_b_494497.html

P.S. Just a few more words on Biden

There's not much else to say about Israel announcing the construction of more housing units in East Jerusalem during Vice President Joe Biden's visit. All the usual phrases have already been used: slap in the face, humiliation and so on.

As an Israeli, this is infuriating. The excuses make it even worse. When Netanyahu says that the "timing of the announcement was horrible", what exactly was he thinking? That there's a GOOD time to announce building in East Jerusalem? And what's even worse than that, are the excuses along the lines of I wasn't aware of the announcement". A prime minister shouldn't be too proud to show that he's not exactly running a tight ship, to say the least.

But the most disappointing, maddening part of this was Biden's light slap on Israel's wrist. That's all? We're going to get away with it? Again?!?!

If I was an American watching Biden's little reprimand on TV, I'd be mad at Israel - but even more embarrassed with the overwhelming weakness shown by the U.S. Vice President and the administration he represents.

The article itself is really good. One important message it carries: don't rely on the Americans. Go Europe.

by shergald on Sat Mar 13th, 2010 at 11:06:25 AM EST
.
I liked the straightforward question by Helen Thomas at the White House press conference:

HELEN THOMAS:  I'm sure the President is aware that it's against international law to annex occupied land.  Why do we keep giving, as Vice President Biden did, iron-clad commitments to Israel when it violates international law?  And the President says that our relationship is unshakable.  How can that be?

GIBBS:  Well, we enjoy a strong and important relationship with the country and the people of Israel.  And we are -

HELEN THOMAS:  Even when it violates the law?  I mean, you go into this whole thing -- why should they be -- get this reprieve?

GIBBS:  Well, again, we enjoy a strong relationship with the country and the people.  We are committed to their security in a very important and dangerous -

HELEN THOMAS: How about the Palestinian security?

VIDEO

h/t Mattes

"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."

by Oui on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 03:06:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
.
US ponders denying Israel arms needed for conflict with Iran

DEBKAfiles Our military sources report that the Barak arms list is tailored to a potential four-front offensive against Israel launched by Iran and its allies. It includes systems needed by the Israeli Air Force, certain types of missiles and advanced electronic equipment. During his last visit, the defense minster complained the list had been pending in Washington for more than three months and the sands for a possible conflict were running out fast. He stressed that it was essential for these items to reach Israel before a flare-up occurred. The urgency was such that he suggested that if they could not be supplied to Israel at short notice, they should at least be held ready meanwhile in the emergency stores of the US bases in Israel's Negev.

... Prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu convened his inner cabinet Saturday night, March 12, to discuss the spiraling crisis with Washington and his first response.

American-Jewish criticism was led Saturday night by the Anti-Defamation League's Abraham Foxman, who issued this statement: "We are shocked and stunned at the Administration's tone and public dressing down of Israel on the issue of future building in Jerusalem," he said. "One can only wonder how far the US is prepared to go in distancing itself from Israel in order to placate the Palestinians."

PM Netanyahu on US crisis: "Let's not get carried away"

(Ynetnews.com) - According to sources, both Peres and Barak believe that the incident with Biden was uncalled for, tasteless, and cause seriously damaged ties between the two countries. Last Saturday the defense minister held a number of conversations with Washington and his colleagues in Jerusalem in an attempt to lower the flames, but his efforts so far have proven to be fruitless.

Obama and Israel's QME Over Arab States

Cross-posted from my diary (March 9) -- Blahblah Biden Visits Netanyahu, Israel

"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."

by Oui on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 07:40:14 AM EST
US ponders denying Israel arms needed for conflict with Iran

US ponders not giving Israel the weapons it needs to initiate a war on Iran. Sanity prevails?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 07:52:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.  It'd take a lot more than that to achieve anything resembling sanity.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 04:13:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Here's another last word, from PM's office in Israel: US is to blame for the present crisis in Israeli-US relations.

Last paragraph from a Haaretz article this morning,

Sources in the Prime Minister's Office said over the weekend that the ensuing crisis appeared to be orchestrated by the U.S. administration, as Netanyahu apologized to Biden and believed that the crisis was behind the two allies.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1156275.html




by shergald on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 11:20:12 AM EST
.
The last word has not been spoken ...

Netanyahu must choose between ideology and U.S. support

(Haaretz) - Washington delivered its rebuke to Netanyahu through a number of channels. There was the extended censure by telephone from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a phone call from Biden, the summoning of Israel's ambassador to Washington to the office of Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg, the condemnation from the Quartet and, perhaps most important, a media briefing Clinton delivered during a CNN interview which escalated private rebukes into a full-blown public reprimand.

The reproofs were reminiscent of the "low chair diplomacy" the Turkish ambassador to Jerusalem was subjected to by the Israeli Foreign Ministry at the beginning of the year. The media was informed that the conversation between Clinton and Netanyahu lasted 43 minutes, "rather than 10 minutes as usual," and that the prime minister barely uttered a word.


Israel's diplomatic flap with Turkey. (Photo: Globe and Mail)

Obama himself reportedly worded the message to be delivered to Netanyahu during his weekly Thursday meeting with Clinton, lest the argument be made that it was merely the secretary of state scolding the Israeli leader, and not the U.S. president himself.

A State Department spokesman described the conversation using phrases which bring to mind a teacher castigating a student, not a working discussion with the leader of a friendly country and ally.

The substance was no less damning than the form - Clinton spoke of an "insult" to the United States and of "harming bilateral ties." She could not understand, she said, how such a thing could have been done in light of America's strong obligation to Israel's security. U.S. media interpreted these remarks as suggesting that Washington's military support for Israel is hardly unconditional.

Clinton dismissed Netanyahu's explanation that the decision to approve the housing plan was made without his knowledge, reminding him that as prime minister he is responsible for his government's actions.

The statements from the United States were publicized Friday evening - Shabbat - while Israel was officially unable to respond, therefore affording the White House a media exclusive. The instinctive reaction from Netanyahu and his associates was to accuse Washington of a diplomatic ambush, to simply rely on the support of his backers in the United States. Indeed, Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, was the first to charge the White House with "humiliating" the Israeli prime minister.

Benjamin Netanyahu at CUFI summit in Jerusalem

"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."

by Oui on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 01:48:51 PM EST
From Ha'aretz
The Jerusalem District Planning and Building committee has canceled two meetings planned for this week, apparently out of concern that any more decisions on construction might result in further tensions with the United States.

As reported in Haaretz last week, the committee had already pulled from its agenda discussion of all Israeli construction over the Green Line.

The Interior Ministry has said that the meetings were canceled due to technical reasons, as the director of the committee Ruth Yosef had been invited to overlapping Knesset sessions.

I guess they'll have to wait a week or two.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 03:39:43 PM EST
All in all, it seems to be unfolding as a win-win situation for Netanyahu and the Likud-right wing government.

Apologies galore for the "bad timing" to Obama, but that's about it. In return, Netanyahu got 1,600 housing units approved by the Obama administration, a concurrence on East Jerusalem, which Obama already gave to the Israelis anyway, a desired breakdown of the "informal" i.e., useless, behind the scenes talks (read stall) with Abbas and the Palestinians, and as for AIPAC, whose conference is coming up shortly, he got from Obama, via his press secretary today, more undying commitments to Israel's security, plus everlasting friendship.

What more could an Israeli PM ask for from America? If the Europeans, ala the EU, do not act to declare statehood on their behalf of the Palestinians, we are done for the next generation.

Some believe that we are already in the next phase of this conflict, Apartheid. One way or another, that's where this conflict is going, unless the Europeans act, fend off the assault on Europe of pro-Israel lobby interests, and do what is right.

by shergald on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 06:28:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
unless the Europeans act, fend off the assault on Europe of pro-Israel lobby interests, and do what is right.

The Europeans ceased to have an independent policy no later than 2006.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 07:06:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We'll see how long the Obama Administration's outrage lasts. They have a proven record of backing down in the face of right-wing hissy fits, and we can expect a big one from them this week.

Hillary Clinton is speaking at AIPAC on Tuesday, March 23. I'd be pleasantly surprised if she maintained the new harder line (relatively speaking) toward Netanyahu up to and including at that speech, but I don't expect that.

And the world will live as one

by Montereyan (robert at calitics dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 07:36:48 PM EST
And I suspect you will not be disappointed at Hillary's speech. We are so predictable when it comes to Israel or AIPAC.

by shergald on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 07:59:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed we are. Already Israel, and supposedly insufficient "support" of its policies, has become a major issue in the Republican primary for the US Senate nomination here in California. Carly Fiorina (former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, fired by the board after she ran the company's stock into the ground and spied on other board members) attacked front-runner Tom Campbell on this basis, focusing on his support for Sami Al-Arian and other similar comments. Most of the hour allotted to a recent debate among the 3 Republican candidates was focused on Israel policy, which isn't even the top issue on LA's Westside, and certainly not statewide.

Tom Campbell's Israel problem - Los Angeles Times

Campbell has been accused by the Fiorina campaign of voting to "cut aid to Israel." But in fact, in one of the cases it cites, what he really did was vote against increasing foreign aid by $30 million (over and above the usual $3 billion he'd already voted for and the additional $900 million he'd already voted for). He objected to the increase, he says, because the money would have come from aid set aside for the world's neediest countries.

Similarly, Campbell has been attacked for saying that perhaps Jerusalem could serve as a "shared capital" for Israelis and Palestinians. Though that notion angers those who see Jerusalem as Israel's eternal undivided capital, it would be foolish not to acknowledge that "sharing" the city or redividing it is viewed by many as an essential element of an eventual peace.

I'd like to believe that someday the US can have a sensible discussion about Israel. I am totally unconvinced we are at that point. If Obama and Clinton hold firm, we might just get that chance. I'm sure Rahm Emanuel is already in the Oval Office screaming at them to knuckle under to Bibi.

And the world will live as one

by Montereyan (robert at calitics dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 09:16:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I posted a diary on Tom Campbell, the Republican candidate up against Boxer a few weeks ago. His experience, once an advocate for the Palestinians, is interesting. He is now towing the AIPAC line.

It is incredible the degree to which senatorial and congressional candidates fear AIPAC.


by shergald on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 10:39:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Johann Hari

Could the Israeli government make it any more obvious they have no intention of sharing the Over-Promised Land with its other inhabitants?

This week the Obama administration - who give Israel $3bn a year, more than they dole out to any other nation on earth - made a meek and craven request for Israelis to simply have a pause in seizing even more land, and to sit down with the Palestinians. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded with a big concrete slap: the announcement of 1,600 more homes to be built on occupied Palestinian land from which Arabs will be forcibly kept out. He has made it plain he will not loosen his grip by an inch, announcing: "Even if [Palestinian President] Abu Mazen comes along and says he's ready to sign a peace deal on the spot, we will restore settlement construction to its previous levels." No compromise. Never.



If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 09:47:50 PM EST
The situation in a nutshell. Not to far into the future, we will be arguing with the proIsrael side whether they, the gulag of Palestinian land parcels left, should be called cantons or bantustans, and whether the word, Apartheid, applies.

It will become a battle of semantics.

by shergald on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 10:43:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Petraeus and Mullen now getting in on the act.

Israel is now, of course, turning to congressmen it has bought off.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:31:47 AM EST
It will be interesting to see how this news plays out in the US media this week, especially in conjunction with the AIPAC meeting in Washington.

by shergald on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 07:26:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]